| URL | Status | Contradictions |
|---|---|---|
/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Suomessa netticasinoita on vain yksi: Veikkaus. B: Monopolia ollaan purkamassa, joten myös Suomeen on oletettavasti tulossa lisää online casinoita. The text first claims Finland has only Veikkaus as an online casino, then states that monopoly reforms will bring additional online casinos, which contradicts the claim of there being only one online casino. | ||
/404/ | Clean | |
/american-express-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Amex-kasinot ovat kuitenkin vielä niin harvinaisia, että sivustollamme ei ole tällä hetkellä yhtään verovapaata Amex-kasinoa. B: Poimimme alle kolme tutustumisen arvoista luottokorttikasinoa, joilta voit kotiuttaa voitot verovapaasti. The page first claims there are no tax-free (verovapaa) Amex casinos, but later lists two casinos (Lunar Spins Casino and Arctic Casino) as verovapaa and presents them as examples of verovapaa Amex casinos. | ||
/apple-pay-kasinot/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/20bet/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Plussat: Mobiilisovellukset iOS- ja Android-laitteille B: Mobiiliyhteensopivuus: oma iPhone-puhelimeni sanoo, ettei sellaista ole saatavilla (mobiilisovellusta). One part claims there are mobile apps for iOS and Android, while another section states there is no mobile app available and only a browser-based experience. | ||
/arvostelu/21bets/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus: 100% 250 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta B: 21Bets tervetulobonus tarjous: 1. talletus: 125% 400 € asti; 2. talletus: 75% 500 € asti + 100 ilmaiskierrosta; 3. talletus: 50% 750 € asti + 350 ilmaiskierrosta The page presents two different welcome bonus structures: a first-deposit bonus of 100% up to 250€ with 50 free spins, and a separate three-deposit welcome package with percentages (125%, 75%, 50%) and different caps. These are direct and unambiguous contradictions about the initial bonus terms. A: Minimitalletus 25 € (for 1st deposit bonus in the bonus rules table). B: Minimitalletus 20 € (listed under the Kierrätysvaatimukset) and 20 € as the quick facts 'Min deposit'. The article lists conflicting minimum deposit amounts for the welcome bonus and general deposits: 25 € in one section and 20 € in another (including the quick facts and withdrawal rules). A: Kotiutusten maksimissaan 1 000 euroa vuorokaudessa. B: Nettovoitot on rajoitettu vuorokaudessa vain 5 000 euroa. The page simultaneously asserts a daily withdrawal cap of 1,000€ and a separate daily net win cap of 5,000€, which is inconsistent. Additionally, there is a calculation implying a 5,100€ daily limit for a 100€ deposit, further conflicting with the 5,000€ cap. A: Huonot kokemukset section lists: 'Huonot kokemukset: * Hyvät kokemukset'. B: Hyvät kokemukset section lists: 'Hyvät kokemukset: * Toistuvat negatiiviset kokemukset'. There is an internal mislabeling where the Bad Experiences section contains a bullet labeled as Good Experiences, and the Good Experiences section contains negative items, creating an explicit contradiction in how experiences are categorized. | ||
/arvostelu/21luckybet/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: 21LuckyBet Level Up -kanta-asiakasohjelma palkitsee aktiivisuudesta ja tehtävien suorittamisesta; ohjelman korkeamman tason myötä edut kasvavat. B: VIP-ohjelma Ei The article describes a Level Up loyalty programme with tiered rewards, but a later comparison table lists VIP-program as not present, creating an inconsistency about the existence of a loyalty/vip program. | ||
/arvostelu/22bet/ | Error | |
cache miss (cache-only mode) | ||
/arvostelu/24-casino/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Ensivaikutelma: pikapelaaminen ei kuitenkaan ole mahdollista. B: Plussat: Nyt myös pikapelaaminen mahdollista. One section states instant play is not possible, while another section claims instant play is now available. A: Nykyään kasino toimii Viron lisenssillä, joten tarjolla on verovapaat voitot. B: 24 Casino vertailussa: Verovapaa Ei. The text claims tax-free winnings due to an Estonian license, but the comparison table lists winnings as not tax-free. A: Licenssi Curaçao (Quick facts). B: Kasinon perustiedot: Lisenssi Viron; Osoite Scharlooweg 39, Willemstad, Curacao. Licensing information is inconsistent: Curaçao license is listed in Quick Facts, while other sections say Viron license with a Curacao address. A: Live-chatissa keskustelun voi valita suomeksi. B: Live-chat Englanninkielinen, live-chat avoinna vain talletuksen jälkeen. There is a claim that live chat is English-only after deposit, but another part states Finnish language support for live chat. A: Kotiutusajaksi: välitön. B: Kotiutukset voivat oikeasti kestää 1–3 päivää riippuen maksutavasta. Withdrawals are described as immediate, but later it is stated that withdrawals can take 1–3 days depending on the method. | ||
/arvostelu/24-slots/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus 20 € B: Minimitalletus 10 € Two sections specify different minimum deposit requirements for the first deposit: 20 € in the bonus terms table vs 10 € in the Kierrätysvaatimukset section and the Quick facts. This is a direct numerical inconsistency. A: Uusille pelaajille tarjotaan komea 1 200 euron bonuspaketti. B: Tervetuliaistarjous sisältää 1200 € edestä extraa (as stated), but the listed four-deposit bonuses total 975 € (375 + 150 + 150 + 300). The page claims a 1,200 euro welcome bonus package, but the detailed four-deposit bonus sequence amounts to 975 euros in bonuses, which contradicts the claimed total. | ||
/arvostelu/30bet/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Kotiutuksissa minimiraja on kaikilla maksutavoilla 20 euroa ja maksimi 10 000 euroa per päivä ja 100 000 euroa per kuukausi. B: Tilisiirtoa (1–3 arkipäivää) lukuun ottamatta kotiutukset tapahtuvat välittömästi. The article asserts that withdrawals are instant except for bank transfers, but a later section presents withdrawal times as 1–4 days in the comparison table, contradicting the instant-withdrawal claim. A: Olemalla aktiivinen ja pelaamalla säännöllisesti voit olla oikeutettu kutsuun, jonka kautta pääset liittymään osaksi 30Bet Casinon eksklusiivista kanta-asiakasohjelmaa. VIP-ohjelmiin sisältyy nämä edut: ... B: VIP-ohjelma: Ei The article states there is a VIP/invite-only loyalty program, but the side-by-side comparison table lists VIP-program as not available for 30Bet, creating a direct contradiction about whether a VIP program exists. A: Päivitetty: 24. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 28/01/2026 Two update timestamps are inconsistent: the page header shows a 2025 date, while the bonus section claims a 2026 update, implying conflicting last-update dates. | ||
/arvostelu/31bet/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Please note that we do not have VIP programs on our website. B: VIP / kanta-asiakasohjelma: Ei ohjelmaa suomalaisille The article states there are no VIP programs on the website, but the comparison table implies there could be a VIP program for non-Finnish players (indicating a VIP program exists for some users), creating a direct inconsistency about VIP program availability. A: Minimitalletus: 20 € (Kierrätysvaatimukset section). B: Minimitalletus: €10 (Quick Facts). There is an inconsistency in the stated minimum deposit for the welcome bonus: one section lists 20 €, while Quick Facts (and other parts) state 10 €. | ||
/arvostelu/4kasino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Etusivulta pääsee suoraan tallettamaan, sillä kyseessä on Pay N Play kasino. Kasino mainostaa yli 700 livepeliä ja 3 000 vetokohdetta joka päivä. B: Testaushetkellä tarjolla oli yli 2 000 kohdetta vedonlyöntiin 38 eri lajissa – esport mukaan lukien. There is a direct numeric inconsistency: the homepage claims 3,000 betting options per day, but testing found over 2,000 betting options available. | ||
/arvostelu/5gringos/ | Issues | 6 contradictions |
A: Hybridikasino - Ei rekisteröintiä B: Talletusta ei nykyään tehdä pelitilin avaamisen yhteydessä. Eli ensin avataan pelitili Zimplerin avulla, jonka jälkeen talletus vasta tehdään. The page presents 5 Gringos as a no-registration hybrid casino, but also states that deposits are made only after opening a game account with Zimpler, implying registration is required. A: 5 Gringos tarjoaa yhteensä 34 926 peliä B: Nauti yli 9 000 pelistä! One section claims 34,926 total games, while another part promises 'over 9,000 games'—a clear inconsistency in game counts. A: Kotiutukset ovat pääsääntöisesti nopeita, noin 5–30 minuutin luokkaa B: Ehdoissa on kuitenkin mainittu 2–3 päivän maksuaika Withdrawals are described as typically 5–30 minutes, but the terms mention a 2–3 day processing time, which conflicts. A: VIP-pelaajat saavat hieman korkeammat nostorajat B: Vaikka VIP-taso olisi korkein mahdollinen, ei vuorokautinen kotiutusraja nouse kuitenkaan 1 500 euroa korkeammalle The page says VIPs get higher withdrawal limits, but also states that even at the highest VIP level the daily limit does not increase by up to 1500 EUR, which contradicts the claim of higher VIP limits. A: Minimitalletus bonuksen saamiseksi on 20 € B: Minimitalletus on 10 € The bonus terms require a 20 EUR minimum deposit for the welcome bonus, while the quick facts state a 10 EUR minimum deposit for general play. A: Kolikkopelejä on tarjolla yli 31 000 kappaletta B: Yhteensä 34 926 peliä Different sections cite different totals for games, with over 31,000 slots vs a total of 34,926 games, creating a discrepancy in overall game counts. | ||
/arvostelu/777vault/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus 20 € The quick facts state a minimum deposit of 10€, while the bonus section states a minimum deposit of 20€ to qualify for the welcome bonus, creating conflicting deposit requirements. | ||
/arvostelu/7bit-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: The Quick facts section lists the license as Curaçao (Lisenssi Curaçao). B: Other sections state the casino operates under the Estonian EMTA license (EMTA) with license numbers HKT000017 and HKL000425, implying verovapaa winnings. There is a direct contradiction about which licensing regime the casino uses: Curaçao license vs EMTA (Estonian) license. These cannot both be the governing license simultaneously. A: In the Live kasino section, there are about 480 live games. B: In the main 'Pääpelityypit' overview, the live casino is listed as nearly 500 games. Two different approximate counts are given for the number of live casino games (480 vs near 500), which is an internal inconsistency in numeric data. | ||
/arvostelu/7signs/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Päivitetty: 18. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 13/02/2026 The page lists two different last-update dates: the article is shown as updated on 18 November 2025, while the bonus section claims a last update on 13 February 2026, creating an inconsistency in update timestamps. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset bonukselle ja talletukselle on 35x (Talletus+Bonus) (e.g., 50€ talletus + 500€ bonus → 19,250€ kierrätysvaatimus). B: Tallensin 50 € ja valitsin 100 % bonuksen 500 € asti ... jouduin uudelleen panostamaan 4700 euroa. The stated turnover requirement for a 50€ deposit and 500€ bonus at 35x would be 19,250€, but the text later claims only 4,700€ needed to be wagered, which is inconsistent with the 35x calculation. A: Zimplerin kautta voitot saa kotiutettua nopeasti, parhaimmillaan vain muutamassa minuutissa. B: Käyttöehdoissa mainitaan 1–3 päivän käsittelyaika, joten yksittäisissä tapauksissa tulee malttaa mieli muutaman päivän ajan. One part of the text claims withdrawals via Zimpler can be instant or very fast, while the terms state a processing time of 1–3 days, creating a contradiction about withdrawal speed. | ||
/arvostelu/888-starz/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: 888 Starz Arvostelu: ... yli 5 000 nimikettä noin sadalta eri pelinkehittäjältä. B: 888 Starz yleiskatsaus: Yli 9 500 peliä laajalta valikoimalta pelivalmistajia. The article presents two conflicting figures for the size of the game library (5,000+ vs 9,500+), which cannot both be correct. A: KYC-prosessi: Asiakirjat tarkastetaan yleensä muutamissa tunneissa. B: Miten KYC-prosessi etenee?: Dokumenttien käsittely kestää muutamasta päivästä noin viikkoon. KYC processing times are stated as hours in one section and days to a week in another, which is inconsistent. A: Asiakaspalvelu: suomalaisille pelaajille 24/7 suomenkielinen tuki on saatavilla. B: Onko kasinolla suomenkielisen asiakaspalvelun?: Asiakaspalvelu toimii pääasiassa englanniksi, live-chat ja sähköposti ovat avoinna 24/7. One part claims Finnish-speaking support is available 24/7, while the FAQ states service is mainly in English with Finnish support only via live chat and email, creating a contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/alawin-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Alawin Casino on vuonna 2025 lanseerattu nettikasino, joka toimii Costa Ricassa. B: Julkaisuvuosi 2026 (Alawin Casino yrityksen tiedot). One section states the casino launched in 2025, while the company information lists the release year as 2026, which is inconsistent. A: Ensitalletusbonus 150% 750 € asti + 100 ilmaiskierrosta. B: Kasinon tervetuliaispaketti: 300 % jopa 2 000 € + 300 ilmaiskierrosta + 1 Bonus Crab. The page presents two different first-deposit bonuses with conflicting percentages and caps; one shows 150% up to 750 €, the other 300% up to 2,000 €, which cannot both be valid. A: Minimitalletus bonukseen: 20 € (ensimmäinen bonus Crab-etuun riittää 10 €). B: Minimitalletus: 10 € (Min deposit) per Quick facts. The minimum to participate in bonuses is stated as 20 €, while the general minimum deposit is stated as 10 €, which contradicts. | ||
/arvostelu/alf-casino/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/alfobet-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Uusille pelaajille on tarjolla yhteensä 100 € bonusrahaa kasinopeleihin tai 20 € edestä ilmaisvetoja. B: Kasinobonus: 100 % talletusbonus 75 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta (ja vedonlyönnin tervetulobonus: 20 € arvoiset ilmaisvedot). The introductory claim promises 100 € in welcome bonus cash or 20 € in free bets, while the detailed bonus terms specify a casino bonus of 100% up to 75 € plus 50 free spins (and a separate 20 € bet bonus). The two statements cannot both be true simultaneously. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 30x (Bonus) ja 30x (ilmaiskierrosta). B: For a 20 € deposit, the kierrätysvaatimus is 700 €, which implies 35x rather than 30x. The general wagering requirements state 30x, but an example shows a 20 € deposit requiring 700 €, equating to 35x. This inconsistency means the same bonus has conflicting wagering requirements. A: Jackpot-pelien arvostelu: Jackpot King progressiiviset jackpot-pelit ovat Blueprint Gaming -pelivalmistajan Jackpot King -ominaisuuden sisältäviä. B: Rainbow Jackpots and El Jackpotto are from Blueprint Studios, not Blueprint Gaming, implying a discrepancy about the manufacturer. Two sections attribute jackpot games to different Blueprint entities (Blueprint Gaming vs Blueprint Studios), creating an internal inconsistency about the game providers. | ||
/arvostelu/allspins-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimum deposit is €20 (as stated in Quick Facts). B: Minimum deposit is €10 for several payment methods (listed in the Maksutavat section). The page lists €20 as the minimum deposit in Quick Facts, but elsewhere shows €10 as the minimum deposit for multiple payment methods, creating an internal inconsistency about the required initial deposit. A: AllSpins Casino offers over 9,000 games in total. B: The pelivalikoima section lists over 7,500 slots and over 400 live games (roughly 7,900 total), which would be less than 9,000. The total catalog claim of over 9,000 games conflicts with the breakdown that only sums to around 7,900 (7,500+400), suggesting an inconsistency in the reported total game count. A: Page updated on 14 November 2025. B: Bonus last updated on 23 February 2026. Two different update timestamps are given for the page content and the bonuses, implying inconsistent update timelines. | ||
/arvostelu/allwins-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Lisenssi: Curaçao (listed in Quick facts) B: Lisenssi: EI OLE (no license currently) / 'ei lisenssiä' in the Allwins Casino company info The page simultaneously states in Quick facts that the license is Curaçao, while later sections explicitly state there is no license currently (EI OLE) and that the site operates without a license, creating a direct contradiction about the current licensing status. | ||
/arvostelu/allyspin-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: AllySpin Casinolla kokemuksia: yli 13 000 peliä B: AllySpin Casinon pelivalikoiman arvostelu: yli 25 000 peliä The page presents two incompatible totals for the number of games: 'over 13,000' in one section and 'over 25,000' in another. A: Kolmas talletus: 50% bonus up to 200 € plus 100 free spins B: Kolmas talletus: 75% bonus up to 200 € plus 100 free spins There is a direct contradiction in the third deposit bonus: one part says 50% (up to €200) and another part says 75% (up to €200). | ||
/arvostelu/amok/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus bonukseen on 20 € B: Minimitalletus on 10 € (Quick facts) for deposits The welcome bonus requires a 20€ minimum deposit, while the Quick Facts section lists a 10€ minimum deposit, creating conflicting deposit minimums. A: Asiakaspalvelu live-chatissa: Suomeksi B: Asiakaspalvelu service language: Englanti The page inconsistently states the live chat language: Finnish in one section but English in another. | ||
/arvostelu/amunra/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Header on the page: 'Ilman rekisteröintiä'. B: The article describes AmunRa as a hybrid casino that can be played both with registration and without registration, and provides a registration process. The page header claims 'Ilman rekisteröintiä' (without registration), but the body explicitly describes a registration process and states the casino is a hybrid that can be played with or without registration. A: Welcome bonus claim: 'yhteensä 150 % 2 000 € asti ja 100 ilmaiskierrosta' for new players. B: Bonus sections and deposit-by-deposit table indicate a first deposit: 50% up to 500€, second: 50% up to 1000€ + 50 FS, third: 50% up to 1500€ + 50 FS; which would total 150% with max 1500€ bonus (not 2000€). The stated total bonus (150% up to 2000€) conflicts with the per-deposit maximums, which would sum to a maximum of 1500€ in bonus, not 2000€. A: Minimum deposit for bonuses/table: 'Minimitalletus 20 €' for each deposit. B: General minimum deposit stated elsewhere is 'Minimatalletus 10 €' (and 'talletusminimi 10€' in the deposits section). There is an inconsistency where the bonus terms specify a minimum deposit of 20€, but the general site information lists a 10€ minimum deposit. | ||
/arvostelu/arctic-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Min deposit€5 B: Minimitalletus 10 € Two sections specify different minimum deposit amounts (5 € vs 10 €). A: Kolikkopelit 3700 peliä B: Kolikkopelit noin 3800 peliä The page gives conflicting counts for slot games: 3700 in one section and about 3800 in another. A: Maksutavat Arctic Casinolla on peräti 22 erilaista. B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä 17 Two sections give different counts for available payment providers (22 vs 17). A: Monitasoinen uskollisuusohjelma B: Arctic Casinolla ... ei ole erillistä kanta-asiakasohjelmaa tai VIP-etuja The page claims a multi-tier loyalty program exists, but later states there is no loyalty program currently. | ||
/arvostelu/art-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Päivitetty: 2. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 19/02/2026 The page shows two different update dates for content: an overall update date and a separate bonus update date, which is inconsistent. A: "Divine Fortune jackpot kolikkopeli" B: "Progressiivisia jättipottipelejä, joissa päävoitto voi kasvaa jopa useisiin miljooniin euroihin, ei Art Casinon valikoimasta löytynyt." DivinBe Fortune is listed as a jackpot game, which implies progressive jackpots exist in the catalog, yet another line explicitly states there are no progressive jackpot games. | ||
/arvostelu/asino-casino/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/avo-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus: 50% 400 € asti + 30 ilmaiskierrosta B: 1. Talletus: Kasinobonus: 100% 400 € asti ja 50 ilmaiskierrosta The article presents two different first-deposit bonus offers for Avo Casino: one shows a 50% match up to 400€ with 30 spins, while the bonus section describes a 100% match up to 400€ with 50 spins for the first deposit. A: Kasinopelejä on reilusti yli 3 000 (Avocasino kokemuksia). B: Kasinopelien valikoima: yli 2 000 peliä. In one part of the text Avocasino is described as offering well over 3,000 casino games, while another section states the game catalog is over 2,000 games, creating a direct inconsistency about the number of games. A: Maksutapavaihtoehtoja on 13 Maksutapaa (Maksutavat Avocasinolla). B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä taulukossa vertailussa: 12. The page claims 13 payment methods in the main payment section, but a comparison table lists only 12 payment providers, which is contradictory. | ||
/arvostelu/bankonbet/ | Error | |
cache miss (cache-only mode) | ||
/arvostelu/bassbet/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: BassBet offers verovapaat voitot (tax-free winnings). B: Winnings are not tax-free in Finland (voittoja ei ole verovapaita Suomessa). The text both claims winnings are tax-free in one section (Verovapaat voitot) and later states that winnings are not tax-free in Finland (Voitot eivät ole verovapaita Suomessa), creating a direct contradiction about tax treatment. A: Minimum deposit is 10 € (Minimitalletus €10 in Quick facts). B: Minimum deposit is 20 € (Minimitalletus 20 € in bonus rules and related sections). Two parts of the page specify different minimum deposit amounts for participation in offers or deposits, 10 € vs 20 €, which cannot both be true simultaneously. A: Ilmaiskierrokset jaetaan 20 kappaleen erissä kymmenenä perättäisenä päivänä (free spins are divided into 20 per batch over 10 consecutive days). B: Arkisin ilmaiskierrokset: 50 ilmaiskierrosta 20 € talletuksella (weekday free spins: 50 spins with a 20 € deposit). There are two promotional statements describing different distributions of free spins and do not align, implying conflicting promotion mechanics for the same or overlapping offers. | ||
/arvostelu/bc-game/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: First deposit bonus: 120% up to 1000 € + 100 free spins (1st deposit) with minimum deposit 5 € B: Welcome bonus: 180% up to 20,000 BCD + 100 free spins (1st deposit) with minimum deposit 10 BCD The page contains two different first-deposit offers for BC.Game: one section states a 120% bonus up to 1000 EUR (with a 5 EUR minimum), while another section promotes a 180% bonus up to 20,000 BCD (with a 10 BCD minimum). These cannot both be current simultaneously. A: Minimum deposit for bonus: 5 € B: General minimum deposit: about 30 USD The site lists a 5 € minimum to claim the first deposit bonus, but elsewhere states a general deposit minimum of around 30 USD, creating inconsistent minimum deposit requirements. | ||
/arvostelu/bcasino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Kasinon minimitalletus on nimittäin vain 5 euroa B: Minimitalletus: 20 € One part of the page states the casino's minimum deposit is 5 EUR, while the bonus terms specify a minimum deposit of 20 EUR for eligibility; these are incompatible. A: Min deposit€10 B: Kasinon minimitalletus on nimittäin vain 5 euroa The quick facts claim a minimum deposit of 10 EUR, but another section states the minimum is 5 EUR, creating inconsistency about the base minimum to start. A: Kotiutukset käsitellään kolmen arkipäivän sisällä B: kotiutusten käsittelyssä kasinolla kestää jopa 3-5 arkipäivää One part claims withdrawals are processed within three business days, while another states withdrawals can take up to 3-5 business days; this is a direct inconsistency about withdrawal timing. | ||
/arvostelu/be-on-bet-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Be On Bet Casino on vuonna 2024 avattu perinteinen nettikasino B: Be On Bet Casino — Julkaistu: 2025 (listed in the Kasinon perustiedot section) The article describes the casino as opened in 2024, but the basic information table lists the publication year as 2025, creating a conflicting timeline for the same entity. | ||
/arvostelu/berriez/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Ensitalletusbonus poikkeaa perinteisestä: rahabonuksen sijaan saat 365 ilmaiskierrosta viikon aikana sekä jopa 20 % päivittäisen cash back -palautuksen. B: Päivittäinen cash back ‑palautus 5–15 % palautusta tavallisille pelaajille; 10–20 % VIP‑tasolla. The welcome bonus claims up to 20% daily cashback, whereas the ongoing cashback section states 5-15% for regular players (and 10-20% only for VIP), creating an inconsistent cashback range for standard players. | ||
/arvostelu/bet-alice-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus 20 € The page lists the minimum deposit as €10 in Quick Facts, but the bonus terms state a minimum deposit of €20 to claim the first deposit bonus, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/bet-and-you-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Bet And You Casinolla on 8-tasoinen uskollisuusohjelma. Kaikki pelaajat aloittavat Kupari-tasolta, ja korkeampien tasojen cashback-prosentit sekä kokemusvaatimukset kasvavat tasojen edetessä. B: VIP-ohjelma | Ei The main article asserts an 8-tier VIP/loyalty program with escalating cashback and experience multipliers, while the comparison table claims there is no VIP program ('VIP-ohjelma Ei'), directly contradicting. | ||
/arvostelu/bet-label-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Bet Label erottuu MGA-lisenssin alaisista kasinoista erityisesti siinä, että maksutapoihin kuuluu 14 erilaista kryptovaluuttaa. B: Lisenssin Bet Label Casinolle on myöntänyt Curacaon peliviranomainen. One part claims Bet Label operates under an MGA license, while another part states the license is Curacao; the two statements cannot both be true for the same casino. A: Yli 5 000 peliä ja urheiluvedonlyönti. B: Bet Labelin noin 4 000 pelin valikoima. Two sections assert different total numbers of games offered (over 5,000 versus about 4,000), which is a direct numerical inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/bet-rebels-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € (as stated in the bonus terms section). B: Minimitalletus: 10 € (as stated in the wagering/KYC section). The article lists two different minimum deposit amounts for bonus eligibility: 20 € in the bonus terms and 10 € in the wagering/ KYC section, which is inconsistent. A: There is no loyalty program at Bet Rebels (Kanta-asiakasohjelmaa ei ole). B: After depositing you can email to obtain a 'Loyalty' bonus (Uskollisuusbonus) and the casino promises at least a bonus. One part of the text claims there is no loyalty program, while another part describes a process to obtain loyalty-type bonuses via email, creating a direct contradiction. A: The review says Bet Rebels does not look like a quick casino, but it is a quick casino (pikakasino). B: In addition, it is explicitly described as a quick/fast casino due to Trustly and Pay N Play. Two statements are contradictory: one saying it does not look like a fast casino, and another affirming that it is a fast casino. A: KYC ceiling: 'eväytys' no withdraw until KYC; 'ehdot: 2 300 euron talletukset kumulatiivisesti' (deposit cap). B: The text claims KYC is to be completed immediately and withdrawals are blocked until KYC is completed, and separately claims there is a cumulative deposit cap of 2,300 €. The article presents a claimed deposit cap before KYC and simultaneously states immediate KYC is required before withdrawals, which is inconsistent and contradictory in practice. | ||
/arvostelu/betalright-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: KYC-prosessin luvataan hoitaa kymmenessä päivässä. B: Testasin KYC:n, ja prosessi hoitui neljässä päivässä. The page states a 10-day KYC processing time, but also reports a personal test completing KYC in 4 days, which is a direct conflict in timelines. A: Muut tärkeät kotiutusrajat ovat enintään 500 euroa vuorokaudessa. B: Voittoja voi nostaa kerralla 1 500 euron edestä. One part of the text claims a daily withdrawal limit of 500€, while another part allows withdrawals up to 1500€ per single withdrawal, creating an impossible combination if both are enforced on the same account. A: Maksimibonuksen eli 500 euroa voit saada 250 euron talletuksella. B: Maksimibonuksen eli 500 euroa voit saada 500 euron talletuksella (100% match up to 500€). A stated calculation implies you would get 500€ bonus for a 250€ deposit, which contradicts the 100% match up to 500€ (which would require depositing 500€ to receive a 500€ bonus). | ||
/arvostelu/betandplay-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus
125% 1000 € asti +
250 ilmaiskierrosta B: Talletus 1: 125 % bonus 500 € asti + 150 ilmaiskierrosta (bonuskoodi BNP2) Two different first-deposit bonus amounts and spin counts are stated for the initial bonus (up to 1000€ with 250 spins vs up to 500€ with 150 spins), creating a direct numerical contradiction. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset (first deposit bonus) stated as 50x (Bonus) / 25x (ilmaiskierrosta) in bonuses section B: Kierrätysvaatimukset (first deposit bonus) stated as 45x (Bonus) / 30x (ilmaiskierrosta) in another part Different turnover requirements are given for the same welcome bonus in separate parts of the text, causing inconsistency. A: Päivitetty: 20. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 12/02/2026 Two different update dates are claimed for bonus information on the same page, implying timeline inconsistency. A: BetandPlay Casino bonuskoodit & bonukset section states: 'yhteensä jopa 1750 € bonusrahaa ja 550 ilmaispyöräytystä' B: Ensitalletusbonus / talletus 1 claims different totals (125% up to 1000€ with 250 spins or 125% up to 500€ with 150 spins) and other sections enumerate different totals The page presents conflicting total welcome-package figures (1750€ + 550 spins) alongside other sections that specify different first-deposit bonus totals, creating a contradiction in the overall welcome bonus offer. | ||
/arvostelu/betblast-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Lisenssi: Curacao B: Lisenssi Curaçao, Costa Rica The page lists two different licensing jurisdictions for Betblast in different sections (Curacao in one place and Curaçao, Costa Rica in another), which is inconsistent and cannot both be correct. | ||
/arvostelu/betchan/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Lisenssinumero: MGA/B2C/394/2017 B: myönnetty 1.8.2018 The license number contains the year 2017, while the text states the license was granted on 1 August 2018, creating an inconsistency in licensing dates. | ||
/arvostelu/betfair/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: kasino ja vedonlyöntipörssi perustettiin jo vuonna 2000 B: Betfair Casino perustettiin vuonna 1999 Two sections give conflicting founding years: one states Betfair's casino and betting exchange were founded in 2000, while another states Betfair Casino was established in 1999. | ||
/arvostelu/bethall-casino/ | Issues | 6 contradictions |
A: Plussat: Yli 21 000 peliä + vedonlyönti B: BetHall Casino yleiskatsaus: Yli 11 400 peliä yli 95 pelinkehittäjältä The page lists three different game counts (21,000+, 11,400+, and later 21,000+ again). These conflicting totals cannot all be correct for the same casino on the same page. A: Onko BetHall verovapaa suomalaisille pelaajille? Ei ole, koska kasinolla on EU:n ulkopuolinen Anjouan-lisenssi. B: BetHall verovapaa: Kyllä (verovapaa suomalaisille pelaajille in a comparison table) One section states BetHall is not tax-free due to its Anjouan license, while another table marks BetHall as tax-free, which is a direct contradiction. A: Minimi kotiutus: 20 € B: Miniminosto: 10 € Two different minimum withdrawal figures are stated: 20 € in one place and 10 € in another. A: Nimi: BetHall Casino B: Nimi: Bethall The page inconsistently uses BetHall and Bethall as the casino name, which is a factual discrepancy in branding. A: KYC-prosessi: KYC on yleensä suoritettava 30 päivän sisällä pelitilin luomisesta. B: KYC-prosessi: Käsittely kestää yleensä 1-3 arkipäivää. Two timelines for KYC processing are provided: up to 30 days vs 1-3 business days, which cannot both be accurate. A: Päivitetty: 26. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 07/02/2026 The page shows two update dates that are not aligned, suggesting inconsistent update chronology (2025-11-26 vs 2026-02-07). | ||
/arvostelu/bethard/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Minimitalletus is 5 € (via Siru Mobile) or 10 € for other methods. Two different minimum deposit amounts are stated in the page: 20 € in the bonus/terms section, but 5 € (Siru Mobile) or 10 € for other methods in the deposits section. A: KYC is required when the total of deposits and withdrawals exceeds 2,000 euros. B: KYC verification was requested when deposits exceeded 300 €. Official policy cites a 2,000 EUR threshold for KYC, but a user testimonial reports a KYC check triggered at 300 EUR, creating inconsistency. A: Bethard has Finnish-speaking customer support (Suomenkielinen asiakastuki). B: Live chat interactions were conducted in English, suggesting Finnish live chat support is not consistently available. The page promotes Finnish-language support, but a user testimonial notes a live-chat conversation in English, indicating a language inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/betify/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Yli 3000 kasinopeliä ja laadukas vedonlyöntiosasto B: yli 3100 raha- ja kasinopelin valikoima The article states two different totals for the number of games (over 3000 vs over 3100), which is a direct numeric inconsistency within the same text. | ||
/arvostelu/betinia/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Nopeat kotiutukset B: Kotiutuksessa voi kestää montakin päivää The page claims withdrawals are fast in one section ('Nopeat kotiutukset') but also states that withdrawals can take several days ('Kotiutuksessa voi kestää montakin päivää'), which directly contradicts the asserted withdrawal speed. | ||
/arvostelu/betiro/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Onko Betiro suomenkielinen? Ei, sivusto ja asiakaspalvelu toimivat vain englanniksi. B: Suomenkielinen sivu Betiro? Kyllä. (Betiro Casino vs. Rizzio table lists 'Suomenkielinen sivu' as 'Kyllä') The FAQ states Betiro is not Finnish-language, but a comparison table claims a Finnish version exists, creating a direct language-availability contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/betizy-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: 1. talletuksella: 100% 250 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta B: Mikäli ensitalletus on 100 euroa, saa sillä 100 ilmaiskierrosta. The first deposit bonus is stated as 100% up to 250 € with 50 free spins, but it also claims that a 100 € first deposit yields 100 free spins. These two statements cannot both be true for the same first deposit condition. | ||
/arvostelu/betkwiff/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus: 30 € (as stated in Betkwiff Casinon tervetuliaisbonus/Rules section). B: Min deposit: 20 € (as stated in Quick facts). Two different sections specify different minimum deposit requirements for the welcome offer: 30 € vs 20 €. A: Minimitalletus: 30 € (as stated in Betkwiff Casinon tervetuliaisbonus). B: Minimitalletus: 20–30 € (as stated in the Betkwiff Casino vertailussa table). The page contains conflicting minimum-deposit figures for the bonus in separate parts (a fixed 30 € vs a 20–30 € range). | ||
/arvostelu/betnflix/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/betonic/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: verovapaat voitot suomalaisille B: Voitot eivät ole verovapaita Suomessa The page first asserts that winnings are tax-free for Finnish players, then later states that winnings are not tax-free for Finnish players, which is a direct contradiction. A: Betonic Casino avattiin vuonna 2024 B: Käynnistysvuosi: 2020 Two different launch/start years are given for Betonic Casino on the page. A: Omistaja Bellona N.V. B: Omistaja Betsson Group The page lists two different owners for Betonic Casino, which is contradictory. A: Lisenssit Curaçaoan pelilisenssi: 8048/JAZ2010-010 B: Lisenssi Anjouan Gaming License Two different gaming licenses are claimed for Betonic Casino on the same page. A: Minimitalletus 10 € B: Minimitalletus 20 € The page presents conflicting minimum deposit requirements: 10 € in the quick facts versus 20 € in the deposit/bonus sections. | ||
/arvostelu/betovo-casino/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/betplays/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Min deposit€10 The article contains conflicting minimum deposit requirements: the bonus rules specify a 20 € minimum deposit, while the quick facts section lists a 10 € minimum deposit. | ||
/arvostelu/betrix-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Min deposit€20 B: Minimitalletus 25 € The quick facts section states a minimum deposit of €20, while deposit terms and other sections specify a minimum deposit of €25. A: Betrix Casino offers 560 live games B: Betrix Casino offers 561 live games Two sections cite different counts for live casino games (560 vs 561), creating a direct numerical contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/betroom24-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kierrätysvaatimukset | 0x (Bonus) B: Kierrätysvaatimukset | 5x (bonuksella) / 0x (ilmaiskierroksilla) The page contains two conflicting wagering requirement entries for the same welcome bonus: one section lists 0x wagering on the bonus, while another section lists 5x wagering on the bonus portion (with 0x on the free spins). This is a clear internal inconsistency in the bonus terms. | ||
/arvostelu/bets-bunny-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: The casino has over 15,000 games in its catalog. B: The casino's game catalog is over 15,300 games. Two sections claim different total game counts for BetsBunny's catalog (over 15,000 vs over 15,300), which cannot both be true. A: Minimum withdrawal is 25 €. B: Minimum withdrawal is 50 €. The withdrawal minimum is listed as 25 € in the main payment section, but a comparison table elsewhere lists it as 50 €, creating a conflicting specification. | ||
/arvostelu/betsamigo/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Betsamigo tarjoaa noin 4 500 kasinopeliä sekä laajat vedonlyöntimarkkinat. B: Kolikkopelien valikoima on noin 3 000 slottia, pöytäpelien valikoima 172, ja live-kasinon pelejä 350–400 (yhteensä noin 3 522–3 572 peliä). The page claims about 4,500 casino games in total, but later provides counts for slots, table games, and live games that sum to roughly 3,500–3,600, not 4,500, creating a numerical inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/betstro/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletus: 25 € (listed in the bonus rules table under Säännöt ja ehdit Betstro bonus) B: Minimitalletus: 20 € (listed in Quick facts: Min deposit€20) The page specifies two different minimum deposit amounts: 25 € in the bonus terms section and 20 € in the quick facts section, which is a direct inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/betwarts-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Huomioi, että kotiutukset eivät onnistu ennakkoon maksetuille korteille, Neteller-tilille eikä mobiilimaksujen kautta. B: Saatavilla olevat maksutavat: Nettilompakot: Neteller, Skrill, MiFinity The text states that withdrawals cannot be made to Neteller accounts, yet it lists Neteller as a withdrawal option in the available payout methods. | ||
/arvostelu/betway/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Betway on vuonna 2006 ovensa avannut kasino- ja vedonlyöntisivusto. B: Kasinon perustiedot - Julkaistu: 2016. The article states Betway opened in 2006, but the 'Kasinon perustiedot' box lists the site as published in 2016, creating a direct conflict about the founding/publication year. A: Betway mainostaa 400 pelin valikoimaa. B: Betwayn kolikkopelivalikoima on noin 700 peliä. There is a direct discrepancy between the advertised slot count (400) and the counted number of slot games (about 700). | ||
/arvostelu/big-boost/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Big Boost offers non-sticky bonus for new players up to €500. B: In the Big Boost comparison table, the bonus is listed as 'Ei bonusta' (no bonus). One part of the article states there is a non-sticky welcome bonus up to €500, while the comparison section claims there is no bonus at all. A: Curacao license means winnings are taxed (verolliset voitot). B: Later the article claims the license moved to MGA and winnings are tax-free (verovapaa). The page presents conflicting statements about tax treatment: Curacao implies taxed winnings, while MGA implies tax-free winnings. A: Big Boost offers only one payment method (Brite verkkopankki). B: Withdrawal instructions state you can choose Brite or Revolut, implying multiple methods. There is an inconsistency about available payment methods: one section says only one method, another mentions Revolut as an option. | ||
/arvostelu/big-lucky/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € (cashback), 30 € (ilmaiskierroksia). B: Minimitalletus 30 € (bonus rules box shows Minimitalletus = 30 €). The article presents two different minimum deposit requirements for the welcome bonus: 20 € for cashback and 30 € for free spins, while another section lists a fixed minimum deposit of 30 € for the bonus. This is an internal inconsistency about the required deposit to qualify. A: Kotiutuksille on asetettu maksimirajat, jotka ovat 5 000 euroa vuorokaudessa. B: Käyttöehdoista löytyy kuitenkin ehto, jolla rajataan vuorokaudessa saatavat nettovoitot 100 000 euroon (ei päde jackpotteihin tai VIP-tilanteisiin). There is a daily withdrawal cap of 5,000 EUR alongside a daily net-winnings cap of 100,000 EUR. Having both per-day limits creates an inconsistency in how much a player can withdraw in a day. A: Miinukset: Vain yksi maksutapa. B: Vertailutaulukko: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä = 3. The review claims there is only one payment method as a downside, but a side table lists three payment service providers, which is inconsistent about the actual number of available payment options. | ||
/arvostelu/bigwin/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Kierrätysvaatimukset | 0x (ilmaiskierrosta) for megakierroksia B: Oma talletus kierrätettävä kerran ennen kotiutusta (rollover of the deposit) The bonus terms claim zero wagering on the megakierroksia (0x), but also state that the depositor's own deposit must be rolled over once before withdrawal, which directly contradicts the 0x wagering claim. A: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä: 3 (in the comparison table) B: Maksutavat: Viljo (only one provider) and 'Vain Viljo' mentioned elsewhere The site lists three payment service providers in the comparison table, yet the Pay N Play setup uses Viljo as the sole payment method and explicitly notes that Viljo is the only provider, creating an inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/billy-bets-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Esimerkin laskukaava on tämä: [40 x (85 € + 85 €)] + (40 x 25 €) = 4 060 €. B: 40 x (85 € + 85 €) + (40 x 25 €) = 7 800 €. The calculation shown as the example of the withdrawal/rollover requirement is incorrect: 40 x (85 + 85) equals 6,800 and 40 x 25 equals 1,000, so the total should be 7,800 €, not 4,060. | ||
/arvostelu/bingo-bonga/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Bingo Bonga Casinolla on suorastaan hurja pelivalikoima, kun tarjonnassa on noin 5 000 peliä. B: Pelien määrä 9000 + The main article states Bingo Bonga has about 5,000 games, while the side-by-side comparison table lists 9,000+ games, which is inconsistent. A: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä Bingo Bonga Casinolla (vertailutaulukko) on 3. B: Bingo Bonga Casinolla tarjotaan useita maksutapoja kuten Trustly, Visa, Skrill, Neteller, Mifinity, Jeton, Paysafecard, Siru Mobile, Tilisiirto. The comparison table claims there are 3 payment service providers, but the main 'Maksutavat' section lists many more payment methods, indicating a higher number of providers. | ||
/arvostelu/bitcasino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Bitcasino on vuonna 2014 perustettu yksi maailman ensimmäisistä lisensoiduista kryptokasinoista B: Bitcasino kertoo olevansa markkinoiden ensimmäinen lisensoitu kryptokasino. The text claims it is 'one of the world's first licensed crypto casinos' and later 'the market's first licensed crypto casino', which are mutually exclusive if interpreted as a single 'first' status. A: Bitcasino vahvuuksia ovat laaja pelivalikoima, kaksi uskollisuusohjelmaa, suuret bonukset kokonaisuudessaan jopa 5 000 USDT bonusrahaa B: Bitcasino ei tarjoa pelaamisen aloittamiseen lainkaan bonusta. One part of the text touts large bonuses up to 5,000 USDT, while another part says there is no welcome bonus at all. A: Vinkki! Mikäli sinulta ei entuudestaan löydy mitään näistä valuutoista, voit ostaa haluamaasi vaihtoehtoa suoraan kasinon sivujen kautta esimerkiksi Visalla tai Apple Paylla. B: Bitcasino is a pure crypto casino and does not offer traditional payment methods; deposits and withdrawals are only in cryptocurrencies. The page simultaneously states Bitcasino is a crypto-only casino and also suggests you can buy fiat payment methods like Visa or Apple Pay to use on the site, which contradicts the crypto-only claim. A: Kierrätysvaatimus: X B: Esimerkki: Lunastat 150 USDT bonusrahaa ja sinun pitää panostaa yhteensä 4 500 USDT (30 x 150 USDT) The terms list the wagering requirement as 'X' while the example uses a 30x wagering requirement, making the conditions inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/bitkingz/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: LisenssiCuraçao, Costa Rica B: Lisenssi: Curaçao The quick facts section lists both Curaçao and Costa Rica as licenses, while the Licenses section states Curaçao only (with a license number). This creates an inconsistency about which jurisdiction licenses Bitkingz. A: Sähköposti (support@casino.com) B: Sähköpostituki support@bitkingz.com Two different support email addresses are shown for Bitkingz (support@casino.com and support@bitkingz.com), which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/bitsler/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Bitsler Casino Arvostelu shows a rating of 2.8/5 (e.g., at the top '★ 2.8/ 5' and in the 'Bitsler Casino vertailussa' table). B: Bitsler Casino Trustpilot arvosana states a Trustpilot rating of 4/5 (pääosin hyvät arvosanat (4/5)). The page attributes two different overall ratings to Bitsler: 2.8/5 in the main header/table and 4/5 in the Trustpilot section, which is a clear inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/blaze-spins-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Miinukset: Ei vastuullisen pelaamisen työkaluja B: Pelitilin asetuksista ei löytynyt minkäänlaisia vastuullisen pelaamisen työkaluja; tukipalvelu kertoi, että talletusrajoitukset ja pelieston saa aktivoitua vain ottamalla yhteyttä tukipalveluun The bullet list claims there are no responsible-gaming tools, but the article later states that deposit limits and self-exclusion can be activated by contacting support, implying tools exist. A: Miinukset: Ei suoraa tilisiirtomahdollisuutta B: Maksutavat Blaze Spins Casinolla: Tilisiirto kryptovaluuttojen ostoa varten: Rapid Transfer The 'no direct transfer' claim conflicts with the listed Rapid Transfer option for purchasing cryptocurrencies, which is a form of direct transfer. A: Kanta-asiakasohjelmaa: Blaze Spins Casinolla pelaajat voivat edetä 10 tasoa sisältävässä kanta-asiakasohjelmassa B: VIP-ohjelma: Blaze Spins Casino – Ei The article describes a 10-tier loyalty program, but the comparison table marks there is no VIP program, creating a contradiction about the existence of a loyalty program. | ||
/arvostelu/blazebet/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Päivitetty: 23. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 04/02/2026 The page lists the overall update date as December 23, 2025, but also states that the bonus was last updated on February 4, 2026, implying two different last-update times for the page and the bonus section. | ||
/arvostelu/blitz-bet/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus: 100% 500 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta B: Tervetuliaispaketti: yhteensä 400 % bonusta jopa 2 000 euroon asti sekä 150 ilmaiskierrosta The article presents two different welcome bonus structures with differing total bonus percentages and numbers of free spins, creating an explicit contradiction about the welcome offer. A: Minimitalletus 25 € (bonus terms: 'Minimitalletus 25 €') B: Minimitalletus 20 € (Quick facts / deposit table state 20 € minimum) Minimum deposit is stated as 25 € in bonus terms but as 20 € in general information and deposit sections, leading to inconsistent requirements. | ||
/arvostelu/bob-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Tasolle 21 pääseminen edellyttää kolmella miljoonalla eurolla pelaamista. B: Tasolle 21 pääseminen edellyttää noin 630 euroa panostusta (21 BP × 30 €). The text states a rate of 1 BP per 30 €, and gives an example for level 1 (600€ for 20 BP). It then claims level 21 requires 3,000,000€, which contradicts the implied 21 BP × 30€ = 630€ based on the stated rate. A: Tasolle 22 pääseminen vaatii 9 miljoonaa euroa panostusta. B: Tasolle 22 pääseminen pitäisi vaatia vain 660 euroa panostusta (22 BP × 30 €) ainoastaan käytetyn BP-periaatteen mukaan. Following the stated BP rate (1 BP per 30€), reaching level 22 would require 22 × 30€ = 660€. The text, however, claims 9,000,000€, which is a clear contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/bonusbet/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Onko BonusBet Casinolla kanta-asiakasohjelmaa? VIP- tai uskollisuusohjelmia ei ole BonusBet Casinolla. B: BonusBet VIP-ohjelma Kyllä (BonusBet vertailussa samankaltaisiin kasinoihin). One part of the text states there is no VIP/loyalty program, while a comparison table later claims that BonusBet has a VIP program. A: Kuukaudessa voi kotiuttaa 1 000 euroa ilman ylimääräisiä kulueriä. B: Kuukausittainen kotiutusraja on 7 000 euroa. The article states two different monthly withdrawal limits (1,000 EUR vs 7,000 EUR), which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/boo-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Yhteensä tarjolla on 250% talletusbonus 1000 € asti + 150 ilmaiskierrosta. B: 1. talletuksella: 100% 500 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta; 2. talletuksella: 50% 200 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta; 3. talletuksella: 100% 300 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta. The introductory bonus summary claims a total bonus of 250% up to €1000 plus 150 free spins. However, when broken down by deposit, the three deposits yield bonuses of 500 + 100 + 300 = 900 in bonus money (plus 150 spins), not the €1000 claimed. This is an unambiguous numerical inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/boom-casino/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/boomerang-bet/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Suomenkielinen sivusto toimii Curacaon lisenssillä. B: Lisenssi: Anjouan (Anjouan Gaming License) / Anjouan lisenssi. The page simultaneously claims the Finnish site operates under a Curacao license and that the license is Anjouan, which cannot both be true. A: Minimitalletus: 20 € (kierrätysvaatimuksissa section). B: Minimitalletus: 15 € (quick facts: Min deposit €15). Two different minimum deposit amounts are stated (15 € vs 20 €) in different parts of the article. A: Kasinon pelien määrä on yli 5000 peliä. B: Tarkkaa kasinopelien määrää: 3 000–4 000 peliä. The article gives two conflicting figures for the total number of games available (over 5000 vs 3000–4000). A: Kryptot: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Tether, Ripple, USD, DogeCoin, Cardano (USD listed among cryptocurrencies). B: USD is a fiat currency, not a cryptocurrency (implied by its misclassification in a cryptocurrency list). USD is listed under the Kryptot section, which inconsistently treats USD as a cryptocurrency. | ||
/arvostelu/boomerang-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Sain testissä 50 euron ensitalletuksella yhteensä 100 € bonusrahaa. B: Bonusehdot mukaan ensitalletus on 100% bonus up to 500 €; 50 € talletuksella bonus tulisi olla 50 € (ei 100 €). The article contains a personal claim of receiving 100€ bonus on a 50€ deposit, which contradicts the stated 100% match up to 500€ (which would yield only 50€ bonus for a 50€ deposit). A: Ilmaiskierroksia tarjotaan yhteensä 200 kappaletta. B: Ilmaiskierroksia tarjotaan yhteensä 180 kappaletta. Two different totals for the welcome bonus spins are stated in the article, 200 and 180, which cannot both be correct. A: Kotiutukset voivat kestää 2–3 päivää. B: Voittojen kotiutukset tapahtuvat yleensä alle 30 minuutissa. The text simultaneously states that withdrawals can take 2–3 days and, elsewhere, that winnings are typically paid within 30 minutes, a direct contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/boost-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Boost Casino avattu vuonna 2019. B: Kasinon perustiedot: Julkaistu: 2020. The page states the casino was opened in 2019, but the info box lists the publication year as 2020, creating an inconsistent timeline for launch vs. published information. A: Minimitalletus: 30 € (Bonuksen säännöt ja ehdot). B: min. 20 € (Boost Casinolle rekisteröityminen ja bonuksen lunastaminen). Two different minimum deposit requirements are stated for claiming the welcome bonus: 30 euros versus 20 euros. A: Minimi talletus: 5 € (Kotiutus- ja talletustavat - table). B: Minimitalletus: 30 € (Bonuksen säännöt ja ehdot). The page lists conflicting minimum deposit amounts across sections: 5 € versus 30 €, indicating inconsistency in the required deposit amount. | ||
/arvostelu/budsino-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Budsino tarjoaa uusille pelaajille 100 kanta-asiakaspistettä, joiden avulla voit valita itsellesi mieluisan edun bonuskaupasta. Riittää että rekisteröit pelitilin, jonka jälkeen voit käyttää pisteet Loyalty Shopissa ja valita esimerkiksi ilmaiskierroksia, bonushahaa tai muita elämyksiä. Mikä parasta, saat palkinnot ilman kierrätysvaatimusta! B: Ehtojen mukaan bonus tulee pelata 30 päivässä. The page simultaneously claims that the welcome rewards have no wagering requirements, and later states that the bonus must be wagered (played through) within 30 days, which are direct and explicit contradictions. | ||
/arvostelu/buran-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Miinuksina mainitsen Anjouanin lisenssin myötä verolliset voitot suomalaisille. B: Buran Casino on rekisteröintivapaa Curacaon lisenssillä toimiva nettikasino. The article mentions an Anjouan license causing taxed Finnish winnings, but later describes licensing as Curacao and Estonia, and even cites a Curacao license under Rabidi N.V., creating conflicting licensing representations. A: Pelivalikoima ... yli 180 live‑pöytää. B: Live casino valikoima ... noin 150 live‑pelia. Two sections give different counts for live casino offerings (180 vs 150), which cannot both be correct. A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Talleta Zimplerin kautta vähintään 10 €. The bonus terms table states a minimum deposit of 20 €, while the text instructs a minimum of 10 € to claim the bonus, two conflicting requirements. A: Operaattori: Estolio Limited B: Curacaon lisenssi on kasinon alkuperäisen operaattorin Rabidi N.V:n nimellä. The page lists the operator as Estolio Limited, but also states that the Curacao license belongs to the original operator Rabidi N.V., which is a conflicting claim about ownership/licensing. | ||
/arvostelu/buumi/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: LisenssiViro, Curaçao B: Buumi operates under a Viron EMTA license (EMTA) with license numbers HKL000400 and HKT000071; Curaçao license is not used as claimed The quick facts section lists licenses from both Estonia (EMTA) and Curaçao, while the article body describes only an Estonian EMTA license with EMTA license numbers and does not mention Curaçao elsewhere, creating a contradiction about the licensing jurisdiction. A: Miinukset: Ei suomalaista asiakaspalvelua 24/7 B: Asiakaspalvelu Buumi Casinolla section states 24/7 live chat in Finnish (Suomi) and Finnish-language support One part of the text claims there is no Finnish customer support available 24/7, while another part states that live chat is available 24/7 in Finnish, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/buusti-kasino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Tervetuliaisbonus on non-sticky bonus jopa 500 euroa + 100 ilmaiskierrosta Razor Sharkiin. B: Buusti Kasinon tervetulobonus tarjous on 0 € bonus ja 0 ilmaiskierrosta. One part of the text states a welcome bonus up to 500€ with 100 free spins, while another part states a welcome bonus of 0€ and 0 free spins, which is a direct contradiction. A: Lisenssi: Viron EMTA (EMTA-lupa) on Buusti Kasinon lisenssi. B: Lisenssi: Malta MGA (MGA-lisenssi) on Buusti Kasinon lisenssi. The article presents conflicting licensing information: one section attributes the license to Estonia via EMTA, while another section lists Malta MGA, indicating inconsistent licensing claims. | ||
/arvostelu/campeonbet/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: The quick facts section lists the license as 'Costa Rica, Anjouan Gaming License'. B: The Licenses and safety section lists the license as 'Anjouan' (Anjouan license). The page simultaneously implies a Costa Rica license and an Anjouan license, then later claims only Anjouan, creating an inconsistency about which license governs CampeonBet. A: The CampeonBet welcome bonus section states '100% up to €250 + 50 free spins' for the first deposit. B: The Campeon Bet experiences section claims a '225% up to €1,500 + 500 free spins' welcome offer for new players. Two different welcome offers are described with different percentages, caps, and free spins, causing a direct contradiction about the initial bonus. A: Monthly withdrawal limit is stated as €7,000. B: The withdrawal conditions state daily limit of €5,000 and per-account limit of €50,000. The page lists conflicting withdrawal limits (monthly vs daily/per-account), which cannot coherently apply together. A: Bonus rules show 35x wagering on (Deposit + Bonus) for the first bonus. B: If the maximum first deposit is €1,500 with a €1,500 bonus, 35x of (Deposit+Bonus) would be €3,000 × 35 = €105,000, yet the text also states the maximum wagering as €150,000, which is inconsistent. A numerical inconsistency in the bonus wagering calculation: 35x on €3,000 equals €105,000, not €150,000, yet the article claims €150,000. | ||
/arvostelu/candybet/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/cashwin-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Onko Cashwin nettikasino verovapailla voitoilla? Ei ole, eli mahdollinen voitto pitää ilmoittaa veroviranomaiselle. B: Cashwin toimii Curacaon lisenssin alla, eli voitosta pitää maksaa verot. The page asserts both that winnings are not tax-free and that winnings must be taxed, creating a direct conflict about the tax treatment for winnings. A: Cashwin on Willx N.V.-operaattorin alainen ja toimii Curacaon lisenssin alaisuudessa. B: Cashwin on myös vaihtanut lisenssiään Anjouan lisenssiksi ja operoinut hetken aikaa ilman lisenssiäkin, mutta nykyinen toimilupa on myönnetty vuoden 2024 lopulla ja se on ollut voimassa siitä saakka. The text both states a Curacao license and a change to Anjouan license with an active license, and includes a Curacao license number elsewhere, creating inconsistency about which jurisdiction actually licenses the casino. A: Voita oikea Porsche 911 Targan B: Mercedes-Benz G-sarjan auto Two different car prizes are advertised for promotions (Porsche 911 Targa vs Mercedes-Benz G-Class), which is inconsistent regarding the offered prize. A: Sähköpostisupport@cashwin30904.com B: Sähköpostilla (support@cashwin30904.com) Two different contact emails are listed for support, leading to inconsistent contact information. | ||
/arvostelu/casinado-casino/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/casinia/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Lisenssi: PAGCOR B: LisenssiAnjouan Gaming License The page lists PAGCOR as the license in the license section, but the quick facts section lists Anjouan Gaming License as the license, presenting two different licenses for Casinia. A: live-chatissa ja sähköpostitse (support@casinia.com) vuorokauden ympäri (24/7) B: live-chat löytyy ainoastaan ohjauskeskuksen kautta One section claims 24/7 live chat support (via chat and email), while another section states the live chat is only accessible through the help center, contradicting continuous availability. | ||
/arvostelu/casino-bello/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Kotiutus yhdellä kotiutuspyynnöllä enintään 3 000 €. B: FAQ: Nostoraja enintään 15 000 € nostolla. The page states a per-withdrawal limit of 3,000 €, while another section claims a withdrawal limit of up to 15,000 €, directly contradicting each other. A: Yhteenveto: bonusrahan määrä kasvaa usean talletuksen myötä 2 000 € suuruiseksi. B: Tervetulobonuksen yksittäisten talletusten bonukset summautuvat seuraavasti: 120% 1000 € asti (1200 €) + 100 ilmaiskierrosta; 100% 400 € asti + 60 ilmaiskierrosta; 80% 400 € asti + 40 ilmaiskierrosta; 100% 700 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta (yhteensä 2 620 € bonusta). The summary claims the total bonus money is 2,000 €, but the listed four deposited bonuses total 2,620 €, which contradicts the summary. A: Kaikki talletukset kierrätettävä 3x. B: Kierrätysvaatimukset bonuksille ovat 30x (Bonus) / 30x (ilmaiskierrosta) ja 35x (Bonus) / 35x (ilmaiskierrosta) for subsequent deposits—i.e., 30x–35x wagering, not 3x. The page claims 3x wagering for all deposits, but the stated wagering requirements for bonuses are 30x or 35x, which is a clear inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/casino-days/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Päivitetty: 8. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 04/02/2026 The page shows conflicting update dates: the page was updated in December 2025, while the bonus update is listed as February 2026, implying a later update to bonuses than the page content itself. A: Lisenssi: Curaçao, Viro B: Casino Days is a verovapaa nettikasino because it operates under the Estonian license (EMTA). The text simultaneously endorses the Estonian license as the basis for tax-free winnings, but the quick facts list Curaçao as a license; having Curaçao alongside Estonian license creates inconsistency about under which jurisdiction winnings would be tax-free. A: Kotiutusaika: Alle 15 minuuttia B: Käyttöehdoissa mainitaan jopa 4–5 päivän maksuaika Withdrawal time is stated as under 15 minutes in one section but later the terms mention a potential 4–5 day payout delay; these two timelines conflict and cannot both be accurate. | ||
/arvostelu/casino-friday/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Casino Friday kokemuksia section states: 'yli 4000 peliä 110 pelivalmistajalta'. B: Casino Friday vertailussa table states: 'Pelien määrä > yli 3400'. Two sections assign different total numbers of games (over 4000 vs over 3400), creating a clear inconsistency about the size of the game library. A: VIP-ohjelman etuja: 'Jopa 20 % käteispalautusta joka viikko'. B: Casino Friday vertailussa table: 'Käteispalautus Ei cashback-bonusta'. One part claims a weekly cashback of up to 20%, while the comparison table indicates there is no cashback bonus, which directly contradicts. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 'käteisbonukselle on 40x ja ilmaiskierroksille 30x' (tervetulotarjouksen yleiset ehdot). B: Tervetulobonuksen säännöt -taulukossa: 'Kierrätysvaatimukset 0x (ilmaiskierrosta)' for ilmaiskierrokset. The welcome bonus section states wagering requirements of 40x (cash) and 30x (free spins), while the rules table shows 0x wagering for free spins, creating an explicit inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/casino-heroes/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Lisenssi: OGL/2024/503/0352 (voimassa 24.12.2025 asti) B: Päivitetty: 16. helmikuuta 2026 The page states the Curacao license is valid until 24 December 2025, but the article was updated in February 2026, which would imply the license had expired by the time of the update unless a renewal or extension is stated elsewhere. | ||
/arvostelu/casino-joy/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Päivitetty: 5. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 06/02/2026 The page lists two different last-update dates for the content: December 5, 2025 and February 6, 2026, indicating an inconsistent update history. A: Hurjimmillaan bonusrahan määrä voi nousta 6 000 € asti, mikäli valitsee high-roller bonusvaihtoehdon. B: Bonuksen määrä: 200% ensitalletusbonus, jopa 3000 € asti. One part claims the high-roller option can boost the bonus up to 6,000 €, while the explicit high-roller offer states a maximum bonus of 3,000 €, which is contradictory. | ||
/arvostelu/casino-lab/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus 20 € The page lists conflicting minimum deposit requirements: one section states a minimum deposit of €10, while another states €20. | ||
/arvostelu/casino-midas/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä: 14 B: Maksutavat: Visa, Mastercard, pankkisiirto, Bitcoin, eZeeWallet, Ethereum, Litecoin (7 vaihtoehtoa). The comparison table lists 14 payment service providers, but the article's explicit 'Maksutavat' section enumerates only seven payment methods. This is a clear inconsistency in reported providers vs. listed methods. | ||
/arvostelu/casino-vibes/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Casino Vibes on turvallinen nettikasino GCB:n lisenssillä. B: Lisenssi: Curacao The article claims the casino is licensed under a GCB license, but elsewhere lists the license as Curacao, creating a direct contradiction about the licensing authority. A: Yli 7 500 peliä noin 60 valmistajalta. B: Karkeasti arvioituna Casino Vibes tarjoaa 7 000 kolikkopeliä. Two sections give different counts for the number of games (7500+ vs 7000), which is an internal numeric inconsistency. A: Kotiutukset maksetaan yleensä 24 tunnissa. B: Nostopyynnöt käsitellään arkipäivisin alle 8 tunnissa klo 10.00–18.00 välillä. Withdrawals are described as typically taking 24 hours in one part, while another part states withdrawal requests are processed within 8 hours, which cannot both be true simultaneously. | ||
/arvostelu/casino-vice/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Miniminosto on lähtökohtaisesti 20–25 € pankkisiirrolla ja korteilla B: Miniminosto 40 € (Casino Vice vertailussa) The text inconsistently lists the minimum withdrawal as 20–25 EUR in the main section, but a side comparison table later states a minimum withdrawal of 40 EUR, creating a clear numerical contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/casino-x/ | Issues | 6 contradictions |
A: Isoimpana valttina on massiivinen 10-osainen tervetuliaisbonuspaketti, jonka arvo kohoaa peräti 58 000 euroon B: Ensimmäisellä talletuksella pelaaja voi valita kolmesta eri bonusvaihtoehdosta, jotka vaihtelevat 25 %:sta aina 200 % bonukseen, sekä 20 000 €:sta 50 euroon One part claims a single 10-part welcome bonus totaling up to 58,000 EUR, while another describes the first deposit as a choice among options from 25% to 200% up to as high as 20,000 EUR (or up to 50 EUR). These cannot both reflect the same welcome offer. A: Minimitalletus on 5 € (Plussat). B: Minimitalletus on 10 € (Bonuskaket - Minimitalletus). The article lists different minimum deposit amounts: 5 EUR in the pros list and 10 EUR in the bonus structure, which is inconsistent. A: Minimitalletus 10 € (Bonuskaket). B: Minimitalletus 20 € (Miten lunastaa). The bonus structure states a 10 € minimum, while the 'how to claim' section specifies a minimum of 20 €, creating a direct mismatch. A: Minimitalletus 10 € (Bonuskaket). B: Minimitalletus 10–20 € (Min deposit quick facts / various mentions). The bonus table shows 10 € minimum, while other parts of the page indicate 10–20 € or similar ranges, which is inconsistent. A: Casino-X käyttää Microgamingin ohjelmistoalustaa. B: Casino-X tarjoaa pelejä useilta eri pelintarjoajilta (esim. NetEnt, Evolution Gaming, Pragmatic Play, jne.), eikä ainoastaan Microgaming. One statement claims the casino uses Microgaming's platform, while another section lists multiple providers, indicating a multi-provider platform rather than an exclusively Microgaming one. A: Päivitetty: 11. helmikuuta 2026. B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 16/02/2026. Two different update dates are given (Feb 11, 2026 and Feb 16, 2026), which cannot both be the latest update. | ||
/arvostelu/casinobud/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Nostopyyntö hyväksyttiin 42 tunnin kuluttua. B: Kotiutusten käsittely tapahtuu noin 48 tunnin sisään. The text provides two different withdrawal processing times: 42 hours in a testimonial vs 48 hours in the general speed section. A: Lisenssi: MGA/CRP/716/2019 B: Lisenssi: MGA/B2C/716/2019 Two different MGA license identifiers are listed for Casinobud in the same document, indicating an inconsistency in licensing details. | ||
/arvostelu/casinoist/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus: 100% 250 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta B: Casinoist tervetulobonus: 225% up to 1,500 € + 4,000 ilmaiskierrosta The page presents two different first-deposit bonuses with conflicting terms, percentages and caps. A: Lisenssi: Anjouan (listed in Casinoist's details section) B: Lisenssi: Anjouan Gaming License, Costa Rica (listed in Quick Facts) License information is inconsistent: one part lists an Anjouan license, while the quick facts merge Anjouan with Costa Rica, and the address is given as Costa Rica. | ||
/arvostelu/casinoloots/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Lisenssi Costa Rica B: Lisenssi Anjouan Gaming The page lists two different licensing jurisdictions: Costa Rica in Quick Facts, and Anjouan Gaming as the license in the main information, which are incompatible licenses. A: Minimitalletus 25 € B: Minimitalletus 20 € The minimum deposit is stated as 25 € in the payments section, but 20 € in quick facts and bonus rules, creating a contradiction. A: Live chat is not always available B: Live chat is promised 24/7 availability One part of the text states live chat is not always available, while another part promises 24/7 live chat support, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/casinoly/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Minimitalletus: 10 € The welcome bonus terms table states a minimum deposit of 20 €, while another section (Kierrätysvaatimukset) states a minimum deposit of 10 €, which cannot both be correct for the same offer. A: Minimitalletus: 10 € B: Minimitalletus: 20 € Quick facts list shows a minimum deposit of €10, whereas the bonus rules section lists a minimum deposit of €20, creating another inconsistency about the bonus eligibility requirements. | ||
/arvostelu/casinova/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Omistaja: NovaForge Ltd B: Omistaja: Liernin Enterprises Limited The page lists two different owners for Casinova in separate sections, creating a direct ownership contradiction. A: Maksuvaihtoehtoja löytyy Casinovalta noin 10 kappetta B: Maksupalveluntarjoojen määrä 20 One part of the page claims about 10 payment options, while a comparison table later states there are 20 payment providers, giving conflicting figures. | ||
/arvostelu/casombie/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Pääset hyppäämään mukaan zombientäyteiseen seikkailuun minimissään 10 euron ja maksimissaan 1 000–5 000 euron talletuksella. B: Minimitalletus 20 €. The page asserts a minimum deposit of 10 EUR in one section, while other sections state a minimum deposit of 20 EUR, creating an inconsistency. A: Sähköpostiosupport@casombie.com B: support@casombie.com Two different support email addresses are listed on the page, causing inconsistent contact information. | ||
/arvostelu/casoo/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Jokainen talletus tulee kierrättää sloteissa vähintään 3x ja muissa peleissä 5x. B: Kierrätysvaatimukset Ei kierrätysvaatimuksia. The article states a wagering requirement of 3x for slots and 5x for other games, but in the Casoo Casino comparison table it claims there are no wagering requirements. | ||
/arvostelu/casperbets-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Kotiutuspyyntöjä käsitellään vain arkipäivisin, ja yksittäisen tapahtuman sekä vuorokausinoston katto on vain 500 €. B: EcoPayz-kotiutukselle on ilmoitettu minimissään 5 € talletus ja 10 000 € kotiutus, mikä suoraa per-tapahtuman Katon 500 € kanssa ristiriitaista. There is a stated general per-transaction withdrawal cap of 500 €, but the ecoPayz method lists a withdrawal amount up to 10,000 €, creating a direct inconsistency in withdrawal limits. A: Kotiutusten käsittely vie KYC-prosessin jälkeen yleensä 24–28 tuntia. B: Kotiutukset käsitellään tavallisesti 24–48 tuntia, mutta rahojen saapuminen voi kestaa jopa viisi arkipäivää. Two different statements give conflicting withdrawal processing times (24–28 hours vs 24–48 hours) and a potential up-to-five-days payout window. | ||
/arvostelu/caspero-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletus | 20 € B: Min deposit€10 Two sections specify different minimum deposit amounts: 20 € in the bonuses/withdrawal rules section and 10 € in the quick facts, which is a direct numeric contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/casumo/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Casumo has a library of over 4,800 games B: Casumo has over 2,000 casino games Two sections on the page claim different total numbers of casino games (4,800+ vs 2,000+), which cannot both be correct. A: Live chat is available 24/7 for customer service B: Finnish support is available daily from 10:00 to 02:00 One part states 24/7 live chat, while another specifies Finnish support hours of 10:00–02:00 daily, which is contradictory. A: Withdrawals are processed within 24 hours (and can be immediate for some methods) B: Withdrawals are generally processed within 72 hours depending on the payment method Withdrawal processing times are described as both 24 hours/minutes and 72 hours depending on method, creating a direct inconsistency. A: Casumo is licensed by the Malta Gaming Authority (MGA) and the UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) B: Quick facts list the Gibraltar license (Gibraltar Gambling Commissioner) Licensing information is presented inconsistently: MGA/UKGC are claimed elsewhere, while a Gibraltar license is listed in the quick facts section. | ||
/arvostelu/caxino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Kotiutukset 1–2 päivässä (ei Pay N Playta) B: Kotiutusajat Muutama tunti – muutama päivä maksutavasta riippuen Withdrawal time claims conflict: one part states withdrawals take 1–2 days, while another states withdrawal times range from a few hours to a few days depending on the method. A: Minimitalletus 15 € (Siru Mobile) 20 € (muut maksutavat) B: Onko Caxino oikeasti tallettaa vain euron? Kyllä, Caxinolle voi tallettaa vain yhden euron, mutta vain ensimmäisen talletuksen yhteydessä. The page lists minimum deposits of 15€ for Siru and 20€ for other methods, but the FAQ asserts that deposits can be as low as 1€ for the first deposit, creating a direct contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/cazeus-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: There are more than 15,000 casino games in Cazeus' catalog. B: The category counts list: Kolikkopelit ~14,000; Livekasino >500; Pöytäpelit 340; Pikapelit 25 (totaling about 14,865), which does not exceed 15,000. The page states a total of over 15,000 games, but the explicit category counts sum to approximately 14,865, which contradicts the claim of having more than 15,000 games. | ||
/arvostelu/chancer-bet-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: First deposit bonus is 300% up to 1000 € B: For the 1st deposit, the table lists a maximum bonus of 300 € The page states a first deposit bonus of 300% up to €1000, but the detailed bonus table for the first deposit shows a maximum bonus of €300. This is a direct inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/chip-stars/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus 200% 900 € asti B: First deposit bonus up to 1,800 € (100–200%) The page lists two different first-deposit bonus maxima: a header claim of 900 € and later a four-deposit package with a first-deposit bonus up to 1,800 €, which cannot both be correct. A: Minimitalletus 30 € B: Min deposit€10 Two sections disagree on the minimum deposit required to participate: 30 € versus 10 €. | ||
/arvostelu/chipz/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimum deposit shown as 20 € in the bonus terms table. B: Deposit instructions state a minimum deposit of 10 € (and the quick facts also indicate 20 €, but the deposit steps specify 10 €). Two different minimum deposit amounts are stated: 20 € in the bonus terms and 10 € in the deposit instructions, creating conflicting requirements. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 0x (ilmaiskierrosta) (no wagering on the free spins). B: Pelattava talletus: 1x talletuksesta ennen kotiutusta (a wagering requirement on deposits before withdrawal). One section states there is no wagering on the welcome free spins, while another part imposes a 1x wagering requirement on deposits before withdrawal. A: Withdrawals are processed instantly (käsitellään yleensä välittömästi). B: Withdrawal time is listed as 5–15 minutes. There is a contradiction between claiming withdrawals are processed instantly and listing a 5–15 minute withdrawal time. | ||
/arvostelu/cipher-wins-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Pelivalikoima | Erinomainen | Yli 10 000 peliä, todella kattava valikoima B: Yli 13 000 peliä (yleiskatsaus: 'Yli 13 000 peliä yli 110 pelivalmistajalta') Different sections claim different total numbers of games (over 10,000 vs over 13,000). A: 1. talletuksella saat 150 % bonuksen aina 2 000 euroon asti (minimitalletus 20 €). B: 1. talletuksella | 100% 250 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta. The first-deposit bonus is described as 150% up to 2,000 EUR in one place and as 100% up to 250 EUR plus 50 free spins in another, which contradict each other. A: Päivitetty: 19. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 11/02/2026 Two different update dates are stated for the content/bonuses (Nov 19, 2025 vs Feb 11, 2026). | ||
/arvostelu/citobet-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä 10 B: Maksutavat Citobetilla ovat Bank Transfer, Visa, Mastercard, Bitcoin, Tether (5 vaihtoehtoa). The Citobet vs Kanuuna table lists Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä as 10, but the article's Maksutavat section explicitly lists only five payment options. A: Voimassa: 06.11.2023 - 31.12.2024 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 23/02/2026 The bonus validity window ends in 2024, yet the page states the bonus terms were last updated in 2026, which is inconsistent for the same bonus terms. | ||
/arvostelu/cleobetra-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Cleobetra lumoaa egyptiteemallaan ja valtavalla 20 000 pelin valikoimalla B: Cleobetra pelivalikoima ... yli 28 500 kappaletta The article presents two conflicting figures for the total number of games: 20,000 in one place and 28,500+ in another. A: Minimitalletus bonuksen ehtojen mukaan: 20 € B: Minimitalletus Quick facts: 10 € Two sections specify different minimum deposit requirements: 20 € for bonus eligibility versus 10 € as the general minimum deposit, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/cleopatra-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Cleopatra Casino verovapaa Suomessa? Ei ole, sillä Cleopatra Casino toimii Curacao-lisenssin alaisuudessa eikä suomalaiset saa verovapaita voittoja. B: Taustalla: Suomen rahapelimarkkinat avautuvat vaiheittain vuodesta 2027 alkaen, jolloin suomalainen pelilisenssi takaa pelaajille verovapaat voitot. The page states Finnish winnings are not tax-free under the Curacao license, but later claims that with a future Finnish license (from 2027) winnings would be tax-free, creating a contradiction about current vs future tax status. A: Maksutavat: 16 eri vaihtoehtoa. B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä: 17. The page lists 16 payment methods in one section but a different count (17 providers) in a comparison table, causing inconsistency in how many payment options/providers are offered. A: Kasinon minimitalletus on 10 €, mutta monilla maksuavoilla raja on 20 €. B: Minimitalletus: €20. There is a contradiction between the text stating minimum deposit is 10 € (with many methods having a 20 € limit) and the quick facts table stating a minimum deposit of 20 €. | ||
/arvostelu/conquer-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus bonuksen aktivoimiseksi on 10 €. B: Quick facts section lists a minimum deposit of 20 €. The page contains conflicting minimum deposit figures: 10 € is stated as the minimum to activate the welcome bonus, while the Quick Facts section (and a comparison table) lists 20 € as the minimum deposit. A: Kotiutukset käsitellään tyypillisesti 1–3 tunnin kuluessa. B: Nostojen käsittely voi kestää 1–3 pankkipäivää riippuen valitusta maksutavasta. Withdrawal processing times are inconsistent: some sections claim withdrawals are processed within 1–3 hours, whereas another part states withdrawals can take 1–3 banking days depending on the method. | ||
/arvostelu/cookie-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Finnish players are not entitled to deposit bonuses. B: Finnish players can also receive no-deposit bonuses awarded for regular play with no deposit required. One claim says Finnish players receive no deposit bonuses (i.e., no bonuses at all for Finnish players), while another states they can receive no-deposit bonuses based on regular play. These statements directly conflict about the availability of bonuses for Finnish players. A: Suurturnajaiset: kierrätysvaatimus on 3x. B: Trustpilot notes kierrätysvaatimukset bonuksissa, erityisesti 40x kierrätysvaatimus. The article itself specifies a 3x wagering requirement for the large tournaments, but the Trustpilot note claims wagering requirements up to 40x for bonuses in general. This is an internal inconsistency about the same category of promotions. A: Cookie Casinon asiakaspalvelu on suomalaispelaajien käytettävissä vuorokauden ympäri live-chatin ja sähköpostin avulla. B: Asiakaspalvelun kieli: Englanti. One statement asserts Finnish players have 24/7 live chat and email support, while another states the service language is English. Additionally, Trustpilot notes there is no Finnish support, creating a conflict among service availability, language, and target users. | ||
/arvostelu/coolbet/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus kaikilla tavoilla on 10 € B: Minimitalletus 20 € (as listed in the bonus rules table) The Maksutavat section states a minimum deposit of 10 € for all methods, while the bonus section table lists a minimum deposit of 20 € for the first bonus, creating an inconsistency in the stated minimum deposit amounts. A: Suomenkielinen chat ei ole auki 24/7 B: Live-chat 24/7 One part of the page claims the Finnish chat is not open 24/7, while another part states that the live chat is available 24/7, presenting a direct contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/corsaza-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Corsaza kokemuksia: Vahvasti merirosvoteemainen Corsaza näki päivänvalon vuoden 2025 elokuussa. Heti avajaisista alkaen tarjolla on huimasti yli 11 000 kasinopeliä sisältäen myös yli tuhat live-peliä. B: Minkälainen Corsaza Casinon pelien valikoima on? Corsaza Casinon pelivalikoima kattoi yli 10 000 erilaista peliä. Erityisesti Live Casino nousi esiin yli 1 000 live-pelillä. The page asserts over 11,000 games (with over 1,000 live games) in one section, but later states the game library is over 10,000 games (with over 1,000 live games). The numbers 11,000 versus 10,000 are inconsistent within the same text. | ||
/arvostelu/cosmic-slot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Jackpot-peleissä on valinnanvaraa, mutta progressiivisia jättipotteja ei ole tarjolla. B: Jackpot-pelien arvostelussa ilmoitetaan useita progressiivisia jättipottipelejä (esim. Mega Joker, AP McCoy: Sporting Legends, Mega Moolah, Hall of Gods, Divine Fortune). The text first claims there are jackpot games with variety but no progressive jackpots, then later lists multiple progressive jackpot titles, which is a direct contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/craze-play/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Craze Play Casino tuli Suomeen vuonna 2022, ja sen takana on Brivio Limited. B: Operaattorina toimii Starscream Limited (Craze Play Casino) ja Craze Play Casinon yrityksen tiedoissa listing osoittaa Starscream Limited. The page attributes two different corporate entities as the operator/owner: Brivio Limited as the behind-the-casino entity in one section, and Starscream Limited as the operator in the company information section, creating an internal ownership/operating inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/crusino-casino/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Päivitetty: 7. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 07/02/2026 Two different last-update dates are stated for the content, implying conflicting update timestamps. A: Crusino jakaa uusille pelaajille bonusrahaa jopa 5000 € arvosta, jonka päälle saa vielä 300 ilmaiskierrosta. B: 1. talletuksella: 100% 1000 € asti + 100 ilmaiskierrosta ... 5. talletuksella: 100% 1000 € asti + 100 ilmaiskierrosta The page claims up to 5000€ and 300 free spins in one sentence, but the detailed structure sums to 5000€ and 500 free spins; 300 vs 500 spins is inconsistent. A: Lisenssi: Curaçao, Costa Rica B: Lisenssi: Curacao License jurisdiction is listed inconsistently: Curaçao, Costa Rica in one place and Curacao in another. A: seitsemää eri maksutapaa, jotka ovat kaksi yleisintä maksukorttia, nettilompakot, Paysafecard ja kryptovaluutat CoinsPaid-palvelun kautta. B: Taulukko maksutavoista listaa 5 maksutapaa (Paysafecard, Visa/Mastercard, Skrill/Neteller/Mifinity, Pankkisiirto, CoinPaid). The text claims seven payment methods, but the listed methods total five. A: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä Crusino Casino: 12 B: Crusino Casinon maksutavoitteiden ja maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä yhteenvetotaulukossa ja -kohdassa näkyy pienemmät lukumäärät (esim. 5–7), ei 12. The side-by-side comparison lists 12 payment service providers for Crusino, while other sections list far fewer (e.g., five payment methods), creating a numeric inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/dachbet/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus on 20 € jokaiselle bonukselle B: Syötä talletussumma, vähintään 10 euroa The bonus terms specify a minimum deposit of 20 € for each bonus, while a separate section instructs users to deposit at least 10 € for deposits in general. This creates conflicting minimum deposit requirements depending on whether a bonus is being claimed. A: Omistaja: Next Global Era Limited (Belize) B: Next Global Era N.V. (sisarsivustojen yhteydessä) as the owner The page lists Next Global Era Limited as the company owner in the Dachbet company information, but describes Next Global Era N.V. as the owner/managing entity in the sister sites section. This is a contradiction about the actual corporate entity behind the brand. A: Päivitetty: 17. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 28/01/2026 The page shows a 'last updated' date of 17 November 2025, while a separate line states the bonuses were last updated on 28 January 2026. This presents an inconsistency in the reported update timeline. | ||
/arvostelu/dazzlehand-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 40 X (talletus + bonus) B: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 30x (Talletus+Bonus) [and 35x (ilmaiskierrosta)] The article contains conflicting wagering requirements for the first deposit bonus: one section states 40x (talletus + bonus), while another section (the bonus rules table) lists 30x (talletus+bonus) and 35x (ilmaiskierrosta). This is a clear internal inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/directionbet/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus for the first deposit: 20 € (Minimitalletus 20 € in the 1. talletuksella row of the bonus section). B: Minimitalletus is 10 € (Minimitalletus: 10 € in the Kierrätysvaatimukset and a Quick facts note stating Min deposit €10). The article lists conflicting minimum deposit requirements for the first deposit: 20 € in the bonus terms table versus 10 € in the withdrawal terms/quick facts, creating an internal inconsistency. A: Minimum deposit is 1–20 € depending on payment method (stated in the 'How to deposit' section). B: First deposit minimum is 20 € (as indicated in the 1. talletuksella row of the bonus section). The deposit method–dependent minimum (1–20 €) conflicts with the explicit first-deposit minimum of 20 € shown in the bonus terms, causing another internal inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/divas-luck/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Divas Luck tervetulobonustarjous: kasinopuolen tervetulobonus on 150 % talletusbonus 4000 € asti. B: Divas Luck casino bonuskoodit & bonukset: 1. talletuksella 150% 2000 € asti. One section claims the casino welcome bonus for the casino part is up to 4000 €, while the bonus codes table lists the first-deposit cap as 2000 €, conflicting amounts. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset/bonuksen lunastuksen minimitalletus: 'Minimitalletus bonuksen lunastamiselle on 25€'. B: Bonuskoodit & bonukset taulukossa 1. talletuksella Minimitalletus on 20€ (and 2. talletuksella 20€). Two parts of the page specify different minimum deposit requirements for bonus eligibility: 25€ vs 20€. A: Divas Luck on nettikasino ilman tunnistautumista (no identity verification). B: KYC-prosessin kuvaus: henkilöllisyys on vahvistettava ja dokumentit on lähetettävä. "Without identity verification" claim conflicts with the site’s own KYC section describing mandatory identity verification. | ||
/arvostelu/dolly-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € (in the '1. talletuksella' / '2. talletuksella' / '3. talletuksella' rows under Ehdot ja säännöt). B: Minimitalletus: 10 € (in the Kierrätysvaatimukset section). The page lists conflicting minimum deposit requirements for the welcome bonus: 20 € in the bonus terms table, but 10 € in the withdrawal wagering section. A: Withdrawals are processed within three business days. B: There is an anecdote describing a withdrawal that arrived within 12 hours after approval. The article states a standard withdrawal processing time of up to 3 days, yet also includes a user anecdote of a withdrawal completed in 12 hours, creating an internal inconsistency about typical withdrawal speed. | ||
/arvostelu/dragonia/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus: 20 € One part of the page states the minimum deposit is 10 euros, while the bonus terms state the minimum deposit for the bonus is 20 euros, which is a clear numeric contradiction within the same page. | ||
/arvostelu/dreamz-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Dreamz Casinon pelien valikoima on tällä hetkellä noin 9000 peliä. B: Dreamz Casinon mobiiliversiossa on 5 500 peliä. The page presents conflicting totals for the casino's games: about 9,000 games in the desktop/general section, but 5,500 games in the mobile section, which is a clear numeric discrepancy about the same offering. | ||
/arvostelu/drip-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Pelivalikoima on yli 6 800 kappaleen edestä pelattava lähes sadalta pelivalmistajalta. B: Pelivalikoima on yli 6 000 peliä. The article gives two different figures for total games, 6,800+ and 6,000+, which cannot both be correct for the same site without clarification. A: Drip Casino live casino sisältää yli 570 peliä, joista suurin osa on Evolution Gamingin (279) ja Pragmatic Play Liven (166) kehittämiä. B: The sum of the specified live game counts (279 + 166 = 445) does not reach 570, contradicting the claim of over 570 games. The stated total and the provider-specific counts are inconsistent; the numbers don't add up to the claimed total. A: Drip Casinon tervetulobonus on 50% 300 € asti. B: Esimerkki kierrätyksen laskusta mainitsee yhteensä 200 euron edestä bonusrahaa, mikä on ristiriidassa mainitun 50%/300€-lyhkäisyn kanssa. The promotional terms imply a maximum bonus value; an example showing a 200€ bonus would exceed the implied calculation for 50% of deposits under the cap, creating a contradiction. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset esitetään 45x (Bonus) ja 35x (Ilmaiskierrokset). B: Esimerkkilaskelma käyttää 40x kierrätysvaatimusta, vaikka huomautettu kierrätysvaatimus on 45x. The example's wagering factor (40x) does not align with the stated 45x for the bonus, creating an inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/dynabet-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Live-chat is available on Dynabet Casino (customer support includes email, Live-chat and a help center; Chat-tuki avoinna vain pelitilin omaaville). B: In the Dynabetin vertailussa samankaltaisiin kasinoihin table, Live-chat Ei (No). One section states live chat is available, while the comparison table marks live chat as not available. A: Kolikkopelit on koekäyttöni aikaan tarjolla melko tasan 6 100 erilaista. B: Dynabet Casinon pelikirjastossa noin 6 500 kasinopeliä. The article lists two different counts for the number of slot games (6,100 vs 6,500). A: Kasinon lisenssi on Curacao. B: Lisenssi: Curaçao, Kahnawake (as indicated in Quick facts). License information is inconsistent: one section lists only Curacao, while another lists both Curaçao and Kahnawake. | ||
/arvostelu/el-royale/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: In the jackpot section, Mega Moolah is listed as developed by Microgaming. B: In the 'Pelivalmistajat El Royale Casinolla' section, Mega Moolah (jackpot) is listed as developed by RealTime Gaming (RTG). Mega Moolah is a Microgaming title; listing it as RTG in another section contradicts the known developer and assigns two different developers to the same game within the same page. A: Quick facts state the minimum deposit is €20. B: Other sections state the minimum deposit is €10 (e.g., 'Minimitalletus 10 €'). There is an inconsistency between the quick facts (min deposit €20) and multiple sections that specify a €10 minimum deposit, creating conflicting deposit requirements. | ||
/arvostelu/emirbet/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kierrätysvaatimukset: Jokaisella käteisbonuksen osalla sekä lisäksi myös ilmaiskierrosten voitoilla on 40x kierrätysvaatimus. B: Testasin kasinoa minimitalletuksella, ja koin tälläkin summalla kierrätyksen turhan työlääksi, kun kierrätettävää oli 1600 euroa (40 € x 40 = 1600 €). The stated rule is 40x turnover on the deposit plus bonus (Talletus+Bonus). For a 40€ deposit, the first deposit bonus would be 125% of 40€ up to 125€, i.e., 50€ bonus, giving a total of 90€ to turnover, which would require 90 x 40 = 3600€ turnover. The text's calculation of 1600€ turnover (40€ x 40) is inconsistent with the stated 40x on (deposit+bonus), creating a clear numerical contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/energy-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Päivitetty: 8. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 13/02/2026 The page shows two different last-update dates: one at the top for the overall page and another for the bonus section, which is inconsistent. A: Ekskluusivinen Bonus: Ensimmäinen talletus tuplataan 300 € asti (100% up to 300€). B: Bonukset (Energy Casinon bonuskoodit & bonukset): 1. talletuksella 100% 200 € asti + 400 ilmaiskierrosta. Two sections describe different maximum bonus amounts for the first deposit (300€ vs 200€), which cannot both be true simultaneously. A: Kierrätysvaatimus (Talletus+Bonus) 25x and kierrätysvaatimukset (ilmaiskierroksia) 15x. B: Käytännön esimerkki kierrätysvaatimuksesta and EnergyCasino vs VivaBet table: 30x (T+B) and 35x (FS). Wagering requirements conflict: the main terms say 25x for deposit+bonus and 15x for spins, while examples and a comparison table cite 30x for deposit+bonus and 35x for spins. | ||
/arvostelu/epicbet-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Epicbet tarjoaa vain yhden maksutavan, joka on Zimpler. B: Epicbet vertailussa -taulukossa: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä 3. The page states in one section that there is only one payment method (Zimpler), while a separate comparison table lists three payment providers, creating an internal inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/fairspin/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletus: 200 % bonus 2 500 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta + 5 $ ilmaisveto B: Ensitalletus: 200% bonus 2 500 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta One section shows the first-deposit offer including a $5 free bet, while another section lists the first-deposit offer without any free bet; both cannot be simultaneously true for the same bonus. A: Kotiutukset ... käsitellään usein vain 10 minuutin sisällä. B: Kotiutukseen bitcoineilla meni 45 minuuttia sen jälkeen kun tili oli vahvistettu. The general statement claims withdrawals are often processed within 10 minutes, but the text also includes a user anecdote of a Bitcoin withdrawal taking 45 minutes, which contradicts the stated typical speed. | ||
/arvostelu/fast-pay-casino/ | Issues | 7 contradictions |
A: Uusille pelaajille on tarjolla 175 % bonusrahaa 150 € asti ja 100 ilmaiskierrosta. B: Suomalaisille ei ole tervetuliaisbonusta (ei tarjottu tervetuliaisetua suomalaisille). The page states there is no welcome bonus for Finnish players, yet later describes a welcome bonus offer for new players (up to 150€ and 100 spins). A: Peliaulassa on oma kohtansa klassisille pöytäpeleille, ja sen alla on omat kategoriat rulettipeleille, korttipeleille ja pokeripeleille. B: Fastpay ei tarjoa lainkaan perinteisiä pöytäpelejä; pöytäpelikategoria sisältää pelkkiä live-pelejä. The text first describes a dedicated table games area with categories for roulette, card games, and poker, then claims there are no traditional table games and the table games category only contains live games. A: Kolikkopelikattaus sisältää noin 300 jackpot-peliä, eikä sisällä progressiivisia jättipottipelejä. B: Progressiivisten jackpot-pelien potit voivat nousta miljooniin. The page claims there are no progressive jackpots while also stating that progressive jackpots can reach millions, which is contradictory. A: Little Bighorn (Nolimit City) Fastpay RTP on 92.03%. B: Little Bighornin suositeltu RTP on 96.06%. The page lists two different RTP values for the same game, one labeled as Fastpay RTP and another as the recommended RTP. A: Walk of Shame (Nolimit City) Fastpay RTP on 92.17%. B: Walk of Shame'n suositeltu RTP on 96.04%. Two different RTP figures are shown for the same game (Fastpay RTP vs. recommended RTP). A: Blood Suckers (NetEnt) Fastpay RTP on 90.04%. B: Blood Suckers'n suositeltu RTP on 98.00%. Two different RTP values are listed for the same game, creating a discrepancy. A: Ensimmäisen VIP-tason cashbackin kierrätysvaatimus on 60x. B: Fastpay-vertailussa kierrätysvaatimukset ovat N/A (ei kierrätysvaatimuksia). One part of the text states a 60x wagering requirement for cashback, while the comparison table lists no wagering requirements for Fastpay. | ||
/arvostelu/fat-pirate-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Fat Pirate-kokemuksissa todetaan, että kasino 'toimii ilman lisenssiä'. B: Fat Pirate Casinon yrityksen tiedot: 'Lisenssi Costa Rican toimilupa (ei virallinen pelilisenssi)'. One part states the casino operates without a license, while another part states it has a Costa Rican license (described as not an official EU/ETA license), which are mutually incompatible. A: Minimitalletus on 20 € (Fat Pirate tervetulobonus - ehdot: 'Minimitalletus: 20 €'). B: Minimitalletus quick facts: 'Min deposit €10'. The page lists two different minimum deposit requirements (10 € vs 20 €), which is inconsistent. A: Kotiutukset koetaan Heikkoja ja käsittelyaika on usein pitkä (Kotiutukset: 'Käsittelyajat turhan pitkät ja nostorajat rajoittavia'). B: Kotiutuksista kerrotaan monissa Maksutavat-taulukoissa sekä Zimpler: '0-24 tuntia' ja muissa vaihtoehdoissa '1-3 päivää' -aikoja, eli kotiutukset voivat olla nopeita. There is a contradiction between describing withdrawals as slow and restrictive, and listing fast withdrawal times (e.g., 0-24 hours for some methods and 1-3 days for others). | ||
/arvostelu/fatfruit-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: KYC-dokumentit on toimitettava kahden viikon kuluessa vahvistuspyynnöstä. B: Tilini vahvistettiin kahdeksassa tunnissa. The policy states a two-week deadline to submit required KYC documents, while a personal account verification was completed in eight hours, which conflicts with the stated deadline. | ||
/arvostelu/felicebet-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Vähimmäistalletus tervetulobonuksen saamiseksi on 20 € tai vastaava summa kryptovaluutassa. B: Minimitalletus on 10 € (Min deposit€10). The page simultaneously states a 20 € minimum deposit (for the welcome bonus) and a 10 € minimum deposit in the Quick Facts, which is a direct numeric inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/festival-play/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Yli 5 000 peliä & laaja live-kasino B: Noin 1 000+ peliä The article lists two conflicting figures for the total number of games: over 5,000 in one section and about 1,000+ in another, which is a direct contradiction about the size of Festival Play's game library. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset 40x (Talletus+Bonus) B: Talletuksissa on 5-kertainen kierrätysvaatimus The page simultaneously states a 40x wagering requirement on the deposit plus bonus, and later claims a 5x wagering requirement on deposits, which is inconsistent. A: Minimitalletus 20 € B: Minimitalletus 10 € The minimum deposit is shown as 20 € in the bonus rules/table, but elsewhere (quick facts/deposit instructions) it is stated as 10 €, creating a clear inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/fezbet/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: FEZbet Casinon maksutavat: ainoana maksutapana Zimpler B: Fezbet vertailussa samankaltaisiin kasinoihin: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä 17 The site claims Zimpler is the only payment method, but the comparison table lists 17 payment service providers, indicating multiple methods. | ||
/arvostelu/fire-spin/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: The 'Fire Spin Casinon yrityksen tiedot' section lists the license as 'Viro (EMTA)' with license numbers HKL000400 and HKT000071, and the address as Curacao (Korporaalweg 10, Willemstad). B: The Quick facts section lists the license as 'LisenssiViro, Curaçao', implying a Curaçao license, and the 'Osoite' in the Fire Spin Casinon tiedot is a Curacao address, which contradicts the EMTA Estonia license. The page presents conflicting licensing jurisdictions (Estonia EMTA vs Curaçao) and a Curacao address in different sections, which is an explicit inconsistency about the casino's licensing information. A: The page states that Fire Spin has only one payment method in Finland: Briten online bank transfer. B: In the 'Fire Spin vertailussa samankaltaisiin kasinoihin' table, the row 'Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä' shows '3', implying three payment providers. Two sections of the page disagree on how many payment providers the casino uses. A: Customer service is available 24/7 in multiple languages, including Finnish. B: In the 'Fire Spin vertailussa samankaltaisiin kasinoihin' table, the row 'Suomenkielinen sivu' for Fire Spin is listed as 'Ei' (no Finnish page). There is a direct contradiction about whether a Finnish-language page or Finnish support exists. | ||
/arvostelu/flamez-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletus 20 € B: Minimitalletus 10 € The page inconsistently states the minimum deposit: 20 € in the bonus/terms section but 10 € in quick facts / other tables. | ||
/arvostelu/flappy/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: VIP-cashback (present in the 'Plussat' section as a positive feature of Flappy). B: In the 'Flappy Casino vertailussa' table, the 'Käteispalautus' cell says 'Ei cashback-bonusta' (no cashback bonus). The page simultaneously asserts that Flappy offers VIP cashback and that there is no cashback bonus, which is inconsistent. A: Lisenssi listed in Quick facts: 'Lisenssi: Curaçao, Costa Rica' (license includes two jurisdictions). B: In the 'Lisenssit ja turvallisuus' section, the license is shown as 'Lisenssi: Curacao' with a license number, implying only Curacao license. The page inconsistently states licensing: quick facts list two jurisdictions (Curaçao and Costa Rica), while another section lists only Curaçao. | ||
/arvostelu/foggybet/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Min deposit€20 B: Minimitalletus 25 € The page lists multiple minimum deposit figures (20€ in Quick Facts and 25€ for the first deposit in a table), creating an inconsistency about the actual minimum deposit requirement. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset 35x (Talletus+Bonus) B: Kierrätysvaatimus: 30X Two different wagering requirements are stated for welcome bonuses on the same page (35x for the standard bonus vs 30x for the welcome offer), which is contradictory. A: Ensitalletusbonus 100% 250 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta B: FoggyBet tervetulobonus tarjous: 4 000 € asti sekä 4 000 ilmaiskierrosta The page lists two markedly different primary welcome bonuses (250€ up to with 50 spins vs up to 4,000€ with 4,000 spins) without a clear distinction that they apply to different product categories, leading to an ambiguous and conflicting overall welcome bonus offer. | ||
/arvostelu/fortune-panda/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Min deposit€20 B: Pelaamisen aloittaminen oikeiden varojen turvin onnistuu Fortune pandalla 5–20 euron minimitalletuksella riippuen hieman siitä, mitä maksutapaa käytät; esimerkkinä Jeton Cashin mininosto 5 €, Revolution 20 € One part of the page states a fixed minimum deposit of €20, while another part describes a variable minimum depending on payment method, including as low as €5 with Jeton Cash (and €20 for Revolution). This is an explicit inconsistency. A: Voitoista ei peritä veroja B: Sinun tulee maksaa voitoistasi veroja (veronmaksu riippuu Curaçao-lisenssistä), eli voitoista ei ole verovapaa The page first claims winnings are tax-free, then later states that taxes must be paid on winnings due to Curaçao licensing, creating a direct contradiction about tax obligations. | ||
/arvostelu/free-spinza/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Progressiivisia jackpot-pelejä ei ollut lainkaan tarjolla. B: Divine Fortune Black sisältää 20 000x päävoiton. The article states that progressive jackpot games were not available, but later describes a game (Divine Fortune Black) that offers a large fixed payout (20,000x), implying jackpot potential contrary to the earlier claim. A: Kotiutukset voivat kestää 1 - 3 arkipäivää. B: Kotiutukset käsitellään yleensä 24–48 tunnin sisällä arkipäivisin. Two different withdrawal timeframes are given: 1-3 business days in the deposit/withdrawal table, and 24-48 hours in another section, which is inconsistent. A: Minimitalletus 20 €. B: Minimitalletus 25 €. Two parts of the article list different minimum deposit amounts (20 € in Quick Facts vs 25 € in the payments section), which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/frenzino-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus: 125% bonus 400 € asti B: Uusille pelaajille on luvassa iso tervetuliaistarjous eli yhteensä 205 % talletusbonus jopa 1 200€ asti The page presents two different first-deposit welcome bonus structures: 125% up to 400€ and a total welcome bonus of 205% up to 1,200€, which cannot both be true at the same time. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 30x (Talletus+Bonus) B: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 35x (t+b) Wagering requirements for the bonus are shown as 30x in the rules section and 35x in the dedicated wagering requirements section, creating an inconsistency. A: Minimitalletus 25 € (as stated in the bonus rules section for the first/second/third deposit) B: Minimitalletus: 25 € The page lists a minimum deposit of 25 euros in the bonus terms, but the quick facts and other sections also imply different minimums elsewhere; this is an internal inconsistency regarding the required minimum deposit. A: Over 13,000 games B: 15,428 games Two different totals are given for the number of games (over 13,000 versus 15,428), which cannot both be correct. | ||
/arvostelu/fresh-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Fresh Casinolla on 8-tasoinen VIP-ohjelma. B: Fresh Casino vertailussa -taulukossa VIP-ohjelma kohdassa on 'Ei'. One part of the article claims an eight-tier VIP program exists, while the comparison table asserts there is no VIP program, which is directly contradictory. A: Fresh Casinon pelivalikoima on yli 7 700 peliä. B: Fresh Casinon pelivalikoima on noin 1 000 kappaleen edestä pelattavaa. Two different figures are given for the number of games (7,700+ vs 1,000), which cannot both be true. A: Fresh Casinon pelivalikoima on yli 7 700 peliä. B: Fresh Casinon pelivalikoima on 8 000+ peliä. Two separate sections claim different game counts for Fresh Casino (7,700+ in one place and 8,000+ in another), a direct numerical inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/fruity-king-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: In the Fruity King vs Pelikioski comparison table, the Fruity King welcome bonus is listed as 200% up to 50 € + 10 FS. B: In the Fruity King bonus section, the Fruity King welcome bonus is listed as 100% up to 100 € + 50 ilmaiskierrosta. These two entries describe different welcome bonus structures for Fruity King (different percentage, cap, and number of free spins), which is a direct internal contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/frumzi/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Frumzi Casino was founded in 2019. B: Frumzi Casino was founded in 2020. The article states two different founding years for Frumzi: 2019 in one section and 2020 in the 'Perustettu' field and related comparisons. A: Frumzi's license is Curaçao eGaming. B: Frumzi's license is Curaçao, Anjouan Gaming License. Licensing is inconsistently described: one part lists only Curaçao eGaming, while another part lists two licenses (Curaçao and Anjouan Gaming License). A: Withdrawal processing time is three business days. B: Withdrawals were processed in 14 hours and funds arrived in two days. There are conflicting withdrawal timelines: a general claim of 3 business days versus an anecdotal report of Skrill withdrawals being processed in 14 hours and arriving in 2 days. A: Minimum deposit for the welcome bonus is 20 €. B: Minimum deposit for the welcome bonus is 10 €. The welcome bonus section lists a 20 € minimum deposit, while another section (and the quick facts) indicate 10 € as the minimum deposit. | ||
/arvostelu/fruta/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/fun-bet-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: There are over 18,500 games (the article states 'yli 18 500 pelillä'). B: Later in the pelivalikoima section, it claims there are over 18,700 games ('yli 18 700 nimikkeen pelikirjaston'). The text gives two different total counts for the number of games offered (18,500 vs 18,700), which is inconsistent. A: Minimum deposit is 10 € (Min deposit€10) according to the Quick Facts. B: Minimum deposit is 20 € (Minimitalletus 20 €) in the 'Rules and Regulations' section. Two different minimum deposit amounts are stated in different sections of the page (10 vs 20 euros). A: KYC checks are completed within ten days (KYC-tarkistukset... kymmenen päivän sisällä). B: If documents are not uploaded after thirty days, the account is closed (30 päivässä pelitili suljetaan). The page presents conflicting timelines for KYC: one states checks are completed within 10 days, while another implies a 30-day window before potential account closure. | ||
/arvostelu/galactic-wins/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Minimitalletus on 5 euroa The article states two conflicting minimum deposit requirements: 20 EUR in the terms section vs 5 EUR in the payments section. A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus: 20 € The quick facts specify a minimum deposit of 10 EUR, while another section lists 20 EUR as the minimum deposit, creating an additional inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/gama/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Gama Casino is licensed by Curaçao. B: Gama Casino has no license (Lisenssi: Ei lisenssiä). The page's Quick Facts claim lists a Curaçao license, while the Licenses and Safety section explicitly states that the casino operates without a license. A: Withdrawals under 1,000 EUR are processed within 24 hours (and larger withdrawals within 72 hours). B: FAQ claims no fast withdrawals and that withdrawals can take weeks. There is a direct conflict between a stated 24–72 hour processing window and an FAQ assertion that withdrawals are not fast and can take several weeks. A: Customer support is available via 24/7 live chat. B: Chat only features a Russian-language bot with no live agents. One section claims 24/7 live chat support, while another describes the chat as only automated in Russian, with no actual agents available. A: Minimum deposit is €10 (Min deposit €10). B: Welcome bonus terms require a minimum deposit of €15 or €40 depending on the bonus. The page lists a €10 minimum deposit in the Quick Facts, but the bonus section specifies minimum deposits of €15 or €40, depending on the chosen bonus. | ||
/arvostelu/gambloria-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Lisenssinnumero ALSI-202411061-FI2 B: Lisenssinnumero ALSI-182407008-FI1 The page lists two different license numbers for Gambloria Casino, indicating an inconsistency in licensing details. A: Minimitalletus bonuksen aktivointiin: 20 € B: Minimitalletus: 10 € The page shows conflicting minimum deposit requirements: 20 € for activating the welcome bonus versus a 10 € minimum deposit stated in Quick Facts. A: support@gambloria.com B: Sähköpostisupport@gambloria.com Two different support email addresses are listed on the page, creating inconsistency in contact information. | ||
/arvostelu/gemler-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Gemler Casino tarjoaa yli 1 900 peliä. B: Gemler Casinolla on 1 650 kolikkopeliä. The page simultaneously claims the total number of games is over 1,900 and that there are 1,650 slot games, which is inconsistent about the overall game count versus the slot count. A: Minimikotiutus on 10 € (Min deposit€10). B: Ensitalletus on 20–1 000 euroa. Two different minimum deposit figures are stated in different sections (€10 in Quick Facts vs €20–€1,000 for the first deposit), creating a direct inconsistency. A: Live-pelit (+150). B: Live-kasinon 175 peliä. Two different counts are given for live dealer games in separate parts of the page, which is inconsistent. A: Games Globalin jackpot-pelit puuttuvat. B: Progressiivisia jackpot-pelejä on ainakin Volatile Vikings 2 Dream Drop (Relax Gaming). The text asserts that Games Global jackpot games are missing, yet it also mentions a progressive jackpot game (Volatile Vikings 2 Dream Drop), which contradicts the claim that jackpot games are absent. | ||
/arvostelu/gg-bet/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: GG Betin omistaa Invicta Networks N.V, mutta sitä operoi Brivio Limited. B: GG Bet -sivustoa operoi ja sen omistaa nykyäään River Entertainment B.V. The page presents conflicting statements about ownership and operation: one says Invicta Networks N.V owns the site and Brivio Limited operates it, while another states River Entertainment B.V. owns and operates it. A: tasa 'tervetulobonuksen kokonaisarvo voi olla jopa 3 000 € bonusrahaa ja 900 ilmaiskierrosta' (kasinon tervetulobonus/bonuspaketti). B: Kasinon tervetuliaisbonus: Talletus 1: 150 % 500 € asti + 20 ilmaiskierrosta; Talletus 2: 120 % 200 € asti + 25 ilmaiskierrosta; Talletus 3: 120 % 200 € asti + 25 ilmaiskierrosta; Talletus 4: 120 % 200 € asti + 25 ilmaiskierrosta; Talletus 5: 120 % 200 € asti + 25 ilmaiskierrosta; Talletus 6: 60 ilmaiskierrosta; Talletus 7: 125 % 500 € asti. The page first claims a maximum of 3,000 € in bonus money and 900 free spins for the casino welcome package, or 1,000 € for bets with 250 € in free bets. However, the detailed seven-deposit welcome package sums to about 2,335 € in cash bonuses and around 180 free spins, not the claimed totals, indicating an inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/go-kong-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus 20 € The article simultaneously states a minimum deposit of 10 euros in the Quick facts, but also states a minimum deposit of 20 euros for the welcome bonus; additionally, the deposit-methods section lists a minimum deposit of 10 euros for many methods, creating inconsistent minimum deposit requirements. | ||
/arvostelu/god-of-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Early autumn 2025 launch with claims of up to €1,000 in bonuses and 300 free spins on first deposits. B: First deposit bonuses are limited to up to €300 casino bonus + 50 free spins (or €100 for sports) according to the official promo details. There is a direct conflict between the initial claim of up to €1,000 in bonuses and 300 free spins and the documented first-deposit offers, which cap at €300 plus 50 free spins (or €100 for sports). A: Minimum deposit is listed as €10 in Quick Facts. B: Other sections state a minimum deposit of €20 for bonuses and deposits. Different sections of the page disagree on the minimum deposit (€10 versus €20), creating an internal inconsistency. A: The site advertises a daily jackpot payout cap of €100,000. B: Some jackpot slots (e.g., 1 Million Book and Millionaire Mystery Box) are described as potentially offering jackpots well above €100,000. A daily €100,000 jackpot cap contradicts the claim that certain jackpot games can pay out amounts clearly over €100,000. | ||
/arvostelu/gold-roll/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: The page header indicates 'Ilman rekisteröintiä' (without registration). B: Gold Roll Casinolle pitää ensin rekisteröityä, jotta näkee pelivalikoiman sekä muun tarjonnan (you must register to view the game library). The page both claims you can play without registration and also states you must register to view the game lineup, which is a direct conflict about whether registration is required. A: KYC/proof of identity verification can take up to 5 days. B: KYC verification was completed in 2 days. The article contains conflicting statements about the time required for KYC: one mentions a maximum of 5 days, while a quoted user experience says it was completed in 2 days. A: Gold Roll offers a welcome bonus of up to 1,000 free spins (with no wagering). B: This welcome bonus is no longer available for Finnish players. The text first describes a welcome bonus of up to 1,000 free spins, but later states that this bonus is not available to Finnish players, creating a contradiction regarding eligibility. | ||
/arvostelu/golden-star/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus: 30 € B: Minimitalletus: 20 € The article lists 30 € as the minimum deposit for the first deposit bonus in one place, but elsewhere (including license/bonus sections) lists 20 € as the minimum deposit, creating an inconsistency. A: Lisenssi: Curaçao B: Lisenssi: Curaçao, Viro The licensing is described as Curaçao-only in the main safety section, while the quick facts summary states Curaçao and Estonia as licensable jurisdictions, a contradiction. A: Miinukset: Ei suomenkielistä käännöstä B: Sivut sisältävät suomenkielistä sisältöä ja tukipalveluita (esim. 24/7 suomenkielinen chat), eli suomenkielinen käännös ei puutu. One section claims there is no Finnish translation, while other parts of the page are in Finnish and describe Finnish support, which is inconsistent. A: Pelit hyödykkeet: noin 4 000 nimikkeen edestä pelattavaa B: Pelit: yli 10 000 kasinopeliä The article alternates between claiming about 4,000 games and over 10,000 games, which is a clear internal inconsistency. A: Päivitetty: 3. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 17/02/2026 Two different last-update dates are given for the page and the bonus information, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/goldenbet/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Lisenssi Curaçao (Lisenssi Curaçao) is listed in the Quick facts section. B: Lisenssi Anjouan (Anjouan lisenssi) is stated in the Licenses and safety section. The article assigns Goldenbet a license from two different jurisdictions (Curaçao in Quick facts and Anjouan in the Licenses section), creating an explicit contradiction about the site's licensing authority. A: Goldenbet offers unlimited (rajaton) 10% cashback. B: Cashback value limit €500 is stated in the Quick facts. One part of the text claims the cashback is unlimited, while another part specifies a €500 cashback limit, which is a direct inconsistency. A: Customer support email listed as support@goldenbet.email in the 'Asiakaspalvelu' section. B: Customer support email listed as support@goldenbet.com (appears in the comparison table and Quick facts). The article provides multiple, conflicting support email addresses, creating ambiguity about the correct contact channel. | ||
/arvostelu/goldiwin-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus: 100% 200 € asti + 100 ilmaiskierrosta B: Kasinobonus: 325 % talletusbonus 1 150 euroon asti + 300 ilmaiskierrosta The page describes two different welcome bonuses for new players: one offering a 100% match up to €200 with 100 free spins, and another offering a 325% match up to €1,150 with 300 free spins. Both cannot be simultaneously valid. A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Minimitalletus: 10 € The page lists conflicting minimum deposit amounts: 20 € in the bonus rules, but 10 € in the Quick facts section. | ||
/arvostelu/goldzino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: The Quick facts section lists the license as 'Lisenssi Costa Rica, Anjouan Gaming License' (Costa Rica plus Anjouan). B: The verotus section states the license is Anjouan-lisenssi (Anjouan Gaming License) and discusses tax implications for Finnish players. The page presents two different licensing statements: one mentions a license in Costa Rica in addition to Anjouan Gaming License, while another section asserts the license is Anjouan only; this is inconsistent. A: Customer support email listed in the 'Asiakaspalvelu' section is support@goldzino.com. B: The 'Lähteet' section lists a different support email contact@goldzino.com. Two different support email addresses are shown for Goldzino on the same page, creating an inconsistency in contact information. | ||
/arvostelu/goslot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Vaikka talletustapoja on useita, kotiutukseen käyvät vain Coinspaid, kryptorahat ja välitön tilisiirto. B: Talletusten, kotiutusten ja maksujen maailmassa GoSlot listaa useita talletus- ja nostotapoja (esim. Verkkopankki RAPID Transfer, Instant Banking; Prepaid-kortit; Maksukortit; E-lompakot; Kryptovaluutat), mikä viittaa siihen, että kotiutuksissa on käytössä monipuolisia menetelmiä eikä vain Coinspaid, kryptot ja välitön tilisiirto. The text explicitly claims withdrawals are limited to Coinspaid, cryptocurrencies, and instant bank transfer, but elsewhere it lists a broad set of withdrawal/payment options (including bank transfers, e-wallets, and other methods), creating a direct contradiction about which methods can be used for withdrawals. | ||
/arvostelu/grandwin/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Omistaja: Next Global Era Limited (as listed in the GrandWin perustiedot table). B: Kuka omistaa GrandWinin? GrandWinin omistaa Bellona N.V. The page lists two different owners in separate sections, which cannot both be correct. A: Tervetulobonuksella on yhteensä 350% bonus ja enintään 1200 € (neljän talletuksen paketissa). B: FAQ claims the four-deposit welcome package offers up to 1000 € with 350% bonus. Two different maximum bonus amounts are stated for the same four-deposit package (1200 € vs 1000 €). A: Minimitalletus ( bonus terms ) = 20 €. B: Minimitalletus (quick facts) = 10 €. The page presents conflicting minimum deposit amounts for deposits/bonus eligibility within the same site. A: GrandWinillä on VIP-kanta-asiakasohjelma, joka on kutsusta / by invitation only. B: GrandWin vertailussa samankaltaisiin kasinoihin -taulukossa kohteelle VIP-ohjelma = Ei (no VIP program). The article states there is a VIP program by invitation, while the comparison table marks that GrandWin has no VIP program. | ||
/arvostelu/gransino-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimum deposit for the welcome bonus is 20 EUR. B: Minimum deposit without a bonus is 10 EUR. The article states different minimum deposit amounts depending on bonus status: 20 EUR to claim the welcome bonus, but 10 EUR is the minimum deposit without any bonus. A: Wagering requirement for deposits in general is 1x. B: Wagering requirements for the welcome bonus are 35x (deposit+bonus) and 40x (free spins). There is an inconsistency where one section claims a 1x wagering requirement for deposits, while the bonus terms claim 35x and 40x wagering requirements for bonuses. A: Gransino has over 10,000 games. B: Gransino has over 13,000 games. Different parts of the article report different total game counts (10,000+ vs 13,000+), creating a numerical inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/gratowin/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: This Curaçao license-operated site (GratoWin operates under a Curaçao license). B: The Quick facts box lists the license as Kahnawake (LisenssiKahnawake). The page asserts Curaçao as the licensing jurisdiction in the main content, but the Quick facts box lists Kahnawake as the license; these are two different gambling licensing authorities. | ||
/arvostelu/greatwin/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Ilman rekisteröintiä B: Rekisteröityminen vaaditaan, vaikka Zimpler on käytössä. The page simultaneously suggests the casino can be used without registration and that registration is required, which is a direct inconsistency. A: Kasinon lisenssi on Anjouan Gaming License (Anjouan license) as listed in Quick Facts. B: Kasinolla on Viron lisenssi ja Curacaon lisenssi (Estonian and Curacao licenses) per FAQ, and operator is Estolio Limited with Rabidi N.V. mention, contradicting the Anjouan license claim. The page presents conflicting licensing information: Anjouan license vs Estonian/Curacao licenses, and conflicting operator/licensing references. A: Maksimikotiutus vuorokaudessa 500 € (maximum withdrawal per day is 500 €). B: Kotiutuksissa rajat vaihtelevat 10–5000 € (withdrawal limits range from 10€ to 5,000€) with VIP variations. The page states conflicting withdrawal limits: one section specifies a flat 500 € per day cap, another states daily limits can reach up to 5,000 €, creating an explicit numerical inconsistency. A: Minimitalletus (minimum deposit) for the site: 10 € (as per Quick Facts). B: Minimitalletus for the bonus terms is 20 € (as per Kierrätysvaatimukset section). The page lists different minimum deposit requirements for general play (10 €) and for bonus eligibility (20 €), which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/happy-spins/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Happy Spins is a Pay N Play casino that lets you play immediately without registration. B: Account creation is required for real-money play. The page claims both that Happy Spins is a Pay N Play casino (no registration needed) and that a real-money account must be created, which are incompatible statements. A: There is no official loyalty program (VIP program) for Happy Spins. B: VIP players can be entitled to higher withdrawal limits, implying a VIP program exists. One section states there is no official loyalty program, while another part hints at or implies a VIP program with higher withdrawal limits, creating inconsistency. A: Withdrawal limits are up to 40,000 EUR per month and 10,000 EUR per week. B: In the comparison section, Happy Spins is described as having a withdrawal limit of 1,000 EUR per withdrawal (implying a much lower limit). The article simultaneously states very high withdrawal caps and, in a separate section, claims a much lower limit of 1,000 EUR, which is contradictory. | ||
/arvostelu/happyslotscom-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: In the Quick facts section: LisenssiViro, Curaçao, Kahnawake (listing three licenses: Estonia, Curaçao, and Kahnawake). B: In the Licensing section: the license is stated as Viron lisenssi (Estonian license) and discusses verification via Emta.ee, implying a single Estonian license. The page simultaneously attributes multiple licenses in one part and a single Estonian license in another part, which is inconsistent about the operator's licensing. | ||
/arvostelu/helmi/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Welcome bonus offers 250 ilmaiskierrosta for Mermaid's Treasure Trove B: Welcome bonus offers 200 ilmaiskierrosta in the Helmi Casino comparison table The page presents two different welcome bonus amounts for new customers (250 free spins in one section vs 200 free spins in a comparison table), which cannot both be correct. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 20x (ilmaiskierrosta) for the welcome bonus B: Kierrätysvaatimus: 40x for the welcome bonus (as shown in the Helmi row of the comparison table) The page lists conflicting wagering requirements for the welcome bonus: 20x in one section and 40x in another, creating an explicit inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/hexabet-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Lisenssi Curaçao, Costa Rica B: Lisenssi: Curacao The page inconsistently states licensing: one part lists both Curaçao and Costa Rica as licenses, while another part lists only Curaçao. Costa Rica is not a recognized online gambling licensing jurisdiction, so these claims contradict each other regarding the site's licensure. | ||
/arvostelu/heycasino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: HeyCasino on SpectraWeb Services SRL:n operoima pelipaikka. B: HeyCasino käynnistettiin Damagi Marketing Solutions B.V.:n toimesta. The page attributes HeyCasino to different entities as operator/founder (SpectraWeb Services SRL vs Damagi Marketing Solutions B.V.), which is inconsistent. A: Current license is Curacao Gaming Commission (Lisenssi: Curacao Gaming Commission). B: Quick facts list licenses as 'Kahnawake, Curaçao' (Lisenssi: Kahnawake, Curaçao). The article states Curacao as the current license but also lists Kahnawake as part of the license in Quick Facts, creating a contradiction about the licensing jurisdiction. A: Minimitalletus on 20 € (Minimitalletus 20 €). B: First deposit minimum is 10 € (Ensimmäisen talletuksen vähintään 10 €). Two different minimum deposit figures are given for HeyCasino: 20 € in the bonus table and 10 € in the bonus redemption steps. | ||
/arvostelu/highroller-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Perustettu: 2022 B: Lisenssi EMTA (HKL000374 valid 17.12.2021 – 17.12.2026, HKT000063 granted 4.11.2021) / Viron EMTA-lisenssi The page states the casino was founded in 2022, but also lists EMTA license numbers with validity dating back to 2021, implying licensing before the stated founding year. A: Käytössä on vain Zimpler maksutapa B: Myös Revolut-pankki sopii tilin avaamiseen ja talletuksen tekemiseen The section claims there is only one payment method (Zimpler), yet separately states that Revolut also can be used, which is a direct contradiction. A: Minimi: talletus 20 €, kotiutus 4 000 € B: Maksimi: talletus 20 €, kotiutus 4 000 € The quick table shows the minimum and maximum amounts in a conflicting way, effectively implying inconsistent minimum withdrawal values within the same section (deposit min 20 €, withdrawal min 4,000 € in the 'Minimi' row and the same in the 'Maksimi' row), creating an internal contradiction about limits. | ||
/arvostelu/hillo/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Talletusta tehdessä vain 1 € talletus menee läpi The article states a 1 € deposit can go through, but also lists the minimum deposit as 20 €, which directly contradicts. A: Kasinon lisenssi on Viron lisenssi (EMTA) i.e. Estonian license. B: Osoite: Willemstad, Curacao, implying Curaçao registration for the operator. The page claims an Estonian license but lists a Curacao address for the operator, which is inconsistent and mutually exclusive with holding a genuine Estonian license. A: Yleisissä ehdoissa nostopyynnöille useiden päivien odotusaika. B: Kotiutukset maksetaan käytännössä lähes välittömästi, esimerkiksi 1 h. The general terms claim withdrawal times can be days, while the text also states withdrawals are typically instant (1 hour), which is a direct internal contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/hit-me-bet-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Hit me bet Casino claims 'Yhteensä tarjolla on 250 % bonus aina 2 000 € asti ja jopa 250 ilmaiskierrosta'. B: The detailed three-deposit bonus schedule specifies: 1st deposit 100% up to 500€ + 50 FS; 2nd deposit 50% up to 500€ + 100 FS; 3rd deposit 100% up to 1000€ + 100 FS (total bonus cash = 1,750€ and total FS = 250). The stated total bonus of up to 2,000€ conflicts with the sum of the three deposit bonuses (500€ + 250€ + 1000€ = 1,750€), so the 'up to 2,000€' figure is inconsistent with the explicit bonus schedule. A: Minimitalletus on €10 (Min deposit €10) according to Quick Facts. B: Bonus terms state a minimum deposit of €20 to qualify for the welcome bonus. There is an inconsistency between the stated general minimum deposit (€10) and the higher minimum deposit (€20) required to trigger the welcome bonus. A: Osoite: Ave Pastor Diaz, Puntarenas, Costa Rica (Costa Rica address). B: Lisenssi: Anjouan Autonomous Island Government license (Comoros) – license jurisdiction not matching the listed address. The site shows a physical address in Costa Rica while the license is issued by Anjouan in the Comoros; the jurisdiction/address do not align, indicating inconsistent or dubious corporate information. | ||
/arvostelu/hotloot-casino/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: LisenssiCosta Rica, Curaçao B: Lisenssi: Curacao Gaming Control Board The page lists licensing as 'Costa Rica, Curaçao' in the Quick Facts, but later states the license isCuracao Gaming Control Board, indicating conflicting licensing authorities. A: Ensitalletusbonus 100% 250 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta B: 1. talletus: 150% talletusbonus 2 000 € asti (and the three-tiers described under 'Tervetulobonukset') The page presents two different welcome bonus structures: an initial 100% up to 250€ + 50 spins, and later a three-offer welcome scheme including 150% up to 2000€, 100% up to 2000€, and 250% up to 4000 free spins, which cannot all be valid simultaneously. A: Hotloot Casino ilmoitti asiakastukensa palvelevan ympäri vuorokauden sähköpostitse sekä suoraan kasinosivulta avautuvan chat-pikaviestisovelluksen kautta. B: Chat-tukipalvelu ei ollut saatavilla viikonloppuisin. The page claims 24/7 live chat and email support, but a user experience note within the page states that chat support was unavailable on weekends, creating a conflict between claimed and experienced support availability. A: Maksimivoitto 5000 € vuorokaudessa B: Suurin sallittu nosto on 500 € vuorokaudessa The page lists a maximum daily win of 5,000€ but also imposes a daily withdrawal cap of 500€, which can be seen as inconsistent since one allows much larger potential winnings than can be withdrawn in a day. A: Päivitetty: 15. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 09/02/2026 Two different update timestamps are shown: the page itself is dated December 15, 2025, while the 'Bonus updated last' line lists February 9, 2026, creating a chronological inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/hugo-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus on 5–20 euron välillä. B: Talleta 20–50 euroa, riippuen haluatko ilmaiskierroksia bonuksen päälle. One section states a minimum deposit of 5–20 €, while another instructs depositing 20–50 € to qualify for the welcome bonus, creating a direct inconsistency about the minimum deposit. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 45x (Bonus) (ja 45x kierrätysvaatimus ilmaiskierroksille) B: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 70x (B) The bonus section lists wagering requirements as 45x for bonuses (and 45x for free spins), but another section claims 70x for welcome bonuses, a direct contradiction. A: Päivitetty: 2. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 29/01/2026 Two different last-update dates are shown for Hugo Casino on the same page, implying inconsistent update metadata (2025-12-02 vs 2026-01-29). | ||
/arvostelu/hurmio-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus 89 ilmaiskierrosta B: Hurmiolla ei ole lainkaan tervetuliaisbonust The page header lists an 'Ensitalletusbonus 89 ilmaiskierrosta' ( welcome bonus of 89 free spins ), while the 'Hurmio Casino tervetulobonus' section states that there is no welcome bonus at all. This is a direct contradiction about whether a welcome bonus exists. A: Minimitalletus 1 € B: Minimitalletus 20 € Two different minimum deposit amounts are stated in separate sections: 1 € in the Pay N Play / deposit steps, and 20 € in the terms and conditions. This inconsistency creates a conflicting requirement for the minimum deposit. | ||
/arvostelu/ibet/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kotiutusten viive (Skrill, Trustly, RAPID Transfer) | Nopein (välitön) B: Laura Korhonen – Sisällöntuottaja: "Testasin nostoa Skrillillä, ja pyyntö hyväksyttiin 14 tunnissa – nopeampaa kuin kasinon arvio (0–1 h e‑lompakoille, mutta selvästi parempi kuin pankkisiirroilla, jotka saattavat viedä 1–5 päivää)" The withdrawal time table lists Skrill withdrawals as immediate, but a testimonial reports a Skrill withdrawal taking 14 hours, which contradicts the stated instant withdrawal claim. | ||
/arvostelu/ice-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Vuonna 2012 avattu Ice Casino B: on ilahduttanut pelaajia toistakymmentä vuotta The text states Ice Casino was opened in 2012 and that it has delighted players for over twenty years. However, from 2012 to 2025 is about 13 years, not over twenty, creating a contradiction between the stated opening year and the claimed duration. | ||
/arvostelu/icebet-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: The page header/label states 'Ilman rekisteröintiä' (without registration). B: The article later describes that registration is required (e.g., 'sivustolla voi pelata pikana ilman rekisteröitymistä' and 'rekisteröityminen tapahtuu nopeasti' with the account opening in minutes). There is a direct inconsistency between a header claiming 'no registration' and content indicating that registration is required to access the casino features. A: The 'Asiakaspalvelu' section is presented as 'FAQ Suomen/Englanti' support (Finnish/English). B: The narrative text states 'asiakaspalvelu on vain englanniksi' (customer service is only in English). The page asserts Finnish and English FAQ support, but also claims customer service is English-only, which is contradictory. | ||
/arvostelu/immerion-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: VIP-ohjelma: Ei B: VIP program exists with highroller invitations and benefits (e.g., 'By staying active on our platform, you're already on the path to VIP status. Once you meet our criteria, we'll personally reach out to extend your VIP invitation.') One section claims there is no VIP program, while another section describes a VIP program with invitation-based status and benefits. A: Min deposit€10 B: Talletukset: Min. 5 € / Max. 18 000 € Minimum deposit is listed as 10 in the quick facts, but elsewhere it is listed as 5, creating a direct numerical contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/insta-slots/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Päivittäinen 10 % käteispalautus B: Viikoittainen käteispalautus 10 % kolikkopeleissä koetuista nettotappioista The page states cashback is daily in one place and weekly in another, which cannot both be true. A: Päivitetty: 18. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 03/02/2026 Two different last-update dates are shown for the same content, creating a conflicting timeline. | ||
/arvostelu/iwild-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus 200% 1000 € asti + 100 ilmaiskierrosta B: iWild Casino tervetulobonus tarjous: yhteensä 550% talletusbonus 4000 € asti ja 400 ilmaiskierrosta The page lists conflicting welcome bonus figures: one section states a single-deposit bonus of 200% up to €1000 plus 100 spins, while another section claims a total welcome package of 550% up to €4000 and 400 spins. Additionally, a deposit-by-deposit breakdown later sums to 360% (200% + 50% + 30% + 80%) rather than 550%, creating internal inconsistency. A: Kotiutuspyynnöt käsitellään yleensä tunnin sisällä, eikä käsittely vie hitaimmillakaan kuin 24 tuntia. B: Kotiutusaika 1–2 päivää (taulukossa iWildin vertailussa). Withdrawal processing is claimed to be typically within one hour and never more than 24 hours, but a comparison table lists withdrawal time as 1–2 days, creating a clear contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/jackbit/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Tarjolla on tuhansia vedonlyöntikohteita sekä yli 6 100 kasinopeliä B: Pelien määrä 6 000+ The page asserts two different totals for the same attribute (JackBit's game catalog): over 6,100 casino games in one section and 6,000+ games in the comparison table. This is a clear internal numerical contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/jackburst-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Käteispalautus Ei cashback-bonusta B: VIP-ohjelman kohdassa kerrotaan cashback-etuja: esimerkiksi Taso 2 sisältää '2 % cashback' (2% cashback) The page states in the general 'Cashback' field that there is no cashback bonus, but elsewhere in the VIP program it describes cashback benefits (e.g., 2% cashback at Tier 2), which is a direct contradiction about cashback availability. | ||
/arvostelu/jackpot-city-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: The Quick Facts section lists licenses: Alderney Gambling Control Commission, Kahnawake. B: In Jackpot City Casino yrityksen tiedot, lisenssit: Kahnawake Gaming Commission (only). One part of the page attributes both Alderney and Kahnawake licenses, while the company info section lists only the Kahnawake license, creating an internal inconsistency about the casino's licensing. A: In the Jackpot City vertailussa samankaltaisiin kasinoihin table, Suomenkielinen sivu: Ei. B: The page itself is written in Finnish (Finnish-language content throughout). The comparison table states there is no Finnish-language site for Jackpot City, but the article itself is presented in Finnish, which is a clear internal contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/jackpoty-kasino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Kasinon käyttöehtojen mukaan sivuston minimitalletus on 10 euroa. B: Testatessani sivustoa kuitenkin huomasin minimitalletusrajan olevan todellisuudessa 20 euroa. Two statements give conflicting minimum deposit amounts (10€ vs 20€). A: Bonusrakenne 1, 1. talletuksella: Minimitalletus 20 €; 100% bonus up to 500 € (FDB500). B: Bonusrakenne 2, 1. talletuksella: Minimitalletus 300 €; 50% bonus up to 1000 € (ROLL). Two different first-deposit bonus structures claim different minimum deposits and maximum bonus amounts for the same 'first deposit' promotion, which cannot both apply simultaneously. | ||
/arvostelu/jeffbet/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: JeffBet is advertised as a casino with 'Ilman rekisteröintiä' (no registration). B: The article later states identity verification is required for the first withdrawal and describes a 'pelitilin vahvistus' (account verification) process. One part claims no registration is required, while another part implies an account exists and must be verified, which is inconsistent. A: Trustly is the only payment method available at JeffBet (Trustly hoitaa rahansiirrot, Vaihtoehtoja ei ole). B: In the comparison table, JeffBet lists 'Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä' as 3 (three providers). One section says only Trustly is available, while another section lists three payment providers, a clear inconsistency. A: Minimitalletus (bonus) is 10 €. B: Minimitalletus (payments section) is 20 €. Two different minimum deposit amounts are stated for deposits, which is contradictory. | ||
/arvostelu/jellona-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Pelivalikoima sisältää noin 2000 peliä ja yli 200 live-peliä. B: Jellona Casino mainosti 3 000 kasinopelin tarjontaa. The page presents two conflicting total-game counts: about 2,000 (and over 200 live games) versus an advertised 3,000 casino games. A: Minimitalletus ilman bonuksia on 1 €. B: Minimitalletus eksklusiivisen bonuksen yhteydessä on 10 €. Different sections specify different minimum deposits to participate in play or bonuses, creating inconsistency. A: Minimitalletus kierrätysvaatimuksissa on 20 €. B: Min deposit€1. The minimum deposit required for wagering and bonuses is stated as 20 € in one place and as 1 € in another, which is contradictory. | ||
/arvostelu/jet-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kasinobonuksessa on voittokatto 5x bonus. B: Näin kierrätys toimii käytännössä: esimerkin mukaan voittokatto on 10x bonuksen arvo, jolloin voitto voi olla enintään 3 000 € (esim. 300 € bonuksella). The bonus terms state a win cap of 5x the bonus, but the practical example uses a 10x win cap, implying a maximum of 3,000€ for a 300€ bonus, which is inconsistent with the stated 5x cap. | ||
/arvostelu/jettbet-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Päivitetty: 20. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 23/02/2026 The page lists two different last-update dates for content: the main page shows last updated November 20, 2025, while the bonus information states it was last updated February 23, 2026, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/joker-io/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Min deposit€1 B: Minimitalletus 25 euroa The article lists different minimum deposit requirements in separate sections: 1 euro in the Quick facts, but 25 euros in the payments table, creating a direct inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/jokeri-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Jokeri Casino uses Trustly as the only payment method (Trustly-kasino). B: In the comparison table, Jokeri Casino shows Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä as 3. The article states Jokeri Casino is a Trustly-only payment methods casino; however the side-by-side comparison table lists three payment providers, which contradicts the stated Trustly-only method. A: Jokeri Casino has a Finnish-language site (Suomenkielinen sivu: Kyllä). B: In the comparison table, Jokeri Casino's Finnish-language site is marked as No (Ei). The main text claims the site is fully Finnish/localized with Finnish support, but the comparison table marks Suomenkielinen sivu as Ei, creating a direct contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/jokery-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Lisenssi: Anjouan Gaming License B: Lisenssitietoja ei ole näkyvillä; lisenssiksi epäillään Curaçao Gaming Authorityn alaisuutta. The page inconsistently states licensing information: one part lists 'Anjouan Gaming License' as the license, while another part says license details are not visible and suggests the license is likely Curaçao-based. A: Sähköpostisupport@jokery2590.com B: Sähköposti: support@jokery2590.com Two different support email addresses are listed for Jokery Casino on the same page, creating inconsistent contact information. | ||
/arvostelu/joki-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Joki Casino asiakaspalvelu: Live-chat on 24/7 palveleva tuki B: Miinukset: Live-chat vain rekisteröityneille The article states live chat support is available 24/7, but also lists a drawback claiming that live chat is only available to registered players, creating a direct conflict. A: Maksutavat: 'vain ja ainoastaan yksi' maksutapa (Brite AB) — rekisteröintityylistä riippumatta B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä: 3 The text claims there is only one payment method, yet in a comparison table it lists three payment service providers, which contradicts the 'one method' claim. A: Päivitetty: 21. lokakuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 11/02/2026 Two update timestamps imply the page or its sections were updated at different times, which is inconsistent about the recency of updates. | ||
/arvostelu/joo-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: First deposit bonus advertised as 100% up to €3,000 plus 100 free spins. B: Welcome package advertised as 200% up to €19,000 plus 300 free spins across four deposits (1st: 100% up to €3,000 + 100 spins; 2nd: 50% up to €4,000 + 50 spins; 3rd: 50% up to €8,000 + 50 spins; 4th: 100% up to €4,000 + 100 spins). The page presents two different welcome bonus structures: a first-deposit bonus of 100% up to €3,000 plus 100 spins, and a four-deposit package claiming 200% up to €19,000 plus 300 spins, which cannot both be true. A: Total maximum bonus across the four deposits is €13,000 (3,000 + 2,000 + 4,000 + 4,000). B: Total maximum bonus across the four deposits is €19,000 as stated in the header 'up to €19,000'. The per-deposit bonuses sum to €13,000, which contradicts the stated €19,000 maximum in the welcome offer. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset for the welcome bonus table: 40x (Bonus) and 40x (ilmaiskierrosta). B: Kierrätysvaatimukset stated in the separate Kierrätysvaatimukset section: 50x (Bonus) and 50x (ilmaiskierrosta). Two different turnover requirements are given for the same welcome bonus in separate sections, creating an internal inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/joy-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Miinukset: 5e minimitalletus kasino B: Bonuskierroksen ja talletusten yhteydessä minimitalletus on usein 20 € (esim. 1. talletus minimitalletus 20 €). The article simultaneously states a 5 euro minimum deposit in the 'Cons' section and a 20 euro minimum deposit in the bonus/tiedote sections, creating an internal inconsistency about the required minimum deposit. A: Miinukset: Ei suomenkielistä käännöstä B: Asiakaspalvelu Joy Casinolla: Sivustolla on kattava suomenkielinen UKK-osio. One part claims there is no Finnish translation, while another part asserts there is a comprehensive Finnish FAQ section, which is inconsistent. A: Joy Casino can withdraws in up to 24 hours B: Withdrawal processing times are typically 24–48 hours (or longer for some methods). Some sections claim withdrawals are completed within 24 hours, while others specify a processing window of 24–48 hours, which directly contradicts the 'up to 24 hours' claim. | ||
/arvostelu/jupi-casino/ | Issues | 7 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus 150% 2000 € asti B: Ensitalletus: 100 % 2000 € asti The page presents two different first-deposit bonus figures: one stating 150% up to €2000, and another stating 100% up to €2000. This, plus another section offering up to €4,000 plus 4,000 free spins, creates clear inconsistencies about the initial bonus. A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Minimitalletus: 25 € Two different minimum deposit requirements are stated: €20 in one place and €25 in another. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset (1. talletuksella): 40x (Talletus+Bonus) B: Esimerkkikierrätys: 35x (Talletus+Bonus) for the first deposit Wagering requirements for the first deposit are shown as 40x in the formal terms, but an example in the article uses 35x, creating a direct inconsistency about the first-deposit wagering requirement. A: Jupi Casino vertailussa: Bonus 1 500 € + 500 FS B: Tervetulobonus / main offer: up to 4 000 € bonus money + 4 000 FS The page shows conflicting welcome-bonus figures in different sections: 1,500 € + 500 FS in a comparison table versus up to 4,000 € + 4,000 FS in the main offer sections. A: Maksutapojen määrä: yli kymmenen kappaletta B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä 9 The text claims there are over ten payment methods, while a side table lists 9 providers for Jupi, which is inconsistent. A: Päivitetty: 10. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 28/01/2026 Two different update dates are given for the page/bonuses, suggesting inconsistent updating timelines. A: Live-chat: 24/7 saatavilla B: Testissä live-chat ei toiminut normaalisti ja asiakaspalveluun mentiin sähköpostitse; chatbot oli käytössä The article claims 24/7 live chat availability, but the tester reports that live chat was not available and they had to rely on a chatbot and email, creating a contradiction about support availability. | ||
/arvostelu/justspin/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: The Quick Facts box lists a minimum deposit of 10 €. B: The Tervetulobonus section states a minimum deposit of 25 €. Two parts of the page specify different minimum deposit amounts (10 € vs 25 €). A: The Maksutavat section shows Zimpler as the payment method with 'Molemmat' (deposit and withdrawal). B: The article also claims JustSpin is a fast-pay (pikakasino) where payments are possible through only one method (verkkopankkimaksuna). One part says Zimpler can be used for both deposits and withdrawals, while another part says there is only one payment method available. A: The Services section says live chat is available 24/7. B: In the same page the Live Chat hours are given as 11:00–18:00. Conflicting stated live chat availability (24/7 vs limited hours). A: Nostopyynnöt käsitellään 72 tunnissa (withdrawals processed within 72 hours). B: Kotiutukset ovat nopeita (5–30 minutes). The page simultaneously claims withdrawals can take up to 72 hours and also claims they take 5–30 minutes in some cases. A: JustSpin vertailussa lists Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä as 3. B: Other parts of the page claim there is only one payment method (Zimpler). The page inconsistently states 3 providers in one table but also says only one payment method exists elsewhere. | ||
/arvostelu/kaahaus/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Voitot Kaahaus Casinolta ovat verollisia Suomesta pelaaville B: Voittojen verotus: Verovapaa The page states in the FAQ that winnings for Finnish players are taxable due to Curacao license, but later in a comparison table it lists Kaahaus winnings as tax-free (Verovapaa). This is a direct contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/kanuuna/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Bonuksen ilmaiskierrokset jaetaan kahden päivän aikana lunastamisesta 100 kierroksen erissä. B: Ilmaiskierrokset ovat voimassa aina 24 tuntia. The bonus states that 200 free spins are distributed over two days in batches of 100, but also states that the free spins expire after 24 hours, which would prevent using the second batch and creates an inconsistency between the two distribution/execution timelines. | ||
/arvostelu/karhubet/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus 20 € B: Min deposit €10 The page lists conflicting minimum deposit amounts: 20 € (in the kierrätysvaatimukset/bonus section) versus 10 € (in the Quick facts section). A: Kierrätysvaatimukset 5x (ilmaiskierrosta) B: Kierrätysvaatimukset Ei kierrätysvaatimuksia The page contains two incompatible statements about wagering requirements for Karhubet: one says 5x wagering on the welcome bonus, another comparison section states there are no wagering requirements. A: Jacks or Better Draw Poker RTP 0,46 % B: Other RTP values listed for live games are around 1.00%–2.70% or higher (e.g., Prosperity Tree Baccarat 1.11%, Immersive Roulette Deluxe 2.70%), and Moon Princess 100 is listed at 94.20% The Live casino RTP table explicitly lists Jacks or Better Draw Poker at 0.46%, which is inconsistent with the other RTP entries on the page that show mid- to high-90s for other games, indicating an internal contradiction or probable data entry error. | ||
/arvostelu/kingdom-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Asiakaspalvelu Kingdom Casinolla: 'Valitettavasti näin ei voi sanoa live chat-palvelusta. Vaikka kasino mainitsee chat-asiakaspalvelua, valitettavasti sellaista ei ole saatavilla ollenkaan.' B: Kingdom Casino vertailussa samankaltaisiin kasinoihin: Live-chat Kyllä One section claims there is no live chat available, while a comparison table later lists live chat as available. A: Kingdom Casino tervetulobonus: Minimitalletus on 10 €. B: Kingdom Casino bonus codes & bonuses: Minimitalletus 20 € for 1st-4th deposits Two sections conflict on the required minimum deposit for the welcome/bonus: 10 EUR in the welcome section vs 20 EUR in the bonus codes table. A: Miinukset list: Kierrätysvaatimukset 30× bonus. B: Bonus rules table: Kierrätysvaatimukset 10× (Bonus) for 1st-3rd deposits, and 10× (Talletus+Bonus) for the 4th. The page lists 30x turnover requirements as a drawback, but the bonus terms shown elsewhere specify 10x turnover for most deposits, creating a direct inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/kingmaker/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Kotiutukset käsittelyaika on jopa 72 tuntia B: Omalla kohdallani nosto kesti yhteensä 4 arkipäivää The article states withdrawals can take up to 72 hours, but the author reports a withdrawal taking 4 business days, which contradicts the stated processing time. A: Maksutapojen määrä on 20+ B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä on 19 One section says there are 20+ payment methods, while the comparison table later lists 19 providers, creating a numerical inconsistency. A: Asiakaspalvelu on englannin kielellä eikä suomeksi B: Suomenkielinen sivu: Kyllä The support section states help is available in English only, but the 'Finnish site' entry in the comparison table claims a Finnish-language site is available, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/kingpalace-casino/ | Issues | 7 contradictions |
A: 2. talletus: 150 % 300 € asti B: 2. talletuksella | 100% 300 € asti The page lists two different bonuses for the second deposit: one offering 150% up to 300€ and another offering 100% up to 300€, which cannot both be valid for the same promotion. A: 3. talletus: 100% 2000 € asti B: 3. talletuksella | 50% 400 € asti The third deposit offers conflicting bonus percentages: one entry says 100% up to 2000€, another says 50% up to 400€. A: Kierrätysvaatimus: 25x (Talletus+Bonus) B: Kierrätysvaatimukset | 30x (Talletus+Bonus) Inconsistent turnover requirements for the Talletus+Bonus portion of the bonuses (25x vs 30x). A: Kierrätysvaatimukset | 50x (ilmaiskierrosta) B: Kierrätysvaatimukset | 25x (ilmaiskierrosta) Discrepancy in turnover requirements for the free spin (ilmaiskierrosta) portion: 50x in one line vs 25x elsewhere. A: Minimitalletus | 20 € B: Minimitalletus€10 Two different minimum deposit requirements are stated: 20€ in the bonus/exclusive section and 10€ in the quick facts. A: Kingpalace tarjoaa jopa 4 503 peliä B: Yli 4 500 peliä Two different counts for the game library are given: 4,503 vs over 4,500. A: Kolikkopeleille on oma osio, jossa on vähintäänkin 4 000 peliä B: Kingpalace tarjoaa jopa 4 503 peliä The article lists conflicting counts for slot games vs total library: at least 4,000 slot games vs a total library of 4,503 games. | ||
/arvostelu/koi-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Min deposit€20 B: minimitalletus on vain euron The article states conflicting minimum deposit amounts: 20 EUR in Quick facts, but 1 EUR in the main text sections. A: Koi Casino on pikakasino, therefore there is only one payment method: Brite AB's quick deposit via bank transfer. B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä: 3 The page claims only one payment method, but a comparison table elsewhere lists three payment service providers for Koi Casino. A: Lisenssi: Viron, Curaçao B: Koi Casino toimii EMTA-lisenssillä (Estonia) The page inconsistently states the license jurisdiction: it lists Viron and Curaçao in Quick Facts, while elsewhere it asserts an Estonian EMTA license. | ||
/arvostelu/kruuna-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: VIP-ohjelma Kruuna Kasino: Kyllä B: Uskollisuus-/VIP-ohjelma: Kruuna Kasino ei ainakaan tällä hetkellä tarjoa erillistä VIP- tai uskollisuusohjelmaa. One section of the page's comparison table claims Kruuna has a VIP program, while another section states there is no VIP/loyalty program at the moment. A: Minimitalletus = 5 euroa B: Minimitalletus = 20 euroa Two different sections state different minimum deposit amounts (5€ in the welcome bonus table vs 20€ in the deposits/withdrawals section). | ||
/arvostelu/kunkku/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Maksutapavalikoiman laajuuden osalta tämä Pay N Play kasino ei ole mikään kasinomaailman kuningas, koska niitä löytyy vain yksi: Trustly AB. B: Kunkku Kasino vs. samankaltaisiin kasinoihin -taulukossa 'Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä' kohdassa Kunkku Kasino lukee 2. The article simultaneously claims the casino uses only one payment method (Trustly) and that the comparison table lists two payment service providers for Kunkku Kasino, which are mutually inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/kyngs-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus on 20 € B: Minimitalletus on €10 The Quick facts section lists a minimum deposit of 10 €, while the deposit rules section states a minimum of 20 €, creating an explicit discrepancy about the required minimum deposit. A: Sähköpostisupport@kyngs1.com B: support@Kyngs6507.com Two different customer support email addresses are given for Kyngs Casino, indicating inconsistent contact information within the page. A: Kasinon sivuilla ei anneta mitään tietoja siitä, kuka kasinon omistaa ja minkä pelilisenssin alaisuudessa se operoi. B: Omistaja: 130Group N.V.; Lisenssi: Curaçao; Lisenssinumero: OGL/2024/129/0131 The page first claims that ownership and licensing information is not provided on the casino's site, but later presents explicit owner and Curaçao license details in a dedicated section, which is a direct inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/lanista-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: The Quick facts section lists the license as 'LisenssiAnjouan Gaming License, Costa Rica'. B: Other sections state that the license is not disclosed (Lisenssi: N/A / Lisenssinumero: N/A). There is a direct contradiction about whether Lanista Casino has a license: one part claims a license is listed, while other parts say the license is not disclosed. A: In the Lanista Casino bonus section, the minimum deposit (Minimitalletus) is listed as 20 €. B: Other sections show a minimum deposit of 10 € (e.g., Quick facts 'Min deposit €10' and deposit options listing 'Min. talletus 10 €'). The page contradicts itself on the minimum deposit amount required to claim bonuses or deposit: 20 € in one section vs 10 € elsewhere. | ||
/arvostelu/lapilanders/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Lapilanders Casinon perustiedot: Perustettu: 2021 B: Lapilanders Casinon lisenssinumeron (MGA/B2C/233/2013) myönnetty 2.7.2013 The page lists the casino as founded in 2021, but also shows an MGA license with a 2013 grant date, which is inconsistent unless the company predates 2021 or underwent a lineage change. A: Minimitalletus (bonus lunastamiseen) 25 € B: Minimitalletus: 20 € (Quick facts) and minimitalletus per payment method: 10 € The article shows multiple, conflicting minimum deposit figures: 25 € to claim the welcome bonus, 20 € as the general minimum deposit, and 10 € as the per-method minimum deposit, leading to inconsistency. A: Asiakaspalvelu on helppo ottaa yhteyttä; suomenkielinen tuki saatavilla B: Kokeilin yhteydenottoa; live chatissa oli ainoastaan botti, eikä vastausta kysymyksiin The page claims customer service is generally easy to contact and available in Finnish, but a user experience description later states the live chat was only a bot and could not answer questions, contradicting the earlier positive claim. | ||
/arvostelu/larabet-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Ensivaikutelma on vahva: ... pelivalikoima lähes käsittämätön (yli 15 000 peliä) B: Kolikkopelien valikoima LaraBetilla on suomalaisista kasinoista yksi laajimmista – yli 10 000 vaihtoehtoa. One part claims over 15,000 total games; another claims the slot (kolikkopeli) catalog exceeds 10,000, which is inconsistent about the size of LaraBet's slot/game catalog. A: Päivitetty: 13. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 20/02/2026 The bonus update date (Feb 20, 2026) is later than the page update date (Nov 13, 2025), creating a conflicting timeline for when the information was last updated. | ||
/arvostelu/las-atlantis/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimum deposit: 20 USD The page lists conflicting minimum deposit amounts in different sections: €10 in one place and $20 in another, creating an internal inconsistency about the required minimum deposit. A: 250 % tervetulobonus 9 500 $ asti B: 250% up to €9,500 The article presents the welcome bonus as up to 9,500 USD in one section and up to 9,500 EUR in another, causing a currency inconsistency for the same offer. | ||
/arvostelu/lataamo/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Kasinon ainoa maksumetodi on Trustly. B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä 3. One section states the only payment method is Trustly, while another section lists three payment service providers, which cannot both be true. A: Suomenkielinen sivu: Ei. B: Kasinon sisältö sekä käyttöliittymä ovat suomenkielisiä (selkeällä suomen kielellä). The comparison table marks that there is no Finnish-language site, yet the article repeatedly describes Finnish-language content and a Finnish user interface. A: Kasinon lisenssi: Virolisenssi (Vironi lisenssi). B: EU-maiden pelilisenssejä: Viron EMTA-lisenssi ja Maltan MGA-lisenssi. The text claims two EU licenses (Estonian EMTA and Maltese MGA) exist, but the information box lists only the Estonian license. | ||
/arvostelu/legend-play/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Päivitetty: 11. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 02/02/2026 The page shows two conflicting last-update dates: the page itself is dated December 11, 2025, while the bonus section claims the last update occurred on February 2, 2026. A: Kotiutusnopeus: Kotiutuksissa voi mennä jopa kaksi viikkoa B: Nostopyynnöjen käsittelyssä menee 1 - 3 päivää Withdrawal speed is described as up to two weeks in one place, while another section states withdrawal requests are processed in 1-3 days, which is contradictory. A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Minim deposit: 10 € The page lists a minimum deposit of 10€ in Quick Facts but 20€ in the bonus terms, creating an inconsistency about the minimum deposit amount. A: Legend Play ei kerro mitään lisenssitietoja sivuillaan B: Lisenssi: Anjouan; lisenssin numero ALSI-152406028-FI2 (myönnetty 14.6.2024) The site claims it does not disclose license information, yet later it provides explicit license details (Anjouan, license number ...), which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/legiano-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Vuonna 2024 avattu kasino tarjoaa yli 10 000 kasinopeliä. B: Legiano Casinolla on tällä hetkellä 15 049 peliä. The page asserts two different totals for the number of games at the same time (over 10,000 and exactly 15,049), which cannot both be true simultaneously. A: Syntilista pystyy Legiano Casinolla samana, kuin sen sisarsivustoilla: voittoja verotetaan ja vuorokautinen kotiutusraja on vaivaiset 500 euroa. B: VIP-taso 5 per vrk -kotiutusraja on 1 500 euroa. The general daily withdrawal limit is stated as 500 €, but higher limits exist for VIP levels (up to 1,500 € per day), creating an inconsistency in withdrawal caps across user statuses. | ||
/arvostelu/legzo-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € (listed in the Ehdot ja säännöt table for the 50% 300 € welcome bonus) B: Minimitalletus: 10 € (listed in the Kierrätysvaatimukset section for the same welcome bonus) The same bonus promotion lists conflicting minimum deposit amounts in two places: 20 € in the general terms table and 10 € in the detailed wagering terms. | ||
/arvostelu/lempi/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Sivustolla ei ole rajoituksia sen suhteen, kuinka paljon päivällä tai kuukaudessa voi kotiuttaa. B: Kotiutuksiin kohdistuu 5 000 euron viikoittainen maksimimäärä. One sentence claims there are no daily or monthly withdrawal limits, while another sentence imposes a weekly withdrawal cap of 5,000 EUR, which is a clear contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/lex-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Pelejä yli 120 valmistajalta B: Lex Casinolla on 84 pelien tuottajaa testaukseni aikaan Two different counts are given for the number of game providers: 120+ vs 84, indicating an inconsistency in the provider counts. A: Pelejä yli 120 valmistajalta B: Pelivalikoima on yli 80 valmistajalta Different parts of the text conflict on the number of game providers: 120+ vs 80+ providers. | ||
/arvostelu/librabet-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Kierrätysvaatimukset 35x (Talletus+Bonus) B: Kierrätysvaatimukset 30x (bonus + talletus) The page lists conflicting wagering requirements for the Librabet welcome bonus: 35x in one section and 30x for the combined bonus + deposit in another. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset 40x (ilmaiskierrosta) B: Kierrätysvaatimukset 30x (bonus + talletus) The page shows different wagering requirements for the welcome bonus, claiming 40x for free spins in one place and 30x for the combined bonus + deposit in another. A: Yli 11 000 kasinopeliä ja urheiluvedonlyönti B: Pelivalikoima: yli 5 000 peliä The page claims Librabet offers over 11,000 casino games in one section, but elsewhere states the game selection is over 5,000 games, a direct numerical inconsistency. A: Librabet tarjoaa urheiluvedonlyönnin B: Librabet on pääasiassa nettikasino, eikä sillä ole urheiluvedonlyöntiä suomalaispelaajille One part of the page asserts the casino offers sports betting, while the FAQ explicitly says there is no sports betting for Finnish players, a direct contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/lilibet/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Miinukset: Ei tervetuliaisbonusta suomalaisille. B: Lilibet Casino tarjoaa tervetulobonuksen suomalaisille, esimerkiksi 1. talletus: 100 % 500 € asti. One part says there is no welcome bonus for Finnish players, while another part describes a Finnish welcome bonus (100% up to €500). A: Kotiutusnopeus taulukossa: Kotiutuksessa meni kuusi päivää. B: FAQ/withdrawal section states withdrawals are processed within two business days after KYC. Withdrawal processing time is given as six days in one section and two business days in another, a direct inconsistency. A: Lisenssi: Curaçao (listed in Quick Facts). B: Lisenssi: Malta (MGA) with MGA license number MGA/B2C/799/2020; MGA license stated elsewhere. The page lists a Curaçao license in Quick Facts, but elsewhere claims Malta MGA licensing, which is inconsistent about the site's regulatory authorization. A: Minimitalletus: 20 € (in bonus terms). B: Minimitalletus: €20 stated; but Quick Facts claim 'Min deposit €10'. Two sections specify different minimum deposits (€10 vs €20). | ||
/arvostelu/livewinz/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Lisenssi: Curaçao, Costa Rica B: Lisenssi: Curacao The Quick Facts section lists the license as 'Curaçao, Costa Rica', implying two licenses or a Costa Rica license in addition to Curaçao. Throughout the article, the license is described as Curacao only, and there is a Curacao license verification link; the Costa Rica license mention is inconsistent with the rest of the text. | ||
/arvostelu/lizaro/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletus | 20 € (1. talletuksella) in the 'Säännöt ja ehdot' bonus rules section. B: Minimitalletus on kaikilla muilla maksutavoilla 10 €, mutta bitcoineilla 30 € in the 'Maksutavat' section. The first-deposit bonus rules specify a minimum deposit of 20 €, while the deposits/methods section states a general minimum of 10 € (with Bitcoin at 30 €). This is a direct inconsistency in minimum deposit requirements. | ||
/arvostelu/lolly-spins-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: LollySpins Casino pelivalikoiman arvostelu: yli 11 nimikkeen edestä B: Lolly Spins Casino pelivalikoiman arvostelu: yli 11 000 peliä The article simultaneously states the game library as over 11,000 games and over 11 titles, which is inconsistent because 'nimikkeet' (titles) cannot be far fewer than the total games. A: Kolikkopeli: Rock & Riches: Hold & Win – RTP 117,88 % B: RTP-lukuja harhaanjohtavia: yli 100 % RTP:t eivät kestä tarkastelua pitkällä aikavälillä The article complains that RTP values above 100% are not sustainable long-term, yet lists a game with 117.88% RTP, creating a direct inconsistency. A: 3x talletuskierrätys ennen nostoja (bonukset/ maksutavat section) B: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 40x (Bonus) + 35x (ilmaiskierrosta) One section states a 3x deposit turnover requirement before withdrawals, while later sections state 40x bonus and 35x for free spins, a clear contradiction. A: Lightning Storm (Evolution) ... RTP 144 % B: todellinen RTP on noin 96–97 % The page presents a 144% RTP figure for Lightning Storm, then asserts the real RTP is around 96–97%, contradicting the initial claim. | ||
/arvostelu/lolo-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: The 'LoloCasino tervetulobonus' section states that the minimum deposit for each bonus is 20 €. B: The 'Kierrätysvaatimukset' section (and 'Miten lunastaa tervetulobonus') state the minimum deposit for each bonus is 25 €. These sections specify different minimum deposits (20 € vs 25 €) for the same welcome bonus, creating a clear inconsistency. A: The main content asserts that LoloCasino operates under a Costa Rica license and winnings are not tax-free. B: The quick facts line lists 'Lisenssi Anjouan Gaming License, Costa Rica', which implies a different or additional license. The licensing information is inconsistent: the body refers to a Costa Rica license, while the quick facts mention Anjouan Gaming License alongside Costa Rica. A: The 'Maksutavat' section states there are around ten deposit methods. B: The 'Pelit vertailu' (comparison) table lists the number of payment service providers for Lolo Casino as 2. There is a discrepancy in the reported number of payment providers: about ten vs two. A: The Quick facts section states 'Min deposit €25'. B: The welcome bonus section states a 20 € minimum deposit to activate the bonus. Two different minimum deposit figures (25 € in Quick facts vs 20 € for bonus activation) are presented. | ||
/arvostelu/lonkero/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Maksutavat Lonkero Kasinolla: Lonkero kasinon maksuliikenteestä vastaa Zimpler maksupalvelu. Sekä talletukset että kotiutukset vahvistetaan nettipankkitunnuksilla. Pelaajat voivat käyttää maksuissa kaikkia suomalaisia pankkeja sekä pelkästään netissä toimivaa Revolut pankkia. B: Maksutavat Lonkero Kasinolla: Zimpler on maksupalvelu, mutta pelaajat voivat käyttää kaikkia suomalaisia pankkeja sekä Revolut pankin nettipankkitunnuksilla. One part states that all payments are processed via Zimpler with netbank verification, while another part claims players can also use all Finnish banks and Revolut for payments, which is inconsistent. A: Kanta-asiakasohjelma exists: the section 'Onko Lonkero Casinolla kanta-asiakasohjelmaa?' describes loyalty tiers (limenvihreä, vaaleanpunainen, vaaleansininen, punainen ja musta) with progression based on activity. B: Lonkero Kasino vs Highroller Casino table lists 'VIP-ohjelma: Ei' (no VIP program). The article simultaneously asserts there is a tiered loyalty/kanta-asiakasohjelma, but also claims there is no VIP program in the comparison table, which is inconsistent. A: Lisenssit ja turvallisuus: Lisenssi on Viron rahapeliviranomainen (lisenssinumerot HKT000089 ja HKL000470) with a Malta address for the operator. B: Osoite/Major operator: Blixx Gaming Ltd is Maltalle rekisteröity, and the page lists a Malta address, implying Maltese operator with Estonian license. The text presents a Maltese-registered operator (Blixx Gaming Ltd) with an Estonian license, and shows a Malta address in the operator details, creating a mismatch between licensing jurisdiction and registered address within the same article. | ||
/arvostelu/love-casino/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Love Casino avattiin suomalaisille pelaajille kesällä 2023. B: Kasinon perustiedot listaa Vuosi: 2024. The page states the casino opened in 2023, but the infobox lists the establishment year as 2024, creating conflicting founding dates. A: Lisenssi: Curaçao. B: Lisenssi: N/A (lisenssitieto puuttuu; Love Casinolla ei ole lisenssiä). One section claims the site has a Curaçao license, while another section states there is no license. A: Näiden lisäksi voit kokeilla muutamaa harvinaisempaa kolikkopeliä, mutta muita viihde- ja erikoispelejä ei ole. B: Taulukossa listataan viisi erikoispeliä (Red Dog, Pai Gow Poker, Sic Bo, Double Exposure, Casino Hi-Lo). The text declares there are no entertainment or special games, then later lists five erikoispeliä. A: Bonukset tulee lunastaa kokonaisuudessaan 7 vuorokauden kuluessa ensimmäisestä talletuksesta. B: Kierrätysvaatimukset tulee suorittaa 30 päivän kuluessa. Two different deadlines are given for the bonus: 7 days to redeem and 30 days to meet the wagering requirements. A: Minimitalletus 15 €. B: Minimitalletus 20 € (bonus-talletuksille). The page lists conflicting minimum deposit amounts: 15 € in the payments section, but 20 € for bonus-related deposits. | ||
/arvostelu/lucky-koala-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Lucky Koala offers over 7,000 games and sports betting. B: Lucky Koala's game library comprises nearly 6,000 games. Two different counts are claimed for total games offered: over 7,000 vs nearly 6,000. A: Pikatalletus ei ole mahdollinen (instant deposits are not possible). B: Talletukset ovat rekisteröitymisen jälkeen välittömiä (deposits are immediate after registration). The article states that instant deposits are not possible, but elsewhere deposits are described as immediate; an example Revolut deposit arrived in about 2 minutes. A: Minimitalletus: 20 € (minimum deposit). B: Minimitalletus: 10 € (minimum deposit listed in comparison table). Two different minimum deposit amounts are given for Lucky Koala, 20 € in the main rules and 10 € in the comparison section. A: Päivitetty: 21. marraskuuta 2025. B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 23/02/2026. Two different last-updated dates are shown for the page and the bonus section; the bonus update is dated after the page update. | ||
/arvostelu/lucky-nugget-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Kierrätysvaatimukset Ei kierrätysvaatimuksia B: Kierrätysvaatimukset 200x (ilmaiskierrosta) and Kierrätysvaatimukset 200x (Bonus) The page's comparison table claims there are no wagering requirements for Lucky Nugget, while the main sections state that the welcome bonus and free spins carry 200x wagering requirements, which directly contradicts. A: Min deposit€10 B: 1st deposit minimum 1 € (minimitalletus 1 €) The Quick Facts section lists a minimum deposit of €10, but the bonus rules specify that the first deposit can be as low as €1, which is an internal inconsistency. A: Päivitetty: 19. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 07/02/2026 Two different update dates are presented—one for the overall page and one for the bonus information—creating conflicting timelines about when information was last updated. | ||
/arvostelu/lucky-spins/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Lucky Spins on vuonna 2022 nettikasinoiden valtamereen syntynyt pikakasino, jonka omistuksesta vastaa Well Play Media Limited. B: Kasinon omistaja on Play Well Media Limited, jonka portfoliosta löytyvät myös esimerkiksi Casino Days ja Buusti Kasino. The page refers to two different owner names for Lucky Spins: 'Well Play Media Limited' in one place and 'Play Well Media Limited' in another, which is a clear inconsistency about ownership. | ||
/arvostelu/lucky-trunk-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Lucky Trunk Casinolla on kaikki talletukset kierrätettävä vähintään 3x kasinopeleissä. B: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 35x (Bonus) ja 35x (ilmaiskierrosta) sekä 7x vedonlyönnin talletus- ja bonusraha. One part of the page says deposits must be wagered at least 3x, while another part lists wagering requirements of 35x for bonuses (and 35x for free spins) and 7x for the sportsbook portion, creating a direct conflict about wagering requirements. A: Lucky Trunk Casinon maksutapana on ainoa käytössä oleva maksutapa on nopea tilisiirto. Zimpler huolehtii välittömistä talletuksista ja kotiutuksista. B: Lucky Trunk vertailussa: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä on 13. The page claims Zimpler as the only payment method, but in a comparison table it lists 13 payment service providers for Lucky Trunk, which contradicts the earlier claim. A: Lucky Trunk Casinon asiakaspalvelun luvataan olevan avoinna 24/7. B: Testihetkellä paikalla ei ollut lainkaan henkilökuntaa; chat bot handled inquiries. The page promises 24/7 customer support, but it also notes that at the time of testing there were no staff available and only a chatbot answered, which contradicts the 24/7 availability claim. | ||
/arvostelu/lucky-wins/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: First deposit bonus: 100% up to 500 € + 100 free spins (listed under 'Bonusrakenne 1'). B: First deposit bonus: 200% up to 10000 € + 500 free spins (listed under 'Bonusrakenne 2'). The article contains two mutually exclusive first-deposit bonus offers: one states a 100% match up to €500 with 100 free spins, while the other claims a 200% match up to €10,000 with 500 free spins. Both cannot be simultaneously valid. | ||
/arvostelu/luckycapone-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: LuckyCapone Casino on vuonna 2025 avattu Curacao-kasino, jonka taustalla toimii Neroblanko Tech B.V. B: LuckyCapone Casino perustamisvuosi on 2024–2025. One part states the casino opened in 2025, while another section lists the founding year as a range (2024–2025), which is inconsistent regarding when the casino began. A: Min deposit€20 B: Minimitalletus 15 € The page lists the minimum deposit as €20 in the quick facts, but the deposit/bonuse rules section lists a minimum of €15, creating a direct discrepancy. A: Asiakaspalvelu on käytännössä vain botti B: Live-chat: Kyllä The article describes customer service as effectively bot-only, yet a comparison table indicates that live chat is available, which is conflicting about the actual support options. | ||
/arvostelu/luckydays/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Lisenssi: Malta (MGA), Curaçao B: Maltan lisenssi (MGA) as the license for the site The article lists both Malta MGA and Curaçao licenses in the quick facts, but later sections clearly state the Maltese MGA license as the license basis; this is inconsistent. A: Lucky Days bonus section states there is a welcome bonus of 200 ilmaiskierrosta (free spins) on the first deposit. B: Miinukset: Ei tervetulobonusta (no welcome bonus). The text simultaneously claims there is a welcome bonus of 200 free spins and also states that there is no welcome bonus, which is a direct contradiction. A: Min. Talletus: 10 € (in the Maksutavat table). B: Minimitalletus: 20 € (appears in other sections as the minimum deposit). The minimum deposit is stated as 10 EUR in the payment methods table, but elsewhere it is stated as 20 EUR, creating an inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/luckyfruits/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/lucys-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Kasinon tervetulobonus on [talletusbonus] 1 500 euroon asti ja 500 ilmaiskierrosta. B: 1. talletuksella | 100% 250 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta Two different descriptions of the casino's welcome bonus exist; one states a welcome bonus up to 1500 EUR with 500 free spins, while another states the first deposit bonus is up to 250 EUR with 50 spins. A: Kasinon tervetuliaisbonuksien kierrätysvaatimukset ovat seuraavanlaiset: Kasinon tervetuliaisbonus: 40x (talletus ja bonus); kierrätyksen aikaraja 30 päivää. B: Kierrätysvaatimukset | 35x (Talletus+Bonus) The wagering requirements for the welcome bonus differ: 40x with a 30-day limit in one section, but 35x for the first deposit in another, creating a contradiction. A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus 25 € The page lists conflicting minimum deposit amounts: €10 in the Quick Facts, but €25 in another section (comparison table). | ||
/arvostelu/lunar-spins-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Talletuksilla 3x kierrätysvaatimus B: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 35x (Talletus+Bonus) The article states deposit-based wagering of 3x, while the welcome bonus terms specify 35x wagering on the deposit plus bonus, which is a direct inconsistency. A: Minimitalletus 25 € B: Minimitalletus 20 € Some sections list a minimum deposit of 25 EUR, while the Quick Facts section lists a minimum deposit of 20 EUR, creating a conflicting deposit requirement. A: Minimikotiutus vaihtelee 25 € ja 100 € välillä maksutavasta riippuen B: Minimikotiutus 25 € Some parts of the text claim the minimum withdrawal varies by payment method (between 25 and 100 EUR), while another section states a fixed minimum withdrawal of 25 EUR, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/lvbet/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus 150% 1555 € asti + 155 ilmaiskierrosta B: LV Bet tarjoaa ... jopa 400 € bonukset ja 100 ilmaiskierrosta Two different stated welcome bonuses exist: one claims a 150% bonus up to 1,555€ plus 155 free spins, while another claims a total of 400€ in bonuses with 100 free spins, which cannot both be correct. A: Ensimmäinen talletus: 100% 200 € asti ja 50 ilmaiskierrosta B: Minimitalletus 10 € (mikäli haluat ilmaiskierroksia, pitää sinun tallettaa 200 € ja 400 €) The first-deposit offer states 100% up to 200€ with 50 FS, but the terms also state that to receive free spins with bonuses you must deposit 200€ on the first and 400€ on the second, which contradicts the simple 200€ cap for the first deposit. A: Minimitalletus 5 € (in the bonus table for first/other deposits) B: Minimitalletus 10 € (to unlock free spins you must deposit 200€ first and 400€ second) The bonus terms show a 5€ minimum deposit, but the dedicated terms specify a 10€ minimum and higher thresholds to unlock free spins, creating an inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/lyra-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Päivitetty: 9. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 29/01/2026 The page lists two different last-update timestamps: the page update is dated 9 December 2025, while the bonus section claims it was last updated on 29 January 2026, creating an inconsistency in update timelines. | ||
/arvostelu/lyrabet-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Maksutapa: Zimpler (yksi maksutapa). B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä in the Lyrabet vertailussa: 3. The page claims Lyrabet has exactly one payment method (Zimpler), yet a comparison table later states there are 3 payment service providers. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 30x (Bonus). B: Esimerkkilauseessa kierrätysvaatimus on 6 000 € (30 × 2 000 €), using 2 000 € as the base, which contradicts the stated bonus amount and the 30x requirement. The example miscomputes the wagering base (2 000 €) relative to the stated bonus (200% up to 1 000 €, i.e., 2 000 € max bonus) and 30x wagering, creating an internal inconsistency in how the wagering is calculated. | ||
/arvostelu/lysti/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Min deposit€20 B: 1e minimitalletus The article inconsistently states the minimum deposit: €20 in the Quick Facts section, but elsewhere it states a €1 minimum deposit. A: Kotiutusaika 1-2 tuntia B: Kotiutuksen kesto oli testissäni hieman yli tunnin; rahojen siirtyminen Briten kautta kesti noin 15 minuuttia The withdrawal time in the table is listed as 1-2 hours, whereas the author reports a withdrawal processing time of about one hour and a further transfer time of roughly 15 minutes, indicating conflicting timelines. | ||
/arvostelu/mafia-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Kotiutusten perusrajat: 500 euroa päivässä ja 7 000 euroa kuukaudessa B: Kotiutuksen maksimi per kotiutus (tapahtuma) on 5 000 € The article states a daily withdrawal limit of 500 EUR and a monthly limit of 7,000 EUR, but also lists a per-withdrawal maximum of 5,000 EUR, which are conflicting withdrawal limits within the same page. A: Lisenssitietoja ei näy missään B: Lisenssi Anjouan Gaming License (lisenssinumero ALSI-152406028-FI2) on listed on the page The page claims license information is not shown anywhere, yet it provides explicit license details (Anjouan Gaming License) and a license number, creating a contradiction about license disclosure. | ||
/arvostelu/magic-red/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Min deposit€20 B: Minimissään 10 euroa talletettavaksi The page lists different minimum deposit amounts: 20 EUR in the quick facts, but 10 EUR as the minimum deposit elsewhere (e.g., deposit process). A: Kotiutukset max 7 000 euroa kuukaudessa B: Kotiutukset max 7 000 euroa viikossa Withdrawal limits are stated as 7,000 EUR per month in one section and 7,000 EUR per week in another, creating an inconsistency in the time frame. A: Minimitalletus 20 € B: Minimitalletus 10 € The minimum deposit requirement is shown as 20 EUR in the bonus wagering section, while other sections state 10 EUR as the minimum deposit. A: Lisenssinumero MGA/CRP/148/2007 B: Myönnetty 17.8.2009 The license number includes the year 2007, but the license grant date is given as 17.8.2009, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/magius-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Nettilompakot list includes Neteller (MiFinity, Neteller, Skrill). B: Withdrawals to prepaid cards and to Neteller are not possible. The payments section lists Neteller as a withdrawal option, but another part of the text states that withdrawals to Neteller are not possible, which directly contradicts. A: Minimitalletus in the bonus terms is 20 € (with an exception of 10 € for Bonus Crab). B: The quick facts state a minimum deposit of 10 €. Two sections assign different minimum deposit amounts: 20 € for standard bonus eligibility (10 € for Bonus Crab) versus 10 € stated as the general minimum in Quick facts, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/malina/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Malina Casino's licensing is listed as Anjouan Gaming License in the quick facts section. B: Malina Casino's licensing is stated as Maltan license (MGA) in the FAQ section. The page attributes two different licenses to the casino (Anjouan vs Malta MGA), which cannot both be correct for the same casino. A: The bonus terms table lists a minimum deposit of 20 €. B: The bonus rules section states a minimum deposit of 10 €. Two different minimum deposit amounts appear on the page, creating inconsistency. A: Päivitetty: 8. joulukuuta 2025 (page last updated). B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 18/02/2026. Two different last-update dates are shown for the page/content; the bonus content claims a later update than the main page. A: Nostopyynnöt käsitellään viiden (5) päivän kuluessa. B: Withdrawal times in the tables show 0–3 days for bank transfers, 1–3 days for e-wallets, and 1–5 days for card withdrawals. A general statement asserts a 5-day processing time, while the withdrawal time table lists shorter processing windows for most methods. | ||
/arvostelu/mammona-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Mammona Kasinon pelivalikoima sisältää yli 3 300 laadukasta peliä. B: Kolikkopelit valikoima sisältää noin 3 000 nimikettä. The page inconsistently reports the size of the game library: one section claims the library contains over 3,300 games, while another section claims the slot game selection contains around 3,000 titles. A: Päivitetty: 18. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 04/02/2026 There is a conflicting timeline: the page lists a general update date of December 18, 2025, but also states the bonus terms were last updated on February 4, 2026. | ||
/arvostelu/mason-slots/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Plussat: 20-tasoinen VIP-ohjelma B: Vertailutaulukko Mason Slotsissa: VIP-ohjelma Ei The article lists a 20-tier VIP program as a positive feature, but a comparison table later states that Mason Slots does not have a VIP program, directly contradicting each other. A: Miinukset: Ainoastaan yksi maksutapa B: Vertailutaulukko Mason Slotsissa: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä 3 The text claims there is only one payment method, while a separate comparison table lists three payment service providers, creating an internal inconsistency about the number of payment options. | ||
/arvostelu/maxibet/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Alle 2 € minimitalletus B: Minimitalletus 10 € (1. talletuksella) / 1 € CASHlib The page lists a minimum deposit of '2€' in the benefits section, but elsewhere states a 10€ minimum for the first deposit (and as low as 1€ when using CASHlib), creating an unambiguous conflict over the actual minimum deposit amount. A: "Toisaalta heikkoudeksi voidaan lukea se, että mitään muita maksutapoja ei suomalaispelaajille tarjota kuin kryptovaluutat." B: Deposit methods section lists non-cryptocurrency payment options such as Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Revolut, Paysafecard, Neteller, Skrill, CASHlib, Flexepin and Jeton. The article simultaneously claims Finnish players have only crypto payment options and also lists a broad set of non-crypto payment methods, which is a direct contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/maxxwin/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Päivitetty: 9. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 28/01/2026 The page lists two different last-update dates for the content: the top of the page says it was updated on 9 December 2025, while the bonus section claims the bonus was last updated on 28 January 2026. A: Viikoittainen cashback (10–30%) B: Käteispalautus Ei cashback-bonusta A loyalty program section claims weekly cashback exist (10–30%), but a side-by-side comparison table states there is no cashback bonus. A: nostoraja 50 000 €/pvä B: nostokatto on harvinaisen korkea 50 000 euroa per 24 tuntia Two parts of the page describe the withdrawal cap: one says 50,000 EUR per day, the other says 50,000 EUR per 24 hours, which are not the same window. A: Perustettu: 2023 B: Lisenssi myönnetty 27.10.2017 (lisenssinumero MGA/B2C/347/2016) The stated founding year (2023) conflicts with licensing information indicating a Maltese MGA license granted in 2017, suggesting an inconsistency between founding date and licensing timeline. | ||
/arvostelu/megapari/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus: 5 € There is a conflict about the minimum initial deposit: the Quick Facts section states the minimum deposit is €10, while the bonus terms state a minimum deposit of €5. | ||
/arvostelu/megarich-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Megarich Casinon kampanjasivulla kerrotaan selkeällä suomen kielellä tervetulobonuksista ja jopa väitetään niiden olevan kaikkien rekisteröityneiden pelaajien saatavilla. B: Totuus on toinen, sillä Suomessa asuvat pelaajat eivät ole tervetulobonuksiin oikeutettuja. The page simultaneously claims that welcome bonuses are available to all registered players in Finnish, and later states that Finnish residents are not eligible for welcome bonuses, which are direct contradictions. A: Ensivaikutelma Megarich Casinosta väittää 2 500 € edestä bonusrahaa (tervetulotarjouksenä). B: 1. talletus: 100 % talletusbonus 1 000 € asti ja 100 ilmaiskierrosta. The introductory section promises a 2,500 € bonus, while the detailed terms list first-deposit bonuses capped at 1,000 €, which is inconsistent. A: Suurjättipotit eivät ole tarjolla Megarich Casinolla (jättipotit eivät kuulu tämän lisenssin kasinoille). B: Wolf Gold 1 Million -kasinopelin päävoittona voi olla jopa miljoonan euroon asti. The page claims that mega jackpots are not available, yet it mentions a game with a potential top prize of 1,000,000 €, which contradicts the claim. | ||
/arvostelu/megarush/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimum deposit stated as 20 € (Minimitalletus: 20 €). B: Quick facts state a minimum deposit of 10 € (Min deposit €10). The page lists different minimum deposit figures in separate sections: 20 € in the rules/bonus section and 10 € in the Quick facts, which is inconsistent. A: First and second bonuses require 10x turnover based on (Deposit + Bonus) — i.e., 10x (Talletus+Bonus). B: All bonus tiers have the same 10x turnover on the Bonus (i.e., 10x (Bonus)). There is a contradiction: one part states that the 10x turnover for the first two bonuses includes both the deposit and the bonus, while another part asserts that all bonus tiers have a uniform 10x turnover on the bonus alone, implying no inclusion of the deposit. | ||
/arvostelu/merlin-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kierrätysvaatimukset | 0x (Bonus) and Kierrätysvaatimukset | 0x (ilmaiskierrosta) B: Talletuksen kierrätys 1x The page contains conflicting wagering requirements: the bonus and free spins are listed as 0x (no wagering) in one section, while another section states that the deposit must be rolled over 1x before withdrawal. | ||
/arvostelu/metal-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Metal Casinolla on ollut live-chat aiemmin, mutta testihetkellä sellaista ei löytynyt ja suomenkielistä apua ei tarjota. B: Metal Casino -vertailutaulukossa kohdassa Live-chat: Kyllä. One part of the text states there is no live chat currently and no Finnish support, while the comparison table lists that Metal Casino has live chat available. A: Metal Casinon suomenkielisyys on 'ei suomeksi' (suomeksi apua ei tulla tarjoamaan). B: Metal Casino -vertailutaulukon Suomenkielisyys: 'Sivusto ja tuki englanniksi' (English only). The article claims there is no Finnish-language support, but the comparison table indicates the site/support are English-only. A: Bonus kierrätysvaatimus = 30x (Talletus+Bonus) and 60x (ilmaiskierrosta) in the Säännöt ja ehdot table. B: Bonuksen säännöt ja ehdot state kierrätysvaatimukset = 35x (T+B) and 35x (ilmaiskierrosta). There are two conflicting sets of withdrawal/rollover requirements for the welcome bonus: 30x/60x versus 35x/35x. | ||
/arvostelu/midarion-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kotiutusaika (Zimpler) 1–3 arkipäivää B: Kokonaisuudessaan kotiutuksen kesto oli viisi arkipäivää The page lists withdrawal times as 1–3 business days for Zimpler, but the author reports a total withdrawal duration of five business days due to KYC processing and delays, introducing an explicit inconsistency in withdrawal timing. | ||
/arvostelu/millioner/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Lisenssi Costa Rica B: Anjouan-lisenssi (Anjouan Gaming) The page inconsistently lists the license as Costa Rica in the Quick Facts section and later states the license as Anjouan-lisenssi (Anjouan Gaming) in other sections. A: Minimitalletus 10 € B: Minimitalletus 20 € Different sections of the page specify different minimum deposit amounts (10 € in some parts vs 20 € in the bonus rules). A: Nostot käsitellään kolmen arkipäivän kuluessa B: Nostot käsitellään hitaasti Withdrawal processing is described as three business days in some parts, while the page’s downsides claim withdrawals are slow, causing a direct contradiction in expected withdrawal speed. | ||
/arvostelu/moana-casino/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Päivitetty: 25. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 12/02/2026 Two different update dates are stated for Moana Casino content and bonuses within the same page, creating an inconsistency. A: Ensitalletusbonus 150% 2000 € asti B: 1 500 euron edestä bonusrahaa The quick facts claim a first-deposit bonus up to 2000€ at 150%, while the explicit welcome package states a total of 1500€ in bonus; this is inconsistent about the total welcome bonus and its cap. A: Yli 10 000 euron voitot kasino maksaa kuukausittaisissa erissä. B: Kuukausitasolla on mahdollista kotiuttaa enintään 7 000 euroa One part says winnings over 10,000 are paid monthly in installments, while another part states a hard monthly withdrawal cap of 7,000€, which cannot both be true. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset 40x (Talletus+Bonus) (1. talletuksella) B: Kierrätysvaatimukset 35x (Talletus+Bonus) (1. talletuksella) The bonus section/table lists first-deposit wagering at 40x, while the later text states 35x for the same bonuses, creating an internal inconsistency. A: 3. talletuksella 4000 ilmaiskierrosta B: 3. talletus: 350 ilmaiskierrosta The bonuses section claims 4,000 free spins for the third deposit, whereas another part of the page states 350 free spins for the third deposit, which is a direct contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/mogo-bet-casino/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/moi-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Tämä nettikasino ei tarjoa uskollisilleen virallista VIP-ohjelmaa B: Moi Casino vertailussa samankaltaisiin kasinoihin - VIP-ohjelma: Kyllä The page states there is no official VIP program, but a comparison table later claims a VIP program exists for Moi Casino, which is a direct contradiction about the presence of a VIP program. A: Kasinolla mainitaan päivittäinen 10% cashback ilman kierrätysvaatimusta B: bonusehdot paljastavat, ettei tämä etu ole suomalaisten pelaajien käytettävissä One part of the page mentions a daily 10% cashback without wagering, while another part states that this benefit is not available to Finnish players, creating a clear inconsistency about availability. A: Lisenssi: Curaçao, Viro, Kahnawake (Quick facts) B: Nykyään lisenssin myöntäjänä on Curaçao Gaming Control Board, ja Kahnawake-lisenssi mainittiin vain historiallisena The page lists multiple licenses in the quick facts section, while elsewhere it states the current licensor is Curaçao Gaming Control Board and refers to a former Kahnawake license, causing inconsistency about which licenses are currently valid. | ||
/arvostelu/mond-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Mond Casino opened in 2021. B: Mond Casino company info lists founding year as 2020 (estimated). Two different founding years are stated for Mond Casino: 2021 in the main review section and 2020 (estimated) in the company information, which is inconsistent. A: Mond Casino welcome bonus is a three-deposit package totaling up to 800€, with first deposit 100% up to 200€, second 50% up to 400€, and third 100% up to 200€. B: FAQ states a single first-deposit welcome bonus of 100% up to 700€ with a 30x wagering requirement. The page presents conflicting welcome-bonus structures: a three-deposit package totaling 800€ vs a single first-deposit bonus up to 700€, including different rollover requirements (35x vs 30x). A: The bonus wagering requirement is stated as 35x (deposit + bonus). B: The FAQ states wagering requirements of 30x. There is an inconsistency in the bonus wagering terms between sections: 35x vs 30x. | ||
/arvostelu/mono-play-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletus (minimum deposit) is €10, as stated in the Quick facts section. B: The first deposit minimum to claim the welcome bonus is €20, as listed in the bonus terms and how-to sections. The page simultaneously states a €10 minimum deposit in Quick facts while requiring a €20 minimum deposit to activate the first deposit bonus, which is a direct inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/monro/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Monro Casino marketing states that there is a mobile app for iOS and Android. B: The page states that the mobile app does not allow real-money play and is a play-money baccarat game. The page contains a direct contradiction: the site claims a real-money mobile app exists, but then clarifies the app only offers play money. A: The welcome bonus is described as 50% up to 300€. B: A FAQ section claims the welcome bonus is 100% up to 600€. Two clear, conflicting statements about the first-deposit bonus amount and cap. A: The minimum deposit is stated as 10€ in Quick Facts. B: The bonus terms section lists a minimum deposit of 20€ for the welcome bonus. Two different minimum deposit requirements are stated for playing or qualifying for the bonus. A: The page says monthly withdrawal cap is 125,000€. B: VIP level Supreme lists 'No limits' on withdrawals. Conflicting statements about withdrawal limits; a 'no limits' claim contradicts a global monthly cap. A: In the bonus test section, the reviewer writes: 'Tein 350 € talletuksen ja sain saman verran bonusrahaa' (I made a 350€ deposit and received a bonus equal to that amount). B: The official welcome bonus is described as 50% up to 300€ (i.e., a 350€ deposit should yield at most 300€ bonus). The reviewer claims a 350€ bonus on a 350€ deposit, contradicting the stated 50% up to 300€ cap. | ||
/arvostelu/monsterwin-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Monsterwin Casino avautui toukokuussa 2025 ... Valikoimasta bongasin yli 11 000 kasinopeliä. B: Kasinopelit ovat yli 12 000 erilaista nimikettä. The article presents two conflicting figures for the number of casino games: over 11,000 in one place and over 12,000 in another. A: Minimitalletus on 20 € (Kierrätysvaatimuuksissa listattu minimitalletus: 20 €). B: Minimitalletus on €10 (Min deposit: €10). Two sections specify different minimum deposit amounts (20 € vs 10 €). A: Kasinon toiminnasta vastaa NovaForge Ltd, joka on ollut toiminnassa vuodesta 2024 asti. B: Operaattori: Lumina Holdings (Monsterwin perustiedot -taulukossa). The page lists two different operators for Monsterwin: NovaForge Ltd and Lumina Holdings. A: Vastuullisen pelaamisen työkalut: Pelitilin jäädyttäminen väliaikaisesti; Tilin pysyvä sulkeminen. B: Miinuksissa lukee: Ei vastuullisen pelaamisen työkaluja. The page both lists actual responsible gaming tools and states in a pros/cons section that there are no such tools. | ||
/arvostelu/mozzart/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Miinukset
* Pieni tarjonta slotteja B: Kolikkopelien valikoima
Kuten jo hetki sitten totesimme, on slotteja karvan noin 1 800 kappaletta. The page lists 'Pieni tarjonta slotteja' as a drawback, but elsewhere it states there are around 1,800 slot games, which is a large number and directly contradicts the claim of a small slot selection. | ||
/arvostelu/mr-fortune/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Mr Fortune's welcome bonus is described as '200% talletusbonus 1500 € asti + 180 ilmaiskierrosta' (200% up to €1,500 and 180 free spins). B: The detailed three-deposit bonus terms specify: 1st deposit 100% up to €700 + 50 spins; 2nd deposit 50% up to €300 + 60 spins; 3rd deposit 50% up to €500 + 70 spins, totaling €1,100 in bonus money (not €1,500). The page presents a 200% welcome bonus up to €1,500, but the explicit per-deposit terms yield only €1,100 in bonus money, which contradicts the stated overall cap. A: Pelaamisen aloittaminen Mr Fortunella on mahdollista vain 5 euron minimitalletuksella. B: Minimitalletus bonus-ehdoissa on 20 € (Minimitalletus 20 €). The article states a 5€ minimum to start playing but bonus terms require a 20€ minimum for bonuses, a direct contradiction. A: Minimitalletus Quick Facts: 10 € (Min deposit €10). B: Minimitalletus bonus-ehdoissa on 20 € (Minimitalletus 20 €). There is an additional inconsistency where Quick Facts list a 10€ minimum, while the bonus rules require a 20€ minimum. | ||
/arvostelu/mr-pacho/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: LisenssiAnjouan Gaming License B: PAGCOR license The page presents conflicting licensing information, simultaneously listing Anjouan Gaming License in the Quick Facts and PAGCOR as the license in another section, indicating two incompatible licenses. A: Minimitalletus 15 € (Siru Mobile) 10 € (muut maksutavat) B: Minimitalletus 20 € Two sections specify different minimum deposit requirements for bonuses: 15 € and 10 € depending on method, versus 20 € stated for the bonus terms, which is inconsistent. A: Nostorajat 4 000 € / kk (alin VIP-taso) B: VIP-ohjelman korkein taso: kuukausittainen nostoraja 75 000 €, aloitustaso 7 000 € Withdrawal limits conflict: one part says the lowest VIP level has a 4,000 €/kk limit while another part states the base tier limit is 7,000 €/kk; both cannot be correct simultaneously. A: Kasinon sivut on lokalisoitu suomeksi; erinomainen suomenkielinen käyttöliittymä B: Asiakaspalvelu on englanniksi (ei suomenkielistä tukea) The page claims Finnish localization for the site, but also states customer support is English-only, creating a language support inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/mr-play/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kierrätysvaatimus: 0X B: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 35x (Talletus+Bonus) (for 1. talletuksella) and 35x (ilmaiskierrosta) (for first-deposit free spins) The page states that the welcome offer has 0x wagering for the free spins, but another section lists 35x wagering requirements for the first deposit bonus and for the free spins, which directly contradicts each other. | ||
/arvostelu/mr-punter-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: The Quick facts section lists a license as 'LisenssiAnjouan Gaming License' B: The company information section lists 'Lisenssi: Ei lisenssiä' The page simultaneously claims the site has an Anjouan Gaming License and that it has no license at all. A: Päivitetty: 23. lokakuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 23/02/2026 Two different last-update dates are stated for different parts of the page, creating inconsistency in update timing. A: Minimitalletus 10 € (as shown in Quick Facts / welcome sections) B: Minimitalletus 20 € (shown in the welcome bonus table) Two different minimum deposit amounts are stated for the welcome bonus and site deposits, causing conflicting requirements. | ||
/arvostelu/my-empire/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Jos asiakirjoja vaaditaan, tulee ne ladata kasinolle 30 päivässä. B: Kasino lupaa tarkistaa asiakirjat viimeistään kymmenessä päivässä. The page states that documents must be uploaded within 30 days if required, but also states that the casino will verify documents within 10 days, creating conflicting KYC timeframes. | ||
/arvostelu/mystake-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Mystake Casino has over 8,000 casino games. B: Mystake Casino has over 8,300 casino games. The article lists two different total game counts for Mystake Casino (over 8,000 in one section and over 8,300 in another), which is inconsistent for the same casino. A: Minimum deposit is €10. B: Minimum deposit is €20. The Quick facts section states a minimum deposit of €10, while the deposit/tutorial sections state a minimum deposit of €20, creating a clear inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/nalu-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus kasinolle on kaikilla maksutavoilla 25 €. B: Minimitalletus kasinolle on 20 € (minimitalletus 20 € for bonuses and in quick facts). The article cites 25€ as the minimum deposit in the deposits/payouts section, but other sections (bonus terms and quick facts) state a 20€ minimum deposit. A: Tervetulobonuksen tarjous: kolmeen osaan jaetun tervetuliaispaketin arvo on kokonaisuudessaan jopa 1500 € ja 500 ilmaiskierrosta. B: Tervetulobonuksen tarjous: kolmeen osaan jaetun tervetuliaispaketin arvo on kokonaisuudessaan jopa 1500 € ja 4000 ilmaiskierrosta. There is a conflict over the number of welcome spins: 500 spins in one description vs 4,000 spins in another. | ||
/arvostelu/naobet-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Quick facts section states 'Min deposit€10' B: Kierrätysvaatimukset section states 'Minimitalletus: 20 € (talletusbonus ja ilmaiskierrokset), 10 € (Bonus Crab)' The article gives conflicting minimum deposit requirements for Euro deposits: 10€ in the Quick facts, but 20€ as the minimum for the main deposit bonus (with 10€ minimum applying to Bonus Crab). This is a direct inconsistency about the standard minimum deposit. | ||
/arvostelu/need-for-spin/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus 100% 500 € asti B: Need for Spin tervetulobonus tarjous: 250 % talletusbonus 2 200 € saakka ja 550 ilmaispyöräytystä The article presents two different welcome bonuses: one states a first-deposit 100% bonus up to 500 €, while another describes a 250% deposit bonus up to 2,200 € plus 550 free spins, which cannot both be the actual offer. A: 1. talletuksella | 100% 500 € asti B: 1. talletus: 100 % bonus 300 € asti + 120 ilmaiskierrosta ja 3 kolikkoa The first-deposit bonus described in the bonus-structure table claims 100% up to 500 €, while the welcome-bonus section shows 1st deposit as 100% up to 300 € plus extra spins/coins, creating conflicting first-deposit offers. A: Need for Spin erottuu joukosta laajalla pelivalikoimallaan, joka kattaa yli 8 000 peliä B: Need for Spinilla on tarjolla reippaasti yli 15 000 kappaletta kasino- ja rahapelejä The page claims two different sizes of the game library: over 8,000 games in one section and over 15,000 games in another, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/neon54/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/neonvegas/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus: 25 € B: Minimitalletus on 10 euroa The article lists two different minimum deposit amounts in different sections: 25 € (for bonus wagering) and 10 € (as the general minimum deposit for deposits), which is inconsistent. A: Esimerkki: Ensimmäinen talletukseni oli 20 €, ja kierrätysvaatimus oli 1 600 € (= (20 € + 20 €) × 40). B: Minimitalletus: 25 € An example uses a 20 € deposit, which conflicts with the stated minimum deposit of 25 € for bonuses. | ||
/arvostelu/netbet/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: NetBet maksutavat: Neteller - Minimi kotiutus: Ei voi nostaa B: NetBet lists Neteller as a withdrawal method (NetBet Casinon maksutavat table includes Neteller). There is a direct contradiction: the withdrawal methods table lists Neteller as a payout option, but also states that Neteller withdrawals are not possible ('Ei voi nostaa'). | ||
/arvostelu/ninja-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Ninja Casinolla sinun ei tarvitse ihan hirveästi käyttää aikaa sopivan maksutavan valitsemiseen, sillä ainoa käytettävissä oleva maksuvaihtoehto on ruotsalainen Zimpler AB. B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä 3 The page claims that the only available payment method is Zimpler AB, yet the comparison table later lists three payment service providers, contradicting the 'only Zimpler' claim. | ||
/arvostelu/ninlay/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Ninlay Casinon lisenssi: Anjouan Gaming License B: Kansainvälinen lisenssi valvoo toimintaa. The article simultaneously asserts that Ninlay is licensed by Anjouan and that operations are overseen by a 'Kansainvälinen lisenssi' (international license), which are incompatible licensing statements. A: Minimitalletus 20 € (1. talletuksella bonus-taulukon mukaan) B: Minimitalletus 10 € (vain bonus grab) sekä 20 € (bonus + ilmaiskierrokset). The page contains conflicting minimum deposit requirements: 20 € in the main bonus terms table for the first deposit, but also states a 10 € minimum for the 'bonus grab' option and 20 € for 'bonus + ilmaiskierrokset', creating an unambiguous inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/nitro-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Nitro Casino on pikakasino konseptin alkuperäisessä merkityksessä, eli maksutapoja on vain yksi. B: Se tarjoaa kyllä Bank Transfer -palvelun ja vaihtoehdon käyttää Revolut-pankkia. The article first claims that as a classic 'pay-and-play' (no-registration) fast-casino, Nitro has only a single payment method, but later states that it offers Bank Transfer and Revolut as options, which is inconsistent. A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus bonuksen lunastamiseksi on 25 €. There is a discrepancy where the quick facts list a minimum deposit of €10, while the bonus rules state a €25 minimum deposit to be eligible for the welcome bonus. A: Nitro Casino mainostaa 1 000 kolikkopelin valikoimaa. B: todellinen lukema lienee yli 3 000 slottia. The text alternates between claiming 1,000 slot games and stating the actual number is likely over 3,000, which is a direct inconsistency. A: Minimitalletus (Nitro) in the Nitro Casino vs. Jellona comparison table: 10 €. B: Minimitalletus bonuksen lunastamiseksi on 25 €. The comparison table lists a 10€ minimum deposit, while the bonus section specifies a 25€ minimum to claim the bonus, creating a conflicting deposit requirement. | ||
/arvostelu/nomini/ | Issues | 6 contradictions |
A: Nomini Casino lanseerattiin vuonna 2019. B: Nomini Casino perustettu vuonna 2021. Two different founding years are stated for Nomini Casino within the same page. A: Nomini Casino Quick facts lists lisenssi Curaçao. B: Nomini Casino's company information states lisenssi Anjouan (ALS I-202411077-FI2) and implies tax status tied to Anjouan. Two different licenses are referenced (Curaçao vs Anjouan) in the same text, implying conflicting licensing information. A: Voittoja ei voi kotiuttaa verovapaasti (voitot eivät ole verovapaita). B: Voitot ovat verollisia Suomessa Anjouan-lisenssillä. The article contradicts itself on taxation, claiming winnings are not tax-free in one place and taxable due to the license in another. A: Pelivalikoima ilmoittaa yli 13 000 peliä. B: Kolikkopelien arvostelussa ilmoitetaan yli 11 600 peliä. Total game count vs. subset (slots) count are inconsistent. A: Monet jackpot-pelit puuttuvat. B: Jacpot-pelien arvostelussa valikoimassa on yli 1 400 jackpot-pelejä. Inconsistent statements about jackpot availability: some text says many jackpots are missing, while another cites a large jackpot collection. A: Kotiutukset käsitellään tyypillisesti kolmen arkipäivän aikana. B: Kotiutukset voivat kestää parikin viikkoa. Withdrawal processing time is described as both typically three days and potentially several weeks. | ||
/arvostelu/nopein/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: No traditional welcome bonuses are offered; instead the site provides a daily cashback of 15%. B: Via Kasinohain you can receive 200 free spins when joining Nopein Casino. The page simultaneously claims there is no standard welcome bonus and also asserts that 200 free spins can be obtained via an affiliate link, which is a direct contradiction regarding welcome bonuses. A: Minimum deposit is €20 (minimitalletus 20 €; min deposit shown as €20 in Quick Facts). B: During the account setup, the deposit minimum is €10 (minimi talletus 10 €) for deposits, with €20 needed for bonuses. Different sections of the page list conflicting minimum deposit amounts (€20 in some places vs €10 in the registration steps), creating an inconsistent requirement for deposits. A: Nopein Casino is licensed by Estonian EMTA (Estonia) with license numbers HKL000400 and HKT000071. B: In the Nopein Casino vs. Pelaa Nyt comparison table, the license is listed as Virolainen/Curacao for Nopein Casino. The main content asserts an Estonian EMTA license, while the comparison table lists the license as Virola/Curacao, which contradicts the stated licensing status. A: Revolut is listed as a supported payment method (deposits and withdrawals) via Zimpler. B: The payment methods table only lists Zimpler with a set of banks and does not mention Revolut. The article claims Revolut support, but the dedicated payment methods table omits Revolut, creating inconsistency about available payment options. | ||
/arvostelu/nords-casino/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/north-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Kasino perustettiin vuonna 2021. B: Perustettu: 2024 (Kasinon perustiedot). The article states two different founding years for North Casino: 2021 in the experience section and 2024 in the basic information. A: Minimitalletus: 25 € (Kierrätysvaatimukset section). B: Minimitalletus: 5 € (Min deposit in Quick facts). The page lists conflicting minimum deposit amounts: 25 € in the bonus terms versus 5 € in the quick facts. A: Maksutapojen määrä on 8 kappaletta. B: Maksutapoja on listattu yhteensä 9 eri tapaa (MiFinity, Visa, Maestro, Mastercard, Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, USDT, Bitcoin Cash). The article first states there are 8 payment methods, but later lists 9 different methods. A: Päivitetty: 7. tammikuuta 2026 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 11/02/2026 Two different update dates are shown: the page update date vs the bonus update date, indicating inconsistent timestamps. | ||
/arvostelu/nova-jackpot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Nova Jackpot on vuoden 2023 loppupuolella julkaistu suomalaisille suunnattu nettikasino ja vedonlyöntisivusto, jonka omistaa Rapidi N.V. Kasino toimii Curacaon lisenssillä, mikä takaa turvallisuuden mutta tarkoittaa, että voitot eivät ole verovapaita suomalaisille. B: Nova Jackpot Casino toimii Anjouan Gamingin pelilisenssillä (lisenssi: Anjouan Gaming License / Gaming Board of Anjouan). The article alternates between Curacao licensing and Anjouan licensing for Nova Jackpot, reporting two different regulatory jurisdictions. This creates a clear internal contradiction about which license governs the casino and, by extension, the tax status claims tied to that license. | ||
/arvostelu/ocean-spin-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Ocean Spin toimii tällä hetkellä melko tuoreen Anjouanin PAGCOR-lisenssin alla. B: LisenssiAnjouan Gaming License The article inconsistently lists licensing: one section states Ocean Spin is licensed under an Anjouan PAGCOR license, while the Quick Facts section lists the license as Anjouan Gaming License (without PAGCOR). This is a direct contradiction about which licensing authority governs the site. | ||
/arvostelu/oh-my-spins/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus on 20 € (listed in the bonus table) B: Minimitalletus on 10 € (stated in the bonus rules section) The page presents two different minimum deposit requirements for the bonus: 20 € in the bonus table and 10 € in the bonus rules, which cannot both be correct. A: OhMySpins Trustpilot arvosana on 1.5/5 B: OhMySpins Casinon arvosana (page header) 3.31/5 The page cites two different overall ratings for OhMySpins—the Trustpilot rating and the page's own rating—creating a contradiction about the site's typical user rating. | ||
/arvostelu/ohmyzino/ | Issues | 6 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus: 100% 250 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta B: OhMyZino tervetulobonus tarjous: 225% up to 1,500 € + 500 ilmaiskierrosta, with a 3-deposit structure (1st deposit 100% up to 2,000 €, 2nd deposit 100% up to 2,000 €, 3rd deposit 4,000 freespins) The page presents two diverging welcome bonus structures: a first-deposit bonus of 100% up to 250 € plus 50 free spins, and a separate offer describing a 225% bonus up to 1,500 € with 500 free spins and a different multi-deposit breakdown. A: Minimitalletus: 25 € B: Minimitalletus: €20 (Min deposit €20) Different sections of the page specify different minimum deposit requirements (25 € in the bonus terms vs 20 € in quick facts), creating a clear inconsistency. A: OhMyZino etusivulla: yli 5 000 peliä B: Tänä päivänä pelejä löytyy yli 10 400 kappaletta The page first claims the site has over 5,000 games, but later states there are over 10,400 games, which is a direct numerical contradiction about the size of the game library. A: VIP-ohjelma: VIP-ohjelma sivuilta löytyy ja se on kutsuperusteinen (VIP-statuksen asiakkailla voi olla oikeus tehdä korkeampia kotiutuksia) B: OhMyZino vertailussa: VIP-ohjelma Ei One section asserts that OhMyZino has a VIP program by invitation, while the comparison table marks the VIP program as 'No', presenting a direct contradiction about the existence of a VIP program. A: Lisenssi: Curaçao, Costa Rica B: Lisenssi: Curaçao The licensing information is inconsistent: one part lists Curaçao and Costa Rica as licenses, while another part lists only Curaçao, causing a contradiction about the regulatory status. A: Minimitalletus 10 € (OhMyZino vs Lunar Spins section: 'minimitalletus on 10 €') B: Minimitalletus 25 € / 20 € (elsewhere on the page) The Lunar Spins comparison states a 10 € minimum deposit, which contradicts other sections that specify 25 € (and a Quick Facts section stating 20 €) as the minimum deposit, creating inconsistency in deposit requirements. | ||
/arvostelu/olybet/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Min deposit: €10 B: Minimum deposits by method: Brite €20, Visa €5, Mastercard €5, Neteller €30, Skrill €30, Bank transfer €20 The Quick Facts section states a universal minimum deposit of €10, but the per-method deposit minimums show that deposits can be as low as €5 (for Visa or Mastercard), meaning the actual minimum can be lower than €10, which is a clear contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/olympusbet/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: 1. talletuksella | Minimitalletus 20 € B: Kierrätysvaatimukset | Minimitalletus 10 € The article contains conflicting minimum deposit requirements for the bonus: the 1st deposit row lists a minimum deposit of 20 €, while the general bonus terms section states a minimum deposit of 10 €. | ||
/arvostelu/omnislots/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: In the OmniSlots Casino comparison table, the 'Asiakaspalvelu' row shows '24/7, vain englanniksi' (English-only support). B: In the article text, it states that customer support is not available in Finnish, not even machine translation, implying Finnish support is not available. The table claims English-only support for OmniSlots, while the prose explicitly states there is no Finnish-language support, creating a direct inconsistency about language availability of customer service. A: All deposits must be rolled over 6 times (6x kierrätysvaatimus) before withdrawal. B: AML guidelines could justify only a 1–2x turnover requirement, but OmniSlots applies a 6x requirement, implying inconsistency with AML norms. The text asserts a 6x turnover requirement, while it also states AML guidelines could justify 1–2x, which contradicts the stated deposit turnover rule. | ||
/arvostelu/onecasino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: One Casino mainostaa 350 pelin valikoimaa B: Arviomme mukaan pelejä on noin 600–800 The article claims One Casino advertises a 350-game library, while it also states in the same or related text that the actual game library is around 600–800 games, which directly contradicts the advertised figure. | ||
/arvostelu/only-spins/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletus 20 € B: Min deposit 10 € The page states a minimum deposit of 20 € to claim the welcome bonus, while elsewhere it lists a minimum deposit of 10 € to start playing; this creates an inconsistent minimum deposit requirement. | ||
/arvostelu/optibet/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: | Pelaajien arviot | Hyvä | Positiivisia kokemuksia | B: Optibetin Trustpilot-arvosana on keskiarvoltaan 2,5/5 perustuen noin 30 käyttäjäarvioon. The page presents 'Pelaajien arviot' as 'Hyvä' in a table, but separately states a Trustpilot rating of 2.5/5 with about 30 reviews and describes several negative issues, which is inconsistent about overall user sentiment. A: Optibet Casinon Maksutavat: monipuolisen maksutavan ja kotimaiseen käyttöön sopivat maksutavat (the descriptive text). B: Optibet Casinon maksutavat - Ominaisuudet table lists Maksutavat as Keskinkertainen and Rajalliset maksutavat. The descriptive text claims a diverse, Finnish-friendly set of payment methods, while the overview table rates payment methods as mediocre with limited options, creating a contradiction about availability. A: Siirto | 10 € | Talletus vain | Välitön talletus | Kotimainen suosittu vaihtoehto B: Kotiutusaika for Siirto is listed as 'Välitön talletus', which contradicts the 'Talletus vain' designation. In the Siirto row, the table marks the method as deposit-only ('Talletus vain'), but the withdrawal time column shows 'Välitön talletus', implying instant withdrawals, which is inconsistent with 'deposit-only'. | ||
/arvostelu/orionsbet-casino/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus 100% 250 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta B: Orionsbetillä uudet pelaajat toivotetaan tervetulleiksi ... 205 % talletusbonus 1 200 € saakka The page presents two clearly different welcome bonuses: a 100% bonus up to €250 with 50 free spins, and a 205% deposit bonus up to €1,200. Both cannot be the same welcome offer. A: Orionsbetin tervetulobonus: 205 % talletusbonus 1 200 € saakka (125%/400€, 80%/600€, 100%/200€) B: Kolmiosaista tervetulobonusta koskeva FAQ-väite: 225 % bonusrahaa 1 500 € asti sekä 500 ilmaispyöräytystä Two separate sections describe different welcome bonus structures (205% up to €1,200 with specific deposit splits vs 225% up to €1,500 with 500 free spins), which cannot both be correct simultaneously. A: Lisenssi: Curaçao, Costa Rica B: Lisenssi: Curaçao Gaming Authority (Curaçao-lisenssi) The quick facts list two licenses (Curaçao and Costa Rica), while the license section describes a Curaçao license and does not mention a Costa Rica license, creating an inconsistent licensing claim. A: Live-chat - contact method listed under Asiakaspalvelu B: During testing, live chat was unavailable and only a chatbot responded The page lists Live-chat as a contact option, but the narrative states the live chat was closed and only the chatbot was available, which is a direct contradiction about support availability. A: Kierrätysvaatimus (tervetulobonus): 35x (Talletus+Bonus) B: Viikoittaiset tarjoukset: kierrätysvaatimus 30x (esim. maanantain ilmaiskierroksille) The welcome bonus is described with a 35x turnover, while the weekly promotions state a 30x turnover for some offers, introducing an inconsistency in turnover requirements within the same page. | ||
/arvostelu/paf/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kasinon perustiedot: Lisenssi: Lotteriinspektionen, Åland B: Lisenssit ja turvallisuus: Paf holds multiple licenses (Ahvenanmaa/Lotteriinspektionen, Viro/EMTA, Ruotsi/Spelinspektionen, Latvia/IAUI, Espanja/DGOJ) The page's basic info lists only an Åland license, but later sections claim additional licenses from Estonia, Sweden, Latvia, and Spain, creating a contradiction about the operator's licensing. | ||
/arvostelu/palm-slots/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus: 100% up to €500 + 50 ilmaiskierrosta (first deposit). B: Palm Slots tervetulobonus tarjous: 300% talletusbonus up to €2,500 and 250 ilmaiskierrosta across the first four deposits. One section advertises a 100% up to €500 + 50 spins for the first deposit, while another section promotes a four-deposit package totaling 300% up to €2,500 with 250 spins. The two bonuses are incompatible. A: Palm Slots has a VIP program with invitation-based access and benefits (VIP welcome bonus, personal account manager, etc.). B: In the Palm Slots comparison table, VIP-ohjelma is listed as Ei (No VIP program). The article describes an invitation-based VIP program with various benefits, but the comparison table denies the existence of a VIP program. A: Suomenkielinen käännös on jäänyt puolitiehen (Finnish translation is incomplete). B: The Palm Slots comparison table marks Suomenkielinen sivu: Kyllä (Finnish site exists). The text states the Finnish translation is partial, yet the comparison table asserts a Finnish site exists, creating an inconsistency. A: Asiakaspalvelu: Live-chat is 24/7 and support is available around the clock. B: Trustpilot section notes that email responses can take weeks, suggesting slower service there. The page claims 24/7 support, but Trustpilot feedback mentions very slow email responses, revealing conflicting claims about service responsiveness. | ||
/arvostelu/pandido-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Kierrokset lisätään pelitilille kymmenen päivän aikana B: Kierrokset lisätään pelitilille 20 päivässä The article states two different timeframes for crediting the free spins, ten days and twenty days, which cannot both be correct. A: Minimitalletus 20 € B: Minimitalletus 10 € The welcome bonus rules specify a 20 € minimum deposit, whereas the quick facts list a 10 € minimum deposit, creating a numeric contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/paratiisi-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus on 30 € (bonus/kierrätysvaatimuksiin liittyen). B: Paratiisi kasinon minimitalletus on 20 euroa. The page shows two different minimum deposit amounts: 30 EUR in the bonus terms for claiming the free spins, and 20 EUR as the general minimum deposit. This is an inconsistent depost rule within the same page. A: Kotiutukset on rajoitettu 5 000 € päivässä. B: Kotiutuksille on 100 000 € vuorokaudessa (kumulatiivinen nettotuloksen rajoitus, mahdollisesti VIP-tasosta riippuen). The text simultaneously states a 5,000 EUR daily withdrawal limit and a 100,000 EUR per-day cumulative net profit limit, creating conflicting withdrawal caps within the same content. A: WowPot jackpot on 10 218 298 euroa. B: Mega Moolah jackpot on 3 466 077 miljoonaan euroon. The page lists two jackpot totals that are inconsistent in scale and formatting: WowPot at about 10,218,298 EUR and Mega Moolah described as 3,466,077 million EUR (which would be far larger than a typical jackpot and contradicts the other figure). | ||
/arvostelu/paripesa-casino/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Paripesa Casinolla on VIP-tunnus ja VIP-tasot sekä erikoiskohtelua saava kanta-asiakasohjelma. B: Paripesa vertailussa -taulukko listaa VIP-ohjelman: Ei. The article describes a VIP program with tiers and benefits, but the comparison table marks the VIP program as not available, creating a direct inconsistency. A: Paripesa on Suomenkielinen sivusto/sisältö (suomenkielinen lokalisaatio). B: Paripesa vertailussa samankaltaisiin kasinoihin -taulukko: Suomenkielinen sivu: Ei. The article repeatedly indicates Finnish language support, while the comparison table claims there is no Finnish page, which is inconsistent. A: Paripesa tarjoaa rahansiirtoihin 19 turvallista maksutapaa. B: Paripesa vertailussa samankaltaisiin kasinoihin -taulukko lists Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä as 18. Two parts of the page disagree on the number of payment providers available (19 vs 18). A: Kotiutusrajoja ei ole (no withdrawal limits). B: Visa-maksun yläraja per siirto on 2 000 euroa, indicating a per-transaction withdrawal limit. Saying there are no withdrawal limits conflicts with a stated per-transaction limit of 2,000 euros for Visa withdrawals. A: Quick facts listää sähköpostituen osoitteeksi Sähköpostisupport-en@paripesa.com. B: Vertailutaulukko listaa Sähköpostituki support-en@paripesa.com (eri osoite). Two different support email addresses are presented for the same service, causing inconsistency in contact information. | ||
/arvostelu/pelaa-nyt-kasino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pelaa Nyt kasino pelivalikoima on kattava ja tarjoaa parisen tuhatta kasinopeliä. B: Pelivalikoima table lists Pelaa Nyt as +5900 games. The article claims around 2,000–3,000 games, but later the comparison table lists 5,900+ games for Pelaa Nyt, which is an explicit numeric inconsistency about total games. | ||
/arvostelu/pelikaani-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Miinukset
* Vain yksi maksutapa B: Pelikaani Kasino vertailussa
| Kasino | Arvosana | Bonusrakenne | Kierrätysvaatimukset | Käteispalautus | Minimitalletus | Miniminosto | Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä | VIP-ohjelma | Verovapaa | Suomenkielinen sivu | Live-chat | Puhelintuki | Sähköpostituki | Pelaa |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Pelikaani | Arvosana ★ 4.43/ 5 | Bonusrakenne 1000 ilmaiskierrosta | Kierrätysvaatimukset Ei kierrätysvaatimuksia | Käteispalautus Ei cashback-bonusta | Minimitalletus 10 € | Miniminosto - | Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä 2 | VIP-ohjelma Ei | Verovapaa Kyllä | Suomenkielinen sivu Kyllä | Live-chat Kyllä | Puhelintuki Ei | Sähköpostituki support@pelikaani.com | [Pelaa](https://www.kasinohai.com/go/pelikaani) | The page explicitly states in a 'Downsides' section that there is only one payment method, but in the Pelikaani comparison table it lists 'Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä 2' (two payment service providers), which contradicts the stated downside. | ||
/arvostelu/pelikioski-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Progressiivisia jackpot-pelien ei näytä olevan lainkaan B: Pelikioski kokemuksia: Urheiluvedonlyönti, progressiiviset jackpotit ja 24/7 asiakastuki tekisivät kasinosta vieläkin paremman. One section claims there are no progressive jackpot games, while another section implies progressive jackpots would improve the casino, suggesting their existence. | ||
/arvostelu/pelipeto/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Vain yksi maksutapa B: Pelipeto maksutavat section states money can be moved via Zimpler and bank-based payments (pankkitunnuksilla). The 'Miinukset' list claims there is only one payment method, while the 'Maksutavat' section describes multiple payment methods (Zimpler and bank-based payments), creating a contradiction. A: Nostot hoituvat välittömästi (withdrawals are processed instantly) per FAQ B: Käyttöehdot say withdrawals are processed within five business days. The page contains conflicting withdrawal timelines: the FAQ suggests immediate processing, whereas the terms state a 5-day processing window. | ||
/arvostelu/pistolo-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Min deposit: €10 The page lists two different minimum deposit requirements: 20 € for the welcome bonus in the bonus rules section, and 10 € as the general minimum deposit in the quick facts. This is a direct inconsistency about the minimum amount to deposit. | ||
/arvostelu/plan-games-casino/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/platin-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Ensitalletusbonus – 100% up to 500 € B: Platin Casinolla on luvassa 100% bonus aina 2000 € asti The page presents two different maximum welcome bonuses for the first deposit (500 € in one section and 2000 € in another), which is a direct inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/playfast-casino/ | Issues | 8 contradictions |
A: Kasino lanseerattiin Suomessa 2024 ja sen omistajana toimii ProgressPlay Limited Curacaon lisenssin turvin. B: Perustettu: 2021 The article claims the casino launched in Finland in 2024, but the basic info box lists the founding year as 2021, which is inconsistent. A: PlayFast houkuttaa pelaajia yli 13 000 pelillään. B: yli 11 400 peliä The page initially states over 13,000 games, but later sections reference around 11,400 games, creating a contradiction in total game count. A: kolme tervetuliaisbonuksellaan (jopa 2000€!) B: 1. talletuksella: 150% 2000 € asti; 2. talletuksella: 100% 2000 € asti; 3. talletuksella: 250% + 4000 ilmaiskierrosta One part of the article suggests three welcome bonuses totaling up to 2,000€, while another section lists two deposits with specific percentages up to 2,000€ plus a third deposit offering 250% plus 4,000 free spins, which are incompatible. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 40x (Talletus+Bonus) B: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 35x (Talletus+Bonus) The terms state 40x wagering, but an example within the page uses 35x, causing an explicit inconsistency. A: Kryptovaluutat: Ethereum, Bitcoin, Tether, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash B: Testatessani PlayFastia ... maksutapavalikoima on yllättävän suppea – ei kryptovaluuttoja eikä mobiilimaksuja The payment methods section lists cryptocurrencies, while a quoted reviewer states there are no crypto payments, a direct contradiction. A: Lisenssi Costa Rica B: Lisenssi: Curaçao; Lisenssinumero: 8048/JAZ2021-155 The quick facts claim a Costa Rica license, while the license section details a Curaçao license with a license number, creating inconsistency. A: Trustpilot arvosana 2.3/5 B: header rating 2.8/5 Two different overall ratings are shown for PlayFast Casino (2.3/5 from Trustpilot vs 2.8/5 in the header), which is inconsistent. A: Käsittelyaikaa jopa kolme arkipäivää nostopyynnön käsittelyyn B: Kotiutukset 2–3 päivää Withdrawal processing times are given as up to 3 business days in one section and 2–3 days in another, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/playfina/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Playfina tarjosi ennen neliosaisen tervetuliaispaketin, mutta tämä on valitettavasti muuttunut. Tällä hetkellä kasino ei tarjoa enää bonus tarjousta uusille pelaajille. B: Millainen on Playfinan tervetuliaisbonus? Tarjolla on 225 % bonus 1 000 € saakka ja 600 ilmaiskieppiä sekä jonkinlainen yllätysbonus. One part of the text states there is no welcome bonus currently, while another part claims a welcome bonus exists (225% up to €1,000 + 600 free spins and a mystery bonus), which is a direct contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/playfrank/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Hyvän pelikokemuksen perustana on yli 3 500 kasinopeliä. B: Vuonna 2026 PlayFrank Casinolla on 3 000–3 500 peliä. The two statements assign the total number of games to conflicting values: one claims more than 3,500 games, while the other states a total range up to 3,500. They cannot both be true. A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Min deposit€10 Two different minimum deposit amounts are stated for PlayFrank: €20 in the bonus terms and €10 in the Quick facts. They conflict. | ||
/arvostelu/playojo/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Kotiutukset voivat kestää jopa seitsemän (7) päivää. B: Nostot nettilompakoille luvataan alle 24 tunnissa (ja yleisesti 1–3 päivää). The page states contradictory withdrawal times: withdrawals can take up to 7 days, while it also promises under 24 hours for e-wallet withdrawals (and elsewhere cites 1–3 days). A: Suurin mahdollinen voitto yksittäisellä panostuksella on 500 €. B: Panos on 0,10 €, joten 500×panos ei voi olla 500 €, vaan 50 € at most per single spin; thus the stated max win is inconsistent with the stated bet size. The stated maximum win per bet contradicts the given stake: with a 0.10€ bet, a 500x win would be 50€, not 500€. | ||
/arvostelu/playoro-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Lisenssi Curaçao, Kahnawake B: Lisenssi: Kahnawake Gaming Comission The Quick Facts section lists Curaçao and Kahnawake licenses, while the licensing section states the license is Kahnawake Gaming Commission (Kahnawake Gaming Comission) only, creating an inconsistency about which license applies. | ||
/arvostelu/playtoro/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Playtoro Casinolla on käytössä yksi maksutapa, joka on Trustly. B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä on 11. The page simultaneously states that only Trustly is available and that there are 11 payment service providers, which cannot both be true. A: Minimitalletus on 10 € (Quick Facts: Min deposit €10; talletuksia min 10 €). B: Minimitalletus bonuksille on 20 € (Minimitalletus 20 € in the bonus terms). The deposit minimum for general use and the bonus-specific minimum are inconsistent: 10 € vs 20 €, creating conflicting requirements. A: Kotiutusaika on 5–15 minuuttia (Kotiutusaika 5–15 minuuttia). B: Kotiutukset voivat kestää jopa vuorokauden ja joskus käsittelyaika venyy (kotiutukset tyypillisesti minuuteissa, mutta joskus vuorokauteen). Withdrawal processing times are described both as 5–15 minutes and as sometimes taking up to 24 hours, which is contradictory. A: Onko Playtoro suomenkielinen asiakaspalvelu? Ei ole, Playtoro toimii ilman lokalisointia. B: Asiakaspalvelun toimivuus suomeksi (Finnish-language customer support) is listed as a key strength in the article. The page asserts there is no Finnish-language support, yet also promotes Finnish-language customer service as a strength, which is inconsistent. A: Lisenssinumero MGA/CRP/171/2009 (myönnetty 1.8.2018) B: The license number includes 2009 while the license is stated as granted in 2018. The license number contains 2009, but the text states the license was granted in 2018, creating a conflicting date/number claim. | ||
/arvostelu/pledoo/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Pledoo Casino toimii ilman lisenssiä. B: Lisenssi: Curaçao. The page states both that the casino operates without a license and that it has a Curaçao license, which are mutually exclusive licensing statuses. A: Sivusto ja pelit auditoidaan säännöllisesti lisenssinantajan toimesta. B: Pledoo Casino toimii ilman lisenssiä. Audit by a licensor presupposes a license; if the casino has no license, such regular audits by a licensor would be inconsistent with that claim. A: Pledoo Casinolla on pelattavissa noin 50 pelistudion pelejä. B: Pelivalmistajat Pledoo Casinolla -taulukossa on listattu viisi pelivalmistajaa (Hacksaw Gaming, Pragmatic Play, Play’n GO, NetEnt, Red Tiger). The text claims games from about 50 studios, but only five game developers are listed; this is inconsistent about the breadth of the game library. A: Minimitalletus (bonus) 50 € B: Minimitalletus (yleisesti) 10 € The bonuses section states a minimum deposit of 50 € for bonuses, while the quick facts section lists a minimum deposit of 10 €; these conflicting minimums create inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/pommi-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Brite-pikakasino 1 € minimitalletuksella B: Min deposit€20 The article lists two different minimum deposit amounts for Pommi Casino: 1 euro in some sections and 20 euros in the Quick facts, which is a direct numeric inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/posido/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus on 10 € (Minim deposit in Quick facts: Min deposit€10). B: Minimitalletus 20 € (Minimitalletus 20 € in bonus terms). The page lists two different minimum deposit requirements: €10 in the Quick Facts section and €20 in the bonus terms, which cannot both be correct. A: Käteispalautus 25% 200 € asti (Käteispalautus 25% 200 € asti). B: Kanta-asiakasohjelman parhaat edut: Käteispalautus aina 3 000 euroon asti (VIP cashback up to €3,000). Cashback has conflicting limits: standard terms cap cashback at €200, while the VIP program claims cashback up to €3,000. A: Lisenssi: Curaçao, Viro (License listed in Quick facts). B: Lisenssin kuvaus/omistusoite: Viron lisenssi valvoo toimintaa, lisenssinumerot (esim. HKT000056, etc.) sekä osoite Kyproksella, mikä viittaa Viron ja Cyprus-tyyppisiin lisensointitietoihin. The page presents conflicting licensing information: Quick Facts lists Curaçao and Estonia, while other sections reference an Estonian license with numbers and a Cyprus address, creating ambiguity about the actual licensing jurisdiction. | ||
/arvostelu/possu-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Possu Casino kokemuksia states 200 ilmaiskierrosta for new players. B: Possu Casino tervetulobonus arvostelu states 76 ilmaiskierrosta (and 10€ minimum) for new players. The page alternates between 200 and 76 free spins for new players, and ties 76 spins to a 10€ minimum deposit in the bonus section, creating an unambiguous inconsistency in the welcome bonus offer. A: Minimitalletus is 1 euro (general deposits) as stated in Possu Casinon yleiskatsaus. B: Minimitalletus for the welcome bonus is 10 euros (76 ilmaiskierrosta bonus) as stated in Possu Casino tervetulobonus arvostelu/bonus section. The page shows conflicting minimum deposit requirements: 1€ for general deposits, but 10€ to qualify for the welcome bonus. | ||
/arvostelu/powbet/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: PowBet Casinolla on PAGCORin lisenssi. B: Lisenssi: Anjouan Gaming License. The page lists two different licenses for PowBet—PAGCOR (Philippines) in one section and Anjouan Gaming License in another—creating an unambiguous contradiction about which licensing authority regulates PowBet. A: PowBetin asiakaspalvelu tarjoaa suomenkielistä tukea 24/7 käännösohjelman avulla. B: PowBet Casino ei tarjoa aitoa suomenkielistä asiakaspalvelua vuonna 2026. The article first states that customer support is available in Finnish via a translation program, then later claims there is no genuine Finnish-language customer service in 2026, which is a direct contradiction about Finnish-language support. | ||
/arvostelu/power-up-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Kun ensimmäisillä neljällä talletuksella voi saada yhteensä 250 % bonusta 3000 euroon asti B: Ensimmäisten neljän talletuksen bonukset ovat 150% + 75% + 50% + 25% (yhteensä 300%), jolloin maksimibonus on 3000 € The page states a 250% total bonus for the first four deposits, but the bonus amounts listed for those deposits sum to 150% + 75% + 50% + 25% = 300%, which is inconsistent. A: neliosainen tervetulopaketti, joka sisältää 450 % bonusrahaa 1 000 € asti ja 300 ilmaiskierrosta B: The four-deposit welcome package is described elsewhere as 150% + 75% + 50% + 25% (up to 3000 €), not 450% The FAQ asserts a 450% welcome bonus up to €1,000, which contradicts the four-deposit structure described elsewhere on the page (150%/75%/50%/25%), implying a different total. A: Minimitalletus 20 € (bonus terms table for the welcome bonus) B: Minimitalletus is listed as 10 € in Quick Facts and in several sections (Min deposit €10) The site inconsistently lists the minimum deposit as 20 € in the bonus section, while other sections and Quick Facts show 10 €; this is a clear internal contradiction. A: Päivitetty: 5. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 23/02/2026 Two different update dates are shown for content: the page is marked as updated in December 2025, while the bonus terms indicate an update in February 2026, creating an inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/pribet/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pribet Casino toimii Curacao-lisenssin alla (Curacao lisenssi) ja suomalaispelaajien voitoista maksetaan veroa B: Pribet Casino toimii Malta Gaming Authority (MGA) -lisenssillä ja suomalaispelaajien voitot ovat verovapaita The page presents Curacao licensing implying taxable winnings, but later claims MGA licensing implying tax-free winnings; these licensing statements conflict and imply opposite tax treatments. | ||
/arvostelu/primebetz-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: PrimeBetz Casino on tarjonnut kasinopelejä vuodesta 2023 alkaen. B: Lisenssit ja turvallisuus -kohdassa listataan PrimeBetz Casinon 'Vuosi' arvoksi 2024. The page asserts the casino has offered games since 2023, but the licensing info box lists the year as 2024, creating a clear inconsistency about when the casino started operating. A: 2. talletuksella: 50% 500 € asti B: 2. Bonus: 100% 500 € asti + 100 ilmaiskierrosta The second deposit bonus is described differently in two sections: one states a 50% match up to 500, while another states a 100% match up to 500 plus 100 free spins, which contradicts each other. | ||
/arvostelu/prontobet/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: ProntoBet lists its license as EMTA (Lisenssi: EMTA; Lisenssinumero: HKT000060 ja HKL000373). B: The Quick facts section lists licenses Curaçao, Viro, and Kahnawake. The page presents conflicting licensing information: one section indicates an EMTA license, while the Quick facts section lists Curaçao, Viro, and Kahnawake licenses. A: Withdrawals are processed within a few minutes (Kotiutukset käsitellään muutamien minuuttien sisällä). B: 'Ensimmäinen 50 € kotiutukseni hyväksyttiin noin 45 minuutissa, mutta tilillä raha näkyi vasta seuraavana päivänä.' There is a contradiction between the claimed processing time (minutes) and a user testimonial describing a withdrawal that took about 45 minutes to be approved but only appeared the next day. A: Päivitetty: 9. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 04/02/2026 Two different last-update dates are given for content sections (main page updated in 2025, bonus information updated in 2026), indicating inconsistent update history. | ||
/arvostelu/punterz/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Päivitetty: 13. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 07/02/2026 The page lists an overall update date of 13 November 2025, but also a bonus-update date of 7 February 2026, implying the bonus information was updated after the page's stated last update. A: Viikossa on 10 000 euron kotiutusraja ja kuukausiraja on 40 000 euroa. B: Kotiutusten nopeus: Alle 15 minuuttia (Zimpler). Withdrawal timing is described both as a weekly/monthly limit and as withdrawals possibly taking under 15 minutes via Zimpler, which cannot both be true simultaneously. A: Tämän otoksen palautusprosentit eivät ole ihan parhaasta päästä, eikä RTP-lukua ole ilmoitettu kaikissa peleissä, vaikka kasinon UKK-osiossa niin mainitaan. B: RTP on ilmoitettu UKK-osiossa (RTP:ta on saatavilla UKK:ssa). One sentence says RTP is not shown for all games, while another note claims RTP is listed in the FAQ/UKK, creating a direct contradiction about RTP availability. | ||
/arvostelu/q88bets/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Kasinolla on arvostettu MGA-lisenssi sekä UK Gambling Commissionin myöntämä rahapelilupa. B: Kasinon perustiedot - Lisenssi: MGA; Lisenssinumero: MGA/B2C/231/2012 (UK Gambling Commission license is not listed). The FAQ claims the casino holds both MGA and UK Gambling Commission licenses, but the license block lists only MGA with a license number and does not list a UK Gambling Commission license. A: Nettilompakot 4–7 päivää. B: Kotiutus Skrillille maksoi 2,50 € käsittelymaksua ja nosto hyväksyttiin noin 1,5 tunnissa. Withdrawal times for e-wallets are stated as 4–7 days, but a user testimonial reports a Skrill withdrawal completed in about 1.5 hours, contradicting the stated timeframe. A: Verovapaiden voittojen perustana on Maltan pelilisenssi, eikä kasinolla veloiteta kuluja rahansiirroista. B: Kotiutuksesta Skrillille veloitettiin 2,50 € käsittelymaksu. The page claims there are no transfer fees, but a user testimonial states a 2.50 EUR processing fee for a Skrill withdrawal, contradicting the no-fee claim. | ||
/arvostelu/qbet/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/quickslot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Päivitetty: 10. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 10/02/2026 The page shows two update timestamps that are inconsistent: the main page update is stated as December 10, 2025, while the bonus section claims it was last updated February 10, 2026, creating an inconsistent timeline for updates. | ||
/arvostelu/rabona-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: VIP ohjelma: 0-15 % cashback B: Vertailussa Rabona Casino -taulukossa Käteispalautus: Ei cashback-bonusta One section states the VIP program offers cashback (0-15%), while a comparison table lists Rabona as having no cashback bonuses, which is a direct inconsistency. A: Minimitalletus bonusasioissa: 20 € B: Minimitalletus kierrätysvaatimuksissa: 10 € Two parts of the page specify different minimum deposit amounts for the bonus: 20 € in one table, and 10 € in another section, constituting a clear discrepancy. | ||
/arvostelu/raju-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Trustly is the only payment method. B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä 3 (three payment providers). The article states that payments are via Trustly only, but a later comparison table lists three payment providers, implying more than one method is available. A: Kierrätysvaatimus: 1x. B: Kierrätysvaatimukset: Ei kierrätysvaatimuksia. One section claims a 1x wagering requirement, while another part states there are no wagering requirements at all. A: Live chat is available from 08:00 to 02:00. B: Email support is available 24/7. The page lists limited live chat hours but advertises email support as 24/7, which is inconsistent in overall support availability. | ||
/arvostelu/raketti/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus 30 € B: Minimitalletus 20 € The page states two different minimum deposit amounts: 30 € in the bonus rules table and 20 € in the quick facts/step guidance, creating an unambiguous inconsistency. A: Yli 5 500 slottipeliä B: Yli 5 000 peliä The text lists over 5,500 slot games in one section, while another part claims over 5,000 games, which is a clear numerical inconsistency about the size of the game library. | ||
/arvostelu/rant-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Lisenssinumero: 00932 (voimassa 19.7.2023-19.1.2024) B: Rant Casino toimii Kahnawake-lisenssillä ja on voimassa oleva lisenssi (kasinon toiminta perustuu tähän lisenssiin). The license is stated with an expiry date of 19.1.2024, but the article was updated in 2025 and presents the casino as if the license remains current. This creates a contradiction about whether the license is still valid. | ||
/arvostelu/rapid-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Rapid Casino's claimed number of games is reilut 1 000 kappaletta pelejä B: The article states the actual number of games is about 3 000 kappaletta Two conflicting figures are given for total game count (1,000 vs 3,000), which cannot both be correct. A: Minimitalletus in the bonus section is 25 € B: Minimitalletus in the bonus/kierrätys section is 10 € Two different minimum deposit requirements are stated for the bonus/rollover terms, 25€ and 10€, indicating inconsistency. A: Päivitetty: 17. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 29/01/2026 The page shows different last-update dates for content and for the bonus rules, implying a timeline inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/real-spin-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus 20 € (as shown in the Real Spin bonus rules: Minimitalletus 20 € for 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th deposits). B: Vähimmäistalletus on 10 euroa (stated in Kierrätysvaatimukset) and the Quick facts list Min deposit €10. The page lists conflicting minimum deposit values: 20 € in the bonus rules, but 10 € in the general rules/quick facts, creating an internal inconsistency. A: Lisenssi: Anjouan (Anjouan Gaming License) with license number ALSI-102310002-FI5. B: The page also refers to a Curacao license (via the Curacao license logo) and instructs to verify license status by clicking Curacao logo, implying Curacao licensing. Two different licensing authorities are presented as the casino's license: Anjouan and Curacao, which is inconsistent. A: Talletusten 5x kierrätysvaatimus (deposit-based wagering requirement). B: Kierrätysvaatimukset section states 40x (Talletus+Bonus) and 40x (ilmaiskierrosta) wagering requirements. The article presents two different wagering requirements for bonuses: 5x for deposits and 40x for (deposit+bonus) and for free spins, which is contradictory. | ||
/arvostelu/red-dice/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Red Dice Casino ei mainosta sivuillaan kanta-asiakasohjelmaa tai VIP-etuuksia. B: Kasino on sisäinen VIP-järjestelmä. Toisin sanoin pelaajien aktiivisuutta tarkkaillaan kasinon toimesta, ja aktiivisimmille pelaajille myönnetään VIP-etuuksia, kuten oma tilinhoitaja, erikoisbonuksia sekä korkeammat kotiutusrajat. The article claims there is no publicly advertised loyalty/VIP program, but later states there is an internal VIP system offering benefits, which is a contradiction about whether a VIP program exists. A: Quick facts listaa lisensseiksi Curaçao, Viro, Kahnawake. B: Myöhemmin artikkeli väittää lisenssin olevan Viron lisenssi. The Quick Facts section lists multiple licenses (Curaçao, Vi (Estonia), Kahnawake), while another part of the article claims the license is specifically from Estonia (Viron). This is inconsistent about the casino's licensing. A: Red Dice Casinon maksutavat: Verkkopankki (Brite) on ainoa maksutapa. B: Red Dice Casino vertailussa -taulukossa Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä on 3. One section says only one payment method exists, but the comparison table lists three payment providers, which is a direct inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/red-dog/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Red Dog Casino's live chat is not available (live-chat ei ole käytössä). B: In the comparison table, the live chat is listed as 'Live-chat Kyllä' (Yes). The page contains a direct inconsistency about whether live chat support is available: one section claims live chat is not in use, while the comparison table marks live chat as available. A: Minimitalletus: 10–40 $ (riippuu maksutavasta). B: Min deposit€20 (Minimum deposit 20 euros) according to the Quick Facts section. There is a discrepancy in the stated minimum deposit: one part says 10–40 USD depending on payment method, while the quick facts section states a minimum deposit of 20 euros, implying conflicting currency thresholds. | ||
/arvostelu/red-lion/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Kasinon perustiedot: Lisenssi – Kasino toimii ilman lisenssiä B: Lähes Quick facts: Lisenssi – Curaçao The page states the casino operates without a license in the main section, but the quick facts claim a Curaçao license, which cannot both be true. A: Red Lion sanoo sivuillaan tarjoavansa yli 2 000 peliä B: Kaikkiaan niitä on yli 8 900 There is a contradiction in reported game counts: the site claims 2,000+ games, while the article asserts there are over 8,900. A: Kerralla voi kotiuttaa korkeintaan 500 euroa B: Kotiutusten maksimi vuorokaudessa 5 000 euroa Withdrawal limits conflict: a per-withdrawal cap of 500 EUR vs a per-day cap of 5,000 EUR. A: Live chat on 24/7 B: During testing, only a bot was reachable in chat (no human support) The site claims 24/7 live chat, but tester experience indicates only an automated bot was available, contradicting the claim of genuine 24/7 human support. | ||
/arvostelu/refuelcasino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Refuel Casino mainostaa etusivullaan tarjoavansa yli 4 000 kappaletta pelattavaa. B: Refuel Casino pelivalikoiman arvostelu states there are about 2 000 games. The article contains two conflicting claims about the total number of games: over 4,000 on the homepage versus about 2,000 in the review section. A: Kotiutusten nopeus on 72 tuntia. B: Payment methods table lists withdrawal speeds as 'Nopea kotiutus' for some methods (e.g., verkkopankki and net wallets). Withdrawals are described as taking up to 72 hours in one part, but the payment methods table lists some withdrawals as fast, which is inconsistent. A: Refuel Casinon maksutavat: 'reilut kymmenen maksutapaa' (over ten payment methods). B: In the Refuel Casino comparison table, Refuel is shown as having 18 payment providers. There is a mismatch between the narrative claim of over ten payment methods and the comparison table listing 18 providers. | ||
/arvostelu/reipas/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: pelejä on vain 1 100 kappaletta B: pelivalikoima sisältää vain 1 170 nimikettä The article presents two conflicting counts for the total number of games on the site: 1,100 vs 1,170. A: Kolikkopelejä on Reipas Casinon avajaisviikolla 1 101 kappaletta B: pelejä on vain 1 100 kappaletta Slot counts differ between sections, giving 1,101 vs 1,100, which is inconsistent within the same page. A: Kolikkopelejä on Reipas Casinon avajaisviikolla 1 101 kappaletta B: Kolikkopelejä on 1 170 kappaletta A separate section lists slot counts as 1,170, conflicting with the 1,101 figure for the same category. | ||
/arvostelu/respin-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Kierrätysvaatimukset 0x (Bonus) & Kierrätysvaatimukset 0x (ilmaiskierrosta) B: Reload Weekend - 25 % talletusbonus 100 € saakka vuorovikossa: Bonusrahaa koskee 35x kierrätysvaatimukset The article states zero wagering requirements for the welcome bonus and free spins, but later describes a weekly Reload Weekend bonus that carries a 35x wagering requirement, which is a direct contradiction. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset 0x (Bonus) & Kierrätysvaatimukset 0x (ilmaiskierrosta) B: Bonuksen vapautuminen osissa XP:n keräämisen myötä (XP-pisteet kerryttävät; 400 XP -> 10 €; bonus vapautuu osissa) – which implies wagering requirements The welcome bonus table claims 0x wagering for the bonus, yet the XP-based release mechanism described later implies wagering to unlock the cash bonus, creating a contradiction in the stated wagering requirements. | ||
/arvostelu/revolution-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus on 20 €. B: Talleta vähintään 10 €. One section states a minimum deposit of 20 €, while another part instructs to deposit at least 10 €, creating an internal inconsistency. A: Maksimassaan kotiuttaa voi 5 000 euroa. B: tasolla 1 päivässä saa kotiuttaa maksimissaan vain 500 euroa. The article asserts both a general withdrawal cap of 5,000 € and a daily cap of 500 € for Level 1, which cannot both be correct. A: Talletusten, kotiutusten ja maksujen nopeus: Talletukset siirtyvät kaikilla maksutavoilla pelitilille välittömästi. Tallituksista on peräti 28 eri maksutapaa. B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä: 20. The page claims 28 payment methods in one section, but the comparison table lists only 20 payment providers, creating an inconsistency. A: Päivitetty: 24. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 03/02/2026 Different last-updated dates are shown for general content and for bonus rules, indicating inconsistent update timestamps. | ||
/arvostelu/rich-royal-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Lisenssi Curaçao B: Minkä lisenssin alla Rich Royal toimii? Siitä ei ole täyttä varmuutta, koska kasino ei kerro lisenssistään missään päin omia sivujaan, eikä se myöskään avannut asiaa lupauksista huolimatta sähköpostitse. One section states the casino uses a Curaçao license, while another section explicitly says the license is not clearly disclosed. The two claims cannot both be true. | ||
/arvostelu/rio-ace-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus ja -kotiutus ovat 20 € tilisiirtoina ja nettilompakoilla. B: RioAce vertailussa Minimitalletus 10 €. The section on deposits and withdrawals states a minimum of 20€ for bank transfers and e-wallets, but the RioAce comparison table later lists a 10€ minimum deposit, which is inconsistent. A: Kaikilla talletuksilla on 3-kertainen kierrätysvaatimus. B: Kierrätysvaatimukset: Kasinopeleihin 40x (bonus), Ilmaiskierrosten voitot 35x, Vedonlyöntibonuksen bonusraha 6x. Deposit turnover is stated as 3x in one place, while the bonus wagering requirements listed later are 40x for bonus cash, 35x for free spins, and 6x for sportsbook bonus cash, creating a direct inconsistency. A: Käteispalautusta maksetaan peliviikon nettotappioista 10–35 % riippuen pelaajan VIP-tasosta. B: RioAce vertailussa table says 'Käteispalautus Ei cashback-bonusta'. The text claims cashback of 10–35% on weekly net losses depending on VIP level, yet the comparison table states there is no cashback bonus. A: Progressive jättipotit puuttuvat valikoimasta kokonaan. B: Jackpot-pelejä on tarjolla ja niissä voi voittaa jopa miljoonan eurolla. The article claims progressive jackpots are completely missing, but also states there are jackpot games with top prizes up to around 1 million euros, which implies fixed jackpots rather than progressive ones; this is an inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/rise-of-bets/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Min deposit €10 (mentioned in Quick facts). B: Minimum deposit €25 (mentioned in deposits and withdrawal sections). Two sections state different minimum deposit amounts, creating an inconsistency. A: Rise of Bets has a VIP program (the article states users are invited to a VIP program). B: The Rise of Bets comparison table lists VIP-ohjelma: Ei (no VIP program). One part asserts there is a VIP program, while another part states there is not. A: Customer support is advertised as 24/7. B: Customer support is not 24/7; a chatbot is used and responses can be slow or unavailable. There is a direct contradiction about whether support is available 24/7. A: Support email listed as support@riseofbets.com B: Alternate support email listed as Sähköpostisupport@riseofbets.com Two different email addresses are presented for support, causing inconsistency. A: Withdrawals are processed within 72 hours. B: Withdrawals can take 0–5 days (and a comparison table even mentions up to a week). Withdrawal processing times are described with conflicting timeframes across the page. | ||
/arvostelu/ritzo-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus 20 € (e.g., Verkkopankki: Minimitalletus 20 €, Korttimaksu: 20 €, E-lompakot: 20 €, Kryptovaluutat: 20 €; Siru Mobile: 5 €) The page's Quick facts state a minimum deposit of €10, but several sections show a minimum deposit of €20 (with some methods like Siru Mobile at €5). This is a direct inconsistency about the required starting deposit. A: Ensimmäinen talletus Kierrätysvaatimukset: 45x (Bonus) B: Ensimmäinen talletus Kierrätysvaatimukset: 70x (Bonus) Wagering requirements for the first deposit bonus conflict: 45x (Bonus) in the bonuses table vs 70x (Bonus) described in the tervetulobonus arvostelu section. A: 2. talletuksella Kierrätysvaatimukset: 45x (Bonus) B: 2. Bonus Kierrätysvaatimukset: 70x (Bonus) Wagering requirements for the second deposit bonus conflict between 45x (in the 2. talletuksella row) and 70x (in the 2. Bonus row). | ||
/arvostelu/rizzio/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: VIP-klubi, jossa etuja räätälöidään henkilökohtaisesti B: VIP-ohjelma Ei The article describes a VIP club with personalized offers, but the comparison table claims there is no VIP program. A: Minim deposit: 20 euros B: Minimitalletus: 25 euros Different sections specify different minimum deposit requirements (20 € vs 25 €). A: Lisenssi Costa Rica, Anjouan Gaming License B: Lisenssi Anjouan Gaming The quick facts list a two-license setup (Costa Rica and Anjouan), while the company info lists only Anjouan licensing. A: Maksutapojen määrä on lähes 20 B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä 1 The main text claims about 20 payment methods, but the comparison table lists only 1 payment provider. A: Kotiutusten minimimäärä 100 € B: Minimosto 0 € The article states a minimum withdrawal of 100 €, while the comparison table lists a 0 € minimum withdrawal. | ||
/arvostelu/robocat-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: RoboCat Casinolla oli testaushetkellä noin 13 000 peliä peliaulassaan. B: Pelivalikoima kattaa 21 850 nimikettä, mutta valtaosa tarjonnasta on kolikkopelejä. The page claims two different total numbers of games (about 13,000 and 21,850), which contradict each other. A: Minimitalletus on kaikilla maksutavoilla vain 10 euroa. B: Minimitalletus 20 €. Two different minimum deposit amounts are stated for deposits—10 euros generally vs 20 euros for the bonus offer. | ||
/arvostelu/roby-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Min deposit€10 The page presents two different minimum deposit requirements: 20 € in the deposit/bonus terms, and 10 € in the Quick facts section, which is inconsistent. A: Roby Casinon pelivalikoima on noin 16 000 peliä (noin 16,000 games). B: Roby Casinon pelivalikoima on 15 870 peliä (15,870 games). Two sections report different total game counts (16,000 vs 15,870), which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/rolling-slots/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: yli 90 jackpot-peliä B: yli 120 ovat progressiivisia jättipottipelejä The text states there are over 90 jackpot games, and also that over 120 of these are progressive jackpot games. This is logically inconsistent because the number of progressive jackpots cannot exceed the total number of jackpot games. | ||
/arvostelu/rollino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Talletuksissa minimisumma on 10 euroa The page states the minimum deposit as 20 € in the bonus/terms section, but later claims a 10 € minimum deposit in the deposits section, which cannot both be true. | ||
/arvostelu/rooli/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Miinukset listassa mainitaan: 'Ei pankkitunnistautumista'. B: Rooli Casinolla on Pay N Play -teknologia käytössä, joten rekisteröityminen hoituu helposti verkkopankkitunnuksilla. The page lists 'No bank login authentication' as a drawback, yet it also states that the casino uses Pay N Play technology enabling sign-in with online banking credentials, which is contradictory. A: Nostopyynnöt käsitellään 0–24 tuntia, ja rahat tulevat perille 0–7 arkipäivässä. B: Esimerkissä, jos voitat 10 000 €, joutuisit odottamaan voittojesi kotiuttamista yli kaksi viikkoa. The payout processing window is stated as 0–24 hours with 0–7 business days for funds to arrive, but the text also provides an example claiming payout could take more than two weeks, which contradicts the stated timeframe. | ||
/arvostelu/rooster-bet/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Rooster Bet tervetulobonuksen tarjous: yhteensä 275 % talletusbonus 5000 € saakka ja 300 ilmaispyöräytystä John Hunter and the Book of Tut -kolikkopeliin. B: Talletusbonusten neljän talletuksen maksimibonukset summaavat seuraavasti: 1. talletus 100% (1000 €) + 100 ilmaiskierrosta, 2. talletus 50% (1000 €) + 50 ilmaiskierrosta, 3. talletus 50% (1500 €) + 50 ilmaiskierrosta, 4. talletus 75% (1500 €) + 100 ilmaiskierrosta; näiden maksimibonusten yhteismäärä on 3 375 €, ei 5 000 €. The promo text claims a total bonus of 275% up to €5,000, but the detailed 4-deposit structure yields €3,375 in bonus cash at the stated maxima, making the claims inconsistent. A: Kasinon lisenssi on EMTA (Estonia) with lisenssinumero HKT000017 ja HKL000425. B: Kasinon osoite on Scharlooweg 39, Willemstad, Curaçao, ja Quick facts -kohdassa lukee lisenssiksi Viron ja Curaçao, eli Viron EMTA-lisenssi ja Curaçao-osoite/lisenssi The page inconsistently pairs an EMTA (Estonian) license with a Curaçao address and even lists license jurisdictions as 'Viro, Curaçao' in different sections, which is internally contradictory. | ||
/arvostelu/royal-vegas-casino/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Baytree Ltd:n omistama kasino toimii Kahnawaken lisenssin alla B: Lisenssi: Malta Gaming Authority (MGA) sekä Kahnawaken lisenssi mainitaan tekstissä The page asserts licenses from different authorities (Kahnawake and MGA) for the same casino, which is inconsistent and mutually exclusive in a single operator's licensing. A: Royal Vegas Casino on toiminut vuodesta 2000 lähtien B: Kasinon perustiedot: Vuosi 2024 The article states the casino has operated since 2000, but the infobox lists the year as 2024, creating conflicting founding/establishment dates. A: Trustly-kasino eli kasino ilman rekisteröitymistä B: Talletusohjeet edellyttävät kirjautumista ja sisäänkirjautumista tilille ennen talletusta The text simultaneously promotes Trustly as a no-registration method while also requiring users to log in to deposit, which is contradictory. A: Asiakaspalvelu toimii pääasiassa sähköpostilla eikä live-chat tai puhelintuki ole tarjolla vuorokauden ympäri B: Asiakaspalvelu: Live-chat toimii; puhelintuki ei Different sections claim conflicting support options: one says no live chat; another states that live chat is available. A: Sähköposti: fortunelounge@playersupportcenter.com B: Sähköpostiosoite: support@fortunelounge.com Two different support email addresses are listed for contacting the casino, causing inconsistency in contact information. | ||
/arvostelu/royalistplay/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Pienin mahdollinen talletus on kymmenen euroa B: Minimitalletus 20 € The page contains two different minimum deposit figures for deposits: one section states 10 EUR minimum, while the bonus terms list 20 EUR minimum. A: LisenssiAnjouan Gaming License B: Curacao license (8048/JAZ2010-010) The Quick Facts box lists Anjouan Gaming License, but the article's body and the 'Kasinon perustiedot' show a Curacao license with a specific license number, creating a licensing inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/royspins/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Minimitalletus: 10 € The bonus terms table lists a minimum deposit of 20 € for each deposit, while the Kierrätysvaatimukset section later states a minimum deposit of 10 €. These are conflicting minimum deposit requirements for the same welcome bonus. | ||
/arvostelu/rt-bet/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Lisenssin vahvistussinettiä ei ole kasinosivustolla julkaistu. B: Onko RT Bet lisensoitu kasinosivusto? Kyllä on. Lisenssinä on Anjouan lisenssi. Lisenssin numero ALSI-152406028-FI2. One part states license certificate is not published, while another part provides a specific license type and license number, creating a direct contradiction about license disclosure. A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Minimitalletus: 10 € (Min deposit €10) in the Quick facts section. Two sections specify different minimum deposit requirements: 20 euros for bonus wagering/minimum to participate vs 10 euros listed in Quick facts, which cannot both be correct. | ||
/arvostelu/ruby-fortune/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Kolikkopelejä on arviolta noin 500 - 700, ja ne tulevat viideltä eri pelintarjoajalta. B: Kasinon kaikki pelintarjoajat ovat: Games Global; Ready Play; Pragmatic Play; Hacksaw Gaming; Blueprint; OnAir; Spribe. The slot provider count is stated as five in one place, but the text later lists seven different slot providers, creating a factual inconsistency. A: Lisenssi: Kahnawake Gaming Comission; Lisenssinumero: 00892. B: LisenssiKahnawake, Malta (MGA). The body text attributes a Kahnawake license (with license number 00892), while the quick facts claim a Maltan MGA license; these are conflicting regulatory licenses for the same casino. | ||
/arvostelu/ruby-reels/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Plussat: Erilliset Android- ja iOS-sovellukset B: Mobiilikäytettävyys: erillistä sovellusta ei ole olemassa The article simultaneously claims there are separate Android and iOS apps in the 'Plussat' section while stating there are no dedicated mobile apps in the 'Mobiilikäytettävyys' section, which is a direct contradiction about app availability. | ||
/arvostelu/ruhtinas-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Ruhtinas ei tarjoa lainkaan perinteistä tervetuliaisbonusta. B: 1. talletuksella 300 ilmaiskierrosta. One section states there is no traditional welcome bonus, while another section lists a first-deposit offer of 300 free spins, which is a direct contradiction. A: Maksutavat: ainoa käytössä oleva maksutapa on Brite. B: Ruhtinas vertailussa samankaltaisiin kasinoihin - Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä: 3. The site claims only Brite is available as a payment method, yet the comparison table lists 3 payment service providers for Ruhtinas, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/rullat-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Min deposit: 1 € The article states a 20 € minimum deposit for bonuses in one section, but Quick Facts lists a minimum deposit of 1 €, creating an explicit inconsistency. A: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä: Bank Transfer, Brite & Revolut B: Maksupalvelut/main text section states payments are handled via the Brite-maksupalvelu only (no Revolut mentioned) The comparison table lists three providers (Bank Transfer, Brite, and Revolut), while the main text describes payments as being handled via Brite without mentioning Revolut, causing a contradiction. A: Päivittäinen kotiutusraja on 10 000 € B: Nostoraja column in Rullat vs Tuuri table shows '-' (not specified) The article explicitly states a daily withdrawal limit of 10,000 €, but in the side-by-side comparison table the withdrawal limit is left unspecified ('-'), which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/rx-casino/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: RX Casinon pelivalikoima kattaa yli 3 000–4 000 peliä eri kategorioista. B: RX Casinon vertailutaulukossa pelivalikoima on 'Yli 8 800 peliä'. Two different figures are given for the number of games available, conflicting within the same document. A: Minimitalletus on 10 € (esim. Quick facts min deposit 10€). B: Talletusohjeessa mainitaan minimitalletus 20 €. The minimum deposit requirement is stated as 10€ in some sections but 20€ in the deposit instructions, creating inconsistency. A: RX Casinon Trustpilot-arvosana on noin 2,8/5. B: Sivun yläreunassa lukee RX Casino Arvostelu: ★ 3.26/5. Two different Trustpilot/review ratings are presented for the same site, which is contradictory. A: Kotiutukset ovat rajoitettu 5 000 € kuukaudessa. B: FAQ: Kuukausittainen kotiutusraja on 5 000–10 000 euroa. Monthly withdrawal limit is stated as both 5,000€ and a range up to 10,000€ in different parts of the text. A: Kolmen talletuksen bonuksen maksimibonus on 17 500 € (Maksimibonus: Yhteensä 17 500 €). B: Jos lasketaan kolmeen talletukseen käytetyllä bonussummalla, maksimibonus on 28 125 € (7500 + 7500 + 13125). The stated maximum bonus for the three-deposit package does not align with the percentage limits and deposit caps, leading to a numeric contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/saga-spins-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: KYC is triggered after withdrawals exceed 2,300 EUR (the page states: 'KYC-prosessin yhteydessä tulee toimittaa ... 48 tunnin sisällä pyynnöstä' and 'KYC-prosessin tulee vastaan vasta kotiutusten ylittäessä 2 300 euroa'). B: KYC happens immediately with the first deposit (a reader comment states: 'KYC tapahtuu heti ensimmäisen talletuksen yhteydessä'). One section of the page says KYC is required after crossing a 2,300 EUR withdrawal threshold, with documents requested within 48 hours; a reader comment claims KYC occurs immediately upon the first deposit. These are direct conflicting statements about when KYC occurs. | ||
/arvostelu/saletti-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus 20 € The page lists conflicting minimum deposit amounts: €10 in Quick Facts, but €20 in other sections. A: Rahansiirtoja voi tehdä ainoastaan Trustlyllä ja Revolutilla. B: Vain yksi maksutapa Some sections claim two payment methods (Trustly and Revolut), while another states there is only one payment method. A: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä 3 B: Talletukset ja kotiutukset on mahdollista ainoastaan Trustlyllä The comparison table lists 3 payment providers, while the main sections indicate only Trustly (and possibly Revolut) are supported, creating a mismatch. A: Päivitetty: 26. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 07/02/2026 The article shows an update date in 2025 but a bonus update date in 2026, indicating inconsistent update timestamps. | ||
/arvostelu/scarawins/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Kasinon perustiedot: Perustettu: 2024 B: ScaraWins Casino toimii vuonna 2014 perustetun L.C.S. Limited -nimisen white label -yhtiön nimissä. The page presents two different founding years for ScaraWins: 2024 in the 'Perustettu' field, and 2014 as the founding year of the operator L.C.S. Limited. A: Lisenssi: MGA B: Kasino toimii Maltan arvostetun peliviranomaisen Malaysia Gaming Authorityn (MGA) lisenssillä The Malta Gaming Authority license is stated, but later the text refers to the 'Malaysia Gaming Authority' (MGA) as the licensor, which is factually inconsistent since MGA stands for Malta Gaming Authority. A: Minimitalletus on yleensä 25 euroa B: 1. talletus – Minimitalletus 20 € The article lists different minimum deposit amounts: 25 € as the general minimum, but the first deposit bonus section specifies a 20 € minimum for the first deposit. | ||
/arvostelu/scatters/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Omistaja: Starscream Limited B: Omistaja: Gammix Limited The page attributes ownership of Scatters Casino to two different companies in separate sections. A: Lisenssi: Kahnawake (Kahnawake Gaming Commission) license B: Lisenssi: Malta Gaming Authority (MGA) license The text cites two different licensing authorities for Scatters, indicating conflicting licenses. A: Bonusten rakenne: Ei bonusta B: Tervetulobonus: 100 ilmaiskierrosta ilman kierrätysvaatimusta tarjolla 24 tunnin ajan rekisteröitymisestä The bonuses summary claims there are no bonuses, while the review describes a welcome bonus of 100 free spins with no wagering. | ||
/arvostelu/scibet/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Monipuolinen maksuvalikoima koostuu kymmenestä eri vaihtoehdosta B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä: 14 The payment section states there are ten options, while the comparison table lists 14 payment service providers, creating a numeric inconsistency. A: Päivitetty: 18. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 07/02/2026 Two different last-update dates are present for bonuses versus the overall page, causing conflicting timelines. | ||
/arvostelu/selectbet-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Lisenssinsä se on hankkinut Curacaolta, mikä valitettavasti tarkoittaa suomalaispelaajille aina verollisia voittoja. B: Kasinon perustiedot - Lisenssi: Anjouan (Anjouan Gaming License). The page states the site is licensed by Curacao, which implies taxable winnings for Finnish players, but the basic facts table lists an Anjouan license, creating conflicting licensing information. A: Testasin myös rahansiirtojen sujuvuutta kasinolla tekemällä aluksi 20 euron talletuksen Bitcoinilla. Talletus näkyi tililläni alle 5 minuutissa. B: Maksutavat - Bitcoin is not listed among the available payment methods (only e-wallets, cards, bank transfers, etc.). The author claims to have used Bitcoin for a deposit, yet the payment methods section lists no Bitcoin option, indicating inconsistency about Bitcoin support. A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Minimitalletus: 20 €, while Quick facts say Min deposit €10. Two sections specify different minimum deposits for new players (20 € vs 10 €), creating a direct numeric inconsistency. A: Selectbet ei veloita talletuksista tai kotiutuksista. B: kasino voi lisätä kotiutukseen 8 % käsittelymaksun (withdrawal fee) or even reject it. The page simultaneously states there are no fees for deposits or withdrawals, and later warns that withdrawals can incur an 8% processing fee, which is a direct contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/seven-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus 200% 250 € asti B: 1. talletus: 100% 250 € asti The first deposit bonus percentage is inconsistent: one section states a 200% match up to €250, while another section states the first deposit bonus is 100% up to €250. A: Ei live-chat 24/7 B: Live chat 24/7 The page lists no 24/7 live chat as a downside, but another section explicitly states that live chat is available 24/7. A: Lisenssi Costa Rica, Curaçao B: Lisenssi: Costa Rica There is a license inconsistency: one part of the page lists two licenses (Costa Rica and Curaçao), while another part lists only Costa Rica. | ||
/arvostelu/sg-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: EMTA-lisenssin tuoma viranomaisvalvonta parantaa pelaajan oikeusturvaa ja edellyttää reiluja pelikäytäntöjä. B: Lisenssi: Anjouan (ALSI-2024411077-FI2) – sivuston perustietojen mukaan SG Casinon lisenssi on Anjouan, eikä EMTA-lisenssi valvonnassaan. Claim A asserts regulatory oversight under an EMTA license, while the site’s own license information lists Anjouan (ALSI-2024411077-FI2); these statements are inconsistent because they imply different regulators. | ||
/arvostelu/shokki-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Shokki Casino käyttää ainoastaan Brite-maksupalvelua, joka toimii verkkopankin kautta ja tukee kaikkia suomalaisia pankkeja. B: Maksutavoista on tarjolla vain Brite, jonka kautta voi tallettaa kotimaisista pankeista sekä Revolutin kautta. Claim A asserts that only the Brite payment service is available, while Claim B states deposits can also be made via Revolut. This is a direct contradiction about supported payment methods. | ||
/arvostelu/shotz-casino/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Shotz Casino operates under a Estonian license (Viron lisenssillä) and offers tax-free winnings for Finnish players. B: Shotz Casino is licensed by EMTA (Estonian Tax and Customs Board) since 2024. The page simultaneously asserts an Estonian license (Viron lisenssillä) and an EMTA license; EMTA is the Estonian authority, but presenting both as different licensing statements creates an internal inconsistency about which specific license governs the casino. A: The welcome bonus can be claimed with a minimum deposit of 20 €. B: In the quick facts table, the minimum deposit is listed as 10 € (bonus claimed at 20 €). Two different minimum deposit figures are given for bonus eligibility: 20 € in the main text versus 10 € in the quick facts table, which is contradictory. A: The maximum withdrawal is 4000 EUR. B: The quick facts table states there is no withdrawal limit (Ei rajoitusta). One section specifies a concrete withdrawal cap of 4000 EUR, while another table claims there is no withdrawal limit, which cannot both be true. A: Only one payment method is supported: Zimpler. B: A side comparison table lists three payment providers. The main text states Zimpler as the sole payment method, but a separate comparison table claims there are three payment providers, creating inconsistency about available payment options. A: Cyprus address is listed for Shotz (Cyprus-based address). B: Licensing sections indicate EMTA license (Estonia) with Estonia-based licensing details. The page shows a Cyprus address while also describing an Estonia-based EMTA license, which is inconsistent and suggests conflicting corporate/licensing information. | ||
/arvostelu/slot-it-casino/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Slot It Casino ei tarjoa tällä hetkellä tervetulobonusta normi pelaajille. B: Kasinohain kautta pelaajat voivat nimittäin lunastaa seuraavan eksklusiivisen tarjouksen: 100 % 500 € asti. The page states there is no welcome bonus for regular players, but also advertises an exclusive welcome offer of 100% up to €500. A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus: 20 € Two different minimum deposit amounts are stated within the page (€10 vs €20). A: Ainoa tapa kotiuttaa on tilisiirto. B: Kryptoja hyväksytään monipuolisesti talletuksiin ja kotiutuksiin. Withdrawals are described as only via bank transfer, but the page also claims cryptocurrencies are accepted for withdrawals. A: Sähköposti: support@slotit.com B: Sähköpostisupport@slotit.com Two different support email addresses are listed in the page (support@slotit.com and sähköpostisupport@slotit.com). A: Lisenssinumero: OGL/2024/1788/1030 B: Lisenssirekisterin mukaan rekisteröintipäivä on 2025 (20250918), mikä on ristiriidassa lisenssinumeron OGL/2024/1788/1030 kanssa. The license is cited with a 2024 number, while the license registry link shows a 2025 registration date, creating a mismatch in licensing dates. | ||
/arvostelu/slot-paradise/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: The page lists the license as EMTA (EMTA lisenssi) in Slot Paradise baselines (Lisenssi: EMTA; license numbers HKL000373 and HKT000060). B: The Quick facts section lists the license jurisdictions as Curaçao, Viro, Kahnawake. The page presents two different licensing jurisdictions for Slot Paradise: EMTA (Estonian license) in the main licensing section, and Curaçao/Viro (Viro is Finnish for Estonia)/'Kahnawake' in Quick facts. This is inconsistent about which license(s) govern the casino. A: Maximum withdrawals are 5,000 euros per day, 10,000 euros per week, and 40,000 euros per month. B: If the week is spread over five days, this would amount to only 2,000 euros per week. The text first states explicit weekly and monthly withdrawal caps, but later recalculates weekly limits by dividing a 10,000 weekly cap across five days to yield 2,000 per week, which contradicts the stated 10,000 per week. | ||
/arvostelu/slot-stars/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Yli 5 500 kasinopeliä suosikkistudioilta B: Slot Starsin pelivalikoima kattaa testaushetkellä noin 5000 peliä Two different totals are given for the casino game library: over 5,500 games vs about 5,000 games. A: Live-kasinopuolella on yli 350 peliä B: Live-casino 300 Conflicting counts for live casino games (300 vs over 350). A: Kolikkopelejä on lähes 5 000 kappaletta B: Yli 5 500 kasinopeliä Conflict between the number of slot games (about 5,000) and the total number of casino games (over 5,500), suggesting inconsistent figures for scope. | ||
/arvostelu/slota-casino/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Slota Casino kokemuksia: uusille pelaajille tarjotaan 1 100 eurolla bonuksia. B: Slota Casinolla uusille pelaajille on jaossa 5000 euroa bonusrahaa sekä 255 ilmaiskierrosta. The page presents two conflicting statements about the total welcome bonus for new players: 1,100 euros in one section and 5,000 euros plus 255 free spins in another. A: 1. talletuksella: 100% 1000 € asti (bonuskoodit & bonukset section). B: 1. talletus: 100% 300 € asti + 80 ilmaiskierrosta (tervetulobonus). There are conflicting claims about the maximum first-deposit bonus: up to 1,000 euros in one section versus up to 300 euros plus 80 free spins in another. A: Yleinen kotiutusaika on 2–3 arkipäivää. B: Lähetin Neteller kotiutuspyynnön: voitot ilmestyivät tililleni seuraavan viikon alussa; kesto noin 3-5 arkipäivää. Withdrawal time is stated as 2–3 days in one part, but a personal test log later notes 3–5 days, creating an inconsistency. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 70x (Bonus). B: Kotikäyttöön liittyvä kierrätysvaatimus talletuksille on 3x (KYC section). The page lists a 70x wagering requirement for bonuses, while another section mentions a 3x wagering requirement for deposits, which is inconsistent. A: Päivitetty: 26. marraskuuta 2025. B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 05/02/2026. Two different last-update dates are shown (2025-11-26 for the page, 2026-02-05 for the bonus), which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/slotbox-n-v/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/slotexo-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Kierrätysvaatimukset are 35x (talletus+bonus) with 40x for ilmaiskierrosta. B: Kierrätysvaatimukset can rise to as high as 70x because both the bonus and the deposit must be rolled over. The page states 35x (deposit+bonus) and 40x for free spins, but later claims the wagering could reach 70x, which is a direct numerical contradiction. A: Minimum deposit is 10 euros (Quick Facts: 'Min deposit€10'). B: Minimum deposit is 20 euros (listed as 'Minimitalletus 20 €' in the bonus/terms and in the registration steps). Two sections specify different minimum deposit amounts (10€ vs 20€), creating an explicit inconsistency. A: Registration can be completed via Zimpler without traditional registration (ilman rekisteröitymistä). B: The page also states that the account must be created in the traditional way ('tili on luotava silti aina perinteiseen tapaan'). The text presents both a no-registration path and a requirement to create an account in the traditional way, which is contradictory. | ||
/arvostelu/slotimo/ | Issues | 6 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus: 100% 300 € asti + 25 ilmaiskierrosta B: Slotimo bonuspaketti: 1000 € tervetuliaisetuna (bonuspaketti) across four deposits The page presents two different welcome bonuses for new players: one limited to 300 € first-deposit bonus, and a larger 1000 € total bonus package across four deposits. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 25x (Talletus+Bonus) B: Kierrätysvaatimus: 5x kaikille talletuksille Wagering requirements are stated as 25x for deposits-plus-bonus in the bonus terms, but the review text also claims a 5x wagering requirement for all deposits, which cannot both be true. A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Minimitalletus: 10 € The page lists conflicting minimum deposit amounts (20 € in terms, 10 € in a comparison table, and 10 € in the quick facts table). A: Lisenssi: Anjouan lisenssi (ALS...); lisenssinumero: ALSI-102310002-FI5 B: Lisenssi ei ole aktiivinen (lisenssi saatettu olla vanhentunut/epävirallinen) The page alternates between stating that Slotimo operates under the Anjouan license and that the linked license is not active, which is a direct contradiction about the platform's regulatory status. A: Ensimmäisen talletuksen bonus koodi: SLWEL300 B: Ensimmäisen talletuksen bonus koodi: 300WEL25 (bonuskoodit-taulukossa) The page provides two different bonus codes for the first deposit: SLWEL300 in the promotional section and 300WEL25 in the bonus codes table, which is inconsistent. A: Kolikkopelit: noin 5 000 peliä B: Kolikkopelit: lähes 6 000 peliä Different sections state different counts for slot games (5,000 vs about 6,000), creating an internal inconsistency in the game's library size. | ||
/arvostelu/slots-hammer/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Nettilompakko withdrawals can be received immediately after approval. B: Nettilompakko withdrawals take 1–3 days. The article claims immediate payouts for e-wallet withdrawals, but another section provides a 1–3 day withdrawal time for e-wallets, creating a direct inconsistency. A: Slots Hammer has no progressive jackpot games. B: Divine Fortune is a progressive jackpot game listed among jackpot options. Divine Fortune is known to be a progressive jackpot game, which contradicts the claim that there are no progressive jackpots. A: There are slightly more than 2,700 slot titles. B: There are over 5,300 slot titles. Two different counts for the number of slot games are given in the text, a discrepancy of more than 2,000 titles. A: The casino requires a 3x turnover on deposits even if no bonuses are claimed. B: The turnover requirements are 35x (Deposit+Bonus) and 35x (free spins). There is a direct conflict between a 3x deposit turnover rule and the stated 35x turnover requirements for deposit+bonus and free spins. A: The number of payment service providers is 9. B: There are 13 payment methods/providers listed (including Brit). One part of the text cites 9 providers, while another section lists 13 payment methods, which is contradictory. | ||
/arvostelu/slots-palace/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Trustpilotissa Slots Palace saa keskitasoisen arvosanan: 3,7 tähteä ja arvioita on yli 80 kappaletta. B: Trustpilotissa Slots Palace saa keskitasoisen arvosanan: 1,7/5 tähteä ja arvioita on yli 80 kappaletta. The page lists two different Trustpilot ratings for Slots Palace (3.7/5 and 1.7/5), which cannot both be correct. A: Minimitalletus: 20 € (as shown in the casino's welcome bonus table). B: Minimitalletus: 10 € (as stated in the bonus terms / quick facts). Different sections specify conflicting minimum deposit requirements: 20 € in the bonus table vs 10 € in the terms/quick facts. A: Live chat claimed that there are no deposit or withdrawal limits at the casino. B: VIP withdrawal limits exist by tier (e.g., Tier 1 allows 500 € per day and 7,000 € per month; higher tiers allow larger amounts). A stated no-limit policy conflicts with documented tiered withdrawal limits. A: Withdrawals are usually processed within a few business days. B: A live chat anecdote claimed a withdrawal was approved and processed in 14 hours. General processing time claims conflict with a reported 14-hour withdrawal in a chat anecdote. | ||
/arvostelu/slotstoto/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Slotstoto väittää sivuillaan kivenkovaa tarjoavansa live casinollaan Evolution Gamingin pelejä. B: Live-peleille kehitetystä osiosta löytyy ainoastaan yksi vaihtoehto, joka on Betsoftin kehittämä live craps. The page simultaneously claims Evolution Gaming as the live dealer provider and states there is only one live game option, Betsoft's live craps, which is contradictory. A: Omistaja: BNR LTD B: Omistaja tuntematon One section lists BNR LTD as the owner, while another section claims the owner is unknown. A: Päivitetty: 22. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 17/02/2026 Different last-update dates are given for the page content and the bonus information, implying inconsistent timelines. | ||
/arvostelu/slotsvader/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Slotsvader Casino operates under an Anjouan gaming license (Anjouan lisenssi). B: FAQ stated that the casino uses a Curacao license. The page contains conflicting statements about the casino's licensing jurisdiction: one part asserts Anjouan license, while the FAQ section claims Curacao license. A: The page header states 'Päivitetty: 23. joulukuuta 2025'. B: The bonus section states 'Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 09/02/2026'. Two different last-update dates are provided for the page/bonus content, creating a timeline inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/slotti/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus on vain 1 euro The page contains conflicting statements about the minimum deposit: one section lists 10 euros, while another states the minimum deposit is 1 euro. A: Minimitalletus 20 € B: Minimitalletus 1 € A separate section lists the bonus minimum deposit as 20 euros, whereas other parts of the page indicate a 1 euro minimum deposit, creating an additional numerical inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/slottimonsteri/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Päivitetty: 10. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 07/02/2026 The page lists two different update dates for different sections, which could imply inconsistent update timelines (the bonus section claims a later update date than the page itself). A: Maksutapaa Slottimonsterilla on TrumoPay (kasino maksutavat: TrumoPay with a list of banks). B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä in the comparison table is 2 for Slottimonsteri. The dedicated payments section lists only TrumoPay as the payment method, while the comparison table claims there are two payment providers for Slottimonsteri, creating a contradiction about available payment providers. | ||
/arvostelu/slotuna-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletus bonuksen lunastamiseksi on 20 euroa B: Minimitalletus on 10 euroa The welcome-bonus terms state a minimum deposit of 20€ to qualify for the bonus, while other sections list the minimum deposit as 10€, creating a direct conflict about the required minimum deposit. | ||
/arvostelu/snatch-casino/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Snatch Casino ... tarjolla on yli 7 000 peliä B: Snatch Casinon pelien määrä ... noin 9500 kappaletta The page provides two different totals for the number of games offered, over 7,000 in one place and around 9,500 in another. A: 1. talletuksella: 200% 1000 € asti + 100 ilmaiskierrosta B: 1. talletuksella: 200% 3000 € asti + 100 ilmaiskierrosta The first-deposit bonus is described with two different maximum deposit caps (1000€ or 3000€) for a 200% match, which is inconsistent. A: Enimmillään bonusta voi saada ensimmäisellä talletuksella 1000 euroa B: 1. talletuksella ... 3000 € asti One claim states the maximum first-deposit bonus is 1000€, while another part allows up to 3000€, which contradicts each other about the maximum bonus on the first deposit. A: Päivitetty: 23. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 09/02/2026 Two different last-update dates are given: the page shows 2025-12-23, while the bonus section shows 2026-02-09, implying inconsistent update timestamps. A: Kotiutukset käsitellään pääsääntöisesti 24 tunnin sisällä. B: Esimerkkikotiutus hyväksyttiin 48 tunnissa ja kokonaistoiminta kesti yli 2 vuorokautta. A general claim of 24-hour processing conflicts with a personal example where a withdrawal took around 2 days, suggesting slower processing in practice. | ||
/arvostelu/sol-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Sol Casino tarjoaa uusille pelaajille 50% bonuksen aina 300 € asti ensimmäiselle talletukselle. B: Vedonlyönnin ystäville tarjotaan kolme talletusbonusta... Pelkästään ensitalletusbonus on 150 % bonus aina 100 € asti. The page describes conflicting first-deposit bonuses for casino vs sports betting: 50% up to €300 vs 150% up to €100. A: Sol Casino avattiin vuonna 2019. B: Se joutui Ruotsin peliviranomaisen tarkastelun kohteeksi vuonna 2004 ja sai kiellon markkinoituaan pelejä ruotsalaisille pelaajille Drip Casinon brändin nimessä. The article states the operator has been active since 2019, but also references a 2004 Swedish regulator investigation; the dates conflict, implying the company could not have been active in 2019 if it faced actions in 2004. | ||
/arvostelu/sombrero-spins-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Kasinon perustiedot listaa lisenssiksi Kahnawake Gaming Commission (Lisenssi: Kahnawake Gaming Commission; Lisenssinumero: 00939). B: Quick facts -osio listaa lisensiksi 'Lisenssi: Kahnawake, Costa Rica' (eli kaksi lisenssijärjestelmää). The page inconsistently states licensing: one section claims only a Kahnawake Gaming Commission license, while the Quick Facts section lists both Kahnawake and Costa Rica as licenses, implying conflicting regulatory jurisdictions. A: Ensimmäisen talletuksen bonuksen merkintä: 100% 250 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta (talletustuotteen ensimmäiselle talletukselle). B: Kierrätysvaatimukset- ja esimerkkitekstissä lukee: 'Testasin ensimmäisen talletusbonuksen (125 % €50 talletukselle)' sekä 35x kierrätys, mikä ei vastaa 100%/250€-mallia. There is a direct contradiction between the stated first-deposit bonus in the table (100% up to €250 with 50 spins) and the example text (125% on a €50 deposit with 35x wagering), including inconsistent calculation results. | ||
/arvostelu/sparkle-slots-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: In the Sparkle Slots vs Kanuuna comparison table, Suomenkielinen sivu: Sivusto ja tuki englanniksi. B: In the Sparkle Slots vertailussa samankaltaisiin kasinoihin table, Suomenkielinen sivu: Kyllä. Two sections disagree on whether Sparkle Slots has a Finnish-language site: one states the site and support are English-only, while the other states a Finnish site is available. | ||
/arvostelu/speedz/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Kierrätysvaatimukset Ei kierrätysvaatimuksia B: Speedzin ilmaiskierroksilla saadut voitot tulee kierrättää 10x The comparison table claims there are no wagering requirements for Speedz bonuses, while the main bonus section states that free-spin winnings must be rolled over 10 times. A: Miniminosto 0 € B: The Speedz payments section indicates a minimum deposit of 20 € and shows withdrawal terms with substantial limits; there is no indication of a 0 € minimum withdrawal. The comparison table lists a 0 € minimum withdrawal, which contradicts the rest of the page that specifies a 20 € minimum deposit and typical withdrawal terms. | ||
/arvostelu/spiderbets/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Talletukset kierrättävä 5x ennen nostoa B: Kierrätysvaatimukset 30x talletus + bonus The Miinukset section states a 5x rollover for deposits, while the Kierrätysvaatimukset section lists 30x as the rollover for deposit plus bonus, creating a direct inconsistency. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 30x talletus + bonus B: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 35x (Bonus) The page later presents 35x (Bonus) as a wagering requirement, contradicting the earlier 30x figure for the same bonus terms. A: Ensitalletusbonus: 100% 200 € asti + 100 ilmaiskierrosta B: Kasinobonus: 325% bonus 1 150 € asti + 300 ilmaiskierrosta Two different welcome offers are presented as the first-deposit bonus and the casino bonus, with incompatible terms (100% up to €200 with 100 spins vs 325% up to €1,150 with 300 spins). A: Sähköposti: customersupport@instantgamesupport.com B: Sähköposti: support@spiderbets.com Two different customer support email addresses are listed, causing confusion about which contact to use. | ||
/arvostelu/spin-dragons/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/spin-mills-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Quick facts section lists license as Curaçao (Lisenssi Curaçao). B: The licensing section states the license is Anjouan (Anjouan license ALSI-202412042-FI2). The page presents two different licenses for Spinmills: Curaçao in the Quick Facts and Anjouan in the Licenses section. A: Spin Mills vertailussa shows Finnish page available (Suomenkielinen sivu: Kyllä). B: Miinukset list Suomenkielinen käännös puuttuu (Finnish translation is missing). The article simultaneously asserts that a Finnish page exists and that the Finnish translation is missing, which is inconsistent. A: Käteispalautus in the comparison table is 'Ei cashback-bonusta' (no cashback). B: VIP-program advertises 10–35% cashback. The comparison table claims there is no cashback, while the VIP program description states cashback offers (10–35%). A: Minimitalletus is 20 € (as stated in Quick Facts and deposit-related sections). B: Bonus terms list a minimum deposit of 25 € for bonuses. There are two conflicting minimum deposit figures: 20 € for general deposits and 25 € for bonus eligibility. | ||
/arvostelu/spin-platinum-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletus: 10 € B: Minimitalletus: 20 € The article lists different minimum deposit amounts in different sections: 10 € in several places (Quick facts and comparison table), but 20 € in the bonus/wagering section, which is a clear inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/spinanga/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Spinanga Casino perustiedoissa: Julkaistu: 2023. B: Spinanga Casino vertailussa: Julkaisuvuosi 2021. Two different launch years are stated for Spinanga (2023 in the main info vs 2021 in the comparison table), which is inconsistent. A: Kasinon VIP-ohjelma on 5-tasoinen. B: VIP-ohjelma on 4-tasoinen (VIP-taso 1–4) ja mainittu tasorakenne ajoittain puuttuu viides taso. The article asserts a five-tier VIP program, but elsewhere lists only four VIP tiers, creating an internal inconsistency about the number of VIP levels. A: Tervetuliaisbonuksen minimitalletus on 20 €. B: Kierrätysvaatimuksissa sekä bonussäännöissä mainitaan minimitalletus 10–20 € (ja 20 € varsin welcome bonusin yhteydessä). There is inconsistency about the minimum deposit: some sections state 20 €, while the bonus terms also mention 10–20 €. A: Alimmillaan VIP-nostorajaksi mainitaan 500 €/vrk ja 7 000 €/kk. B: Korkein VIP-taso lisää nostorajan 1 000 €/vrk ja 15 000 €/kk. The text mixes tiered caps: some lines state 500 €/vrk/7,000 €/kk for low tiers, while the top tier shows 1,000 €/vrk and 15,000 €/kk, which is inconsistent with the lower-tiers bounds and with the overall 'highest' tier claim. | ||
/arvostelu/spinara-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Max kotiutus voi olla 5000 euroa /kerta B: Max kotiutus yhteensä 20 000 euroa kuukauden aikana The page states a per-withdrawal limit of 5,000 EUR and a monthly limit of 20,000 EUR, which are conflicting withdrawal limits within the same policy. | ||
/arvostelu/spinaro-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Spinaro Casinon 30-portainen VIP-ohjelma on avoin kaikille rekisteröityneille pelaajille. B: Spinaro vertailussa -taulukossa lukee 'VIP-ohjelma Ei' (ei VIP-ohjelmaa). One section claims a 30-tier VIP program is open to all registered players, while the comparison table explicitly states there is no VIP program. A: Spinaron ensitalletusbonus on 100% 1000 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta. B: Spinaro vertailussa -taulukossa Bonus: Jopa 2 500€ + 50 FS. Two different maximum welcome bonuses are presented for Spinaro in different parts of the page. A: Kotiutusten minimi on 20 € (kotiutuksen tulee olla vähintään 20 €). B: Spinaro vertailussa -taulukossa miniminosto on 0 €. Minimum withdrawal is stated as 20 euros in the prose, but the comparison table lists 0 euros as the minimum withdrawal. A: Spinaron lisenssit: ei lisenssitietoja ole julkaistu (lisenssitietoja piilotellaan). B: Sivun Spinaro perustiedot ja lisenssitietoja koskeva osa sekä lisenssinumeron maininta väittävät Curacaon lisenssin olevan voimassa. The page first claims license information is hidden, then later presents a Curacao license with a certificate/number, creating inconsistency about license disclosure and existence. | ||
/arvostelu/spinbara-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Spinbara Casino avattiin Suomessa viime vuonna. B: Spinbara Casino on uudehko, vuonna 2025 Suomessa lanseerattu nettikasino. The page states launch/opening year as both last year and 2025, which cannot both be true. A: Spinbara Casino on uudehko, vuonna 2025 Suomessa lanseerattu nettikasino. B: Julkaisuvuosi | Kasinon nykyinen muoto vuodelta 2017. One section asserts a 2025 launch, while another claims the current form dates to 2017, a direct inconsistency. A: Pelaajien voitot ovat Suomessa veronalaista tuloa. B: Onko Spinbara Casino verovapaa? Kyllä, Spinbara toimii Curacao lisenssillä, ja voitot ovat verovapaita Suomessa. One part states winnings are taxable in Finland, while the FAQ claims winnings are tax-free under a Curacao license. A: Spinbaran lisenssi on Comoroksen Anjouanin pelilisenssi. B: Spinbara Casino toimii Curacao lisenssillä. The licensing jurisdiction is stated as Anjouan in one section and Curacao in another, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/spinbetter-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus: 10 € B: Minimitalletus: 5–10 € The article's Quick Facts section states a fixed minimum deposit of 10 €, while another part of the text claims the minimum deposit ranges from 5 to 10 €, creating a contradiction in the minimum deposit requirement. A: Kasinon omistaja- ja lisenssitietoja ei ilmoiteta. B: Kasinon omistaja ja lisenssitiedot ovat Sprut Group B.V. Curaçao-lisenssillä (lisenssin numero 8048/JAZ), kuten asiakaspalvelu vahvisti. One section says owner and license information is not disclosed, while another section provides specific ownership and licensing details, indicating inconsistent statements about disclosure. | ||
/arvostelu/spincasino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Spin Casino – Live-chat: Yes B: Spin Casinolla ei ole lainkaan reaaliaikaista asiakaspalvelua live chatin kautta. The page's comparison table lists Spin Casino as having live chat (Live-chat: Yes), while the customer service section states there is no real-time live chat available. | ||
/arvostelu/spinfever/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: SpinFever tarjoaa uusille asiakkaille 4000 € bonuspaketin ja 200 kierrosta kaupan päälle. B: Ensimmäisellä talletuksella on pelkästään luvassa 100 % bonus aina 500 € asti sekä 50 [ilmaiskierrosta] peliin Gates of Olympus. Two different welcome bonus offers are presented for new players; one claims a 4000€ package with 200 spins, while another claims a 100% bonus up to 500€ with 50 spins, which cannot both be valid simultaneously. A: Minimitalletuksen raja on 20 €. B: Minimitalletus on 30 € (for certain promotions in the bonus sections). The article lists conflicting minimum deposit requirements: one place states 20€, while bonus sections specify 30€ as the minimum deposit for promotions. | ||
/arvostelu/spinia/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Spinia is a Finnish-language online casino. B: There is no Finnish-language support available. The article both states that Spinia is a Finnish-language casino and later notes that Finnish-language support is not available. A: Minimum deposit is 20 EUR. B: Minimum deposit is 5 EUR. Different sections of the page list conflicting minimum deposit amounts (20 EUR in some sections and 5 EUR in Quick Facts / comparison table). A: Page last updated on February 19, 2026. B: Bonus last updated on February 16, 2026. Two different update timestamps are given for the page and the bonus terms, creating an inconsistency in update dates. A: License number is MGA/B2C/394/2017. B: The license was granted on 1 August 2018. The license number includes the year 2017, while the stated grant date is 2018, creating a mismatch between the license code and its grant date. | ||
/arvostelu/spinight-casino/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus 100% 1000 € asti + 100 ilmaiskierrosta B: Kasinobonus: 2500 € asti ja 250 ilmaiskierrosta The page presents two different first-deposit bonus offers for Spinight: one stating 100% up to 1000€ + 100 free spins, and another stating up to 2500€ + 250 free spins. They cannot both be correct. A: KYC-prosessin kestävän enintään kymmenen päivää. B: Ohjekeskus sanoo enintään 1–3 päivää. Two different maximum durations for KYC processing are given on the same page (10 days vs 1–3 days). A: KYC-prosessin kestävän enintään kymmenen päivää. B: Loppukädessä nettikasinon käyttöehdot ovat voimassa, joten lähes parin viikon käsittelyaikaan on varauduttava. A third, even longer timeframe (~two weeks) is stated for the KYC process, creating inconsistency with the other two durations. A: Yli 20 000 kasinopeliä ja vedonlyöntimarkkinat B: pelivalikoima ... yli 21 000 nimikettä The page cites two different total counts for the game library (over 20,000 vs over 21,000), which conflicts. A: Spinight toimii Anjouanin pelilisenssin alla. B: Lisenssi: Anjouan ([PAGCOR](https://www.pagcor.ph/index.php)) The text both states an Anjouan license and references PAGCOR as the regulator in the license line, which is inconsistent because PAGCOR is a Philippine regulator and does not correspond to an Anjouan license. | ||
/arvostelu/spinit-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € (listed in the 'Säännöt ja ehdot' / Minimitalletus row) B: Minimitalletus: 10 € (listed in the 'Kierrätysvaatimukset' section: 'Minimitalletus: 10 €') The page shows two different minimum deposit amounts for the same bonus/offer (20 € in one section and 10 € in another), creating a clear numerical contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/spinnalot/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Vuonna 2021 lanseerattu Spinnalot on Maltan pelilisenssin alla toimiva nettikasino B: Käynnistysvuosi Kasino avattiin noin vuonna 2020 The two statements assign different opening years (2021 vs ~2020) for Spinnalot, which is a direct contradiction. A: VIP-ohjelmaan mukaan vain kutsulla B: VIP-kanta-asiakasohjelma | Erilaiset henkilökohtaiset edut ja tarjoukset One part says the VIP program is invitation-only, while another part states there is a VIP program with various benefits, implying different access models for VIP status. A: Spinnalot erottuu edukseen muun muassa korkealaatuisella pelivalikoimallaan, suomenkielisellä sivustolla B: Spinnalot Casino vs Neon54 Casino – Suomenkielinen sivu: Spinnalot = Ei The text claims a Finnish-language site exists, while the comparison table later marks 'Suomenkielinen sivu' as 'Ei' for Spinnalot, a direct contradiction about language availability. | ||
/arvostelu/spinnaus-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Spinnaus Trustpilot arvosana: noin 3,5/5 B: Spinnaus Casino Arvosana: ★ 3.72/5 The page presents two different ratings for Spinnaus: one states the Trustpilot rating is about 3.5/5, while a separate comparison table shows an overall rating of 3.72/5. This is an inconsistency in the stated evaluations within the same article. | ||
/arvostelu/spinni-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Sivusto julkaistiin alkujaan jo vuonna 2022. B: Perustamisvuosi 2025 (uudistukset 2025). The article claims the site first launched in 2022, but the corporate information section lists the founding year as 2025 and mentions a relaunch in 2025. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset 40x (Talletus+Bonus). B: Kierrätysvaatimukset 30x (tai 35x riippuen voiton tyypistä) Fortune Wheel -promo -osiosta. Two different wagering requirements are given for bonuses/promotions: 40x for the general bonus, and 30x or 35x for the Fortune Wheel promotion, which is inconsistent. A: Spinni Casinon pelivalikoiman arvostelu väittää, että Play’n GO puuttuu valikoimasta. B: Spinni Casinon pelivalikoiman arvostelun lisäksi Pelivalmistajat Spinni Casinolla -osion taulukko listaa Play’n GO:n pelivalmistajana (esim. Book of Dead). Play’n GO is described as missing from the selection in one section, but another section lists Play’n GO as a pelivalmistaja, creating an explicit inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/spinny-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Spinny Casino on vuonna 2025 lanseerattu Green Champions Leader SRL omistama ja pyörittämä Trumo kasino B: Riippuen siitä, mistä päin maailmaa pelaat, Spinny Casino kertoo omistajakseen joko Green Champions Leader SRL:n tai Famagousta B.V:n. The page asserts a single owner (Green Champions Leader SRL) in one place but later states ownership could be either Green Champions Leader SRL or Famagousta B.V., which is internally inconsistent. A: Lisenssi Costa Rica (Quick facts) B: Lisenssit: Anjouan (Spinny Casino yrityksen tiedot) with license ALSI-202502014-FI1 The article lists two different licensing authorities (Costa Rica in Quick Facts and Anjouan in the detailed info) for Spinny Casino, which cannot both be the official license and thus constitutes a contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/spinoli-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Spinoli kokemuksia: Spinoli tarjoaa yhteensä 1 000 € ja 300 ilmaiskierrosta kasinopeleihin ensitalletuksien myötä. B: 1. Talletus: 200% 500 € asti + 100 ilmaiskierrosta. The page first claims a welcome package of 1,000 € plus 300 free spins, but later details a first-deposit bonus of 200% up to €500 plus 100 free spins, which cannot simultaneously total 1,000 € and 300 spins. A: Päivitetty: 23. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 09/02/2026 Two update dates are given for the same content: the page header claims an update date of 23 December 2025, while the bonus section states the last update was 9 February 2026, creating a chronological inconsistency. A: Kasino on asettanut kasinopelivoitoille 100 000 € ylärajan. B: Million Book ja Jackpot Raiders -slotteja päävoitto ylittää reilusti 100 000 €, mikäli pelaa suuremmilla panoksilla. There is a stated payout cap of €100,000 for casino game winnings, yet the text mentions jackpots in games like Million Book and Jackpot Raiders that exceed €100,000, which directly contradicts the stated cap. A: Minimitalletus 20 € B: Minimitalletus €10 The quick facts section lists a minimum deposit of €10, while the casino bonus rules state a minimum deposit of €20 for the first deposit bonus, creating inconsistent minimum deposit requirements. | ||
/arvostelu/spinsamurai/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletus: 10 € B: Minimitalletus: 25 € One part of the page states the minimum deposit is 10 €, while a comparison table later lists the minimum deposit for Spin Samurai as 25 €, which is a direct numeric inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/spinz/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Spinz Casinon pelivalikoima kattaa yli 3 500 peliä. B: Spinz Casinon pelivalikoima kattaa yli 6 000 kasinopeliä. The page contains two different total-game counts for Spinz (3,500 and 6,000+), which conflict with each other. A: Tervetuliaisbonuksessa on 100 ilmaiskierrosta jaettu viiden päivän ajalle. B: Saat lisäksi 50 ilmaiskierrosta, jotka jaetaan 5 päivän ajalle (10 kierrosta päivässä). The welcome bonus is described as including 100 free spins distributed over five days, but another section states only 50 free spins distributed over five days, a direct numeric inconsistency. A: Rekisteröityminen on pakollista (Spinzin osiossa erillisistä heikkouksista). B: Chipz Casino on rekisteröitymisvapaa kasino (ilman rekisteröitymistä). The page states registration is required for Spinz, but lists Chipz Casino as a no-registration casino, which contradicts the general registration requirement within the page. A: Spinz pelivalikoima 1 250+ peliä (Spinz vs Neon54 -taulukko). B: Spinz pelivalikoima kattaa yli 3 500 peliä (tai yli 6 000 pelia). The Neon54 comparison table lists Spinz with 1 250+ games, conflicting with other sections that claim 3,500+ (or 6,000+) games. | ||
/arvostelu/spinzen/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Yhteensä paketti on jopa 4 250 € ja 550 ilmaiskierrosta B: The four-deposit welcome package totals 2,550 € in bonus cash and 400 free spins (150 + 100 + 75 + 75), not 4,250 € and 550 free spins. The stated total value and total number of free spins for the four-deposit welcome package (4,250 € and 550 spins) do not match the actual breakdown, which sums to 2,550 € in bonus cash and 400 spins (150 + 100 + 75 + 75). | ||
/arvostelu/spinzwin/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Kierrätysvaatimukset Ei kierrätysvaatimuksia B: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 50x (Bonus) / 50x (ilmaiskierrosta) The bottom comparison table claims there are no wagering requirements, while other sections repeatedly state 50x wagering requirements for bonuses and 50x for free spins, creating a direct contradiction. A: SpinzWin ei tarjoa VIP-ohjelmaa, vaan sen kanta-asiakasohjelmassa on hyödynnetty gamificationin elementtejä. B: VIP-ohjelma: Ei The article describes a gamified loyalty system as the program, but the side-by-side table lists 'VIP-ohjelma' as 'Ei' (No VIP program), which contradicts the described gamified loyalty features. | ||
/arvostelu/sportaza/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Onko Sportaza verovapaa suomalaisille? B: Huomaa, että koska kasinon lisenssi tulee ETA:n ulkopuolelta, voitoista pitää maksaa verot Suomeen. The page states Finnish players are not tax-free for Sportaza, but also claims that winnings must be taxed due to the non-ETA license, which are conflicting statements about tax treatment. A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Minimitalletus: 10 € The page lists two different minimum deposit amounts: 20 € (bonus terms) and 10 € (quick facts), which is inconsistent. A: Nostopyynnöt käsitellään kolmen arkipäivän sisään B: Kotiutus hyväksyttiin 14 tunnissa (Skrill) – huomattavasti nopeammin kuin 3 arkipäivää. The article states withdrawals are processed within about 3 days, but includes an anecdote claiming a withdrawal was approved in 14 hours, contradicting the stated processing time. | ||
/arvostelu/sportcenter-betting/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä: 16 B: Maksutavat sisältävät 17 eri maksutapaa (Rapid Transfer, Revolut, Visa, Mastercard, Skrill, Neteller, WebPayz, paysafecard, Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, USDT Tether, Ethereum, LINK, Litecoin, USDC, Stellar Lumens, Ripple) There is a numeric inconsistency: the Sport Center Casino experience table lists 16 payment providers, while the text detailing the available payment methods lists 17 providers. | ||
/arvostelu/sportsbet-io/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Fiat-valuutoja tarjolla ovat Turkin liira, Intian rupia, Kanadan dollarit ja Japanin yenit. B: Perustason pelaajalle Sports Bet ei ole paras valinta, koska fiat-valuuttaa ei voi käyttää. The page claims fiat currencies are available for deposits (fiat currencies listed), but later says that basic players cannot use fiat currencies, implying fiat options exist but are unusable for standard players. This is an internal inconsistency about supported payment methods. A: Anonyymi pelaaminen on pääsääntöisesti mahdollista ajasta ikuisuuteen. B: KYC-prosessin takarajaksi mainitaan 2 500 euron kotiutukset kumulatiivisesti. The text simultaneously suggests anonymous play is generally possible forever, while also indicating withdrawals may require normal KYC verification (including a cumulative 2,500 EUR limit), creating an explicit conflict between anonymity and mandatory KYC. | ||
/arvostelu/sportuna/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus 20 € B: Minimitalletus 10 € The article presents two conflicting minimum deposit figures: 20 € (in the bonus terms) and 10 € (in the quick facts section). A: Kasinon operaattorina on laajalti tunnettu iGATE B: Omistaja: Liernin Enterprises Ltd. The page states the operator as iGATE, but lists the owner as Liernin Enterprises Ltd, creating inconsistency about who operates versus who owns the casino. | ||
/arvostelu/starda/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Min deposit: €10 The page contains two conflicting minimum deposit figures for the same casino: 20 € (listed under the bonus rules/terms) and 10 € (listed in the Quick facts). This cannot be true simultaneously for the same operator. | ||
/arvostelu/starsplay-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Nostoraja (withdrawal limit) in the StarsPlay comparison table is 5 000 €. B: Customer support states the withdrawal limit is usually 500 € per day (daily withdrawal cap). The page lists conflicting withdrawal limits: one figure shows a 5,000 € withdrawal cap, while another section claims withdrawals are normally limited to 500 € per day. A: The license is listed as Curacao in the casino info table. B: The quick facts section lists the license as 'Curaçao, Tobique License' and other parts mention Tobique licensing, implying Tobique (and Curaçao) licensing. Licensing information is inconsistent: one place attributes the license to Curacao, while other parts attribute Tobique (and Curaçao) licensing, creating conflicting claims about StarsPlay's regulatory status. | ||
/arvostelu/stupid-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Ilman rekisteröintiä B: Stupid Casinolla pelaaminen edellyttää tavallista rekisteröitymistä The page header states 'Ilman rekisteröintiä' (without registration) while the body repeatedly says that playing requires standard registration. | ||
/arvostelu/sunnybet/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/superkasino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: The article states that there is a loyalty program named Superpeliluola. B: In the 'Superkasino vertailussa' table, it lists 'VIP-ohjelma: Ei' (no VIP program). The text asserts the existence of a loyalty/VIP program (Superpeliluola) while the comparison table claims there is no VIP program, creating a direct contradiction about the program's existence. A: The casino offers only one payment method: Zimpler (no other payment providers mentioned). B: The 'Superkasino vertailussa' table shows 'Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä: 2' (two payment service providers). One part of the text says only Zimpler is available, while the comparison table claims there are two payment providers, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/sushi-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Kasino toimii ilman lisenssiä. B: Sushi Casinon yrityksen tiedot osoittavat omistajan Virtual Games Limited ja aiemmin olleen lisenssin ALSI-132405052-FI3. One part of the text states the casino operates without a license, while another part lists the operator and references a previously used license (ALSI-132405052-FI3), implying there was a license in the past. This is inconsistent about whether Sushi Casino currently holds a license. A: Nostojen käsittely kestää muutaman päivän. B: Nostot käsitellään 72 tunnissa. One section claims withdrawal processing takes a few days, while another specifies withdrawals are processed in 72 hours. The two statements about timing are unambiguously conflicting. | ||
/arvostelu/taika-spins-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Taikaspins perustettu: 2023 B: Taikaspins on vuonna 2024 perustettu L.C.S. Limitedin Zimpler kasino ilman rekisteröintiä. The founding year is inconsistent: 2023 in the basic information section vs 2024 in the experience section. A: Minimitalletusrajaksi on asetettu 20 euroa B: Minimitalletus: 25 € Two sections specify different minimum deposit amounts: 20 euros and 25 euros. A: Taikaspinsin live casinolta löytyy pelattavaa yli 550 nimikkeen edestä B: Todellisuudessa erilaisia live-pelejä ei ole ihan tällaista määrää tarjolla An initial claim of over 550 live games is contradicted later by the assertion that not that many live games are actually available. | ||
/arvostelu/taikawin-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: TaikaWin vertailussa: Minimitalletus 10 € B: Bonus rules: Minimitalletus 25 € (talletus bonukselle). The page shows conflicting minimum deposit amounts: the comparison table lists 10 € as the minimum, while the bonus terms state 25 € minimum to claim the bonus. A: TaikaWin vertailussa: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä 3 B: TaikaWin Casinon maksutavat: the section lists only Zimpler (and Revolut as an added option). The comparison table claims there are 3 payment service providers, but the dedicated payments section only lists Zimpler (with Revolut added later), implying fewer than 3 providers. | ||
/arvostelu/talismania/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimum deposit listed in Quick facts as 15 € B: Minimum deposit listed in bonus/terms sections as 20 € The article inconsistently states the minimum deposit as €15 in Quick facts, but later lists €20 as the minimum in the bonus terms section. A: Minimum deposit stated as 10 € in the 'Talletusten, kotiutusten ja maksujen nopeus' section B: Minimum deposit listed in the 'Talismania vertailussa' table as 15 € Different parts of the article report different minimum deposit amounts (€10 vs €15). A: Number of payment methods claimed as 20 B: Number of payment service providers in the comparison table as 19 The page claims 20 payment methods, but the comparison table lists 19 providers for Talismania. | ||
/arvostelu/the-clubhouse-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: The Clubhouse Casinolla voittojen kotiutukset tapahtuvat alle 24 tunnissa. Nopeimmillaan maksut siirtyvät minuuteissa, mutta ruuhka-aikoina maksujen vahvistus voi vielä melkein vuorokauden. B: Pankkikortti (Visa, Mastercard) | 20 € | 15 000 € / kk | 1–3 päivää (kotiutuksen nopeus). The page claims withdrawals can be completed in under 24 hours, but the payment methods table lists withdrawal times of 1–3 days (and 1–2 days for some methods), creating a direct contradiction about withdrawal speed. A: The Clubhouse Casinolta löytyy Loyalty Program, jossa keräät klubipisteitä ja saat etuja kuten ilmaispyöräytyksiä, cashbackia, muita bonuksia ja yllätyksiä. B: The comparison table lists Bonusrakenne as 'Ei bonusta' and Kierrätysvaatimukset as 'Ei kierrätysvaatimuksia', implying there is no bonus structure or wagering requirements, despite mentions of a loyalty program and bonuses elsewhere. The article describes a loyalty program with points and various bonuses, yet the table explicitly states there is no bonus structure and no wagering requirements, which is inconsistent. A: Asiakaspalvelu on saatavilla ainoastaan englanniksi. B: Siellä lukee 'Suomenkielinen sivu: Kyllä' (the site has a Finnish version). Customer support is described as English-only, while the compare table indicates there is a Finnish-language site, creating a language availability contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/the-slotz-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: The Slotz Casino was opened in 2022. B: The Slotz founding year is listed as 2025. Two different establishment years are stated for The Slotz Casino: one says it opened in 2022, while the operator information section lists a founding year of 2025. A: Second deposit bonus: 100% up to 500 € + 75 free spins. B: Second deposit bonus: 100% up to 700 € + 75 free spins. The second deposit bonus maximum differs between sections: one part states up to 500 €, another part states up to 700 €. | ||
/arvostelu/thor-casino/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/thrillsy/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Pienin mahdollinen talletus on 20 €. B: Minimitalletus: 10 € The article lists two different minimum deposit figures: 20 EUR in the bonus terms section and 10 EUR in the 'Minimitalletus' line elsewhere, which cannot both be correct. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 25x (Talletus+Bonus) B: Koska kierrätysvaatimus koskee sekä talletusta että bonusta, on oikea kierrätysvaatimus siis 50x. Wagering requirements are given as 25x for deposit+bonus, but later there's a claim that the required wagering is 50x when combining deposit and bonus; the two are inconsistent. A: Kaikkia talletuksia koskee 5x panostusvaatimus. B: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 25x (Talletus+Bonus) The text asserts both a 5x wagering requirement on all deposits and a 25x deposit+bonus wagering requirement, which cannot both be correct. A: Voittokatto: 10x B: Voittokatto vuorokaudessa: 100 000 euroa A 'win cap' of 10x is stated in wagering terms, while a separate daily win cap of 100,000 EUR is also stated; these likely refer to different contexts but are presented as inconsistent caps. A: Kanta-asiakasohjelma (Levels) löytyy B: VIP-ohjelma: Ei The article says there is a Levels loyalty program, but the comparison table lists that the casino has no VIP program. | ||
/arvostelu/tiki-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus on kaikilla maksutavoilla 20 €. B: Minimitalletus Tikicasinolla on 10–20 € (min 10 €, riippuen maksutavasta). Two different statements about the minimum deposit: one says 20 € for all methods, the other says 10–20 € depending on the payment method. A: Kotiutukset ovat teknisesti välittömiä. B: Kotiutusten hyväksyminen kestää 2–3 arkipäivää. Withdrawal timing is described as instantaneous, but later as taking 2–3 business days to approve. A: Lisenssi on Anjouan-lisenssi (Anjouan itsehallintoalueen rahapeliviranomainen). B: Lisenssi on Curaçao, Anjouan Gaming License. Licensing is stated as Anjouan only in one section but Curaçao plus Anjouan in another, inconsistent. A: Sähköpostisupport@tikicasino.com B: Sähköpostituki support@tikicasino.com Two different support email addresses are listed in different parts of the page. | ||
/arvostelu/tikitaka-casino/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus 20 € The page lists a 10 EUR minimum deposit in Quick Facts, but also states a 20 EUR minimum deposit for bonus eligibility/registration, which is inconsistent. A: Päivittäinen kotiutusraja on 500 euroa B: VIP-tasoilla maksimikotiutus on 1 500 € päivässä Base daily withdrawal limit is stated as 500 EUR, while the VIP tier is claimed to allow up to 1,500 EUR per day, creating a mismatch in withdrawal caps by tier. A: Kuukausikohtainen kotiutusraja on 7 000 euroa B: VIP-tasoilla 20 000 € kuukaudessa Base monthly withdrawal limit is given as 7,000 EUR, but VIPs are said to have a monthly limit up to 20,000 EUR, which contradicts the base figure. A: Kritiikkiä lisenssitiedot: Lisenssitietoja ei ilmoiteta B: Lisenssi: Anjouan Gaming License The review claims license information is not disclosed, yet the quick facts list a specific license (Anjouan Gaming License), which is inconsistent. A: TikiTaka Casinolla on hieman yli 14 000 kolikkopeliä B: Nettikasino tarjoaa peräti 15 000 peliä The article states the site has about 14,000 slot games, while another section claims the site has 15,000 games in total, creating a discrepancy in game counts within the article. | ||
/arvostelu/tiktakbet-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: The article states the first deposit bonus is 100% up to 250 € plus 50 free spins. B: The comparison table later lists the first deposit bonus as 250€ bonus plus 100 free spins. There is an inconsistency between the described first-deposit bonus (50 free spins) and the later comparison table (100 free spins) for the same tier. A: The bonus terms specify a minimum deposit of 25 €. B: The Quick facts section lists a minimum deposit of €20. Two different minimum deposit amounts are stated in the same page for the same site, causing a contradiction. A: The 'Maksutavat' section states there is only one payment method available (Zimpler AB). B: The 'Tiktakbet vertailussa' table lists Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä as 14. The article simultaneously claims there is a single payment method and that there are 14 payment service providers, which cannot both be true. A: The article implies live chat is available 24/7. B: The author reports that live chat is not always available and may not provide a live agent. There is a conflict between the claimed 24/7 live chat availability and the tester's experience of intermittent or unavailable live support. | ||
/arvostelu/tonybet/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Asiakaspalvelu Tonybet Casinolla: Live-chat on listed as a customer support channel. B: Tonybet vertailussa -table: Live-chat Ei (no) for TonyBet Casino. One section states that live chat is available as a support channel, while the comparison table claims that live chat is not available. A: Kotiutus- ja talletusnopeudet: Nostopyynnöt käsitellään 48 tunnin sisällä; E-wallet withdrawals ~12 hours; Crypto withdrawals <24 hours; Bank/card withdrawals up to 7 days. B: Tonybet vertailussa -taulukko: Kotiutusnopeus 1–3 päivää for TonyBet Casino. Withdrawal processing times are given as 12 hours for e-wallets and up to 7 days for cards in one section, but a separate comparison table lists 1–3 days as the withdrawal speed, creating conflicting timelines. A: Lokalisointi: Suomenkielinen sivusto, tuki suomeksi. B: Asiakaspalvelu-osiossa: Kysytään, voidaanko keskustella suomeksi; vastaus on, ettei suomenkielistä tukea ole saatavilla (englanti käytössä). The site is described as Finnish-localized with Finnish support, yet another section explicitly states Finnish-speaking support is not available. A: Päivitetty: 20. marraskuuta 2025. B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 17/02/2026. Two separate last-update dates are given, implying an inconsistency about the most recent update to the content. | ||
/arvostelu/trickz/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Lisenssi: HKT000062 (Viron Vero- ja tullihallitus) B: Lisenssi: Anjouan Gaming License, Viro The article presents two different licensing jurisdictions for Trickz: one section states the license is issued by the Estonian Tax and Customs Board (EMTA) with license number HKT000062, while the Quick Facts box claims an Anjouan Gaming License (Comoros) with 'Viro' appended, which is inconsistent. A: Päivitetty: 18. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 09/02/2026 The page shows a main update date in 2025 and a bonus-specific update date in 2026, implying that bonus information was updated after the main page update. This creates a chronological inconsistency in the timing of updates. | ||
/arvostelu/trino-casino/ | Error | |
cache miss (cache-only mode) | ||
/arvostelu/trivelabet-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Quick facts list claims license: Estonia (Viro) and Kahnawake. B: Main text claims the casino operates under an Estonian license issued by the Estonian Tax and Customs Board (Viron Vero- ja Tullihallituksen myöntämällä pelilisenssillä). The page presents conflicting licensing jurisdictions: one section lists Estonia and Kahnawake as licenses, while another states the casino operates under an Estonian license. This inconsistency cannot both be true. | ||
/arvostelu/trust-dice-win-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Päivitetty: 19. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 23/02/2026 The page lists two different last-update timestamps for related content: a general update date of 19 November 2025 and a separate 'bonus updated' date of 23 February 2026, which is inconsistent. A: Trust Dice Win lupaa, että 99,4 % kotiutuksista välittömästi. B: Kotiutukset voivat odottaa 1-5 arkipäivää. One part claims withdrawals are instant for 99.4% of cases, while another part states withdrawals may take 1-5 business days, which directly contradicts the instant withdrawal claim. A: Kolmiosaisessa tervetulotarjouksessa itselleen voi lunastaa jopa 3 BTC edestä täytettä pelikassaan. B: Ensimmäinen talletusbonus: 200% bonus 30 000 $ / 1 BTC asti ... (and similarly for the other two bonuses). The page simultaneously asserts a total potential of up to 3 BTC for the three-bonus package, while each individual welcome bonus is described as up to 1 BTC (30,000 USD / 1 BTC asti), creating a numerical inconsistency in the BTC cap. | ||
/arvostelu/tsars-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus 20 € (for deposits) in the Tsars Casino maksutavat section The page lists conflicting minimum deposit amounts: €10 in the Quick facts, but €20 as the minimum deposit in the deposit methods section. A: Lisenssi Curaçao, Anjouan Gaming License B: In the verovapaa Suompelaajille section, the license is described as Curacao with MGA (Malta Gaming Authority) reference There is an inconsistent treatment of the licensing: one part lists Curaçao and Anjouan Gaming License, while another part (the verovapaa section) incorrectly references MGA, which cannot apply to a Curacao-licensed site. A: Tsars Casino rating at the top: ★ 2.8/5 B: Tsars Casinon Trustpilot arvosana: 4.4/5 The page presents two different overall ratings for Tsars Casino from different sources, which is inconsistent within the same page. | ||
/arvostelu/tuohi-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Lisenssi on tällä kertaa myöntänyt Mansaaren peliviranomainen (GSC). B: Maltan MGA lisenssin mukaisesti työkaluja ei ihan ole tarjolla. The page presents two different licensing authorities for the same casino: Isle of Man's Gambling Supervision Commission (GSC) and Maltese MGA license, which is inconsistent and cannot both apply simultaneously. | ||
/arvostelu/tuplaus-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Päivitetty: 9. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 20/02/2026 Two different last-update dates are given for the content (one in 2025 and one in 2026), which is inconsistent. A: Lisenssi: MGA lisenssi; Lisenssinumero MGA/B2C/1079/2025 B: MGA lisenssi numerolla MGA/B2C/599/2018 Two different MGA license numbers are stated for Tuplaus Casino, which cannot both be correct. A: Kategoria: Asiakaspalvelu | Keskitaso | 24/7, suomenkielinen tuki ei ollut paikalla lupauksista huolimatta. B: Asiakaspalvelua on tarjolla vuorokauden ympäri sekä sähköpostilla että suoraan chat; suomenkielinen tuki on käytettävissä. The page contains conflicting statements about Finnish customer support availability: one line claims Finnish support was not available despite 24/7 promises, while another section claims 24/7 Finnish support is available. | ||
/arvostelu/tusk-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Päivitetty: 9. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 12/02/2026 The page shows two different last-update dates: the overall page was updated on 9 December 2025, while the bonus section claims it was last updated on 12 February 2026, creating an inconsistency in update timelines. | ||
/arvostelu/tuuri-kasino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: KYC-prosessista (Know Your Customer) ei löydy mitään mainintaa Tuuri Kasinon sivuilta. B: Varaudu siis henkisesti siihen, että voit joutua lähettämään eteenpäin seuraavat dokumentit osana henkilöllisyytesi vahvistusta: Henkilöllisyys: Passi, henkilökortti tai ajokortti; Maksutapa: Tiliote; Kotiosoite: Pankin / viranomaisen lähettämä dokumentti, tiliote tai kotitalouslasku (esim. nettilasku, max. 3kk vanha). The page states there is no information about the KYC process, yet later it provides specific required KYC documents, which is inconsistent. A: Auki päivittäin klo 10.30–00.00. B: Trumo asiakaspalvelu on tavoitettavissa 24/7 live-chatin ja sähköpostin kautta. Customer service hours are stated as daily 10:30–00:00, while another part claims 24/7 availability via live chat and email, creating a contradiction about support availability. | ||
/arvostelu/tykitys/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Tykitys tarjoaa 333 ilmaiskierrosta tervetuliaisbonuksena. B: Ensitalletuksen yhteydessä annettiin 133 ilmaiskierrosta (83 heti, 50 seuraavien päivien aikana), eli huomattavasti vähemmän kuin 333 ilmaiskierrosta. The article first states a 333 free spins welcome package, but later describes receiving 83 spins initially and 50 more spins over subsequent days, totaling 133 spins, which contradicts the stated 333. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset ilmaiskierroksille ovat 35x. B: Tykitys Jackpot -pelin voitot ovat ilman kierrätysvaatimuksia. Wagering for free-spin winnings is stated as 35x, but the text also claims the Tykitys Jackpot game has no wagering requirements for its prizes, which contradicts the general 35x requirement. A: Minimitalletus on 20 €. B: Miniminosto (minimum withdrawal) on 0 €. The article specifies a 20 € minimum deposit, but the comparison table lists the minimum withdrawal as 0 €, creating an inconsistency between deposit and withdrawal requirements. | ||
/arvostelu/ultra-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus for the welcome bonus: 25 € B: Minimum deposit for general deposits: 10 € The article states a 25€ minimum deposit to claim the welcome bonus, while Quick facts list a 10€ minimum deposit for deposits in general, creating a direct inconsistency in the required deposit amount depending on context. A: Päivitetty: 24. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 11/02/2026 Two different last-update dates are given: the page shows 24 November 2025, while the bonus section says updated last on 11 February 2026, which is inconsistent. A: Lisenssi: MGA/B2C/203/2011 (myönnetty 1.8.2018) B: License was granted on 1.8.2018 The license number contains the year 2011, but the text also states the license was granted on 1 August 2018, creating an inconsistency about the license's year. | ||
/arvostelu/valhalla-wins-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Päivitetty: 10. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 20/02/2026 Two different last-update dates are stated for content: the page overall shows December 10, 2025, while the bonus section claims February 20, 2026, implying an inconsistency. A: Livekasino on kattava sisältäen lähes 700 peliä B: Livekasino (290+ peliä) Two different counts are given for live casino games: 290+ in one place and nearly 700 in another, which cannot both be accurate. A: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä 10 B: Kotiutukset onnistuvat vain Skrill-nettilompakkoon tai Zimplerin kautta verkkopankilla The table claims 10 payment service providers, but the text states withdrawals are effectively limited to Skrill or Zimpler, creating an inconsistency. A: Perustamisvuosi 2023 B: Valhalla Wins Casinoa avattu vuonna 2025 The company founding year (2023) differs from the claimed casino launch year (2025), suggesting a discrepancy about when the casino began operating. | ||
/arvostelu/valtti/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Valtti Casino's text claims the live casino includes 'lähes 3000 kasinopeliä sekä lähes sata live-peliä sisältävän live casinon'. B: The live casino section later states there are '95 erilaista live-peliä'. Two different counts are given for live casino games (about 100 vs 95), which cannot both be correct. A: No progressive jackpot games are offered: 'Progressiivisia jättipottipelejä ... ei ollut tarjolla lainkaan.' B: Jackpot games are present: 'Jackpot Raiders' and 'Jackpot Express' searchable via the game search. The page claims there are no progressive jackpots, yet also lists jackpot games. A: Päivitetty: 9. joulukuuta 2025. B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 16/02/2026. Two different last-update timestamps are given for content sections, implying inconsistent update history. A: Ensitalletusbonus described in the main text as 100% up to 500 € + 30 free spins. B: In the comparison table, the Ensitalletusbonus row shows '500€ bonus + 300 ik' (inconsistent with 30 free spins). Contradictory presentation of the welcome bonus amount or number of free spins between sections. A: Kotiutusten käsittelyaika: the 'Rahansiirtojen nopeus' section states withdrawals are processed within 24 hours. B: In the Valtti comparison table, withdrawal time is shown as approximately 1 hour. Withdrawal processing time is described as 24h in one place and ~1h in another, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/vauhdikas-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus: 25 € B: Minimitalletus: 10 € One section lists the minimum deposit to claim the bonus as 25 €, while another part (including Quick Facts) lists 10 € as the minimum deposit. This is a clear numeric inconsistency regarding the bonus eligibility threshold. A: Ei chat-asiakaspalvelua (no live chat support) B: Live-chat: Kyllä (live chat available) The article states there is no live chat support, but a comparison table later indicates that live chat is available. This is a direct contradiction about whether live chat support exists. | ||
/arvostelu/vega-zone/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Trustpilot shows only two reviews, both five-star B: The average rating is 3.8 stars Two 5-star reviews would yield an average rating of 5.0, not 3.8, so these statements are inconsistent with each other. | ||
/arvostelu/vegas-hero/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Valikoima yli 30 000 peliä B: Valikoima yli 33 000 peliä kattava tarjonta Two sections claim different sizes for the same game library (30k+ vs 33k+), which is inconsistent. A: Sivuston alaosassa on kattavasti tietosivuja ja pelikategorioita, mutta lisenssitiedoista ei ole mainintaa lainkaan B: Kasinolla on Costa Rica Gambling -lisenssi One part says license information is not mentioned on the site, while another section states a Costa Rica Gambling license exists. A: Kasinon omistajasta ja lisenssistä ei kerrota sivustolla mitään tietoa B: Kasinon omistaja on Lumina Holdings Limitada One section claims ownership/licensing details aren't disclosed, while another provides the operator's name (Lumina Holdings Limitada), creating inconsistency about transparency of ownership. | ||
/arvostelu/vegas-mobile-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: The page header displays 'Ilman rekisteröintiä' (without registration). B: The FAQ section asks 'Onko Vegas Mobile Casino rekisteröintivapaa?' and answers 'Ei ole, eli normaali rekisteröityminen vaaditaan ennen tallettamista.' The page presents conflicting statements: one part suggests registration is not required, while another part states that normal registration is required. A: Vegas Mobile Casinon Trustpilot-arvosana on noin 2,5/5. B: Vegas Mobile Casinon Trustpilot-arvosana on noin 2,8/5. Two different Trustpilot ratings are stated for the same casino within the same page. A: Minimitalletus bonus-taulukossa on 10 € (Minimitalletus 10 €). B: Miten lunastaa Vegas Mobile Casino tervetulobonus: tee ensimmäinen talletus vähintään 20 euroa. There is an inconsistency between the bonus terms (minimum 10 €) and the instruction to deposit at least 20 € to claim the bonus. A: Esimerkiksi 50 euron bonuksella voittokatto on vain 150 euroa. B: Bonus-taulukon Voittokatto-sarake shows 20 € (ilmaiskierroksista) for the first bonus and 3x bonus for subsequent bonuses, not 150 euroa. A narrative example cites a 150 € win cap, while the table indicates much lower caps or different multipliers, creating a mismatch. | ||
/arvostelu/vegasino-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Suurin vetonaula on tietysti 20 000 peliä – ei tuollaista pelimäärää ole monesti nettikasinoilla nähty. B: Vegasino Casinon pelivalikoima on toistaiseksi suurin, johon olen nettikasinoilla törmännyt. Vegasinolla on nimittäin 20 350 kasinopeliä ja vedonlyöntiä. The article asserts two different total numbers of games (20,000 vs 20,350), which cannot both be true. A: Live: 300+ B: Yli 400 live-pelin joukosta. The article claims both 300+ and over 400 live games, contradicting each other. A: Lisenssitiedot: Ei näkyvissä, herättää epäilykset B: Lisenssi: Anjouan ([PAGCOR](https://www.pagcor.ph/index.php)) The page first says license details are not visible, then presents a specific license, creating a contradiction about license visibility/identity. A: Minimitalletus | 20 € B: Minimitalletus€10 Minimum deposit is listed as 20€ in one section and 10€ in another, inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/veikkaus/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Veikkaus Oy was founded in 2017 (merger of RAY, Veikkaus, and Fintoton). B: The article states Veikkaus has roots dating back to 1940 with Oy Tippaustoimisto Ab. The article presents Veikkaus Oy as created in 2017 via merger, while also claiming the company's roots go back to 1940 under a different entity, which is inconsistent. A: Veikkaus Kasinon maksutavat: there are two payment methods (online bank transfer and MobilePay). B: Miinukset mention: 'Vain yksi maksutapa' (only one payment method). The article simultaneously states there are two payment methods but also lists 'only one payment method' as a drawback, creating an internal inconsistency about the number of payment methods. | ||
/arvostelu/velobet/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Current license listed as Curaçao in the Quick Facts section. B: The license section states Anjouan as the license (and notes a previous Curaçao license). The article attributes Velobet's license to two different jurisdictions (Curaçao vs Anjouan) in separate sections, creating a direct contradiction about the current licensing. A: There is no loyalty or VIP program. B: There is a VIP program available for customers. One part of the text claims Velobet has no loyalty program, while another part asserts that a VIP program exists, which is inconsistent. A: The welcome bonus for the first deposit is described as 180% up to €1,000 with 70 free spins. B: The welcome bonus for the first deposit is described as 150% + 300 free spins. Two mutually exclusive first-deposit bonus structures are presented in different sections, causing a clear contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/viking-luck-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus bonusen lunastamiseen on 20 € B: Ilman bonuksia minimitalletus on 10 € The article specifies different minimum deposit requirements depending on whether a bonus is used: 20 € to claim the welcome bonus, but 10 € for deposits without a bonus, which is a clear numerical inconsistency. A: Maksutavat: 19 maksutapaa B: Maksupalveluntarjoajien määrä (vertailutaulukossa): 20 There is a discrepancy in the reported number of payment methods: 19 in the 'Maksutavat' section, but 20 listed in the comparison table, which is a direct contradiction. A: Päivitetty: 20. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 23/02/2026 Two different last-updated dates are given for the same content (the article vs. the bonus section), creating an inconsistency in update timestamps. | ||
/arvostelu/vinci-spin/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: New players receive a total of 500 € bonus money and hundreds of free spins. B: New players receive a total of 3,000 € bonus money and 350 free spins. The article presents two different welcome bonus amounts: 500 € vs 3,000 €, which cannot both be true. A: Minimum deposit for bonuses is 30 € (as stated in the bonus terms for each of the three welcome deposits). B: Minimum deposit is 20 € (as stated in the Quick facts section: 'Min deposit€20'). Two different minimum deposit figures (30 € vs 20 €) are stated in the same page, creating a contradiction. A: Da Vinci's Treasure RTP is 295%. B: RTP values listed for other slots in the article are around 95–97%, not 295% (e.g., Legacy of Egypt 96.50%, Rise of Olympus 96.20%). The article explicitly claims an RTP of 295% for Da Vinci's Treasure, while other listed RTP values are in the mid-90s percentage range, making the 295% claim clearly inconsistent with the rest of the content. | ||
/arvostelu/viper-win/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: The bonus terms table lists Minimitalletus (minimum deposit) as 20 €. B: Other sections (the welcome bonus rules and quick facts) state a minimum deposit of 10 €. There is an inconsistency in the documented minimum deposit required to claim the bonus: 20 € in one place vs 10 € elsewhere. A: VIP program includes a cashback (käteispalautus) as one of its benefits. B: The text states that for beginners there is no cashback bonus, contradicting the cashback benefit. The VIP program is described as offering cashback, but also notes that new players should note that there is no cashback, which cannot both be true. A: The page claims a daily withdrawal limit of 5,000 € (5000 €/päivä). B: Other parts of the page specify VIP-determined daily withdrawal limits of 500–1,500 €/day (e.g., 1st level 500 €/day, 5th level 1,500 €/day). Two different figures are given for the daily withdrawal limit, creating a clear inconsistency between sections. A: A review anecdote states a withdrawal was approved in about 14 hours and the money arrived the next morning (~20 hours total). B: The site policy states withdrawals are processed within 1–3 business days. An individual's withdrawal experience (14 hours) conflicts with the stated processing time of 1–3 business days. | ||
/arvostelu/vivatbet-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus ja -kotiutus ovat molemmat 10 €. B: Minimitalletus 5 €. The page simultaneously states the minimum deposit is 5 € in places (Plussat section) and 10 € in the payments section, which is a direct inconsistency. A: Kasinobonuksen kierrätysvaatimukset ovat 30x (Bonus). B: Kasinobonus kierrätysvaatimukset ovat 35x. Two sections assign different wagering requirements for the casino bonus (30x vs 35x), creating conflicting rules. A: VIP-ohjelma on tarjolla: Ei (no public VIP program during testing). B: VIP-ohjelma: Kyllä (VIP program exists in the comparison table). The article states there was no publicly available VIP program during testing, while the comparison table lists a VIP program as available. | ||
/arvostelu/vulkan-vegas/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kotiutukset alle 500 euroa: seuraavana arkipäivänä. B: Kotiutukset alle 500 euroa ovat yleensä 5 min – 12 h. The page presents two conflicting timeframes for withdrawals under 500 euros: one statement says withdrawals are processed the next business day, while another states they are usually processed within minutes to hours. | ||
/arvostelu/wazamba-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Kotiutusten nopeus: Wazamban talousosasto käsittelee nostopyynnöt kolmessa arkipäivässä. B: Zimplerin kautta tehdyn noston oli perillä noin vuorokauden sisällä. The text claims withdrawals are processed within 3 business days, but also provides a firsthand note that a Zimpler withdrawal arrived in about 1 day, which is inconsistent. A: Käteispalautus: 25% 200 € asti. B: VIP-ohjelman cashback on 0–20% (sekä lisäksi 15% viikoittainen cashback VIP-asiakkaille). The page lists a fixed 25% cashback up to €200, while it also describes VIP cashback as 0–20% and a separate 15% weekly VIP cashback, which are conflicting cashback schemes. A: Cashback value limit€200 on Quick facts. B: VIP cashback and other promotions imply percentage-based cashback (0–20% and 15% weekly), not a fixed €200 limit. A €200 cashback limit is stated in Quick Facts, while other sections describe percentage-based cashback offers for VIPs, leading to an inconsistency in how cashback is awarded. | ||
/arvostelu/wazbee-casino/ | Issues | 6 contradictions |
A: Wazbee tarjoaa uusille mehiläistovereilleen hunajaisen tervetiaisbonuksen, joka sisältää jopa 2000 euroa bonuksia sekä 200 ilmaiskierrosta. B: Tervetuliaisbonuksen jakautuminen neljälle talletukselle antaa enintään seuraavat bonukset: 1. talletus: 125% 200 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta; 2. talletus: 50% 400 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta; 3. talletus: 40% 600 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta; 4. talletus: 35% 800 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta (yhteensä enintään 970 € bonus). The page claims a total welcome bonus up to 2000 euros, but the explicit four-deposit structure sums to only 970 euros maximum in bonuses (plus 200 free spins). A: Minimitalletus: 10 € B: Minimitalletus: 20 € The article lists 10 € as a minimum deposit in one section and 20 € in a depositRules table, creating conflicting minimum deposit amounts. A: Arvosana 3.73/5 (top page and one comparison table). B: Arvosana 3.68/5 in a separate comparison table (Wazbee vs Pistolo vs Avo Casino). Two different numeric ratings are presented for Wazbee on the same page, causing inconsistency. A: Gates of Olympus RTP 1000 RTP 96,50 % B: Gates of Olympus RTP 96,50 %. The line lists an impossible '1000 RTP' value alongside a normal 96.50% RTP, which is a factual contradiction. A: BeeCoinsin yhden kolikon arvo on 0,10€. B: Sain 20 Bee-kolikkoa... Kolikot vaihdoin myöhemmin 20 euron pelirahaksi. If each BeeCoin is worth 0.10€, then 20 BeeCoins would equal 2.00€, not 20.00€ as stated. A: XRP B: XRP appears twice in the cryptocurrency list. The list of cryptocurrencies includes XRP twice, which is an inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/welle-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Päivitetty: 9. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 23/02/2026 Two different update dates appear for the content: the page header says it was updated on 9 December 2025, while the bonus section states the last update was 23 February 2026, creating a contradiction about when the information was last updated. A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus: 20 € The quick facts section claims the minimum deposit is €10, but the bonus/terms section lists a minimum deposit of €20, causing an inconsistency. A: Minimitalletus on 10 euroa B: Minimitalletus: 20 € One section states the minimum deposit is €10 while another section states €20, presenting an internal deposit-minimum discrepancy. | ||
/arvostelu/wettson/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Asiakaspalvelu on tarjolla live‑chatin ja sähköpostin kautta, ja apua pitäisi olla saatavilla 24/7. B: Todellinen kokemus: chat oli offline tilassa eikä tiedossa, milloin sitä olisi saatavilla; chatin tavoitettavuudesta ei ole varmuutta. The page asserts 24/7 live chat support, but a quoted user experience states the live chat was offline with no information on when it would be available, contradicting 24/7 availability. A: MiFinity-kotisutuksella on miniminosto 1 000 € (MiFinity kotoitus minimi 1000 €). B: Kotiutussivulla todetaan yleinen minimikotiutus 100 €. The MiFinity withdrawal entry lists a 1000 € minimum withdrawal, while the general withdrawal section states a 100 € minimum, creating an internal numeric inconsistency about minimum withdrawal amounts for MiFinity. A: Sähköpostituki toimitetaan osoitteeseen support@wettson.com. B: Quick facts list the support email as sähköpostisupport@wettson.com. Two different support email addresses are presented (support@wettson.com and sähköpostisupport@wettson.com), which is inconsistent and could lead to confusion about contact methods. | ||
/arvostelu/whamoo/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Talleta esimerkiksi Trustlyn tai Netellerin kautta. B: Nettilompakot: Mifinity, Jeton (ei Netelleriä). One part of the article states deposits can be made via Trustly or Neteller, while the payment methods list only Net wallets Mifinity and Jeton, with Neteller not listed as an available option. This is an internal inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/wheelz/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus 20 € The Quick facts section lists a minimum deposit of €10, while multiple sections state a minimum deposit of €20, creating a direct inconsistency about the required deposit amount. | ||
/arvostelu/wild-fortune/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Yli 5 400 peliä B: hurjat yli 10 000 peliä The page lists the total number of games as over 5,400 in one section and over 10,000 in another, which is inconsistent. A: Ensitalletusbonus 100 ilmaiskierrosta B: Nyt bonus on pienentynyt 300 ilmaiskierroksen ... lunastetaan kolmelta ensimmäiseltä talletukselta 100 kierroksen osissa The header states a welcome bonus of 100 free spins, while the detailed rules describe a total of 300 free spins (100 per deposit across three deposits), creating a contradiction about the current offer. A: nostopyynnöt käsitellään välittömästi B: Sain pyynnön ... rahaa saapui pankkitililleni lopulta noin neljä päivää nostopyynnön tekemisen jälkeen A policy claim that withdrawals are processed immediately contradicts a user anecdote describing a withdrawal taking several days. | ||
/arvostelu/wild-io/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Suuri pelivalikoima yli 7 000 pelillä B: Laaja pelivalikoima yli 9 000 pelillä The article presents two different counts for the number of games: over 7,000 in one section and over 9,000 in another. | ||
/arvostelu/wild-robin-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Top of page shows overall rating: ★ 3.34/ 5 B: Trustpilot rating: 2.2/5 The page presents two different overall ratings for Wild Robin (3.34/5 at the top vs 2.2/5 from Trustpilot), which is inconsistent. A: In the 'Wild Robin vertailussa' comparison table, Wild Robin Arvosana is listed as 4.41 B: Top rating: ★ 3.34/ 5 The same page assigns the Wild Robin rating as 4.41 in a comparison table, while the top shows 3.34/5, causing a contradiction in the stated rating. A: Trustpilot arvosana: 2.2/5 B: In the 'Wild Robin vertailussa' table, Arvosana for Wild Robin is 4.41 The page attributes two different numeric ratings to Wild Robin: 2.2/5 from Trustpilot and 4.41 in the comparison table, conflicting. | ||
/arvostelu/wild-tokyo/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Päätät lunastaa yhteensä 200 euroa bonusrahaa ja samalla voitat ilmaiskierroillasi yhteensä 40 euroa. B: 50 x (400 € + 40 €) = 22 000 € The text states a 200€ bonus (and 40€ from free spins) in the example, but the calculation shown uses a total of 400€ (deposit) + 40€ (free spins) for a 50x requirement, yielding 22,000€. The numbers do not align (200€ vs 400€) and the resulting total does not correspond to the stated bonus amount. | ||
/arvostelu/wildsino-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletus tuplataan 500 euroon asti – sen päälle saa vielä 200 ilmaiskierrosta. B: 1. talletuksella: 100% 1000 € asti + 300 ilmaiskierrosta The article advertises two different first-deposit offers for Wildsino: one claims a 500 EUR maximum with 200 free spins, while another claims a 1000 EUR maximum with 300 free spins. These are mutually conflicting first-deposit bonuses. A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus 20 € The page lists two different minimum deposit amounts: 10 EUR in the Quick Facts section and 20 EUR in the bonus-related sections, leading to an internal inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/wildz-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Welcome bonus maximum amount is 100% up to 500 €. B: First deposit welcome bonus maximum is 250 €. There is an explicit conflict within the bonus details: one section states the welcome bonus can be up to 500 €, while another part of the text states the first deposit bonus is capped at 250 €. A: Minimum deposit for bonuses is 20 €. B: First deposit must be at least 10 €, with the bonus requiring a minimum of 20 €. The article presents inconsistent minimum deposit requirements: one part indicates a 20 € minimum for bonuses, while another part states the first deposit can be as low as 10 € (though the bonus requires 20 €). A: Minimitalletus bonukselle 20 € (minimum deposit for the bonus is 20 €). B: Minimitalletus (yleensä) 10 €, while Siru Mobile has a separate minimum of 15 € for deposits. Multiple sections give conflicting minimum deposit figures: the bonus minimum is listed as 20 €, but another section states the general first deposit minimum is 10 €, with Siru Mobile specifically requiring at least 15 €. | ||
/arvostelu/wildzy/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Wildzylla ei ole varsinaista VIP‑ohjelmaa B: VIP-ohjelma Kyllä One part of the page states there is no VIP program, while the comparison table lists a VIP program for Wildzy, which is inconsistent. A: Live chat ei ole saatavilla kokeiluni aikana. B: Live-chat: Kyllä The review states live chat was not available, but the comparison table indicates live chat is available. A: Minimitalletus per talletus on 25 € B: Minimitalletus joka kerralla on 20 € Deposit terms show a 25 € minimum per deposit, while the welcome bonus section states a 20 € minimum per deposit, creating a direct conflict. | ||
/arvostelu/win-legends/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Win Legendsin omistaja ja pyörittäjä on vuonna 2019 toimintansa aloittanut Altacore N.V. B: WinLegends Casino yrityksen tiedot: Perustettu: 2022 The page asserts that Altacore N.V. started operations in 2019, but later lists the casino's founding year as 2022, creating an inconsistency about the company's founding date. | ||
/arvostelu/win-mega-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Minimitalletus: 10 € (Quick facts) and 20 € for cryptocurrency deposits There is a direct numeric inconsistency: the minimum deposit is listed as €20 in the rules/terms, while the Quick Facts section states a minimum deposit of €10 (and otherwise €20 for crypto deposits). A: Win Mega ei kerro lisenssin tai taustayhtiön tietoja sivuilla. B: Lisenssi: Anjouan Gaming License; Lisenssinumerot: ALSI-102310002-FI5 One part of the text says the site does not disclose license or backer details, while another part provides a specific Anjouan gaming license and license numbers, creating a contradiction about license disclosure. | ||
/arvostelu/winbeatz/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletusvaatimus for first deposit is 15 € (bonus terms). B: Quick facts list states the minimum deposit is 20 €. The page simultaneously claims a 15€ minimum deposit in the bonus terms and a 20€ minimum deposit in the Quick facts, which is inconsistent. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset for the 1st deposit bonus: 35x (Bonus) in the general bonus terms. B: Kierrätysvaatimukset for the 1st deposit bonus: 30x (only for the bonus) under the first deposit conditions. Two sections assign different wagering requirements for the first deposit bonus (35x vs 30x), creating a direct contradiction. | ||
/arvostelu/winissimo-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Winissimo Casinon kanta-asiakasohjelmaa? Kaikki rekisteröityneet pelaajat liittyvät automaattisesti mukaan uskollisuusohjelmaan, joka sisältää viisi tasoa, sekä mahdollisuus kerätä pisteitä ja vaihtaa niitä kasinon omassa kaupassa. B: Winissimo vertailussa samankaltaisiin kasinoihin - VIP-ohjelma: Ei. The article claims there is an automatic loyalty program with five tiers and points exchange, but the comparison table marks the VIP program as not available, indicating inconsistency about whether a loyalty program exists. A: Päivitetty: 15. joulukuuta 2025. B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 09/02/2026. Two different last-update dates are stated: the page update date is 2025-12-15, while the bonus section notes the bonus was last updated on 2026-02-09, creating a timeline inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/winnerz/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: LisenssiViro, Anjouan Gaming License B: Lisenssi: EMTA The Quick Facts section lists the license as 'LisenssiViro, Anjouan Gaming License', while the body states the license is EMTA (Estonian EMTA license); these are incompatible licensing jurisdictions. A: Talletusmaksimi: maksimissaan 10 000 euroa B: Talletus Maksimi: 2 000 € / 10 000 € One part of the text claims a maximum deposit of 10,000 euros, but a deposit table elsewhere lists a maximum of '2 000 € / 10 000 €', presenting conflicting deposit limits. | ||
/arvostelu/winota/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Winota has a five-level VIP program. B: In the Winota Casino comparison table, the VIP program is listed as 'Ei' (no VIP program). The article contains an explicit statement that Winota offers a 5-tier VIP program, but a separate comparison table lists VIP program as not available, which is a direct contradiction. A: MGA license number is MGA/B2C/394/2017. B: License number is MGA/B2C/486/2018 (valid until 12.12.2028). Two different Malta Gaming Authority license numbers are cited for Winota in the same page, which cannot both be valid for the same operator. A: Kanta-asiakasohjelma offers 0–15% cashback. B: Cashback is 25% up to €200 (cashback value limit €200). The loyalty section claims 0–15% cashback, while another part of the page states cashback at 25% up to €200, creating conflicting cashback terms. A: Minimitalletus for the welcome bonus is 20€. B: Minimum deposit listed as €10. The bonus terms specify a 20€ minimum deposit, while quick facts list a 10€ minimum deposit, which is inconsistent. | ||
/arvostelu/winrolla-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Miinukset: Ei vastuullisen pelaamisen työkaluja B: Asiakaspalvelun kautta voi pyytää pelitilin jäädytystä tai sulkemista. Sen sijaan pelaajille ei ole tarjolla mahdollisuutta asettaa omaehtoisia talletus- tai panostusrajoja oman pelitilin kautta. The 'no responsible gaming tools' bullet contradicts later statements describing a freeze/account-suspend option, which is a tool to protect players; thus there is an inconsistency about availability of responsible-gaming tools. A: 1. talletuksella kierrätysvaatimus: 40x (Talletus+Bonus) B: Kasinopeleissä bonusraha + talletus kierrätysvaatimus: 50x The kierrätysvaatimus numbers for the deposit bonus differ between the table (40x) and the rules section (50x) for the same category, creating a factual contradiction. A: Ilmaiskierroksista saadut voitot kierrätysvaatimus: 40x B: Ilmaiskierroksista saadut voitot kierrätysvaatimus: 50x The kierrätysvaatimus for winnings from free spins is stated as 40x in one place and 50x in another, causing inconsistency about free-spin wagering requirements. A: Lisenssi: Anjouan B: Osoite: Marshallsaaret, Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Majuro, MH 96960 License is listed as Anjouan, but the operator address is in Majuro, Marshall Islands, which are different jurisdictions; this is an inconsistency in licensing/jurisdiction details. | ||
/arvostelu/winsane-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Quick facts section lists: 'LisenssiAnjouan Gaming License, Curaçao'. B: Lisanssit ja turvallisuus section states: 'Lisenssi: Anjouan' with license number ALSI-132405052-FI3 (no Curaçao license). The quick facts appear to claim the casino holds both Anjouan and Curaçao licenses, while the dedicated Licenses and Security section later states the license is Anjouan only (with a specific Anjouan license number), creating a direct contradiction about which licensing jurisdiction governs Winsane. | ||
/arvostelu/winshark/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: lisenssinumero 8048/JAZ2020-074 B: Lisenssinumero: OGL/2024/589/0556 The page lists two different license numbers for WinShark (8048/JAZ2020-074 and OGL/2024/589/0556), which is inconsistent for a single casino operator. A: WinSharkin ensivaikutelma: 240% talletusbonus 2 500 € asti sekä 300 ilmaispyöräytystä B: Bonusrakenne: 1. talletuksella 100% 150 € asti + 50 ilmaispyöräystä tai 50% 2 000 € asti + 100 ilmaispyöräystä; 2. talletuksella 80% 200 € asti + 75 ilmaispyöräystä; 3. talletuksella 60% 300 € asti + 125 ilmaispyöräystä The introductory claim of a 240% welcome bonus up to €2,500 and 300 free spins contradicts the detailed bonus structure, which only shows up to 150€ (or 2,000€) on the first deposit and 200€ and 300€ on subsequent deposits, with a total of 250 free spins (50 + 75 + 125) and a maximum bonus far below €2,500. | ||
/arvostelu/winsly/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Winsly mainostaa yli 3 000 peliä valikoimassaan (+3000 rahapeliä & vedonlyöntiä). B: Arvostelussa pelivalikoima on noin 1 200 nimikettä. The page contains two conflicting claims about the number of games available: over 3000 versus around 1200. A: Live chat is shown as closed temporarily (live chat suljettu väliaikaisesti / Sekava asiakaspalvelu - live chat avoinna satunnaisesti). B: In the Winsly comparison table, Live-chat is listed as available (Live-chat: Kyllä). One part of the page says the live chat is closed temporarily, while another section/table claims live chat is available. | ||
/arvostelu/winstler/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus bonuksen saamiseksi 20 € B: Talletusten taulukon 1. talletuksen minimitalletus: 10 € There is a mismatch between the bonus terms requiring a 20€ minimum deposit to qualify for the bonus and the deposit table stating the first deposit minimum is 10€. A: Lisenssi Curaçao, Costa Rica B: Lisenssi: Curacao The page sometimes implies two licenses (Curaçao and Costa Rica) but elsewhere states the license is Curaçao only. A: Kotiutusminimi Visa/Mastercard: 50 €, Maksimimäärä 5 000 € B: Daily withdrawal limit is 1 000 € (2 000 € per week) Withdrawal limits are inconsistent: the per-method maximum (5,000€) conflicts with stated daily and weekly withdrawal caps (1,000€ daily, 2,000€ weekly). A: Minimitalletus: 25 € B: Minimitalletus bonuksen saamiseksi: 20 € The site lists different minimum deposits: 25€ as the general minimum, but bonus terms require a 20€ minimum deposit to be eligible. | ||
/arvostelu/wintopia/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Quick facts list shows license as Curaçao, Costa Rica. B: Licensing section states license as Curacao only (with Curacao address and license number) and makes no mention of a Costa Rica license. The page inconsistently lists two licensing jurisdictions in Quick facts while the body only documents a Curacao license, creating a conflict about which jurisdiction governs the casino. A: Live-kasinolla yli 400 peliä (over 400 live games) as noted in Plussat. B: Live casino section states 451 live games. Different counts for live casino games appear in different sections (over 400 vs 451), which is an inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/winz-io-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Kuukausitasolla voittoja voi nostaa maksimissaan 400 000 eurolla. B: FAQ:ssa on mainittu 5 000 euron raja – ehdot ovat kuitenkin loppukädessä voimassa. The article states a monthly withdrawal limit of 400,000 EUR, but the FAQ mentions a 5,000 EUR limit, creating an inconsistent withdrawal cap. A: Uudet pelaajat saavat Wheel of Winz -onnenpyörässä voittaa jopa 5 000 euroa käteistä. B: The welcome/wheel bonuses show top prizes up to 10,000 euros (e.g., with a 100 EUR deposit, a 10,000 EUR main prize is possible). The Wheel of Winz claims a 5,000 EUR top prize in one section, while other sections list prizes up to 10,000 EUR, causing conflicting maximum prize information. A: Minimitalletus on 10 € (Quick facts). B: Minimitalletus on 25 € (talletukset/bonukset), with a stated 20 € minimum for non-bonus play. The page presents conflicting minimum deposit requirements: 10 € in Quick Facts versus 25 € (and 20 € for non-bonus play) in other sections. | ||
/arvostelu/winzter-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: LisenssiAnjouan Gaming License B: Lisenssi: N/A / Lisenssitietoja ei ole julkaistu (Costa Rica -operaattori, lisenssitietoja ei ole julkaistu) One part states the casino has an Anjouan Gaming License, while another section states there is no license published or available (N/A) and the operator is registered in Costa Rica with no disclosed license. A: Kasinopelien tarjonta kattaa noin 2 000 erilaista kasinopeliä sisältäen yli sata erilaista live-peliä. B: Live kasinon tarjonta on supistunut merkittävästi, noin 48 peliin. There are conflicting claims about the size of the live casino: one statement says there are over 100 live games, while another says around 48 live games. A: Minimitalletus on 50 € B: Minimitalletus on 20 € (Quick facts: Min deposit €20 and bottom comparison shows Minimitalletus 20 €). Two different minimum deposit figures are given for Winzter: 50 € in the bonus/talletus sections and 20 € in the quick facts and comparison table. A: Päivitetty: 20. marraskuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 08/02/2026 Two update dates are provided for different parts of the page, implying conflicting timelines for when information was last updated. | ||
/arvostelu/wisho/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Wisho Casino operates securely under Curacao license. B: LisenssiCuraçao, Viro (Quick Facts) – the page lists both Curaçao and Estonia as licenses. The main text states the casino operates under a Curacao license, but the Quick Facts section lists two licenses (Curaçao and Estonia), implying an Estonian licensing presence not claimed in the main body. A: Not tax-free for Finnish players (Wisho is not tax-free) – Finnish winnings are taxed because the license is Curacao. B: The Wisho row in the 'Wishoo vertailussa samankaltaisiin kasinoihin' table shows 'Verovapaa Kyllä' (tax-free). One section says Wisho winnings are not tax-free for Finnish players, while the comparison table claims the site is tax-free, directly contradicting each other. | ||
/arvostelu/wishwin-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Min deposit€10 B: Minimitalletus 20 € The page lists two different minimum deposit requirements in separate sections: 10 EUR in Quick Facts but 20 EUR in the bonus terms, which is a direct inconsistency. A: 3. talletuksella | 100% 750 € asti + 100 ilmaiskierrosta B: Talletus3: 100% bonus 750 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta The third deposit bonus is described as 100 free spins in the 'bonuskoodit & bonukset' section but only 50 free spins in the 'tervetulobonus' section, leading to conflicting total free spins (200 vs 250). | ||
/arvostelu/wolfy-casino/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Ensitalletusbonus: 100% 200 € asti B: Tervetulobonus: 300 % talletusbonus 1000 € asti (jaettu neljälle talletukselle) The page simultaneously promotes two incompatible welcome bonuses: a 100% match up to €200 and a 300% bonus up to €1,000 distributed across four deposits. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 0x (Bonus) B: Bonuksen lunastamiseen käytetty talletus pitää kierrättää 4-kertaisesti The bonus terms claim zero wagering requirements, but later state that the deposit used to redeem the bonus must be rolled over 4 times, which is inconsistent. A: Kuka omistaa Wolfy Casinon? Versus Odds B.V. B: Wolfy Casino omistaja: Modern World Entertainment B.V. Ownership is stated as Versus Odds B.V. in the FAQ but Modern World Entertainment B.V. is listed as the owner in the 'about' section, creating conflicting ownership claims. | ||
/arvostelu/wonaco-casino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus: 20 € B: Minimitalletus: 10 € The Kierrätysvaatimukset section lists a minimum deposit of 20 €, while the Quick facts section (Min deposit) and a comparison row state a 10 € minimum; this is a direct conflict in the stated minimum deposit amount. A: Testihetkellä minulle ilmoitettiin, että vahvistuksia ei vaadita. B: Vaadittavat KYC-dokumentit: Varmennus osoitteesta (esim. sähkölasku pdf-tiedostona), Maksutapa (esim. verkkotiliote), Henkilötodistus (kuva passista tai ajokortista). The KYC section contains a conflict: at one point the reviewer was told no verifications were required, but another part lists explicit required KYC documents to be submitted. A: Lisenssi: Anjouan Gaming License B: Kasinon lisenssit: PAGCOR sekä Anjouan (EU- ja ETA-maiden ulkopuolella); aiemmin Curacao-lisenssi. The quick facts state only Anjouan as the license, while another section lists PAGCOR and Anjouan (and mentions a former Curacao license), creating inconsistency about the licensing status. A: Header rating: ★ 3.32/ 5 B: Trustpilot arvosana: 2.2/5 The page presents two different overall ratings for Wonaco (3.32/5 at the top vs. 2.2/5 from Trustpilot), which are not reconciled and may confuse readers about overall quality. | ||
/arvostelu/wonderluck-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Wonderluck ei kerro lisenssin tai operaattorin tietoja sivuilla B: Kasinon perustiedot: Lisenssi: Anjouan; Lisenssinumero: ALSI-152406028-FI2 The article states that Wonderluck does not disclose license or operator details on the site, but later the 'Kasinon perustiedot' box provides license information (Anjouan) and a license number, contradicting the earlier claim. | ||
/arvostelu/wyns/ | Clean | |
/arvostelu/xlbet/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Min deposit: €10 (mentioned in Quick facts). B: Minimum deposit for cashback/bonus: €50 (listed under cashback kierrätysvaatimukset). The page states a €10 minimum deposit in the Quick facts section, but later specifies a €50 minimum deposit for cashback/bonus eligibility, creating a clear inconsistency. A: Cashback bonus wagering requirement: 10x. B: In the XLBet vs. Pelipeto comparison, the wagering requirement for XLBet is listed as 40x. The cashback section states a 10x wagering requirement, while the comparison table shows 40x, which is a direct discrepancy. A: Withdrawal time in the XLBet vs. Pelipeto table: 0–3 vrk (days). B: Main text states withdrawals are processed within up to 72 hours (3 vrk). The table lists a range starting at 0 days, implying possible instant withdrawals, while the article text consistently states a maximum of 72 hours, creating an inconsistency. | ||
/arvostelu/yaa-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: The quick facts section lists licenses as 'Kahnawake, Curaçao'. B: The Licenses and safety section states: 'Lisenssi: Curacao' (Curacao license only). There is a discrepancy: one section lists two licenses (Kahnawake and Curaçao), while another section states the license is Curacao only, which is inconsistent. A: Kierrätysvaatimukset: 30x (Bonus) B: An example states turnover is calculated as 30x the deposit amount (e.g., a 75 € deposit yields 2,250 € turnover), implying turnover is 30x deposit, not 30x bonus, despite the claim that the turnover is tied only to the bonus. The page first states a 30x turnover on the bonus, but later provides an example that effectively calculates a 30x turnover on the deposit amount, contradicting the stated rule. | ||
/arvostelu/ybets-casino/ | Issues | 7 contradictions |
A: Lisenssi: Anjouan B: Nettikasino operoi Philippine Amusement & Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) -lisenssillä. The page asserts two different licensing authorities for Ybets (Anjouan vs PAGCOR), which cannot both be true. A: Ybets mainostaa yli 6 500 kappaleen pelattavaa B: Tämän arvostelun aikana pelejä löytyi reilut 4 000. The article itself presents two different counts for the number of available games, which is inconsistent. A: 4. talletuksella: 125% 2000 € asti + 100 ilmaiskierrosta B: 4. talletuksella: 175% 2000 € asti + 100 ilmaiskierrosta The 4th deposit bonus is listed as 125% in one section and 175% in another, which would change the total bonus sum. A: Trustpilot arvosanan 2.8/5 B: Arvosana 4.00 in the comparison table Two different overall ratings are given for Ybets within the same page. A: VIP-ohjelma: ei (according to the comparison table) B: Dash-niminen tukihenkilön vastaus: VIP-ohjelma on olemassa The article claims no VIP program in one section but asserts its existence via a support representative in another. A: Kotiutukset käsitellään 24-48 tuntia B: Testauksen mukaan kotiutukset saapuivat seuraavan viikon maanantaina The anecdotal payout example contradicts the stated processing time of 24-48 hours. A: Kasinon oma digitaalinen valuutta: Ybets Monetary Resource (1 YBC = 1 USDT) B: Ybets mainitsee myös YBS-valuutta (YBS) Two different names for the casino's digital currency are used in the same text. | ||
/arvostelu/zet-casino/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Min deposit€10 (from Quick facts). B: Minimitalletus 20 € (listed under bonus terms and deposit steps). The page states a minimum deposit of 10 euros in the Quick Facts box, but later sections state a minimum deposit of 20 euros for bonuses and account funding, creating a direct inconsistency. A: Ensivaikutelma Zet Casinosta states that license information is missing from the site. B: Lisenssit ja turvallisuus section provides explicit licensing details (Anjouan license). The page first asserts that license information is missing, while another section provides explicit licensing details (Anjouan license), which is a direct contradiction about whether license information is available. | ||
/arvostelu/zipcasino/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: 100% talletusbonus 1000 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta B: 100 % talletusbonus 1 750 € asti + 50 ilmaiskierrosta The article presents two different welcome bonus amounts: up to 1000€ in one section and up to 1750€ in another, which is a direct numerical contradiction. A: Zipcasino on Curaçao-lisenssillä B: Zip casinon lisenssi on voimassa 30.5.2025 asti, ja kasino on lisensoitu Anjouanin toimesta lisenssinumerolla ALSI-132405052-FI3 The page claims Curaçao licensing in one place, but a user comment asserts an Anjouan license with a specific license number, creating contradictory licensing statements. A: Päivitetty: 8. joulukuuta 2025 B: Bonus päivitetty viimeksi: 03/02/2026 Two different update timestamps are shown for the page and the bonus section, creating an inconsistency in when the content was last updated. A: Sähköpostisupport@zipcasino77555.com B: support@zipcasino2864.com Two different support email addresses are listed on the page, causing inconsistency about how to contact customer support. | ||
/arvostelu/zodiac-bet/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Valitettavasti Zodiac Betin sivuilta ei löydy tietoa lisenssistä tai omistajasta. B: Kasinon perustiedot ja lisenssit: Lisenssi on Anjouan Gaming (lisenssinumero ALSI-102310002-FI5). One part of the text states there is no license or owner information on the site, while another part provides explicit license details (Anjouan Gaming license and a license number), creating a direct contradiction. A: Onko Zodiac Betillä kanta-asiakasohjelmaa? – Väitetään olevansa eksklusiivinen VIP-ohjelma, johon pääsee sisään kutsun kautta. B: Zodiac Bet Casino vertailussa -taulukossa VIP-ohjelma kohdassa lukee 'VIP-ohjelma: Ei'. The article claims there is an exclusive, invitation-only VIP program, but the side-by-side comparison table marks the VIP program as non-existent, which is a clear internal contradiction. | ||
/astropay-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kotiuttaminen AstroPaylla käy yhtä näppärästi, kuin tallettaminenkin. B: Voittojen kotiutukseen pitää testaamillani kasinoilla valita joku muu maksutapa, sillä mikään niistä ei hyväksynyt AstroPayta nostoihin. One part of the text claims withdrawals via AstroPay are as easy as deposits, while another part states that withdrawals via AstroPay were not accepted by the tested casinos, directly contradicting each other. | ||
/bitcoin-kasinot/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Kotiutukset ovat nopeita (20–60 min) B: Todelliset kotiutukset voivat kestää pidempään kuin 20–60 minuuttia, esimerkiksi SpinMills Casinoa koskevassa tiedossa 65 tuntia (sekä LaraBet 27 minuuttia ja Rizzio 18 tuntia). The article claims withdrawals are fast (20–60 minutes), but its own data lists withdrawals taking 27 minutes (LaraBet), 18 hours (Rizzio), and especially 65 hours (SpinMills), which contradicts the general speed claim. A: Bitcoin-kasinot sopivat mielestäni parhaiten pelaajille, jotka arvostavat nopeita 15–30 minuutin kotiutuksia. B: Todelliset kotiutukset voivat olla huomattavasti pidempiä, kuten SpinMillsin 65 tunnin kotiutusaika, mikä on ristiriidassa 15–30 minuutin tavoitteellisen ajan kanssa. The author presents bitcoin casinos as best for players who want 15–30 minute withdrawals, yet the text's own withdrawal data (e.g., SpinMills at 65 hours) contradicts this claim. | ||
/boku-kasinot/ | Clean | |
/bonuskoodit/ | Clean | |
/brite-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Brite AB on ruotsalainen maksupalvelu, joka ilmestyi nettikasinoille vuonna 2020. B: Perustettu 2019 The page presents two conflicting statements about the company's timeline: one claims Brite AB entered online casinos in 2020, while the company information lists the founding year as 2019, which cannot both be true for the same entity. | ||
/cashback-bonukset/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Käteispalautuksen koko vaihtelee kasinon mukaan, ja sen prosenttiosuus voi vaihdella 5 prosentin ja 25 prosentin välillä. Yleisimmät cashback kasino prosentit ovat: 5%, 10%, 15% ja 20%. B: Parhaat cashback bonus kasinot -listassa Arctic Casino ja FeliceBet Casino tarjoavat 50% käteispalautuksen. The text first states a typical cashback range of 5-25% with common values of 5, 10, 15, and 20%. It later lists casinos offering 50% cashback, which directly contradicts the stated typical range. A: Arctic Casino: 50% käteispalautusta jokaisesta pyöräytyksestä (ja lisäksi 50% rakeback päivittäin) B: Arctic Casino: Kierrätysvaatimukset: - / 35x (Bonus) for the new bonus offer, implying wagering requirements. The Arctic Casino section claims 50% cashback with no wagering requirements, but later in the 'Uudet cashback bonukset' section lists a 35x wagering requirement for an Arctic offer, creating a conflict about whether cashback is wager-free. A: Cashback 100 % tarkoittaa, että pelaaja saa panostamansa rahat kasinolta takaisin. Esimerkiksi 100 % cashback kasino LuckyCasino antaa rahat kokonaan takaisin, jos pelaaja ei onnistu tuplaamaan tallettamaansa summaa 24 tunnin kuluessa. B: Double Up - bonuksena tunnettu 100 % cashback on erikoinen ja pelaajalle edullinen kampanja. Kierrätysvaatimuksia ei ole, mutta käteispalautusta maksetaan vain 25 euroon saakka. One part describes 100% cashback returning the staked amount, including an example with LuckyCasino. Another describes a 100% cashback offer (Double Up) with no wagering but capped at 25 euros, creating a conflict about cap and terms for 100% cashback. | ||
/cashlib-kasinot/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: In the 'Maksutavat vertailussa' table, the row for Kotiutus (withdrawal) shows 'Kotiutus mahdollinen? Ei' for CASHlib. B: CASHlib's own product descriptions include 'Pay-Out on a Card' and 'Pay-Out on a Voucher', which allow transferring funds (withdrawals) to an IBAN/card or back to a CASHlib card. The table asserts withdrawals are not possible with CASHlib, while the product sections describe withdrawal-capable Pay-Out options, creating a direct inconsistency. A: The article states 'saatavilla on vain muutama CASHlib casino' (only a few CASHlib casinos). B: Later, the 'Parhaat CASHlib-kasinot 2026' section lists at least ten named CASHlib casinos (e.g., Freespinza, Arctic, Casinoloots, God of Casino, Spinny, Live Winz, Lunar Spins, Merlin, SpiderBets, Wettson). The text claims only a few CASHlib casinos exist, but it subsequently enumerates ten or more CASHlib casinos, which is inconsistent. | ||
/casino-bonukset/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Trust Dice Win Casino: Bonus on first deposit of 200% up to 30,000 € with 20 free spins B: Trust Dice Win Casino: Bonus on first deposit up to 90,000 € with 100 free spins The page lists conflicting maximum bonus amounts for Trust Dice Win Casino in different sections (30,000 € in one table vs 90,000 € in another), without clarifying that these refer to different promotions or time frames. | ||
/casino-helsinki/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Casino Helsingin historia alkaa 1980-luvulta. B: Casino Helsinki on perustettu vuonna 1991. The article contains a line claiming the history starts in the 1980s, but elsewhere it states Casino Helsinki was established in 1991, creating conflicting timelines. | ||
/casino-talletus-laskulla/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: In the limits table, the row under 'Ensimmäiset 90 päivää | 90 päivän jälkeen' shows '70 € / pv | 150 € / kk | 300 € / kk', i.e., after 90 days there are both 150 €/kk and 300 €/kk listed as monthly limits. B: The same row lists two different monthly limits (150 €/kk and 300 €/kk) for the period after 90 days, which cannot both be correct. There is an explicit contradiction in the limits table: after 90 days, two different monthly caps are presented for the same period, implying conflicting maximums. | ||
/curacao-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Curacao kryptokasinot – Casino-X: Lisätiedot shows 'Koko käteisbonus ja ilmaiskierrokset talletuksella 38050 € 0 ilmaiskierrosta'. B: The same row's description claims there are ilmaiskierroksia (free spins) while the numeric value shows 0 ilmaiskierrosta. There is an internal inconsistency: the row describes that free spins are offered, but the number of free spins is listed as zero. | ||
/ecogra/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Perustettiin rahapelialan eri toimijoiden aloitteesta vuonna 2003 lisäämään pelaajien luottamusta sekä pelejä että kasinoita kohtaan. B: Organisaatio syntyi 1990- ja 2000-luvun vaihteessa tapahtuneen rahapelien suosion räjähdysmäisen kasvun seurauksena. The first states a specific founding year (2003), while the second places the organization's origin around the turn of the millennium (late 1990s to early 2000s). These timelines are inconsistent. | ||
/eksklusiiviset-bonukset/ | Clean | |
/eta-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: ETA-kasinot ovat nettikasinoita, joilla on pelilisenssi eurooppalaiselta rahapeliviranomaiselta. B: Ison-Britannian peliviranomainen UKGC myöntää lisenssejä brittimarkkinoille. Brexitin myötä UKGC-lisenssi ei kuitenkaan kuulu enää ETA-alueeseen. The text first defines ETA casinos as those with a license from a European gambling authority, but later states that UKGC licenses are not part of the ETA-area post-Brexit. It also lists UKGC licenses among license options in a context that suggests they can be used for ETA casinos, which is inconsistent with the claim that UKGC licenses are outside ETA. | ||
/ethereum-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Ethereum toimii hajautetun lohkoketjujärjestelmänä (hajautettu tietokanta). B: Ethereumin pääkonttori sijaitsee Zugissa, Sveitsissä. A decentralized system does not have a central headquarters; claiming there is a headquarters contradicts the decentralization premise. | ||
/euteller-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Eutellerilla ei voi lainkaan kotiuttaa B: Euteller Express -kotiutus toimii; voit kotiuttaa kasinovoitot verkkopankkitunnuksilla The text first claims that Euteller cannot be used for withdrawals, but later explains that withdrawals are possible via Euteller Express (withdrawals via Express with bank login). | ||
/ezeewallet-kasinot/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: I tested an eZeeWallet deposit to Zip Casino of 100 € and the funds appeared on the casino balance after about 20–30 seconds. B: Zip Casino talletusnopeus is listed as approximately 2 minutes in the deposits speed table. An anecdotal deposit time of 20–30 seconds conflicts with the table's stated deposit time of about 2 minutes for Zip Casino. A: Maxibet Casino bonus: 750 € on deposit plus 200 free spins. B: In the New eZeeWallet casinos section, Maxibet is listed with a 100% bonus up to 200 € plus 100 free spins. Two sections assign different welcome bonus amounts for Maxibet, conflicting for the same casino. A: Hugo Casino is listed in the verovapaa (tax-free) table as Verovapaa: Ei (not tax-free). B: Hugo Casino license includes Cyprus Gaming Commission, an EU license, which would typically imply tax-free winnings. EU license status contradicts the table stating non-tax-free winnings for Hugo Casino. A: Zip Casino withdrawal test claimed an 18-hour processing time. B: Zip Casino withdrawal speed in the speeds table is listed as approximately 24–48 hours. Personal withdrawal test reports 18 hours, but the speeds table lists 24–48 hours for Zip Casino withdrawals. | ||
/flexepin-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: pienimmän myytävänä olevan kortin arvo on 10 euroa ja suurimman 250 euroa B: Korttien arvojen ei saa ylittää 500 dollaria The text sets per-card values as 10–250 EUR in one section, but later states per-card values may not exceed 500 USD, creating an inconsistency in the maximum allowed value per card across currencies. | ||
/free-spins/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Free spins no deposit -bonukset ovat aina sticky bonuksia, sillä pelaajan ei tarvitse tehdä tallettusta, eikä näin ollen oikeaa rahaa ja bonusrahaa voida erottaa toisistaan. B: Non-sticky bonus puolestaan mahdollistaa voittojen kotiuttamisen ilman kierräystä. The article asserts that no-deposit free spin bonuses are always sticky, but also describes non-sticky bonuses that allow withdrawals without wagering; this is a direct contradiction about whether no-deposit freespins can be non-sticky. | ||
/fyysiset-kasinot/ | Clean | |
/google-pay-kasinot/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimitalletus on yleensä 10–20 euroa. B: Casinoloots minimitalletus on 5 €. The page asserts a typical minimum deposit of 10–20 EUR, while the table lists Casinoloots with a minimum deposit of 5 EUR, which contradicts the stated general minimum. A: Päivitetty: 13. helmikuuta 2026 B: Tiedot päivitetty viimeksi 2.2.2026 Two different update dates are presented on the page (Feb 13, 2026 and Feb 2, 2026), creating an inconsistency about when the information was last updated. | ||
/highroller-bonukset/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Casino X Highroller bonus jopa 58 000 € B: Talletus: 2000 €, Bonus 100 %: pelikassa 4000 €; Kierrätysvaatimus 20x The article claims Casino X Highroller bonus up to 58,000 €, but in the accompanying practical example it uses a 2000 € deposit with a 100% bonus (totaling 4000 €), and a 20x wagering requirement. This is inconsistent with a potential maximum of 58,000 €, as the example implies a much smaller bonus base and turnover. | ||
/ilmaiskierroksia-ilman-talletusta/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Kaikki näistä pelikierroksista saadut voitot hyvitetään tilillesi bonusrahoina, mutta niihin liittyy kierrätysvaatimuksia. B: Ilmaiskierroksia ilman kierrätystä ... voitot maksetaan oikeana rahana, jonka voi kotiuttaa kasinolta heti. The text first states that winnings from no-deposit spins are credited as bonus funds with wagering requirements, then asserts that winnings from no-wager (no kierrätys) spins are paid in real cash immediately withdrawable, which is a direct contradiction. A: Raju Casino – Ilmaiskierrokset ilman talletusta: 0 ilmaisiskierrosta. B: The page presents multiple no-deposit spin offers (e.g., Sunnybet 300 FS, Candybet 300 FS, etc.), which are nonzero. An entry for Raju Casino claims zero no-deposit spins, while the page as a whole lists several no-deposit spin offers with nonzero amounts, creating an internal inconsistency. | ||
/ilmaista-pelirahaa-ilman-talletusta/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Ilmaisen pelirahan määrä on yleensä 5–15 euroa. B: Yleisimmin jaetut ilmaisen pelirahan summat ovat 5e, 10e, 20e ja 30e. The text first states that the free bet amount is typically 5–15 euros, but later lists 20€ and 30€ as common deposit-free amounts, creating a numerical inconsistency. | ||
/ilmaisveto/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: In the table titled 'Ilmaisveto vs. Riskittö veto', the Ilmaisveto row shows '10 € riskitön veto'. B: The same table also has a row 'Saat panoksesi takaisin' with 'Ei' under Ilmaisveto, which means the stake is not returned for an ilmaisveto, contradicting the 'riskitön veto' value. The table simultaneously implies that an ilmaisveto is a 'risk-free' (stake-returning) offer by labeling it '10 € riskitön veto', while another row states that the ilmaisveto does not return the stake ('Ei'), which is a direct internal inconsistency. A: In the section 'Ilmaisveto ilman talletusta', it states that newcomers receive a 10 euro ilmaisveto without a deposit as a welcome bonus. B: The same section also presents an example under 'Ilmaisveto ilman talletusta' where a 10 euro ilmaisveto is granted only after the user makes a 10 euro deposit (i.e., deposit is required). This is a direct contradiction: the article claims ilmaisveto without deposit is available, yet provides an example showing a deposit is required to receive/use the 10 euro ilmaisveto. | ||
/jeton-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Asiakirjat hyväksytään yleensä 24 tunnin kuluessa. B: KYC-dokumenttien toimittaminen Jetonille, jossa tarkastetaan ne muutaman päivän kuluessa. The text contains two conflicting timelines for processing KYC documents: usually 24 hours vs. a processing time of several days. | ||
/kaikki-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Ainostaan kaikki ETA-alueen ulkoiset lisenssit ovat varmasti verovapaita kasinoita. B: Verovapaat voitot ovat Maltan MGA-lisenssin ja Viron EMTA-lisenssin alaisuudessa toimivilta kasinoilta. One statement asserts that only licenses outside the ETA region are verovapaa (tax-free), while another asserts that verovapaa winnings come from Malta (MGA) and Estonia (EMTA) licenses within the ETA; these claims are mutually exclusive and directly contradict each other. | ||
/kasino-ilman-pankkitunnuksia/ | Clean | |
/kasino-tampere/ | Clean | |
/kasinobonukset/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Minimitalletusraja kasinolle 5 € B: Bonuksen minimitalletusraja 10 € The Minimitalletus bonukset section shows a single row with two conflicting minimum deposit figures for accessing the bonus: 5 € to deposit to the casino and 10 € as the minimum for the bonus itself. Both cannot be true for the same offer. | ||
/kasinolisenssit/ | Clean | |
/kasinolisenssit/anjouan-lisenssi/ | Clean | |
/kasinolisenssit/curacao-lisenssi/ | Clean | |
/kasinolisenssit/mga-lisenssi/ | Clean | |
/kasinolisenssit/pagcor-lisenssi/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: From December 2024 onwards PAGCOR has not issued any licenses. B: PAGCOR grants licenses to gaming companies both in the Philippines and offshore. The page contains a note stating that PAGCOR has not issued licenses since December 2024, while other sections describe PAGCOR issuing licenses and the licensing process, creating a direct inconsistency about whether PAGCOR is still issuing licenses after Dec 2024. | ||
/kasinolisenssit/spelinspektionen/ | Clean | |
/kasinolisenssit/ukgc-lisenssi/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: UKGC-lisenssi koskee vain Isossa-Britanniassa asuvia pelaajia, joten suomalaispelaajat pääsevät UK:n kasinoille vain jos kasino omaa myös toisen luotettavan lisenssin taustalleen. B: Kyllä, UKGC lisenssi on laillinen ja UKGC:n lisensoimilla nettikasinoilla on täysin laillista pelata Suomesta käsin. Tämä edellyttää kuitenkin sen, että UKGC kasinolla on hallussaan tuplalisenssi, sillä pelkästään UKGC:n lisenssin omaavat kasinot eivät ole suomalaisille tavoitettavissa, vaan lisenssi koskettaa ainoastaan Isossa-Britanniassa asuvia henkilöitä. The page first states that the UKGC license applies only to residents of the UK, implying Finnish players cannot access UK-only casinos. Later it states that Finnish players can legally play from Finland only if the casino also holds another license (tuplalisenssi), which contradicts the earlier absolute claim and creates an inconsistency about who can play on UKGC-licensed sites. | ||
/kasinolisenssit/viron-lisenssi/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Viron lisenssin pelikategoriat: Onnenpelit, Arpajaiset, Vedonlyönti, Taitopelit. B: Viron lisenssin vuotuiset maksut ovat: Onnenpelit: 47,940 euroa; Totopelit ja vedonlyönti: 31,960 euroa; Taitopelit: 3200 euroa (Arpajaiset -kategoriaa ei ole erikseen lueteltu vuosittaisissa maksuissa). The license category list includes Arpajaiset as a separate gambling category, but the annual fee schedule does not include an Arpajaiset entry, listing only Onnenpelit, Totopelit ja vedonlyönti, and Taitopelit. A: Virossa virallinen ikäraja uhkapelaamiselle on 21 vuotta. B: Nettikasinoilla pääsee kuitenkin pelaamaan jo 18-vuotiaana. The page presents two conflicting age thresholds for gambling within the same jurisdiction: the official law states 21, while online casinos are described as permitting 18-year-olds to play. | ||
/kasinopelit/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/automaattipelit/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Veikkauksen automaattipelien palauttavat keskimäärin vain 85–90 % B: Esimerkiksi Kulta-Jaska palauttaa teoreettisesti vain 90,05 % The broad stated average return (85–90%) conflicts with a specific example (90.05%), which lies outside the stated range. A: Automaattipelit rantautuivat Suomeen 1920-luvulla. B: RAY toi ensimmäiset fyysiset peliautomaatit Suomeen 1960-luvulla. One sentence places the arrival of automatic games in the 1920s, while another claims the first physical slot machines arrived in the 1960s; the timelines are inconsistent. | ||
/kasinopelit/baccarat/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Tasapelin todennäköisyys on 9,52 % B: talon etu tasapeliä veikatessa on 14,36 % The text states tie probability as 9.52% and separately states the house edge for betting on a tie as 14.36%. The house edge for a tie bet depends on the payout (8:1 vs 9:1); since the article allows either payout, the fixed 14.36% edge is inconsistent with the 9:1 payout option and would be incorrect for the 9:1 case. | ||
/kasinopelit/bingo/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: RTP – Yleensä 80–95 % B: Nettibingon RTP-taulukossa on pelejä kuten Rainforest Magic Bingo 96.54–97.38 %, Slingo Starburst 96.10 %, Crazy Balls 96.10 %, Bingo Billions 95.04 %, Mega Ball 95.05–95.40 %, jne., joiden RTP on yli 95 %. The article first states nettibingo RTP is usually 80–95%, but later lists several games with RTPs above 95%, creating a direct contradiction. | ||
/kasinopelit/blackjack/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: RTP | 98,5–99,8 % optimaalisella strategialla B: Useimmiten blackjackin palautusprosentti yltää 95–98 %:iin. Optimaalisen strategian kannattajat kertovat taktiikan parantavan voittotodennäköisyyksiä aina 99,91 %:iin asti. The page presents two conflicting maximum RTP figures for online blackjack: 98.5–99.8% with optimal strategy in one section, and up to 99.91% with optimal strategy in another. These cannot both be true simultaneously. | ||
/kasinopelit/craps/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Field bet on 12 can pay 2:1 or 3:1 depending on the casino B: Field bet on 12 pays 3:1 in the payoff table The text provides two different payout values for Field 12: 2:1 or 3:1 depending on the casino in one section, and 3:1 in a separate payout table, which is inconsistent within the same article. A: Pass Line/Come bets have about 98.59% RTP B: Evolution First Person Craps claims up to 99.17% RTP The article cites two different RTP figures for craps: ~98.59% for standard bets and up to 99.17% for Evolution's First Person Craps, leading to an internal inconsistency. | ||
/kasinopelit/hedelmapelit/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/jackpot-pelit/ | Issues | 9 contradictions |
A: Big Time Gaming | Millionaire Megapays | Suurin jackpot: Väh. 300 000 € B: The table is labeled 'Suurin jackpot' but lists 'Väh. 300 000 €' (minimum) for the entry, which is inconsistent with the idea of showing the largest jackpot. The 'Suurin jackpot' column should display the largest jackpot amount, but the entry shows a minimum amount, creating a contradiction. A: Blueprint Gaming | Ted Jackpot King | Suurin jackpot: Kiinteä 10 000x panos B: The same 'Suurin jackpot' column lists a bet multiplier ('Kiinteä 10 000x panos') instead of a jackpot amount. A jackpot value should be a monetary jackpot amount, not a multiplier of the stake, which is inconsistent with the column heading. A: Microgaming | Wheel of Wishes Wowpot | Suurin jackpot: Väh. 2 000 000 € B: As a row under 'Suurin jackpot', 'Minimum 2,000,000 €' is presented, implying a minimum rather than the actual maximum jackpot. The column labeled 'largest jackpot' should present the top possible jackpot, not a minimum. A: NetEnt | Hall of Gods | Suurin jackpot: Väh. 300 000 € B: The 'Suurin jackpot' entry shows a minimum amount for Hall of Gods, which conflicts with the expectation that it shows the largest jackpot. Same issue: the value is a minimum, not the maximum, under a column labeled as the largest jackpot. A: Playtech | Fire Blaze: Sky Queen | Suurin jackpot: Kiinteä 2 000x panos B: The entry lists a stake multiplier instead of a jackpot amount, which contradicts the column's purpose of showing the largest jackpot. A jackpot column should display jackpot figures, not stake multipliers. A: Pragmatic Play | Wolf Gold Jackpot Power | Suurin jackpot: Keskimäärin 4 500 000 € B: An average jackpot amount is shown in a column titled 'largest jackpot', which is inconsistent. The value is an average, not a maximum, which contradicts the column's label. A: Red Tiger | Well of Wilds Megaways | Suurin jackpot: Väh. 10 000 € B: Minimum amount shown under 'largest jackpot' contradicts the expectation that the column lists the largest possible payout. Minimum figure cannot represent the largest jackpot. A: Veikkaus | Kulta-Jaska Lapin kesä | Suurin jackpot: Väh. 100 000 € B: Minimum amount shown under 'largest jackpot' conflicts with the column's meaning of the largest jackpot. Again, a minimum value is shown where a maximum/top jackpot should be displayed. A: Yggdrasil | Gold Frontier FastPot5 | Suurin jackpot: Kiinteä 15 000 € B: Fixed 15,000 € is a fixed amount, not the largest jackpot, conflicting with the column labeled as the largest jackpot. A fixed jackpot amount contradicts the concept of listing the largest possible jackpot. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/9-masks-of-fire/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Voittolinjat: 17 B: Voittolinjat: 20 The article lists 17 winning paylines in one place but later describes the game as having 20 paylines, which is a direct numerical inconsistency about paylines. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/big-bass-bonanza/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pelin RTP on 96,71% B: Pelitestin – 50 kierrosta: Havaittu RTP 85,2% The article states the game's theoretical RTP as 96.71%, but later reports an observed RTP of 85.2% in a short test, which contradicts the claimed RTP for the same game. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/big-bass-splash/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Big Bass Splash -pelin palautusprosentti on 96,71 %. B: Havaittu RTP 77,9 %. The article lists the official RTP as 96.71% but later reports an observed RTP of 77.9% from a test run, which directly contradicts the stated RTP. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/bigger-bass-bonanza/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/bonanza-megaways/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: RTP on 96,00 % B: Havaittu RTP 73,0 % The main RTP figure states 96,00 %, but the 'Pelitesti 100 kierrosta' section lists an observed RTP of 73,0 %, which is a direct numerical conflict within the same article. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/book-of-99/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: The theoretical RTP is exactly 99.00%. B: An observed RTP of 77.0% was reported in a test (100 spins). The page asserts a 99% RTP, but later reports RTP observed at 77% in a test, which is a direct contradiction. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/book-of-dead/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Minimipanos 0,01 € B: Peliin panostaa alkaen 0,2 euroa Two different stated minimum bet values: 0.01€ in the spec line and 0.20€ in the 'Panosrajat' section. A: Maksimipanos 100 € B: Maksimi panos 10 € Two different maximum bet values are given: 100€ in the main spec and 10€ in the comparison table. A: Ei bonuspelejä B: Ilmaispyöräytykset (free spins) are a feature The 'pros and cons' claim that there are no bonus games, yet the article describes free spins as a bonus feature triggered by scatters. A: Havaittu RTP 80,5 % B: RTP 96,21 % The page lists two different RTP values: 96.21% as the stated RTP and 80.5% as the observed RTP in a 100-spin test, which contradict each other within the same text. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/book-of-ra-deluxe/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Book of Ra Deluxe -pelin RTP on 95,1 %. B: Kokonaispaluun havaittu RTP pelitestissä on 58,0 % (testissä 100 kierrosta). The page states a theoretical RTP of 95.1%, but in the 100-spin test section it reports an observed RTP of 58.0%, which is a direct numerical discrepancy. A: Scatter-symboli: Scatter on kultainen kirja; se käynnistää pelin ilmaiskierrokset. B: Scatter-symbolit: Ei. One section claims the game uses a golden book scatter that triggers free spins, while the comparison table lists Scatter-symbols as not present, directly contradicting. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/book-of-ra/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Pelin RTP on 92,13%. B: Observed RTP during a 100-round test was 63,0%. The page states the game's RTP as 92,13%, but a test section reports an observed RTP of 63,0%, which are inconsistent figures. A: Osumatiheys 27,79%. B: Osumataajuus (arvio) 12% (from test data). The article lists a hit frequency of 27,79%, while the 100-spin test section reports an observed hit rate of 12%, which contradict each other. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/das-xboot-2wei/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Theoretical RTP is 95,94 %. B: Observed RTP during test is 216,95 %. The article states a theoretical RTP of 95.94% for Das xBoot 2wei!, but later reports an observed RTP of 216.95% from a 100-spin test, which would imply a return well over 100% and contradict the defined RTP concept. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/dead-or-alive-2/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Voittolinjat: 8 B: Kelat, rivit ja voittolinjat table shows Voittolinjat: 9 The page lists the number of winning paylines as 8 in the header or top summary, but later in the features table it states 9 paylines, creating a direct inconsistency. A: Max voitto: 99999x B: Dead or Alive 2 -pelin suurin mahdollinen voitto on 100000x panoksen suuruinen Two different maximum win figures are stated for the same game: 99999x and 100000x. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/dead-or-alive/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: The page states RTP = 96,82% for Dead or Alive. B: The pelitesti (100 spins) reports an observed RTP of 95,0%. Two conflicting RTP values are given for the same game within the article: 96.82% in the general RTP section and 95.0% as observed in a 100-spin test. A: The page lists Osumatiheys (hit density) as 30,42%. B: The pelitesti reports Osumataajuus (hit rate) as 21%. Two different hit-rate figures are presented for the same content (30.42% vs 21%), implying inconsistency in measured vs stated hit frequency. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/divine-fortune/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Max voitto 100x B: Mega Jackpot – koko pelialueen on oltava kultakolikoiden peitossa. The infobox states the maximum win is 100x, while the jackpot section describes a Mega Jackpot that occurs when the entire game area is covered with coins, implying a payout potentially above 100x. This creates a contradiction about the possible maximum payout. A: Minimipanos 0,20 € B: Panosvaihtoehdot ovat 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20 ja 0.50 € The page lists the minimum bet as 0.20 €, but later provides bet options that include 0.01 €, suggesting a lower minimum than stated. A: Maksimipanos 200 € B: Panosrajat section indicates a maximum bet of 100 € Two parts of the page give different maximum stake values: the infobox lists Maksimipanos 200 €, while the Panostasoja section (and test data) imply a maximum bet of 100 €, creating an inconsistency in the allowed maximum stake. A: RTP on 96,59 % B: Havaittu RTP 108,5 % The theoretical RTP is given as 96,59%, but a test run reports an observed RTP of 108,5%, which is inconsistent with the stated theoretical RTP. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/emma/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Palautusprosentti: 90,40 % (91,40 % jackpotin kanssa) B: Havaittu RTP: 76,00 % The page states an RTP of 90.40% (91.40% with the jackpot), but a 50-spin test reports an observed RTP of 76.00%, which contradicts the stated RTP values. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/fire-joker-freeze/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/fire-joker/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Minimipanos in the 'Fire Joker' column of the 'Fire Joker verrattuna muihin' table is listed as 0,05 %. B: Minimipanos in the 'Panosrajat' section is 0,05 €. The page uses inconsistent units for the minimum bet in different sections: a percentage in one place and euros in another, which is conflicting. A: The page states RTP as 96,15% (RTP: 96,15%). B: Observed RTP during the 100-spin test is 83,0%. The page presents two RTP figures: the nominal RTP of 96,15% and an observed RTP of 83,0% from a test, which contradict each other. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/gates-of-olympus-super-scatter/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Kokonaispanos 100 €, Kokonaispalautus 170,05 €, Havaittu RTP 170,05 % B: RTP on parhaimmillaan 96,50 %, ja vaihtoehdot ovat 96,50 % / 95,50 % / 94,50 % The test results claim an observed RTP of 170.05%, which directly contradicts the stated theoretical RTP values of around 96.50% (with variants of 95.50% and 94.50%). A: Maksimipanos on 360 € B: Maksimipanos on 240 € Two different maximum bet amounts are stated for the same game: 360 € in the infobox and 240 € in the Panosrajat section. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/gates-of-olympus/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pragmatic Playn asettama Gates of Olympus -pelin palautusprosentti on 96,50 % B: Pelitesti – 50 kierrosta -osiossa havaittu RTP on 76,0 % The page states the game's RTP as 96.50%, but later in the test section reports an observed RTP of 76.0%, which is a direct inconsistency regarding the game's return to player. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/gonzos-quest-megaways/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: RTP on 96,00% B: Havaittu RTP: 87,5% The page states an RTP of 96.00% in multiple sections, but a 100-round test reports an observed RTP of 87.5%, creating a contradiction between theoretical RTP and observed performance. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/gonzos-quest/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Julkaisupäivä 11.11.2013 B: NetEnt julkaisi pelin vuonna 2011 The page states the game was released in 2013 in one place, while another part claims NetEnt released the game in 2011, presenting two conflicting release years. A: Pelin suurin mahdollinen voittokerroin on 2 500x panoksen suuruinen B: Pelin maksimivoitto on kohtuullinen 3750x panos The article provides two different maximum payout figures: a maximum win multiplier of 2,500x the stake, and a maximum payout of 3,750x the stake. These are inconsistent and cannot both be correct as stated. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/immortal-romance/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Maximum win is 12,150x the stake (12150x panos). B: Maximum win is 364,000 coins. Two explicit maximum-win figures appear in the article with different units (times the stake vs coins) and without a clear conversion; if the stake max is 30€, then 12,150x would yield 364,500€, not 364,000 coins, indicating an inconsistency. A: The stated RTP is 96,86%. B: The test section reports an observed RTP of 96.0%. The article cites 96,86% as the RTP, but a later test result shows 96,0% RTP, a direct numerical discrepancy within the same page. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/jammin-jars-2/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: The article states RTP ranges from 96,10% at level 1 to 96,60% at the highest level (96,10%–96,60%). B: Push Gaming's page lists RTP as 96,83%. Two parts of the text assign different maximum RTP values for the same game (96,60% vs 96,83%), which is a direct numerical contradiction. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/jammin-jars/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Max voitto 20000x B: Pelin maksimivoitto on noin 20 000-kertainen tai tarkalleen sanottuna 19 998,5x The article states the maximum payout as 20000x panos, but later explicitly states the exact maximum as 19 998,5x, creating an inconsistency for the same statistic. A: RTP on keskimäärin 96,83 % B: Havaittu RTP 77,0 % The theoretical RTP is given as 96,83%, while a test session reports an observed RTP of 77,0%, which contradicts the stated theoretical RTP. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/john-hunter-and-the-tomb-of-the-scarab-queen/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Multiplier Collect contains a multiplier (2x–25x) that multiplies all money symbols on screen before payout. B: Multiplier Collect can multiply money symbols up to 35x and count them 25 times. The article presents two different maximum values for the Multiplier Collect feature: 2x–25x (the stated range) versus up to 35x with 25 multiplications, which cannot both be correct. A: Pelin RTP on 96,50% (the published RTP for the game). B: In a 100-spin test session, the observed RTP was 112,3%, contradicting the published RTP. The text includes a test-session RTP of 112.3%, which conflicts with the stated RTP of 96.50% for the game. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/kulta-jaska-megaways/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kulta Jaska Megaways on ainoastaan Veikkauksen nettikasinolta löytyvä kolikkopeli B: Kulta Jaska Megaways on saatavilla seuraavilla kasinoilla: #1 Raju Casino, #2 Jellona Casino, #3 Joki Casino, #4 Possu Casino, #5 Hurmio Casino The page first claims the game is exclusive to Veikkaus, but later lists multiple other casinos where the game is available, which is a direct contradiction. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/le-santa/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Le Santa RTP is 96,14% (official/default RTP) as stated in multiple sections. B: In the 'Pelitesti 100 kierrosta' section, the observed RTP is 82,1%. The page presents two conflicting RTP figures for Le Santa: 96,14% as the official/default RTP and 82,1% as the observed RTP in a test session, which is a clear contradiction. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/legacy-of-dead/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: RTP is 96.56% B: RTP is 96.58% The page inconsistently lists the game's RTP: 96.56% in one section and 96.58% in others, which is a clear numeric contradiction. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/mega-fortune/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Osumatiheys 52,60% B: Osumataajuus (arvio) 41% The page lists two different percentages for hit rate (52.60% under Osumatiheys and 41% under Osumataajuus (arvio)), treating the same concept with conflicting values. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/mega-joker/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pelin suurin mahdollinen voitto on 2000x panoksen suuruinen. B: Progressiivinen jättipotti voi kuitenkin nousta jopa miljoonaan. The article states that the largest possible win is 2000x the bet, but also states the progressive jackpot can reach up to one million, which would exceed the 2000x limit and thus creates an internal inconsistency about the game's maximum payout. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/mega-moolah/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Volatiliteetti in the infobox is listed as Keskitaso (medium). B: The Pelitest section and For the 'Miinukset' list claim low volatility (matala volatiliteetti). The page asserts medium volatility in the header but repeatedly describes the game as having low volatility in the body and review sections, which is an explicit inconsistency. A: Max voitto is listed as 11250x (maximum win of 11,250 times the stake). B: The Progressive jackpot section states Mega Jackpot starts at €1,000,000 and can grow to multi-millions. A fixed maximum payout of 11,250x the stake conflicts with a progressive Mega Jackpot that begins at 1,000,000 euros and can reach much higher sums. A: RTP is 88,12% (base game RTP). B: Observed RTP during a 100-spin test was 85,5%. The article presents two different RTP figures for Mega Moolah: 88.12% as the stated RTP and 85.5% as an observed result in a short test, creating a numerical contradiction. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/money-train-2/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Erikoissymbolit: Yhteensä 12 erilaista bonussymbolia B: Symboli table lists only 6 erikoissymbolia (Payer, Collector, Collector/Payer, Sniper, Necromancer, Reset Plus) The page claims there are 12 different bonus symbols, but the symbol list section only enumerates 6 specific bonus symbols, creating a numeric inconsistency. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/money-train-3/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/moon-princess-100/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Moon Princess 100 julkaisupäivä on 20.12.2021. B: Moon Princess 100 on julkaistu vuonna 2022. The page lists conflicting release dates for Moon Princess 100: 20 December 2021 in one section and the year 2022 in the FAQ, which cannot both be true. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/moon-princess-trinity/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: RTP is 96,20%. B: Observed RTP during a 100-spin test was 90,7%. The page lists the RTP as 96.20%, but a later 'Pelitesti – 100 kierrosta' section reports an observed RTP of 90.7%, contradicting the stated RTP. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/moon-princess/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Voittolinjat 20 B: ei ole perinteisiä voittolinjoja The page first states there are 20 paylines, then later claims there are no traditional paylines. A: RTP 96,57% B: Pelitestin havainnut RTP 76,3% The article lists a standard RTP of 96.57%, but a 100-spin test reports an observed RTP of 76.3%, which is a direct numerical contradiction. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/piggy-riches-2-megaways/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pelin RTP is 95,68% (as stated in the header). B: Observed RTP in a 100-spin test is 77,0% (77.0%). The page presents two conflicting RTP figures for Piggy Riches 2 Megaways, one claiming 95.68% and another claiming 77.0% observed in a small test, which cannot both be correct without further clarification. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/piggy-riches-megaways/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/piggy-riches/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Parhaimmillaan teoreettinen palautusprosentti on 96,38 % B: Havaittu RTP 115,0 % The page asserts a theoretical RTP of 96.38% but also reports an observed RTP of 115.0% in a 100-spin session, which is inconsistent with the stated theoretical RTP. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/pirots-4/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/reactoonz-2/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pelin palautusprosentti on 96,2 % (96,20%). B: Havaittu RTP 79,5 %. The page lists the official RTP as 96.2% in one section, while a 'Pelitesti – 50 kierrosta' table reports an observed RTP of 79.5%, which is a direct numerical contradiction. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/starburst-xxxtreme/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Starburst XXXtreme on jatko-osa vuonna 2012 julkaulle Starburstille. B: Julkaisupäivä 15.7.2021 The article asserts that Starburst XXXtreme is a sequel to the Starburst released in 2012, but it also lists a release date of July 15, 2021 for Starburst XXXtreme, creating an inconsistency in the timeline. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/starburst/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Julkaisupäivä: 12.11.2013 (in the infobox header) B: Starburst julkaistiin vuonna 2012 The article states two different release dates for Starburst: 12 November 2013 in the infobox, and 2012 in the body text. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/sweet-bonanza/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Osumatiheys: N/A% B: Osumataajuus (arvio): 28% The page states hit rate as not available (N/A%) in one place, but later provides an estimated hit frequency of 28% in the test results, which is inconsistent. A: Kokonaispalautus: 24,50 € B: RTP: 96,48–96,51% The 100-spin test reports total returns of 24,50 € on a 20,00 € total stake (122.5% RTP), which contradicts the published long-term RTP of about 96.5%. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/thunderstruck-2/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Volatiliteetti Keskitaso B: Volatiliteetti on keskitasoa/matalahko (Keski-matalan volatiliteetin) / Keskitasoa/matalahko The article first states volatility as 'Keskitaso' (medium) and later describes volatility as 'keskitasoa/matalahko' and 'Keski-matalan volatiliteetin', which are inconsistent descriptors for game volatility. A: Havaittu RTP: 108,5 % B: Pelitession RTP (108,5 %) oli teoreettista (96,65 %) Two statements assign conflicting RTP values: one claims observed RTP is 108.5%, while another claims that 108.5% is only theoretical and the theoretical RTP is 96.65%, which contradicts the observed figure. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/toshi-ways-club/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/twin-spin/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Twin Spin -pelin volatiliteetti on keskikorkea, eli se on keskitason korkeammasta päästä. B: Korkeahko volatiliteetti - voitot melko harvassa The two statements assign different volatility levels: 'keskikorkea' (mid-to-high) vs 'korkeahko volatiliteetti' (high volatility), which are inconsistent. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/ugga-bugga/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: RTP on 99,07 % B: Havaittu RTP 112,0 % The article states a fixed RTP of 99,07% for Ugga Bugga, but a later section reports an observed RTP of 112,0% from a 100-spin test, which is an inconsistency in the reported RTP for the same game. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/wanted-dead-or-a-wild/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: RTP: 96,38% B: Havaittu RTP: 79,0% The page states an official RTP of 96,38% in the RTP/volatility section, but a later 'Pelitesti – 100 kierrosta' section reports an observed RTP of 79,0%, which is a direct contradiction. | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/who-wants-to-be-a-millionaire-megaways/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Näin keloille 2–4 voidaan saada jopa kahdeksan symbolia. B: Enimmillään pelissä on jopa 117 649 eri tapaa voittaa. The text simultaneously implies that the middle reels can hold up to 8 symbols (specifically reels 2–4), which would affect the total number of winning ways. It also claims the maximum number of ways to win is 117,649 (which corresponds to 7^6). If reels 2–4 can have 8 symbols, the maximum number of ways would differ (e.g., 8^3 * 7^3 = 117,649 is only correct for three reels at 8 and three at 7; the stated extra-row mechanism under the middle four reels would typically yield a higher maximum, creating a contradiction between the described reel-symbol limits and the declared maximum number of ways to win). | ||
/kasinopelit/kolikkopelit/wolf-gold/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Wolf Gold on mekaniikaltaan varsin perinteinen kolikkopeli: pelialueelta löytyy viisi rullaa ja kolme riviä. B: Ominaisuudet listataan taulukossa: Kelat 5, Rivit 2, Maksulinjat 25. The page first states 5 reels and 3 rows, but later the features table lists 5 reels and only 2 rows, which is inconsistent. A: Pelin teoreettinen palautusprosentti (RTP) on tasan 96,0 %. B: Pelitesti – 50 kierrosta -tilanteessa havaittu RTP on 127,4 %. The page claims the official RTP is 96%, but also presents a test result showing an observed RTP of 127.4%, creating an internal inconsistency. | ||
/kasinopelit/korttipelit/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Nettikasinoiden pelivalikoimista tämänkaltaiset online korttipelit eivät löydy, etkä voi pelata niitä rahasta. B: Nettikasinoilla on blackjack, baccarat ja pokeri sekä RNG- ja live-jakajaa vastaan pelattavia versioita. The text first asserts that such online card games are not found in online casino libraries and cannot be played for real money, but later describes playing these casino card games (e.g., blackjack, baccarat, poker) with RNG and live-dealer variants on online casinos, creating a direct inconsistency. A: Korttien jako: jokaiselle pelaajalle jaetaan s11 korttia B: jakaja saa 12 In the Shanghai section, the dealing instructions assign 11 cards to each player while the dealer is stated to receive 12 cards, which directly contradicts. | ||
/kasinopelit/korttipelit/hertta/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Hertta ... Tämä tapahtuu välttämällä herttojen (♥️) tai patakuningattaren (Q♠️) saamista. B: Q♠️: Pelin tärkein kortti, joka on arvoltaan 13 pistettä. The page inconsistently refers to Q♠️ as 'patakuningattaren' (queen of clubs) in one place while also identifying Q♠️ as the queen of spades later. This suit naming inconsistency creates a factual contradiction about which suit Q♠️ belongs to, even though both claims treat Q♠️ as a high-penalty/point card. | ||
/kasinopelit/korttipelit/kasino/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/korttipelit/maija/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/korttipelit/paskahousu/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/korttipelit/seiska/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/korttipelit/shanghai/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Shanghai korttipeli on monivaiheinen seurapeli, jossa voittaja ratkeaa vasta seitsemännellä kierroksella. B: Pelaajia 2–8 pelaajaa. The two claims conflict: the first states the winner is determined on the seventh round, while the second asserts the game supports 2–8 players, which is inconsistent with the earlier note that the optimal/standard range is 3–6 (with 2-player mode) and the 2–8 range appears in a separate table entry. A: Shanghai korttipeli on monivaiheinen seurapeli, jossa voittaja ratkeaa vasta seitsemännellä kierroksella. B: Seitsemän kierroksen jälkeen palataan jälleen ensimmäiseen kierrokseen ja yhdistelmien kerääminen alkaa alusta. The first claim implies a fixed seven-round structure where the winner is decided in the seventh round. The second claim describes looping back to the first round after seven, suggesting the game can continue beyond seven rounds. These statements are inconsistent within the same article. | ||
/kasinopelit/monopoly-live/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/nettiarvat/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Nettiarvat RTP on yleensä hieman alhaisempi (80–90 %) kuin tavallisissa kolikkopeleissä (yli 95 %). B: Nettiarvat RTP is listed as 85–97 % in the Nettiarpa vs arvat paperiversiona comparison table. The article presents two conflicting RTP ranges for Nettiarvat: 80–90% as the typical rate, and 85–97% in a later comparison table. The ranges do not align (the upper bound 97% is outside the earlier 80–90% range), creating an unambiguous inconsistency within the text. | ||
/kasinopelit/nettipokeri/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/nettipokeri/ilmainen-pokeri/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/nettipokeri/omaha/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Esimerkiksi jos potti on flopilla 100 euroa, ensimmäinen pelaaja voi panostaa enintään 100 euroa. Toinen pelaaja voi korottaa potin summaan asti: hän maksaa 100 euroa, ja hänen maksimikorotuksensa on 300 euroa. B: Toisin sanoen potti 100 euroa + 100 euroa maksusta + 100 euroa korotuksesta. The two statements describe inconsistent pot/raise amounts: the first claims the second raise can reach 300 euros, while the second sums the pot as only 100 + 100 + 100 (300) without reflecting the additional raise implied by a 300 maximum, creating a contradiction in the pot size calculation. | ||
/kasinopelit/nettipokeri/pokerihuoneet/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: live-kasinoiden pokeripöydistä, joissa pelit käydään vain jakajaa vastaan silloinkin, kun pöydässä on useita osallistujia. B: live-pokerissa pelaajat kilpailevat toisiaan vastaan, eivätkä ainoastaan jakajaa vastaan. The text claims live-casino poker tables are played only against the dealer even with multiple players, which is incorrect; in real live poker you play against other players, not the dealer. | ||
/kasinopelit/raaputusarvat/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: RTP netin raaputusarvoissa on yleensä 85–95 %. B: Esimerkiksi taulukossa netin raaputusarvoille on RTP-arvoja kuten Scratch Match 97.25 %, Age of Gods Scratch 96,00–98,88 %, Gold Scratch 73,41 %, Scratch'em 55,61 % ja Tiger Scratch 50,29 %. The article states that online scratch cards typically have RTPs of 85–95%, but its own table lists multiple online scratch cards with RTP values outside this range, including values above 95% and well below 85%. A: Age of Gods Scratch -osion otsikko B: Kappale alkaa 'Age of Gods Scratch' -otsikolla, mutta sen teksti viittaa Aztec Gold Mines Scratchiin (IGT:n ja iSoftbetin kehittämä raaputusarpa). There is a mismatch between the section header 'Age of Gods Scratch' and the content describing 'Aztec Gold Mines Scratch', indicating an inconsistency in the game being discussed. A: Gold Scratchin RTP on 73,41 %. B: RTP netin raaputusarvoissa on yleensä 85–95 %. Gold Scratch is listed with an RTP of 73,41%, which falls below the stated typical online range of 85–95%, creating another numerical contradiction within the article. | ||
/kasinopelit/raaputusarvat/veikkaus-joulukalenteri/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Veikkauksen joulukalenterin voitot ovat kiinteitä ja jaossa on yhteensä 4 900 000 €. B: Voittojen jakotaulukon summa vuoden 2026 arvontaan on 4 850 000 €. The page states a total prize pool of 4,900,000 €, but the sum of the individual prize amounts listed in the 2026 prize distribution table equals 4,850,000 €, which is inconsistent. | ||
/kasinopelit/ruletti/ | Clean | |
/kasinopelit/soko/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Sökö on Suomen kansallispokeri, joka muistuttaa säännöiltään viiden kortin avopokeria. B: Suomalainen Sökö pokeri on muunnelma 5 Card Stud pokerista. The article states at first that Sökö resembles five-card draw (avopokeri) in rules, but later claims it is a variant of Five Card Stud, which are different poker variants. | ||
/kasinopelit/videopokeri/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Jacks or Better - Kuningasvärisuora row lists Todennäköisyys 0,000025, Voitto 800 ja RTP 1,98 %. B: The product of probability and payout is 0,000025 × 800 = 0,02 (2%), so the RTP should be 2.00%, not 1,98%. The line's RTP does not equal the probability × payout, indicating a numerical inconsistency or rounding/typo. A: Jacks or Better - 4 kakkosta row lists Todennäköisyys 0,00179 and RTP 3,58%. B: With a payout of 200, the expected RTP from that row should be 0,00179 × 200 = 0,358 (35.8%), i.e., 35.8%, not 3.58%. The RTP value does not match the probability × payout calculation, suggesting a decimal error in the row. A: Double Bonus - 4 Ässää row lists Todennäköisyys 0,00198 and RTP 3,17%. B: With a payout of 160, the expected RTP from that row should be 0,00198 × 160 = 0,3168 (31.68%), i.e., 31.68%, not 3.17%. Again the RTP does not align with probability × payout, indicating a likely decimal misprint. | ||
/kasinopelit/yatzy/ | Clean | |
/kasinot-ilman-lisenssia/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Uudet kasinot ilman lisenssiä 2026 header states that there are new casinos without a license in 2026. B: The three listed casinos (JackBurst Casino, Lolly Spins Casino, Wildzy Casino) show 'Lisenssi Anjouan Gaming License Curaçao' in the table, i.e., they are licensed. There is a direct mismatch: the section title promises 'without a license', but the content lists licenses for the three casinos. A: Pikakasinot ilman lisenssiä Suomesta section title claims 'pikakasinot ilman lisenssiä' (without a license) from Finland. B: The corresponding table entries show 'Lisenssi Vi ro Curaçao' for the listed casinos, indicating they have foreign licenses, not license-less. The section title asserts casinos without a license, but the table indicates these casinos possess licenses (Viro/Curacao), which is inconsistent. | ||
/kasinot-ilman-maksublokkia/ | Clean | |
/kasinotarjoukset/ | Clean | |
/kayttoehdot/ | Clean | |
/kierratysvaatimukset/ | Clean | |
/kierratysvapaat-bonukset/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kierrätysvapaat bonukset mahdollistavat voittojen kotiuttamisen välittömästi ilman rahan kierrättämistä kasinopeleissä. B: Vaikka bonuksella ei ole kierrätysvaatimusta, täytyy talletus kuitenkin pelata läpi ainakin kerran ennen nostoa. The first statement claims immediate withdrawal of winnings without turnover, while the second imposes a play-through requirement on the deposited funds before withdrawal, which contradicts the notion of immediate withdrawals. | ||
/klarna-kasinot/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Klarna ei toimi Suomen nettikasinoilla. B: Parhaat Klarna kasinot 2026 listan mukaan Klarna-kasinot ovat saatavilla Suomessa ja mukana on useita kasinoita. The page separately asserts that Klarna does not operate on Finnish online casinos, while also presenting a list of Klarna-enabled casinos in Finland, implying Klarna is active there. A: Tällä hetkellä markkinoilla ei ole uusia Klarna-kasinoita. B: Alle olemme koonneet vertailuun tämän hetken parhaat uudet kasinot, jotka suosivat Klarnan kaltaisia maksutapoja. The page states there are no new Klarna casinos, but later introduces a section for new Klarna-like casinos, indicating that new Klarna-related casinos exist. | ||
/kryptokasinot/ | Clean | |
/kyc/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Koska maksutiedot ovat arkaluontoisia, on osa niistä mahdollista peittää. Esimerkiksi Visa-kortista riittää, että kuvassa näkyy korttinumeron neljä viimeistä lukua. B: Muuten kuvanlaadun on oltava hyvä ja kortin näyttävä kuvassa kokonaisena. Et voi vain zoomata tai rajata yhtä osaa kortista, ja lähettää vain sitä. The statements conflict: one allows obscuring parts of the card image (showing only the last four digits), while the other says the image must be complete and cannot be cropped. | ||
/landing-page/confirmation-page/ | Clean | |
/landing-page/leadgen-offer-fi/ | Clean | |
/litecoin-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Litecoin on yksi suosituimmista kryptovaluutoista, ja litecoin-kasinot yleisiä. B: Harvinaisempi kryptovaluutta kasinoilla muihin verrattuna. The article simultaneously claims Litecoin is among the most popular cryptocurrencies with widespread Litecoin casinos, and later states that Litecoin casinos are relatively rare compared to other cryptocurrencies. These statements directly contradict each other. | ||
/live-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Jokaisessa pokeri-pelissä on myös pakollinen ensimmäinen sokkopanos eli blind, joka asetetaan ennen omien korttien näkemistä. B: Jotkut pokerivariaatiot eivät käytä blindia ollenkaan (ne käyttävät anteja). The text claims that every poker game has a blind before seeing cards; in reality, some variants use antes or no blind at all, making this an inconsistency. | ||
/lottopelit/ | Clean | |
/lottopelit/el-gordo/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: El Gordo de Navidad ... jakaa osallistujien kesken 2,772 miljardia euroa erilaisten rahapalkintojen muodossa. B: Tänä vuonna 2025 arvonnassa pelataan yhteensä 2,772 miljoonaa euroa, mikä on 70 miljoonaa euroa enemmän kuin edellisenä vuonna. The page states the prize pool as 2.772 billion euros in one section and 2.772 million euros in the 2025 section, which is a direct inconsistency. | ||
/lottopelit/eurojackpot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Todennäköisyys voittaa mikä tahansa voittoyhdistelmä yhdellä rivillä on 1:32. B: The probability table shows that the sum of probabilities for all winning combinations (excluding the no-win category) is about 60.4% per line, implying roughly a 60% chance to win any prize on a single line, which contradicts the stated 1:32 (~3.1%). Two different figures are given for the chance of winning on a single Eurojackpot line: one says about 3.1% (1 in 32), while the table of winning categories sums to around 60% probability of any prize, which is inconsistent. | ||
/lottopelit/euromillions/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Suurin päävoitto on ollut 240 miljoonaa euroa. B: EuroMillionsin merkittävimmissä voitoissa on listattu 250 miljoonan euroon yltäneitä jättipotteja (esim. maaliskuu 2025, kesäkuu 2025, elokuu 2025). The article states the biggest jackpot to date is 240 million euros, but later lists multiple 250-million-euro jackpots in 2025, which is inconsistent. | ||
/lottopelit/jokeri/ | Clean | |
/lottopelit/kaikki-tai-ei-mitaan/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Nettikasinoilla pelin pelaaminen ei ole mahdollista. B: Ulkomaisilla nettikasinoilla pääset pelaamaan myös moderneja lottomaisia pelejä, jotka ovat yhdistelmä kolikkopeliä ja perinteistä lottoa. The first claim states that the Kaikki tai ei mitään game cannot be played on online casinos, while the second claim suggests foreign online casinos offer lotto-like games, implying such games can be played online. If both statements are referring to Kaikki tai ei mitään, they directly contradict each other. | ||
/lottopelit/keno/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Jos valitset numerot itse, Veikkauksen pelissä ne valitaan 70 numeron joukosta. B: Eri Kenon versiossa netissä numeroita voi olla 1–80. The page states two different number pools: Veikkaus' base Keno uses a 70-number pool, while it claims online versions can use 1–80 numbers, which is inconsistent without clarification. A: Taso 11 – 0 oikein (0 correct) -palkkio listataan '1' (1x panos) taulukossa. B: 0 oikein tulisi yleensä tuottaa joko pienin mahdollinen voitto tai ei voittoa; 0 oikein ei normaalisti palkitse. The win table lists a payout of 1x for 0 correct on Tasot 11 (and some other rows), which implies a win without matching any numbers, contradicting the common understanding that 0 correct yields no payout. | ||
/lottopelit/lomatonni/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Ensimmäinen arvonta tehtiin 17. joulukuuta 2016, joten kyseessä on moniin muihin rahapeleihin Verrattuna uusi veikkaus peli. B: Lomatonni ilmestyi ystävänpäivänä vuonna 2016, ja sen säännöt ovat pysyneet samoina ensimmäisestä arvonnasta asti. The page asserts two different debut dates for Lomatonni in 2016: February 14 (Valentine's Day) and December 17; both cannot be correct simultaneously, creating a direct contradiction about the game's launch date. | ||
/lottopelit/lotto/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Numeroita arvotaan väliltä 1–40. B: numeroiden määrää on lisätty alkuperäisestä 40:stä nykyiseen 41:een. The article first states that numbers are drawn from 1 to 40, but later asserts that the total number of possible numbers has been increased to 41, which is inconsistent. A: Lottoarvonta suoritetaan kerran viikossa, lauantai-iltaisin. B: Peliaika/lautantaiarvonta tapahtuu klo 21.45 asti, ja arvonta suunnitellaan klo 22.10 jälkeen. One part says the draw occurs on Saturdays once a week in the evening, while another part specifies a draw time after 22:10 (and a cutoff time of 21:45), which conflict with each other. | ||
/lottopelit/powerball-lotto/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Progressiivinen jackpot kasvaa ilman ylärajaa ja parhaimmillaan Powerball lotosta on voitettu 2,3 miljardia dollaria. B: Suurimmat Powerball voitot -osiossa suurin voittosumma on 2,04 miljardia dollaria (2.04B), ei 2,3 miljardia dollaria. The article first claims the Powerball jackpot is unlimited and has been won up to 2.3 billion dollars, but later lists the largest recorded jackpot as 2.04 billion dollars, contradicting the earlier top-prize figure. A: Vuonna 2024 oregonilainen mies, hänen vaimonsa ja ystävänsä voittivat 1,3 miljardia dollaria, mikä on neljänneksi suurin Powerball-jättipotti. B: Suurimmat Powerball voitot -osiossa ei ole 1,3 miljardin voittoa; ranking tuo esiin 2,04B, 1,76B, 1,586B, 1,08B ja 0,731B, jolloin 1,3B ei mahdu neljän suurimman joukkoon tai sitä ei mainita taulukossa. The text asserts a 1.3 billion dollar Oregon win as the fourth-largest jackpot, but the accompanying table of top jackpots does not include a 1.3B entry and places 1.08B as the fourth-largest, creating inconsistency between the narrative and the data. | ||
/lottopelit/synttarit/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Vain karkausvuosina käytössä oleva 29. helmikuuta on jätetty listalta pois. B: 29. helmikuuta on jätetty listalta pois. The first claim says the February 29 date (which would be leap-year only) has been left off the list, implying it is excluded only because it’s leap-year specific. The second claim simply states February 29 has been left off the list, without addressing leap-year usage, creating an inconsistency about whether February 29 is ever included or excluded. | ||
/lottopelit/viking-lotto/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Viking Lotto on Pohjoismaista lähtöisin oleva lottopeli jota pelataan Suomen lisäksi yhdeksässä Euroopan maassa. B: Nykyään Viking lottoa pelataan seuraavissa maissa: 1. Belgia 2. Islanti 3. Latvia 4. Liettua 5. Norja 6. Ruotsi 7. Slovenia 8. Suomi 9. Tanska 10. Viro. The text states it is Finland plus nine other European countries, but then lists ten countries including Finland, resulting in a contradiction about the total number of participating countries. A: Jos pelasit kuponkisi netissä Veikkauksen pelitilin kautta, sinun ei tarvitse tehdä mitään. Viking lotto voitto maksetaan pelitilille aina 20 000 euroon saakka arvontaa seuraavana arkipäivänä. B: Alle 20 000 euron Vikinglotto voitot maksetaan heti arvonnan jälkeen. The article simultaneously claims online winnings up to 20,000 euros are paid the next business day and that winnings under 20,000 euros are paid immediately after the draw, which are mutually exclusive. A: Viking Lotto verot: voitot ovat pelaajille täysin verovapaita. B: Voitot eivät ole näin enää verovapaita, vaan ansiotulo- tai lahjaveron alaista rahaa. One section asserts winnings are completely tax-free, while another section states that winnings (in group/pool contexts) may be taxable, which directly contradicts the tax treatment. | ||
/luottokortti-kasinot/ | Clean | |
/mainoskaytanto/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kasinohai.com kasinovertailut ovat täysin puolueettomia. B: Nettikasinoiden sijoitus ja näkyvyys listoilla riippuu siitä, miten suuren palkkion kasinolta saamme. The site claims its casino reviews are completely neutral, but also admits that ranking and visibility on its lists depend on the size of commissions from casinos, which would imply editorial influence by payments from advertisers. | ||
/maksutavat/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Nettilompakkoina mainitaan: Skrill, Neteller, Neosurf, MuchBetter, Payz, Jeton, MiFinity, PayPal. B: Toinen vaihtoehto on Neosurf, joka myy prepaid-kortteja netissä. Neosurf is described as a net wallet (nettilompakko) in the net wallets section, but elsewhere it is described as a prepaid card (prepaid-kortti). This is an internal inconsistency about Neosurf's category. | ||
/mastercard-kasinot/ | Clean | |
/mga-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Tuuri Kasino – Top 3 hyvät MGA kasinot: 1. talletuksen käteisbonus ja ilmaiskierrokset 100% asti 300 € ja 40 ilmaiskierrosta B: Tuuri Kasino – Uudet Malta kasinot: Bonus talletuksella 1200 € ja 140 ilmaiskierrosta The same casino (Tuuri Kasino) is described with conflicting welcome-bonus details in two sections: one lists a 100% cash bonus up to 300 € plus 40 free spins; the other lists a 1200 € cash bonus with 140 free spins. | ||
/mifinity-kasinot/ | Clean | |
/minimitalletus/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pikakasino mahdollistaa pelaamisen alkaen 5 euron talletuksella. B: Boostin 100 ilmaiskierroksen ensitalletusbonusta en saanut 5 euron talletuksella, sillä sen minimitalletusraja on 30 euroa. The page states that Boost Casino allows playing from a 5€ deposit, but also states that the 100 free spins welcome bonus requires a minimum deposit of 30€, which directly contradicts the claimed 5€ minimum for playing and for receiving that bonus. | ||
/miten-arvostelemme-kasinoita/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Tähtien määrä 4–5 tähteä → Erittäin hyvä B: Tähtien määrä 3–4 tähteä → Hyvä The ranges 4–5 and 3–4 both include the value 4, making a 4-star rating belong to two different categories, which is inconsistent. | ||
/mobiilikasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: In the 'Uudet mobiilikasinot 2026' table, Tuuri Kasino shows 'Bonus talletuksella 1200 € 140 ilmaiskierrosta' (Julkaistu 10/10/2025). B: In the Kasinohain expert 'paras mobiili Kasino helmikuu -ehdokasta' list, Tuuri Kasino shows 'Käteisbonus 1. talletuksella: 300 €' and 'Ilmaiskierroksia 1. talletuksella: 40'. The two sections list different first-deposit bonus amounts and different numbers of free spins for Tuuri Kasino, which is a direct numerical inconsistency. | ||
/mobiilitalletus-puhelimella/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Siru Mobile on tällä hetkellä Suomen markkinoiden ainoa varsinainen mobiilimaksutapa, jonka käyttö perustuu puhelinnumeroon ja -laskuun. B: Siru Mobile on ainoa varsinainen casino puhelinlaskulla, mutta myös uusia haastajia on markkinoilla nähty. Claim A states Siru Mobile is the only genuine mobile payment method based on phone number and bill; Claim B then asserts that there are new challengers on the market, implying it is not the only option. | ||
/mobilepay-kasinot/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: MobilePay kasinot ovat harvassa, emmekä tällä hetkellä löydä valikoimista yhtään MobilePay kasinoa. B: Parhaat MobilePay kasinot 2026 ... [list of casinos including Raju Casino, Jellona Casino, Joki Casino, Possu Casino, Hurmio Casino, Vivatbet Casino, ReSpin Casino, Tuuri Kasino, Only Spins Casino, Pelipeto Casino, FeliceBet Casino, Rullat Casino, Raketti Casino, Freespinza Casino, XLBet]. The page first states that MobilePay casinos are rare and none are currently found, but later presents a list of multiple 'best MobilePay casinos' for 2026, which directly contradicts the claim that none exist. A: Yksityishenkilöiden väliset maksut: Raja (ajanjakso) 1 viikon liukuva aikaraja 365 päivän liukuva aikaraja. B: Yritysten väliset maksut: 30 päivän liukuva aikaraja. For private-to-private transfers, the page appears to list two different sliding time limits (1 week and 365 days) within the same category, creating an inconsistency in the transfer time-limit policy. | ||
/muchbetter-kasinot/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Jokaista 10 euroa vastaan annetaan 1 MB Coin. B: Pisteet voi muuttaa käteiseksi, kun niitä on kasassa 100. Jos pisteitä on kerättynä esimerkiksi 500, voi käyttäjä lunastaa 5 euron edestä käteistä. The text describes two incompatible reward-value mechanisms: MB Coins are earned at a rate of 1 per 10 euros deposited, while the loyalty points (pisteet) are redeemed at different thresholds (e.g., 500 points → 5 euros), implying inconsistent conversion rates for rewards. A: Voittorahat voi saada 1–2 tunnissa. B: Voitot saapuvat viimeistään muutaman päivän kuluttua. Withdrawals are claimed to be 1–2 hours in one section, but later it states winnings arrive within a few days, presenting a clear contradiction in withdrawal timing. | ||
/neosurf-kasinot/ | Clean | |
/neteller-kasinot/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: kotiutusaika on melko pitkä: jopa kolme arkipäivää B: Kotiutusaika ~ 1–4 vrk for God of Casino The general withdrawal time claims up to three days, but God of Casino's entry lists withdrawals up to four days, exceeding the general statement. A: Katso alta kolme bonusta ja nettikasinoa, jotka eivät ole asettaneet rajoituksia bonuksen lunastamiseen Netellerillä. B: Two casinos are listed (FeliceBet Casino and Casumo Casino) instead of three. The section claims three bonuses/casinos without Neteller bonus restrictions, but only two are shown in the list. A: QBet appears in the 'N Neteller rahansiirtojen nopeus' table as a Neteller casino. B: QBet is not present in the main 'Neteller kasinot 2026' list. The page inconsistently includes QBet in the withdrawal speed table but omits it from the main Neteller casinos list, creating conflicting inclusions. | ||
/nettikasinot-ilman-rekisteroitymista/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kotiutukset alle 15 minuutissa B: Näin nosto on pelaajan tilillä parhaimmillaan alle 5 minuutissa kotiutuspyynnön jättämisestä The text contains two conflicting withdrawal-time claims: one states withdrawals are possible in under 15 minutes, while another states that withdrawals can be as fast as under 5 minutes. These cannot both be the maximums simultaneously. | ||
/nettikasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: The TOP 15 nettikasinot 2026 table lists Tuuri Kasino as rank 1. B: In the section 'XLBet Casino – Lue arvostelu' XLBet Casino is presented as rank 1. The text contains two separate top rankings: Tuuri Kasino is shown as the #1 in the 'TOP 15 nettikasinot 2026' table, while a later section presents XLBet Casino as the #1 in a different list. This is a direct contradiction about which casino is ranked first. | ||
/nettilompakko/ | Clean | |
/no-deposit-bonus/ | Clean | |
/non-sticky-bonukset/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Non sticky bonus tarkoittaa sellaisia bonuksia, joissa kierrätysvaatimukset koskevat ainoastaan bonusrahaa, ei pelaajan omaa talletusta. B: Non sticky bonuksissa kierrätysvaatimus myös talletukselle — vain half-sticky bonuksissa. The article initially states that turnover requirements apply only to the bonus money (not the deposit) for non-sticky bonuses. Later, in a comparison table under Sticky vs Non-Sticky, it indicates that non-sticky bonuses can involve turnover on the deposit, albeit only for half-sticky variants, which contradicts the earlier claim. | ||
/nopeimmat-kotiutukset/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pelipeto Casino — Kotiutukset 24 tunnissa verovapaasti B: Nopeat kotiutukset mahdollistavat voittojen kotiutukset vain minuuteissa – ei tunneissa tai päivissä. Pelipeto Casino is advertised as having withdrawals in 24 hours tax-free, which contradicts the site's primary claim that fast withdrawals occur in minutes or seconds. | ||
/online-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Tuuri Kasino: Bonus talletuksella 1200 € 140 ilmaiskierrosta B: Tuuri Kasino: Aluksi saat tervetuliaisbonuksen 100 % aina 300 euroon asti sekä 40 ilmaiskierrosta The same casino (Tuuri Kasino) is described with two different welcome bonuses in different parts of the page: a 1200 € bonus with 140 free spins in the New online casinos table, and a 100% bonus up to 300 € with 40 free spins in the Tuuri Kasino feature section. | ||
/oppaat/ | Clean | |
/oppaat/baccarat-saannot/ | Clean | |
/oppaat/baccarat-strategiat/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Tavoitteena on tehdä yhden yksikön verran voittoa per sykli. B: 4. Jos häviät neljännellä kierroksella, olet tasoissa (2+6+4-12 = 0). Jos voitat, olet 24 euroa (2+6+4+12) voitolla. The 1-3-2-6 section states the goal is to make one unit of profit per cycle, but the accompanying step-by-step example shows a win yielding 24 euros of profit (and later references a 3-euro profit as the achieved goal), which directly contradicts the stated objective and each other within the same example. | ||
/oppaat/bingo-saannot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: 90 pallon bingo sääntö: Tämä tekee yhteensä 27 numeroa. B: | Sarake | Numerot |
| --- | --- |
| 1. sarake | 1–10 |
| 2. sarake | 11–20 |
| 3. sarake | 21–30 |
| 4. sarake | 31–40 |
| 5. sarake | 41–50 |
| 6. sarake | 51–60 |
| 7. sarake | 61–70 |
| 8. sarake | 71–80 |
| 9. sarake | 81–90 | The section states a 90-ball bingo card contains 27 numbers, but later provides a column-number table listing ranges that span 1–90, implying up to 90 distinct numbers could appear on a card. These two claims are inconsistent. | ||
/oppaat/blackjack-saannot/ | Clean | |
/oppaat/blackjack-strategiakaavio/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Koska Spanish 21 blackjack -pelistä puuttuvat kaikki 10-k short: korttien jakauma ja todennäköisyydet muuttuvat. B: Pelaajat voivat aina tuplata, jakaa jopa neljä kertaa ja ottaa vakuutuksen. In Spanish 21, all 10-value cards are removed, which means a natural blackjack cannot occur and insurance bets would have no payout option. The text simultaneously states players can always double, split up to four times, and take insurance, which is inconsistent with a deck that has no 10s and cannot produce blackjack or insurance outcomes. | ||
/oppaat/bonusehdot-selitetty/ | Clean | |
/oppaat/brite-esto/ | Clean | |
/oppaat/craps-pelin-saannot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Place-panos 4 ja 10 voittokerroin on 5:11 B: Place-panos 4 ja 10 voittokerroin on 9:5 The text states that Place bets on 4 and 10 pay 5:11, but standard craps payouts for these Place bets are 9:5. | ||
/oppaat/kasinosanasto/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: House Edge | Kasinon matemaattinen etu pelaajia vastaan pitkällä aikavälillä. B: Zero House Edge | Pelityyppi, jossa kasinolla ei ole matemaattista etua pelaajaa vastaan, tarjoten tasapuoliset voittomahdollisuudet. The text defines 'House Edge' as the casino's mathematical advantage against players, but later defines 'Zero House Edge' as a game type with zero casino advantage, which directly contradicts the earlier concept. | ||
/oppaat/kertoimien-laskeminen/ | Clean | |
/oppaat/kierratyslaskuri-ohjeet/ | Clean | |
/oppaat/kolikkopelien-symbolit/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Perussymboli Tavalliset symbolit, jotka muodostavat voittolinjoja. B: Yksi merkittävimpiä muutoksia on perinteisten voittorivien puuttuminen. Viime vuosina megaways-pelit ovat suosittuja, joissa perinteisten voittorivien sijaan on tuhansia mahdollisia voittoyhdistelmiä. The article first states that basic symbols form winning paylines, but later asserts that traditional paylines are removed in Megaways games, which contradicts the earlier claim about paylines existing for basic symbols. | ||
/oppaat/korttien-laskeminen-blackjack/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Luku pyöristetään aina lähimpään tasalukuun. B: Todellinen luku lasketaan jakamalla juokseva luku jäljellä olevien pakkojen määrällä (esim. 4). Näin todellinen luku on 2,5 / 4 = 0,625 The general rule states that the true count should be rounded to the nearest integer, but the Wong Halves example shows a decimal true count of 0.625, indicating fractional true counts are used, which contradicts the rounding rule. | ||
/oppaat/mika-on-rtp/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Pelaajat voivat kuitenkin valita nettikasinoiden tarjonnasta isot RTP:t sisältävät pelit ja päättää käyttää –tai olla käyttämättä pelien sisäisiä ostobonuksia. B: Pelaaja ei voi suoraan vaikuttaa RTP:hen. One part states players can influence RTP by choosing high-RTP games and enabling in-game buy bonuses, while another states players cannot directly affect RTP, creating a direct contradiction. A: Kolikkopelit | 92–99 % B: Esimerkiksi MGA-kasinoilla kolikkopelien pienin mahdollinen RTP on 85 %. The table lists slot RTP as 92–99%, but later it claims MGA-licensed casinos may have minimum RTP as low as 85%, which conflicts with the listed general range. A: RTP lasketaan kaavalla 100 % – RTP. B: Näin 95/100 x 100 % = 95 %. The stated formula implies RTP would be 100% minus RTP (which is incorrect), while the example shows the correct calculation of RTP as (payout/stake) × 100; this inconsistency is a factual error. | ||
/oppaat/mita-tehda-kun-nettikasino-ei-vastaa/ | Clean | |
/oppaat/miten-jackpotin-kotiutus-netista-tapahtuu/ | Clean | |
/oppaat/miten-kayttaa-kryptoa-kasinolla/ | Clean | |
/oppaat/miten-nousta-vip-pelaajaksi/ | Clean | |
/oppaat/miten-voittaa-lotossa/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Plusnumero oikein is listed as 1:5 (20%) B: Plusnumero valikoituu väliltä 1–30 The Plusnumero category shows odds of 1:5 (20%), but elsewhere the text states the Plusnumero is drawn from a range of 1–30, which would imply odds of 1/30 (about 3.33%), not 1/5. A: The probabilities for winning categories include Plusnumero oikein at 20% and other small probabilities (e.g., 1.025% for four correct, 0.931% for three + plus, etc.). B: The not-winning category probabilities add up in a way that would exceed 100% when combined with the winning-category probabilities (e.g., top lines sum to about 22% while not-winning lines sum to about 98%), indicating inconsistent probability accounting. The page presents disjoint-looking winning categories and not-winning categories whose probabilities, if treated as additive and disjoint, would exceed 100%, which is mathematically inconsistent. | ||
/oppaat/miten-voittaa-nettikasinolla/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Progressiiviset jackpotit kasvattavat voittosummaa joka kerta, kun joku pelaa kyseistä peliä voittamatta rahaa. B: Potti kasvaa jokaisen panoksen jälkeen yleensä 1–5 %. The first claim implies jackpots rise only when a player plays and does not win, whereas the second claims the pot grows after every bet (per stake). These are incompatible because if the pot increases after every bet, it does not depend on a non-winning outcome, contradicting the first statement. | ||
/oppaat/nettikasinoiden-yleisimmat-ongelmat-pelaajan-opas/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kasinot ilman rekisteröitymistä pystyvät verkkopankkitunnusten kautta nopeisiin, alle 24 tunnin kotiutuksiin. B: nostot odottavat vähintään 48 tuntia ennen niiden käsittelyyn ottoa. The page simultaneously claims that withdrawals for non-registered casinos can be completed in under 24 hours, and that withdrawals may wait at least 48 hours before processing; these statements are mutually incompatible. | ||
/oppaat/pelialustat-ja-pelien-kokoajat/ | Clean | |
/oppaat/pelitili-on-suljettu-nettikasinoiden-syyt-tilin-jaadyttamiseen/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Alle 18-vuotiaita pelaajia ei hyväksytä missään tapauksessa. B: Olet alaikäinen. The page states that under-18 players are not accepted under any circumstances, yet in a rewards table it includes a case where if you are under 18 you do not get your money back after a closed account, effectively implying an under-18 scenario is possible. | ||
/oppaat/pokeri-saannot/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Pöytään jaetaan yhteisiä kortteja siten, että ensin pöydässä on kaksi korttia. Jokainen panostuskierros lisää yhden kortin pöytään aina viiteen saakka. B: Flopissa pöydälle jaetaan kolme yhteistä korttia kuvapuoli ylöspäin. The text asserts that initially there are two community cards on the table and that every betting round adds one card up to five, which contradicts the actual Hold'em sequence where there are 0 community cards preflop, 3 on the flop, then 4 on the turn and 5 on the river. A: Kierros pelataan loppuun, ja mahdollinen voitto siirtyy automaattisesti pelaajan pelitilille. B: Käteispeleissä ja turnauspokerissa yhteyskatko poistaa pelaajan pöydästä. These statements conflict: in online poker (nettipokeri) disconnections are described as allowing the hand to finish with winnings credited to the player's account, while in cash games and tournaments a disconnect removes the player from the table; the handling of disconnects is not consistent across formats within the same page. | ||
/oppaat/pokerikadet/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Käsi 3: 7♥ 7♠ 5♦ 5♠ 5♣ (Neloset) B: Käsi 3 on Täyskäsi (5-5-5-7-7), ei Neloset (Four of a Kind). The hand 7♥ 7♠ 5♦ 5♠ 5♣ comprises three 5s and two 7s, which is a Full House, not Four of a Kind. | ||
/oppaat/pokeriturnaukset/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Alle olemme listanneet kolme Kasinohain asiantuntijoiden suosikkikasinoa B: Taulukossa on vain kaksi Kasinohain asiantuntijoiden suosikkikasinoa (Royal Vegas Casino ja Casumo Casino), vaikka väitettiin kolmea The article claims three Kasinohai expert favorites, but the following table lists only two casinos, creating an inconsistency. | ||
/oppaat/ruletti-saannot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Nollapeli (Jeu Zéro) — 4 pelimerkkiä nollalle ja sen läheisyydessä oleville numeroille 0, 3, 12, 15, 26, 32 ja 35 B: The same section lists seven numbers (0, 3, 12, 15, 26, 32 and 35), implying coverage of seven numbers with four chips There is an inconsistency: it states four chips cover the zero and nearby numbers, yet the enumeration lists seven distinct numbers, which would require more chips to cover. | ||
/oppaat/rulettistrategia/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Martingale esimerkki: Voitto maksetaan suhteessa 1:1 eli saat 16 euron voiton sekä panoksesi takaisin. Yhteensä pelikassasi on nyt 32 euroa. B: Todellisuudessa olet 4 euroa voitolla sen lisäksi että sait kasinolta 16 euron panoksesi takaisin. The Martingale example computes the bankroll after a win inconsistently: one line says the total cash becomes 32 euros, while another line implies you are only 4 euros up after receiving your stake back and the 16-euro wager, which cannot both be true given the preceding bets (4, 8, 16). A: Kolme numeroa: Todennäköisyys 10,8 %. B: Kuusi numeroa: Todennäköisyys 8,1 %. Internal inconsistency: the table lists the probability for hitting 3 numbers as 10,8 % and for 6 numbers as 8,1 %, which contradicts standard roulette odds (3/37 ≈ 8.11% and 6/37 ≈ 16.22%), indicating errors in the probabilities within the same table. | ||
/oppaat/trustly-esto/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Trustly esto on toimenpide, jonka avulla voit estää Trustly-rahansiirrot pelisivustoille. B: Trustly casino eston asettaminen onnistuu helposti sähköpostiviestillä. The article initially states that the block can be set up via email, but later describes the process as using Trustly's contact form with steps that do not involve sending an email. This creates an inconsistency about the required method to activate the block. | ||
/oppaat/useat-kasinotilit-kannattaako-rahapelaaminen-keskittaa-vai-hajauttaa/ | Clean | |
/oppaat/veikkauskortti/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: **Veikkauskortti on nykyään kaikille pelaajille pakollinen**, ja se vaaditaan muun muassa loton ja automaattipelien pelaamiseen. B: Kyllä ja ei – Veikkauskortti itsessään ei ole pakollinen, mutta rekisteröityminen Veikkauksen asiakkaaksi on. The page states that Veikkauskortti is mandatory for all players, but later says the card itself is not mandatory and only registration is required. These two statements conflict on whether the Veikkauskortti must be possessed by players. | ||
/oppaat/volatiliteetti/ | Clean | |
/oppaat/zimpler-esto/ | Clean | |
/ota-yhteytta/ | Clean | |
/palaute/ | Clean | |
/palaute/kasinoarvostelukysely/ | Clean | |
/palaute/kayttajakysely/ | Clean | |
/palaute/valitus/ | Clean | |
/palautusprosentit/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Peli, jonka RTP on 91,68 %, on kerännyt 1 200 000 puntaa liikevaihtoa ja 1 085 000 puntaa voittoja. B: RTP voidaan laskea seuraavasti: 1 085 000 / 1 200 000 = 0,9042. Täten tämän pelin todellinen RTP on 90,42 %. The text first states an RTP of 91.68%, but immediately calculates an empirical RTP of 90.42% from the given turnover and winnings, which is inconsistent. | ||
/parhaat-nettikasinot/ | Clean | |
/pay-n-play/ | Clean | |
/paylevo-kasinot/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Paylevo-kasinot mahdollistavat pelaamisen laskulle. B: Tällä hetkellä Paylevo-kasinoita ei kuitenkaan ole saatavilla. One part of the text claims that Paylevo casinos enable playing on credit, while another part states that Paylevo casinos are not available at the moment. This is a direct contradiction about the current existence of Paylevo casinos. A: Nykytilanne Paylevon osalta on kuitenkin epäselvä, eikä ole olemassa varmaa tietoa onko maksutapaa enää olemassa. B: Paylevo casinot ovat poistuneet markkinoilta. The text says the current status of Paylevo is unclear, but later it asserts that Paylevo casinos have disappeared from the market. This is a conflicting assessment of whether Paylevo still exists. | ||
/paypal-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: In the PayPal row of the 'Maksutapa' table, it shows 0 casinos on our lists that accept PayPal (Kasinoita listoillamme: 0). B: The article lists numerous PayPal-enabled casinos under 'Vaihtoehtoja PayPal kasinoille 2026' (e.g., Trust Dice Win Casino, Chip Stars Casino, Raju Casino, Jellona Casino, Joki Casino, Possu Casino, Hurmio Casino, Vivatbet Casino, ReSpin Casino, Tuuri Kasino, Only Spins, Pelipeto, FeliceBet, Rullat, Raketti). The page simultaneously claims that there are zero casinos on their PayPal-enabled casinos list, while elsewhere listing numerous casinos that accept PayPal as a payment option. | ||
/paysafe-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: The page states that the maximum transaction for a Paysafecard code is 50 €. B: The page lists Paysafecard voucher denominations as 10 €, 25 €, 50 €, and 100 €, implying that codes can be up to 100 €. The two claims are inconsistent: restricting a single Paysafecard code transaction to 50 € contradicts the stated denominations that include a 100 € code, which would allow a 100 € transaction. | ||
/paytrail-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Tällä hetkellä saatavilla on ainoastaan yksi Paytrail-kasino, joten suosittelemme tutustumaan Trustly-kasinoihin. B: Parhaat Paytrail-kasinot 2026 -lista sisältää useita Paytrail-kasinoita: NetBet Casino, One Casino, Raju Casino, Jellona Casino, Joki Casino, Possu Casino, Hurmio Casino, Vivatbet Casino, ReSpin Casino, Tuuri Kasino, Only Spins Casino, Pelipeto Casino, FeliceBet Casino, Rullat Casino, Raketti Casino. The conclusion section claims only one Paytrail casino exists currently, while the rest of the article lists many active Paytrail casinos as of 2026, creating a direct contradiction. | ||
/payz-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Joy Casino – Bonus talletuksella 3950 €, 0ilmaiskierrosta B: Joy Casino's entry in the bonukset comparison table shows 'Ensitalletusbonus 200% 50 € asti' The two claims give conflicting welcome bonus figures for Joy Casino: one lists a 3950 € bonus with 0 free spins, while the other lists a 200% match up to 50 € (likely no spins). This is a direct numerical contradiction about the casino's welcome offer. | ||
/peliarvostelut/ | Clean | |
/pelisivustot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Joki Casino — Verovapaat voitot (EMTA-lisenssi) B: Joki Casino — Lisenssi: Viro The page inconsistently labels Joki Casino's license: one section says verovapaat voitot are under an EMTA license, while another section lists the license as Vi ro. Although later text sometimes equates EMTA with Viron license, the direct conflicting labels constitute an internal contradiction. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Relax Gamingin saamiin tunnustuksiin: Best Mobile Gaming Software Provider (EGR B2B Awards, Casino 20222) B: Relax Gamingin saamiin tunnustuksiin: Product Launch of the Year (GGA Awards 2023) The first claim contains an invalid year (20222) for the award, creating an internal inconsistency in the dating of recognitions within the same section. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/1x2-gaming/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Sijainti Brentwood, Iso-Britannia B: 1x2 Gaming on oikea kasinoalan konkari, joka on luonut viihdyttäviä pelejä... Tämä Brightonissa sijaitseva pelivalmistaja The page inconsistently lists the company's location as Brentwood in the infobox and as Brighton in the article text, which cannot both be correct. A: Työntekijöiden määrä 450+ B: 1x2 Network työllistää 51–200 henkilöä The page provides conflicting employee counts: 450+ for 1x2 Gaming (likely the company) and 51–200 for 1x2 Network (the parent network), creating an internal inconsistency. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/3-oaks-gaming/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Eksklusiivisia 2 Oaks Gaming bonuksia on tarjolla harvoin. B: 3 Oaks Gaming bonuksia on tarjolla – ei 2 Oaks bonuksia. The page explicitly mentions '2 Oaks Gaming' bonuses, which contradicts the surrounding branding and content that centers on '3 Oaks Gaming'. This creates an internal inconsistency regarding the existence of '2 Oaks' bonuses versus the otherwise consistent '3 Oaks Gaming' identity. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/air-dice/ | Clean | |
/pelivalmistajat/apricot/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Apricot on perustettu jo vuonna 1994. B: Perustettu 1995. The article contains two different founding years for Apricot (1994 and 1995), which contradict each other. A: Pelialusta uudelleenbrändättiin ja nimettiin Apricotiksi vuonna 2024. B: Samaan aikaan Microgaming siirsi jakelutoimintansa Games Globalin alaisuuteen vuonna 2022, loput brändistä muutettiin Apricotiksi. The text attributes the branding change to two different years (2022 and 2024), creating an inconsistent timeline for when the Apricot brand was established. A: Apricot on erityisesti tunnettu Mega Moolah jättipottipelistä. B: Mega Moolah on Microgamingin jättipottipeli (historian mukaan). The article suggests Apricot created Mega Moolah and is known for it, but Mega Moolah is historically associated with Microgaming; the text later indicates Mega Moolah is a Microgaming property, causing attribution contradiction. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/aristocrat-gaming/ | Clean | |
/pelivalmistajat/backseat-gaming/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Desert Temple -pelissä puolestaan nähdään suosittu tumble-mekaniikka, jossa symbolit putoavat rullille jokaisella kierroksella. B: RTP-taulukossa neljäs peli on nimeltään 'Desert Tumble' (ei 'Desert Temple'), viitaten nimeämisen epäjohdonmukaisuuteen. The 'Desert Temple' described as tumble mechanic appears in the list of popular games, but the RTP table lists a similar game under the name 'Desert Tumble', indicating inconsistent game naming. A: Kaikkien pelien RTP:t ovat kohtuullisia. B: Old Drac on näytetty RTP-arvona N/A (tuntematon), mikä ei ole kohtuullinen arvo ja ristiriidassa väitteen kanssa. The general claim that all games have reasonable RTP conflicts with Old Drac showing RTP data as N/A, implying the RTP is not available or not defined. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/barcrest/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Barcrest valmistaa sekä netin kolikkopelejä että peliautomaatteja kasinoille. B: Barcrest keskittyy vain kolikkopeleihin, sillä se ei tällä hetkellä valmista muita pelejä. One part of the text states Barcrest makes both online slot games and physical slot machines for casinos, while another part asserts it only focuses on slot games and does not produce other types of games. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/betsoft-gaming/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Pelejä yhteensä 170+ B: Vuonna 2023 Betsoftin pelivalikoima kattoi yhteensä noin 200 julkaisua The page lists different totals for Betsoft's games: 170+ in the header versus about 200 releases in 2023. A: Työntekijöiden määrä 50+ B: Betsoft työllistää yli 200 ihmistä The header states 50+ employees, while another section says the company employs over 200 people, which is inconsistent. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/bgaming/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: BGaming founded in 2018. B: BGaming was founded in 2012 by Ivan Montik. The page states BGaming was founded in 2018, but later claims Ivan Montik founded BGaming in 2012, creating conflicting founding dates (and mentions the brand/studio emerged in 2018). A: Aztec Clusters maximum win is up to 10,000x. B: Aztec Clusters maximum win is €250,000. The same game is given two different maximum-win figures: 10,000x multiplier and 250,000 euros, with no clear explanation of how they relate. A: Plinko has a 99% RTP. B: RTP values listed for Aztec Clusters (97%), Wild Heart (96.92%), Wild West TRUEWAYS (96.84%), and Haunted Reels (97%) do not include 99%, contradicting the claim that Plinko has the highest RTP at 99%. The article states Plinko has 99% RTP, but the RTPs shown for the featured games are all below 99% (the table does not include Plinko), creating a contradiction about the highest RTP. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/big-time-gaming/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Työntekijöiden määrä 20+ B: Emoyhtiön hallussa BTG työllistää hieman yli kymmenen henkeä The article presents two different employee counts for BTG: '20+' in the summary/details section and 'slightly over ten' under Evolution's ownership, which cannot both be true. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/blueprint-gaming/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: The most popular Blueprint Gaming games include Genie Jackpots Megaways, Fishin' Frenzy, The Goonies Megaways, The Lost Boys. B: The FAQ states the most popular Blueprint Gaming games include Jackpot King-sarja, Return of Kong Megaways, Ted and Wolf Legend Megaways. Two sections list different sets of 'most popular' games, which cannot both be true simultaneously. A: B2B-palveluita Blueprint ei tarjoa. B: Blueprint Gaming kasinot on helppo löytää, sillä yhtiön slotit ovat osa monen pelisivuston vakiokalustoa. The article claims Blueprint does not offer B2B services, yet its slots are present on many casino sites, implying B2B distribution. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/bragg-gaming/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Bragg Gaming Groupissa työskentelee 450–500 pelialan ammattilaista ympäri maailmaa. B: Bragg Gaming Groupissa työskentelee 500+ pelialan ammattilaista. One part states 450–500 employees, while another states 500+, which cannot both be true at the same time. A: Bragg Gaming tekee tavalla tai toisella yhteistyötä yli 40 pelintuottajan kanssa. B: Yhteensä kumppaneista (kolmannen osapuolet) löytyy vajaa 30 pelintuottajaa. One claim says about 40 producers; another says fewer than 30; both cannot be simultaneously accurate. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/cryptologic/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Työntekijöiden määrä 100+ B: parhaimmillaan jopa sata henkeä työllistäväksi suuryritykseksi One statement implies current workforce exceeds 100, while another claims peak workforce was at most 100; they cannot both be true. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/elk-studios/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: ELK Studios perustettu 2012 B: ELK Studios perustettiin vuonna 2013 The article lists two different founding years for ELK Studios (2012 in the infobox and 2013 in the history section). A: Pelejä yhteensä 45+ B: ELK Studiosin yli 80 peliä The page inconsistently states the total number of games as 45+ in one section and over 80 in another. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/endorphina/ | Clean | |
/pelivalmistajat/evolution-gaming/ | Clean | |
/pelivalmistajat/extreme-live-gaming/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Työntekijöiden määrä 100+ B: Työntekijöitä yrityksellä on 101–250 The two statements give incompatible employee-count ranges: '100+' implies at least 100 (including 100), while '101–250' excludes 100, making them mutually exclusive. A: Pelejä yhteensä 8+ B: Kauppaan kuului muun muassa kymmenen live-stream-pöytää One claim states a total of 8+ games, while another states there were ten live-stream tables; the numbers are inconsistent if both refer to the same product line. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/games-global/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Games Global omistaa 40 pelistudiota ympäri maailmaa. B: FAQ: Games Globalin portfoliosta löytyy yli 40 pelistudia maailmalaajuisesti. One part of the text states 40 studios owned globally, while another section states there are over 40 studios globally. The two statements imply different counts and are not simultaneously true. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/gamomat/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Gamomat valmistaa pääasiassa kolikkopelejä – Gamomatin omissa valikoimissa ei tällä hetkellä ole kolikkopelien lisäksi ollenkaan muita pelejä. B: Yhteistyössä muiden yritysten kanssa Gamomat on valmistanut myös pöytäpelejä. The first claim asserts that Gamomat's own catalog contains no games other than slot games, implying exclusivity to slots; the second claim states they have produced table games through collaborations, which contradicts the idea of having no non-slot games in their own lineup. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/genesis-gaming/ | Issues | 5 contradictions |
A: Pelejä yhteensä 150+ B: yritys on ehtinyt julkaista yli 200 kasinopeliä The infobox lists 150+ total games, while another part of the text claims more than 200 games; the numbers are inconsistent. A: Työntekijöiden määrä 50+ B: työntekijöitä 51–200 Two different employee count ranges are given in separate sections; they cannot both be accurate at the same time. A: Muut pelit: Live-kasinon pelejä Genesis Gaming ei valmista B: Pöytäpelejä Genesis Gaming tarjoaa muutaman kappaleen One section says they do not produce table or live games, while another says they offer a few table games; this is a direct contradiction. A: Miinukset: Ei pöytäpelejä ja Ei pelejä live-kasinolle B: Zombie Blackjack on pöytäpeliksi mainittu FAQ:ssa The page claims no table or live games, but later mentions a table game (Zombie Blackjack), creating inconsistency about table/live offerings. A: Se on julkaissut yli taitavasti valmistettua 2000 kasinopeliä B: Se on julkaissut yli 200 kasinopeliä The summary claims 2000 casino games, which contradicts the other counts (over 200, and 150+), creating a clear numerical contradiction. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/habanero-games/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pelejä yhteensä 190+ B: Yhteensä pelejä on tällä hetkellä yli 150. The page lists two different total counts for the number of games: 190+ in the header and over 150 later in the content. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/hacksaw-gaming/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pelejä yhteensä 60+ B: Hacksaw Gamingin pelivalikoima – portfoliossa yli 120 peliä The page simultaneously claims there are 60+ total games and later states the portfolio contains over 120 games, which is a clear numerical contradiction about the total number of games. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/igt/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Founding year listed as 1980 in the infobox B: Founding year stated as 1975 with founder William Reed Two different founding years are stated for IGT: 1980 in the infobox vs 1975 in the body attributing the founding to William Reed. A: The article says IGT started in the 1970s B: Founding year listed as 1980 in the infobox The text asserts a 1970s start, while the infobox lists 1980 as the founding year, creating an inconsistent timeline. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/isoftbet/ | Clean | |
/pelivalmistajat/jili/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pelejä yhteensä 210+ B: Yhteensä JILI on valmistanut lähes 200 peliä HTML-teknologialla valmistettua peliä. The page lists two conflicting totals for the number of games: '210+' and 'nearly 200' (HTML-based games). These cannot both be correct simultaneously. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/light-wonder/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Pelejä yhteensä 150+ B: Yhteensä Light & Wonder -konsernin alla on yli 2 000 kasinopeliä The article claims there are only 150+ total games in one place, but elsewhere states that the Light & Wonder group has over 2,000 casino games, which is a clear numerical contradiction. A: Työntekijöiden määrä 5000+ B: Light & Wonderin palveluksessa on noin 6 000 työntekijää Two different employee counts are given for Light & Wonder: 5,000+ in one section and about 6,000 in another, which cannot both be correct. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/merkur-gaming/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Merkur Group on toiminut pelialalla vuodesta 1985. B: Vuonna 2005 perustettu Merkur Group tunnettiin aiemmin nimellä Gauselmann Group. The page states Merkur Group has operated since 1985, and also states Merkur Group was founded in 2005. These are inconsistent founding dates for the same entity. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/microgaming/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Työntekijöiden määrä 200+ B: Yhtiön työntekijöitä Microgamingilla on 51–200 The two statements specify incompatible employee ranges: '200+' implies at least 200 employees, while '51–200' caps at 200; they cannot both be true simultaneously. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/neogames/ | Clean | |
/pelivalmistajat/netent/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Hall of Gods – suurin voitto 2,7 miljoonaa euroa (2018) B: Hall of Gods – yli 7 miljoonan voittoennätys The article states Hall of Gods top payout as 2.7 million euros in one section and as over 7 million euros in another section, which is a clear numerical inconsistency. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/nextgen-gaming/ | Clean | |
/pelivalmistajat/nolimit-city/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Tarina sai alkunsa yli kymmenen vuotta sitten naapurimaassamme Ruotsissa, jonne yhtiön ensimmäinen toimisto avattiin vuonna 2013. B: Perustettu 2014. The page presents two conflicting founding timelines: one states the company originated over ten years ago with its first office in Sweden opened in 2013, while another part states Nolimit City was founded in 2014. A: Huonoiksi puoliksi voidaan laskea se, että valmistaja tarjoaa ainoastaan korkean volatiliteetin pelejä. B: Pelit on jaoteltu neljään volatiliteettiluokkaan: Volatility Medium, Volatility Extreme, Volatility High sekä Volatility Insane. The page claims only high-volatility games in the drawbacks, but elsewhere it lists multiple volatility tiers (Medium, Extreme, High, Insane), indicating a broader range of volatilities than the stated limitation. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/novomatic/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Tällä hetkellä ei ole erityisiä bonuksia tarjolla Novomaticin peleille. B: RT BET: 100% talletusbonus ja 200 ilmaiskierrosta The article first states there are currently no special bonuses for Novomatic's games, but later lists RT BET as offering a 100% deposit bonus and 200 free spins for Novomatic games, which is a direct contradiction. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/peter-and-sons/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pelejä yhteensä 44+ B: Yhteensä Peter and Sons on valmistanut 44 peliä. The page simultaneously claims there are '44+' total games and later states there have been '44' total games, creating a conflicting total count for the number of games. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/play-n-go/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Play’n GO casinot: Perustettu 2005 B: Play’n GO perustettiin Växjössä, Ruotsissa vuonna 1997 The article presents two different founding years for Play’n GO (2005 vs 1997), which cannot both be correct for the same company. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/playson/ | Clean | |
/pelivalmistajat/playstar/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kyllä, Playstar on täysin laillinen pelistudio. B: Valitettavasti tällä hetkellä meillä ei ole tietoa siitä, onko PlayStarilla hallussaan lisenssi. The page claims PlayStar is a fully legal studio, but simultaneously admits there is no information about whether the company holds a license. This is inconsistent because legal operation in this industry typically requires a license, so asserting legality while lacking license information is contradictory. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/playtech/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pelejä yhteensä 500+ B: Pelivalikoima on tällä hetkellä reilusti yli 700 pelin suuruinen. The page lists total games as 500+ in the summary/infobox, but later claims the catalog comprises over 700 games, which is inconsistent. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/pragmatic-play/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pelejä yhteensä 80+ B: Yhteensä pelivalikoimasta löytyy yli 200 kasinopeliä The page states 80+ total games in the infobox, but later claims the catalog contains over 200 casino games, which is inconsistent. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/print-studios/ | Clean | |
/pelivalmistajat/push-gaming/ | Clean | |
/pelivalmistajat/quickfire/ | Clean | |
/pelivalmistajat/quickspin/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Pelejä yhteensä 70+ B: Kolikkopelivalikoimaan kuuluu jo yli 100 kolikkopeliä The article conflicts on the total number of games: 70+ total games in the infobox versus over 100 slot games described in the body. A: Työntekijöiden määrä 49+ B: Nykyään Quickspinillä työskentelee yli 100 ihmistä 29 eri maasta The infobox lists 49+ employees, while the body states over 100 employees, which is a direct contradiction. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/rabcat/ | Clean | |
/pelivalmistajat/raw-arena/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Työntekijöiden määrä 50+. B: Työntekijöitä sillä on 51–200. Two different employee headcount ranges are given for the same company; 50+ and 51–200 are not simultaneously true. A: Pelejä yhteensä 24+. B: alustalta löytyy yli 350 peliä. The page lists only 24+ total games in one place while later stating the platform has over 350 games, a direct numeric inconsistency. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/ray/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: RAY:n uniikit ominaisuudet muihin verrattuna: RAY ei ole lähtenyt vielä kilpailemaan monimutkaisilla ominaisuuksilla ja bonuspeleillä. B: Kulta-Jaska Megaways -kolikkopeliä on julkaistu Megaways-versio, jossa on 117 649 tapaa voittaa. The Megaways version of Kulta-Jaska represents a complex feature set (Megaways), which contradicts the claim that RAY has not pursued complex features or bonus games. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/red-rake-gaming/ | Clean | |
/pelivalmistajat/red-tiger-gaming/ | Clean | |
/pelivalmistajat/relax-gaming/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pelejä yhteensä 100+ B: Relax Gaming kasinot saavat valikoimiinsa jopa yli tuhat kasinopeliä The page first states 'Pelejä yhteensä 100+' (100+ games total) but later claims that Relax Gaming casinos can access 'jopa yli tuhat kasinopeliä' (over a thousand casino games), which is a direct contradiction about the size of the game catalog. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/skywind-group/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Yrityksellä on 7 eri lisenssiä B: Yritykseltä löytyy lisenssit Malta (MGA), Iso-Britannia (UKGC), Ruotsi (Spelinspektionen), Alderney, Gibraltar, Romania, Kreikka, Ontario (AGCO) – eight licensing jurisdictions listed The page states the company has 7 licenses, but later lists eight licensing jurisdictions, creating an explicit inconsistency in the reported number of licenses. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/spribe/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Spriben Aviator-peli on yli 12 miljoonaa pelaajaa joka kuukausi. B: Kymmenet tuhannet pelaajat pelaavat yhtiön pelejä päivittäin. The text claims more than 12 million Aviator players per month, and separately says daily players are tens of thousands. Those two figures are inconsistent; monthly users would imply far more daily users than tens of thousands, or require reconciliation, which the text does not provide. A: hajautettu SHA-521 (Secure Hash Algorithm 512-bit) -siemen ja kierroksen lopputulos. B: SHA-521 (Secure Hash Algorithm 512-bit) The text simultaneously states SHA-521 and describes it as a 512-bit Secure Hash Algorithm, which is internally inconsistent: SHA-521 would not be the same as a 512-bit algorithm. This appears to be an error or contradiction in the stated cryptographic details. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/stakelogic/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Stakelogic operates on over 20 licensed markets. B: The summary states the company has 10 licenses for markets. One part of the page claims the company operates in over 20 licensed markets, while the summary claims the company has only 10 licenses; the numbers refer to licensing counts and markets and are inconsistent. A: Stakelogic has over 10 licenses (more than 10 licensing regions). B: The summary states the company has 10 licenses. The statement that there are over 10 licenses contradicts the summary's exact figure of 10 licenses. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/thunderkick/ | Clean | |
/pelivalmistajat/voltent/ | Issues | 4 contradictions |
A: Voltent is a Curaçao-based game developer. B: Voltent is located in St. Julians, Malta. The article states Voltent is Curaçao-based, but also lists the location as St. Julians, Malta, which is inconsistent. A: Voltent has a Curaçao gaming authority license to offer casino games internationally. B: Voltent's Curaçao license application is still pending. The text simultaneously claims Voltent holds a Curaçao license and that its license application is still in process, which is contradictory. A: Voltent was founded in 2024. B: Voltent's story began in 2010 (the company started then as Wazdan Limited). The text gives 2024 as Voltent's founding year, but also says Voltent's story began in 2010 under the name Wazdan Limited, implying an older origin. A: The article lists Voltent's five most popular games in a table with win probabilities. B: The table shows only four games. The heading claims five top games, but the table contains only four rows, creating a mismatch between claimed quantity and actual entries. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/wazdan/ | Clean | |
/pelivalmistajat/wizard-games/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Suurin potti voi olla jopa 2500-kertainen panokseen nähden B: Dragons of the North Megaways -pelin maksimivoitto on 18 648x The article simultaneously states the maximum pot is 2500x, but later (in the popular games section) lists Dragons of the North Megaways with a maximum win of 18,648x, creating an unambiguous contradiction about the maximum payout. | ||
/pelivalmistajat/yggdrasil-gaming/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Pelejä yhteensä 280+ B: Yggdrasilin tallissa on pelejä noin 200 The article first states there are 280+ total games, but later claims there are about 200 games in Yggdrasil's catalog, which is a direct numerical inconsistency. | ||
/pikakasinot/ | Clean | |
/pokeribonukset/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Parhaat pokeribonukset tarjoavat Ninja Casino ja BetLabel. B: Ninja Casino is listed among the new poker bonuses for 2026, but BetLabel is not included in the list of new bonuses. The article claims BetLabel is one of the best poker bonuses, but the 'Uudet pokeribonukset 2026' section does not include BetLabel in its list of casinos. | ||
/rahapelit-netissa/ | Clean | |
/rapid-transfer-kasinot/ | Clean | |
/ray-pokeri/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Voittoon vaaditaan vähintään kaksi paria tai kolme samanlaista korttia. B: Vain Jacks or Better -peleissä jo yksi jätkäpari voittaa. These two statements conflict because one asserts that winning hands require at least two pair or three of a kind, while the other claims a single pair of Jacks or better can win in Jacks or Better variants. | ||
/reload-bonukset/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Min. talletus bonukselle: 40 € B: Minimitalletus ... 10-30 euron välillä One part of the article states a specific minimum deposit of 40 € for a reload bonus option, while another part claims that typical minimum deposits range from 10 to 30 euros. This is a direct numeric contradiction. | ||
/revolut-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Tänä päivänä Revolutilla on yli 45 miljoonaa käyttäjää B: 2024: Yli 50 miljoonan käyttäjän raja rikki The article states that in 2024 the user count exceeded 50 million, but later claims that as of today there are over 45 million users, which cannot both be true. | ||
/riskiton-talletus/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kasinot riskittömillä talletuksilla | 1 B: Koska kyseessä on uusi bonustyyppi, vaihtoehtoja ei ole vielä paljon saatavilla. Olemme kuitenkin koonneet kattavan kasinolistan sellaisista nettikasinoista, tarjoavat muita riskittömiä tai matalan riskin bonuksia. Emme löytäneet enempää kasinoita, jotka vastaisivat hakukriteereihisi, mutta tässä on joitakin huippuvaihtoehtoja, joita tulet rakastamaan! ... #1 ReSpin Casino, #2 Winz.io Casino, #3 Merlin Casino, #4 Art Casino, #5 Thor Casino, #6 Betroom24 Casino, #7 Raju Casino, #8 Jellona Casino, #9 Joki Casino, #10 Possu Casino, #11 Hurmio Casino, #12 Vivatbet Casino, #13 Tuuri Kasino, #14 Only Spins Casino, #15 Pelipeto Casino The page explicitly presents a table stating there is only 1 casino with risk-free deposits, yet it subsequently lists and describes fifteen different casinos offering risk-free or related bonuses, creating a direct numerical contradiction. | ||
/siirto-kasinot/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Parhaat Siirto kasinot 2026: Emme löytäneet enempää kasinoita, mutta tässä on joitakin huippuvaihtoehtoja, joita tulet rakastamaan! B: Siirto-kasinoita ei tällä hetkellä ole tarjolla. The page claims there are no Siirto casinos currently available, yet it later lists multiple 'Top Siirto casinos 2026' as options, which directly contradicts the claim of nonexistence. A: Siirto toimii Paytrailin kanssa. Paytrail on suomalainen maksutapa, jonka avulla voi tehdä tilisiirtoja netissä, esimerkiksi nettikasinolle tallettaessa. Joidenkin Paytrail-kasinoiden pitäisi siis olla Siirto-kasinoita. B: Siirto-kasinoita ei tällä hetkellä ole tarjolla. The text asserts that Paytrail can enable Siirto payments and that some Paytrail casinos are also Siirto casinos, but elsewhere it states that Siirto casinos are not currently available, creating a direct conflict about availability. | ||
/siru-mobile-nettikasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Jos vahvistat maksun, saat puhelinnumeron, johon soittaa. Tämä puhelu veloittaa sinulta 3. kohdassa eritellyn summan. B: 5 € talletuksen yhteydessä palvelumaksu on 3.62 € ja kokonaiskustannus 8.62 €, eli veloitus ei ole ainoastaan talletuksen määrä, kuten Step 5 väittää. Step 5 states the call will charge the amount described in Step 3 (the deposit amount), but the deposit fee table shows a separate service fee (3.62 €) and a total cost of 8.62 € for a 5 € deposit. This implies the charge is not just the deposit amount, contradicting Step 5. | ||
/sitemap/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Casino Tampere: Suomen toinen kivijalkakasino on sulkenut ovensa B: Tampereen kasino vaarassa sulkea ovensa The first claim states that Tampere's land-based casino has already closed its doors, while the second claims it is only at risk of closing. These statements describe conflicting statuses for the same establishment. | ||
/skrill-nettikasinot/ | Clean | |
/sofort-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Sofort kasinot tiivistettynä: maksut vahvistetaan pankkitunnuksilla, eikä tiliä tarvita, ja rahat siirtyvät välittömästi. B: Sofort kasino talletus on nopea ja helppo prosessi, mutta itse rahansiirroissa toisinaan kestää useita päiviä. One part claims transfers are instantaneous, while another states deposits can take several days, which is a direct inconsistency. | ||
/suomalaiset-nettikasinot/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Monopoliasema olisi voimassa vuoden 2017 kesäkuun loppuun. B: Veikkauksen monopoliasema on voimassa 1.7.2027 saakka. The text contains two conflicting statements about the end date of Veikkaus' monopoly: one says it lasts until June 2017, while another says it lasts until July 1, 2027. A: Pelaaja tallettaa pelitililleen rahaa ensimmäisen kirjautumisen yhteydessä, ja aloittaa pelaamisen. Henkilöllisyys on näin varmennettu eikä lomakkeita tarvitse täyttää. B: Miten suoritat KYC-tarkastuksen: 1. Skannaa tai ota kuva henkilöllisyystodistuksesta... 5. Lähetä kaikki nämä dokumentit kasinolle. The article asserts that identity verification is completed at first login with no forms, but also provides a detailed, step-by-step KYC process requiring submission of identity documents, which is a contradiction. | ||
/talletusbonukset/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kierrätys koskee talletusta ja bonusrahaa 35-kertaisesti. B: Kierrätys onnistui kolikkopeleissä 100-prosenttisesti. The page states a 35x turnover requirement for deposit plus bonus, but then claims that turnover was achieved at 100% on slot games, which would contradict the stated turnover rule. | ||
/tervetuliaisbonukset/ | Clean | |
/tether-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Voitot ovat lähes aina verollisia B: Verovapaat voitot = Maltan/Viron lisenssi (ja suomalaisen tulee ilmoittaa voitot Verohallinnolle, jos lisenssi on ETA-alueen ulkopuolella) One part of the text claims winnings are almost always taxable, while another part states that winnings can be tax-free when the casino has a Maltese or Estonian license (ETA license), which is a direct inconsistency. | ||
/tietoa-meista/ | Clean | |
/tietosuoja/ | Clean | |
/toimituspolitiikka/ | Clean | |
/toimitustiimi/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kyllä. Yhteensä Kasinohain tiimillä on melkein 35 vuotta kokemusta pelialalta. B: Kun summataan yksittäisten tiimin jäsenten kokemuslukuja: Antti Virtanen yli 13 vuotta, Lilli Partanen yli 5 vuotta, Mimmi Malmström 20 vuotta, Laura Korhonen yli 10 vuotta, Jussi Lehtelä yli 17 vuotta, Helena Rautio vuodesta 2015 lähtien (noin 11 vuotta), sekä Aino Lahti yli 20 vuoden kokemuksella, yhteensä on noin 96+ vuotta. The FAQ claims nearly 35 years of collective experience, but the listed individual member experiences sum to roughly 96+ years, which directly contradicts the stated total. | ||
/toimitustiimi/aino-lahti/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Suomalaisen Rahapeliyhdistyksen jäsen B: entinen jäsen sekä Suomen Rahapeliyhdistyksessä että International Masters of Gaming Law (IMGL) -järjestössä. One statement asserts current membership in the Finnish Gambling Association, while another states the author is a former member of that association (and of IMGL), which cannot both be true simultaneously. | ||
/toimitustiimi/antti-virtanen/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Olen ollut Kasinohain päätoimittaja ja Certified Gaming Compliance Specialist (CGCS) vuodesta 2015 lähtien. B: Certified Gaming Compliance Specialist (CGCS) – 2022–2023 The first claim asserts CGCS status since 2015, while the certification section lists the CGCS certification as earned in 2022–2023, creating a direct contradiction about when the CGCS qualification was obtained. | ||
/toimitustiimi/elias-jarvinen/ | Clean | |
/toimitustiimi/helena-rautio/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Näytetään 5 / 0 B: Sivulla näkyy useita artikkeleita, ei 0 tulosta The footer text 'Näytetään 5 / 0' would imply zero results are being shown, yet the page lists numerous articles with dates, indicating many items are displayed. | ||
/toimitustiimi/jussi-lehtela/ | Clean | |
/toimitustiimi/laura-korhonen/ | Clean | |
/toimitustiimi/liisa-martikainen/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kokemusta iGaming-alalta vuodesta 2012 lähtien B: ja jo sitä ennen työskentelin iGamingin parissa yli vuosikymmenen. Starting in 2012 would give roughly 8 years of iGaming experience by 2020, not over a decade. Claiming both 'since 2012' and 'over a decade before 2020' is inconsistent. | ||
/toimitustiimi/lilli-partanen/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Arvostelua 0 B: Toshi Ways Club: Demo, tiedot ja arvostelu The profile lists zero reviews ('Arvostelua 0'), but the 'Viimeisimmät artikkelit' section includes items explicitly labeled as reviews (e.g., 'Demo, tiedot ja arvostelu'), indicating that there are reviews authored. | ||
/toimitustiimi/mimmi-malmstrom/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Näytetään 5 / 0 B: Total items are 0 The line 'Näytetään 5 / 0' implies that 5 items are shown out of a total of 0, which is logically impossible and inconsistent. | ||
/truelayer-casino/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: TrueLayer-kasinoita ei vielä ole saatavilla. B: TrueLayer-kasinot 2026 Emme löytäneet enempää kasinoita, mutta tässä on joitakin huippuvaihtoehtoja, joita tulet rakastamaan! The page first states that TrueLayer casinos are not yet available, but later presents a 'TrueLayer-kasinot 2026' list implying that TrueLayer casinos exist in 2026. | ||
/trumo-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Trumo ei vaadi käyttäjiltään KYC-prosessin läpikäymistä, sillä palvelu saa tarvittavat tiedot käyttäjistä pankkitietojen välityksellä. B: Jos voittosi ylittävät 2000 €, KYC-prosessi on kuitenkin aina pakollinen. The first claim implies KYC is not required at all because information is obtained via bank data, while the second claim states that KYC is mandatory for winnings above 2000 euros. These two statements are incompatible. | ||
/trustly-nettikasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Trustly casinot eivät tarjoa muita maksuvaihtoehtoja. B: Muita maksutapoja on tarjolla Trustly-kasinoilla, esimerkiksi Zimpler, Brite, Euteller, Volt, Paytrail ja Rapid Transfer. The Miinukset section claims that Trustly casinos do not offer other payment options, but the 'Muita samankaltaisia maksutapoja' section explicitly lists other payment methods (Zimpler, Brite, Euteller, Volt, Paytrail, Rapid Transfer) as available, creating a direct contradiction. | ||
/tule-meille-toihin/ | Clean | |
/uhkapelit/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: EU- ja ETA-maan lisenssillä toimivilta kasinoilta voitot saa siirtää omalle pankkitilille kokonaan. B: Veroprosentti ja maksettavaksi jäävä summa määräytyy voittosumman ja pelaajan muiden tulojen, vähennysten ja muiden verotuksellisten seikkojen perusteella. Claim A asserts winnings from EU/ETA-licensed casinos can be transferred tax-free, while Claim B says the tax rate and amount depend on winnings and the player's other income and deductions, implying taxes may apply. These cannot both be true for the same scenario, creating a contradiction. | ||
/ulkomaiset-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Ulkomainen kasino on nettikasino, joka toimii Suomen rajojen ulkopuolella. B: Näihin voidaan lukea myös Ahvenanmaalta käsin toimiva Paf. The page defines 'foreign casinos' as those that operate outside Finland's borders, yet it explicitly includes Paf (which operates from Åland, within Finland) as part of 'foreign casinos,' creating a geographic inconsistency. | ||
/utorg-kasinot/ | Issues | 3 contradictions |
A: Useimmat toimivat Curacaon lisenssillä, eivätkä tarjoa verovapaita voittoja suomalaisille B: Kaikilla on Anjouanin lisenssi, eli voitot tulee ilmoittaa verotettavana tulona Suomessa. One part of the text says most Utorg casinos operate under a Curacao license and do not offer tax-free winnings for Finnish players, while another part claims that all listed Utorg casinos have an Anjouan license and that winnings are taxable in Finland. These directly conflict on both licensing and tax treatment. A: ETA-lisenssillisiä, verovapaita vaihtoehtoja Utorgin kanssa ei tällä hetkellä ole. B: ETA-kasinolta saadut voitot ovat verovapaita, mutta ETA-alueen ulkopuolelta kasinolta voitot ovat aina verotettavaa tuloa. The text simultaneously states there are no ETA-licensed, tax-free options with Utorg, while also stating that winnings from ETA casinos are tax-free (with non-ETA winnings being taxable). This is a direct internal inconsistency regarding licensing and taxation. A: Alla käymme läpi Suomen top 5 Utorg kasino (the page claims to cover the top 5 Utorg casinos). B: Taulukko listaa vain 4 kasinoa, vaikka otsikko väittää Suomen top 5 Utorg-kasinoa. The page explicitly claims to present the top 5 Utorg casinos, but the accompanying table contains only four entries, creating a mismatch between the stated scope and the data presented. | ||
/uudet-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Lolo Casino – Nopea talleta ja pelaa: Miinukset list include 'Suuri 25 € minimitalletus'. B: Lolo Spins Casino (Parhaat uudet nettikasinot helmikuussa) lists 'Minimitalletus 20 €'. The same casino brand is shown with different minimum deposit amounts (25 € vs 20 €) in two sections, creating an explicit numerical contradiction. | ||
/vastuullinen-pelaaminen/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Suomessa tällaista viranomaista ei ole vielä ollut, mutta tilanne muuttuu vuoden 2027 alussa, kun uusi lisenssijärjestelmä otetaan käyttöön. B: Vuonna 2022 Lupa- ja valvontavirasto liittyy myös mukaan vastuu. The text asserts there was no regulatory authority yet in Finland, while also stating that the Licensing and Supervisory Authority joined the responsibility in 2022. These statements are contradictory, as the regulator cannot both be non-existent and have joined in 2022. | ||
/vedonlyonti/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: 2.50 (Koti), 3.20 (Tasapeli), 2.90 (Vieras) → Palautusprosentti: 95.56% B: 2.00 (Koti), 3.30 (Tasapeli), 3.75 (Vieras) → Palautusprosentti: 94.29% The article provides two different sets of odds and corresponding payout percentages, but the implied return calculations from the reciprocals do not match the listed Palautusprosentti (payout) values for either row. For 2.50, 3.20, 2.90, the sum of reciprocals is about 1.0573 (105.7%), not 95.56%; similarly, for 2.00, 3.30, 3.75 the sum is about 1.0697 (106.97%), not 94.29%. This indicates an inconsistency between the odds and the stated payout percentages. | ||
/vedonlyonti/moniveto/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Tähän mennessä suurin Moniveto voitto napsahti vuonna 2007 Siuntioon. Oikea rivi kolmelle jääkiekko ottelulle oli Lukko–Ässät 5–1, Kalpa–JYP 1–8 ja Salamat–K-Vantaa 2–5. Kertoimet olivat 3 208 430,7. Potin päälle tuli vielä lisäosuutena 174 519 €, joten kannattaa aina pitää silmällä lisärahakierroksia. B: Monivedon kerroimet kipusivat 3,8 miljoonaan MM-kisoissa 2018 (Iltalehti kertoo tästä). The text claims the largest Moniveto win in Finland happened in 2007 with odds of 3,208,430.7 and an additional €174,519, but separately claims that in the 2018 MM (World Cup) the odds rose to 3.8 million, implying a larger win. These cannot both represent the largest win. A: Top 10 suurimmat Moniveto voitot: 1) 641 686 €, Siuntio, 2007 B: Sama Siuntio 2007 voitto on esitetty toisessa osiossa kertovat 2007 Siuntio -tuloksista, joissa kertoimet olivat 3 208 430,7 ja potin päälle lisäosuutena 174 519 €. The same event (2007 Siuntio) is shown in the top 10 list as totaling 641,686 €, but another part of the text describes it with much larger payout figures (over 3 million plus bonuses). This is inconsistent and cannot be true simultaneously. | ||
/vedonlyonti/pitkaveto/ | Clean | |
/vedonlyonti/tulosveto/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: palautusprosentti on 80 % B: palautusprosentti on 86 % The article presents a fixed return percentage of 80% for calculating odds, but later provides an example calculation using 86%, which contradicts the earlier stated value. | ||
/vedonlyonti/uudet-vedonlyontisivustot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Tässä ovat mielestämme parhaat uudet vedonlyöntisivut helmikuussa 2026**.** B: Top 5 parhaat uudet vedonlyöntisivut helmikuussa 2026: the accompanying table for the top 5 list has the 'Vedonlyöntisivusto' column with empty entries (site names are not listed). The heading claims to present the best new betting sites for February 2026, but the table intended to list those sites lacks any site names in the first column, making the purported top-5 list incomplete and inconsistent with the claim. | ||
/vedonlyonti/vakiovihjeet/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Vakioveikkausta voi pelata myös ilman rekisteröintiä sekä Veikkauksella että netin ulkomaisilla vedonlyöntisivustoilla. B: Veikkauksella ei voi pelata ilman rekisteröitymistä netissä. The text simultaneously claims Veikkaus can be played without registration, and explicitly states Veikkaus cannot be played without registration online, creating a direct contradiction about Veikkaus registration requirements. | ||
/vedonlyonti/vedonlyontisivustot/ | Clean | |
/vedonlyonti/veikkauksen-toto/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: T-peleihin kuuluu: Toto4, Toto5, Toto56, Toto76, Toto75, Toto86 B: Toto75:ssa, Toto76:ssa ja Toto65:ssa erona on ainoastaan se, että voittoluokkien määrä vaihtelee. The first claim lists Toto56 as part of the T-game options, while the second claim mentions Toto65 as a variant, implying Toto56 and Toto65 are distinct options; this is inconsistent within the same article (a potential misprint or naming error). | ||
/vedonlyonti/veikkausvihjeet/ | Clean | |
/vedonlyonti/voittajaveto/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Veikkauksen voittajavedossa palautusprosentit vaihtelevat 80-95% välillä valitun pelimuodon mukaan. B: Korkein, 90%, palautusprosentti on yksittäisissä voittajavedoissa. The stated range 80-95% implies a possible maximum of 95%, but another part of the text claims the maximum is 90% for single bets, which contradicts the stated range. | ||
/vedonlyontibonukset/ | Issues | 2 contradictions |
A: Isoimmat vedonlyöntibonukset ovat 200 % talletusbonuksia. B: harvinaisuus, eikä mikään Kasinohain listaama kasino tarjoa niitä juuri nyt. The text claims that the largest betting bonuses are 200% deposit bonuses, implying such bonuses exist; it then states that 200% bonuses are rare and that no Kasinohai-listed casino offers them right now, which contradicts the earlier assertion. A: Päivitetty: 18. helmikuuta 2026 B: Päivitetty 11.2.2026. Seuraava tarkistus 1.3.2026. Two different update dates are presented for the content: February 18, 2026 at the top, and February 11, 2026 in a later section, creating an inconsistency in publication/update timelines. | ||
/verkkopankki-nettikasinot/ | Clean | |
/verovapaat-nettikasinot/ | Clean | |
/viljo-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Maksutapa Viljo saatavuus kasinoilla: Kasinoita Kasinohailla = 2 B: Parhaat Viljo kasinot listaa 3 kasinoa (Big Win Casino, Pelikioski Casino ja Pelikaani Casino). The 'Maksutavat vertailussa' section states Viljo is available on 2 Kasinohailla, while the 'Parhaat Viljo kasinot' section lists three Viljo-enabled casinos, creating a contradicting count of Viljo-enabled casinos. | ||
/virolaiset-nettikasinot/ | Clean | |
/visa-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Tutustu kuitenkin huolellisesti bonusehtoihin, jotka ovat tiukat ja pidä mielessä myös Curacaon lisenssi, jonka vuoksi voitot ovat verollisia. B: Miinukset: ... Voitot verollisia (Anjouan lisenssi). The article attributes winnings taxation to different licenses for the same casino: Curacao in one place and Anjouan in another, which is contradictory. | ||
/volt-kasinot/ | Clean | |
/yhteistyokumppanit/ | Clean | |
/zimpler-kasinot/ | Issues | 1 contradiction |
A: Kotiutukset hoituvat parhaimmillaan vain 1–2 minuutissa. B: Zimpler kotiutus kesto: Pikakasinoilla pelatessa kotiutus kestää yleensä 2–15 minuuttia. The text first claims withdrawals can be completed in as little as 1–2 minutes, but later states that on Pay N Play / Pay N Play-enabled casinos withdrawals typically take 2–15 minutes, creating an explicit conflict in withdrawal time expectations. | ||
No pages match the filter.